Does the Brexit deal being voted down imply that Brexit is not going to happen?
Just looking at the TV and I am seeing that the British Parliament rejected the Brexit deal (cannot find an online source yet for this, although multiple sources show this vote result as very plausible).
Does this mean that Brexit is not going to happen or is this only one of the possible scenarios in the near future?
An answer to this question is interesting especially when the UK can legally cancel the Brexit process.
united-kingdom brexit parliament
|
show 5 more comments
Just looking at the TV and I am seeing that the British Parliament rejected the Brexit deal (cannot find an online source yet for this, although multiple sources show this vote result as very plausible).
Does this mean that Brexit is not going to happen or is this only one of the possible scenarios in the near future?
An answer to this question is interesting especially when the UK can legally cancel the Brexit process.
united-kingdom brexit parliament
1
I've voted to close this as off-topic because you're asking about the broad spectrum of future events that may fall out from the vote on the plan. There branch cases for what could now happen with brexit are multitudinous.
– Drunk Cynic
yesterday
9
@DrunkCynic - I am asking if Parliament's decision involves (logically / legally) that Brexit is not going to happen or there are many other possibilities. Your comment suggests that the answer to my question is: no, this does not mean that Brexit process is automatically cancelled.
– Alexei
yesterday
1
@DrunkCynic The core of the question is whether the Parliament vote concerns the terms of the deal or the Brexit itself, which makes it pretty narrow and definitely answerable.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
20 hours ago
1
@MartijnHeemels - yes, I have edited it. Thanks.
– Alexei
19 hours ago
1
Let us hope and pray that my definitely-not-a-slave friends across the pond start to understand how much they don't want to undo the progress of World War 2.
– Spencer Williams
13 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
Just looking at the TV and I am seeing that the British Parliament rejected the Brexit deal (cannot find an online source yet for this, although multiple sources show this vote result as very plausible).
Does this mean that Brexit is not going to happen or is this only one of the possible scenarios in the near future?
An answer to this question is interesting especially when the UK can legally cancel the Brexit process.
united-kingdom brexit parliament
Just looking at the TV and I am seeing that the British Parliament rejected the Brexit deal (cannot find an online source yet for this, although multiple sources show this vote result as very plausible).
Does this mean that Brexit is not going to happen or is this only one of the possible scenarios in the near future?
An answer to this question is interesting especially when the UK can legally cancel the Brexit process.
united-kingdom brexit parliament
united-kingdom brexit parliament
edited 10 hours ago
Community♦
1
1
asked yesterday
AlexeiAlexei
15.6k1891168
15.6k1891168
1
I've voted to close this as off-topic because you're asking about the broad spectrum of future events that may fall out from the vote on the plan. There branch cases for what could now happen with brexit are multitudinous.
– Drunk Cynic
yesterday
9
@DrunkCynic - I am asking if Parliament's decision involves (logically / legally) that Brexit is not going to happen or there are many other possibilities. Your comment suggests that the answer to my question is: no, this does not mean that Brexit process is automatically cancelled.
– Alexei
yesterday
1
@DrunkCynic The core of the question is whether the Parliament vote concerns the terms of the deal or the Brexit itself, which makes it pretty narrow and definitely answerable.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
20 hours ago
1
@MartijnHeemels - yes, I have edited it. Thanks.
– Alexei
19 hours ago
1
Let us hope and pray that my definitely-not-a-slave friends across the pond start to understand how much they don't want to undo the progress of World War 2.
– Spencer Williams
13 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
1
I've voted to close this as off-topic because you're asking about the broad spectrum of future events that may fall out from the vote on the plan. There branch cases for what could now happen with brexit are multitudinous.
– Drunk Cynic
yesterday
9
@DrunkCynic - I am asking if Parliament's decision involves (logically / legally) that Brexit is not going to happen or there are many other possibilities. Your comment suggests that the answer to my question is: no, this does not mean that Brexit process is automatically cancelled.
– Alexei
yesterday
1
@DrunkCynic The core of the question is whether the Parliament vote concerns the terms of the deal or the Brexit itself, which makes it pretty narrow and definitely answerable.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
20 hours ago
1
@MartijnHeemels - yes, I have edited it. Thanks.
– Alexei
19 hours ago
1
Let us hope and pray that my definitely-not-a-slave friends across the pond start to understand how much they don't want to undo the progress of World War 2.
– Spencer Williams
13 hours ago
1
1
I've voted to close this as off-topic because you're asking about the broad spectrum of future events that may fall out from the vote on the plan. There branch cases for what could now happen with brexit are multitudinous.
– Drunk Cynic
yesterday
I've voted to close this as off-topic because you're asking about the broad spectrum of future events that may fall out from the vote on the plan. There branch cases for what could now happen with brexit are multitudinous.
– Drunk Cynic
yesterday
9
9
@DrunkCynic - I am asking if Parliament's decision involves (logically / legally) that Brexit is not going to happen or there are many other possibilities. Your comment suggests that the answer to my question is: no, this does not mean that Brexit process is automatically cancelled.
– Alexei
yesterday
@DrunkCynic - I am asking if Parliament's decision involves (logically / legally) that Brexit is not going to happen or there are many other possibilities. Your comment suggests that the answer to my question is: no, this does not mean that Brexit process is automatically cancelled.
– Alexei
yesterday
1
1
@DrunkCynic The core of the question is whether the Parliament vote concerns the terms of the deal or the Brexit itself, which makes it pretty narrow and definitely answerable.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
20 hours ago
@DrunkCynic The core of the question is whether the Parliament vote concerns the terms of the deal or the Brexit itself, which makes it pretty narrow and definitely answerable.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
20 hours ago
1
1
@MartijnHeemels - yes, I have edited it. Thanks.
– Alexei
19 hours ago
@MartijnHeemels - yes, I have edited it. Thanks.
– Alexei
19 hours ago
1
1
Let us hope and pray that my definitely-not-a-slave friends across the pond start to understand how much they don't want to undo the progress of World War 2.
– Spencer Williams
13 hours ago
Let us hope and pray that my definitely-not-a-slave friends across the pond start to understand how much they don't want to undo the progress of World War 2.
– Spencer Williams
13 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Parliament has already voted on Article 50 and Article 50 has already been invoked. If nothing else happens between now and March 29th, EU membership ends for the UK. That was the case whether this vote took place or not. So that's the simplest answer with what is known to factually and legally be in place at this time. Anything else borders on wild speculation.
add a comment |
No, it does not. Under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act, 2018, the UK will still leave the EU on 29 March at 23:00 GMT. Only a further Act of Parliament to amend it will change this, and as of this writing, there is currently no Bill active in the Commons to do this.
It might be worth referring to the specific "meaningful vote" section of the act (section 13) as well.
– origimbo
yesterday
As far as I can see, Section 13 doesn't make any mention of "exit day". Which would therefore confirm that it doesn't change as a result of this vote.
– Joe C
yesterday
4
Indeed. Although it does guarantee there will be an open motion brought by a government minister within 21 days (actually on Monday 21st January [for Reasons]) onto which members of the house will attempt to hang all kinds of interesting amendments.
– origimbo
yesterday
2
Yes, though these potential amendments fall outside the scope of this question. They may become relevant to a similar question next week, though, depending on what happens then.
– Joe C
yesterday
It has, though, been confirmed by the European Court that the UK Government has the right, up to 29th March 2019, unilaterally, to cancel the Article 50 notification. My understanding is that this would not require an Act of Parliament. The Government can also negotiate with the EU to defer the date of departure.
– WS2
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Assuming a government can be formed after tomorrows' vote of no confidence or the the vote fails. Under the recent amendment controversially allowed by the speaker the prime minister will be required to go back to the house with a new plan or plans for consideration. with that said the PM may still try to continue with a version of the current arrangement.
The following options exist
- Brexit is delayed until a deal can be reached that parliament can agree on (or for as long as the EU will allow it if they will at all).
- No agreement will be reached and the UK will leave the EU on the 29th of march. Note this is currently the default position.
- Parliament will pass a bill to withdraw article 50 and the UK will reamain in the EU (IMO it seems like this might happen so that brexit can be retried with more proper understanding of what is possible etc)
- Parliament will eventually agree to the current deal (given the scale of the defeat this may be unlikely)
In order to reach one of the above there may well be a referendum either considering no deal brexit v the current deal or no deal brexit v the current deal v remain. There may also be a general election if the vote of no confidence is successful.
3
There is a fifth option that somehow a whole new withdrawal is negotiated before 11pm (UK time) on the 29th and voted through by parliament. This is almost certainly cloudcuckooland, but it might just be conceivable for a government of national unity with different red lines than Mrs May's administration.
– origimbo
yesterday
2
@origimbo - Or Mrs May could simply prorogue (suspend) Parliament until March 30th, thus neatly dealing with any opposition. Unlikely to happen, but not beyond the realms of reality
– Valorum
yesterday
2
@Valorum It's already been decided that and deal must have the blessing of Parliament; as per section 13. Suspending Parliament doesn't remove anything other than the possibility of a deal.
– UKMonkey
15 hours ago
2
@UKMonkey - If she prorogues parliament, all current business is ended. Since the default position is that the UK will be leaving at the end of March, no further 'blessing' is required of parliament. She won't be able to ram her deal through though, since that requires (multiple) votes in favour but she can stymie any attempts to block Brexit from happening. As I said though, it's unlikely in the extreme that she'd take this course of action.
– Valorum
15 hours ago
2
@Valorum reading up on it, May couldn't prorogue Parliament either; it requires the Queens doing.
– UKMonkey
15 hours ago
|
show 15 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38011%2fdoes-the-brexit-deal-being-voted-down-imply-that-brexit-is-not-going-to-happen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Parliament has already voted on Article 50 and Article 50 has already been invoked. If nothing else happens between now and March 29th, EU membership ends for the UK. That was the case whether this vote took place or not. So that's the simplest answer with what is known to factually and legally be in place at this time. Anything else borders on wild speculation.
add a comment |
Parliament has already voted on Article 50 and Article 50 has already been invoked. If nothing else happens between now and March 29th, EU membership ends for the UK. That was the case whether this vote took place or not. So that's the simplest answer with what is known to factually and legally be in place at this time. Anything else borders on wild speculation.
add a comment |
Parliament has already voted on Article 50 and Article 50 has already been invoked. If nothing else happens between now and March 29th, EU membership ends for the UK. That was the case whether this vote took place or not. So that's the simplest answer with what is known to factually and legally be in place at this time. Anything else borders on wild speculation.
Parliament has already voted on Article 50 and Article 50 has already been invoked. If nothing else happens between now and March 29th, EU membership ends for the UK. That was the case whether this vote took place or not. So that's the simplest answer with what is known to factually and legally be in place at this time. Anything else borders on wild speculation.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
ouflakouflak
56027
56027
add a comment |
add a comment |
No, it does not. Under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act, 2018, the UK will still leave the EU on 29 March at 23:00 GMT. Only a further Act of Parliament to amend it will change this, and as of this writing, there is currently no Bill active in the Commons to do this.
It might be worth referring to the specific "meaningful vote" section of the act (section 13) as well.
– origimbo
yesterday
As far as I can see, Section 13 doesn't make any mention of "exit day". Which would therefore confirm that it doesn't change as a result of this vote.
– Joe C
yesterday
4
Indeed. Although it does guarantee there will be an open motion brought by a government minister within 21 days (actually on Monday 21st January [for Reasons]) onto which members of the house will attempt to hang all kinds of interesting amendments.
– origimbo
yesterday
2
Yes, though these potential amendments fall outside the scope of this question. They may become relevant to a similar question next week, though, depending on what happens then.
– Joe C
yesterday
It has, though, been confirmed by the European Court that the UK Government has the right, up to 29th March 2019, unilaterally, to cancel the Article 50 notification. My understanding is that this would not require an Act of Parliament. The Government can also negotiate with the EU to defer the date of departure.
– WS2
8 hours ago
add a comment |
No, it does not. Under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act, 2018, the UK will still leave the EU on 29 March at 23:00 GMT. Only a further Act of Parliament to amend it will change this, and as of this writing, there is currently no Bill active in the Commons to do this.
It might be worth referring to the specific "meaningful vote" section of the act (section 13) as well.
– origimbo
yesterday
As far as I can see, Section 13 doesn't make any mention of "exit day". Which would therefore confirm that it doesn't change as a result of this vote.
– Joe C
yesterday
4
Indeed. Although it does guarantee there will be an open motion brought by a government minister within 21 days (actually on Monday 21st January [for Reasons]) onto which members of the house will attempt to hang all kinds of interesting amendments.
– origimbo
yesterday
2
Yes, though these potential amendments fall outside the scope of this question. They may become relevant to a similar question next week, though, depending on what happens then.
– Joe C
yesterday
It has, though, been confirmed by the European Court that the UK Government has the right, up to 29th March 2019, unilaterally, to cancel the Article 50 notification. My understanding is that this would not require an Act of Parliament. The Government can also negotiate with the EU to defer the date of departure.
– WS2
8 hours ago
add a comment |
No, it does not. Under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act, 2018, the UK will still leave the EU on 29 March at 23:00 GMT. Only a further Act of Parliament to amend it will change this, and as of this writing, there is currently no Bill active in the Commons to do this.
No, it does not. Under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act, 2018, the UK will still leave the EU on 29 March at 23:00 GMT. Only a further Act of Parliament to amend it will change this, and as of this writing, there is currently no Bill active in the Commons to do this.
answered yesterday
Joe CJoe C
1,519424
1,519424
It might be worth referring to the specific "meaningful vote" section of the act (section 13) as well.
– origimbo
yesterday
As far as I can see, Section 13 doesn't make any mention of "exit day". Which would therefore confirm that it doesn't change as a result of this vote.
– Joe C
yesterday
4
Indeed. Although it does guarantee there will be an open motion brought by a government minister within 21 days (actually on Monday 21st January [for Reasons]) onto which members of the house will attempt to hang all kinds of interesting amendments.
– origimbo
yesterday
2
Yes, though these potential amendments fall outside the scope of this question. They may become relevant to a similar question next week, though, depending on what happens then.
– Joe C
yesterday
It has, though, been confirmed by the European Court that the UK Government has the right, up to 29th March 2019, unilaterally, to cancel the Article 50 notification. My understanding is that this would not require an Act of Parliament. The Government can also negotiate with the EU to defer the date of departure.
– WS2
8 hours ago
add a comment |
It might be worth referring to the specific "meaningful vote" section of the act (section 13) as well.
– origimbo
yesterday
As far as I can see, Section 13 doesn't make any mention of "exit day". Which would therefore confirm that it doesn't change as a result of this vote.
– Joe C
yesterday
4
Indeed. Although it does guarantee there will be an open motion brought by a government minister within 21 days (actually on Monday 21st January [for Reasons]) onto which members of the house will attempt to hang all kinds of interesting amendments.
– origimbo
yesterday
2
Yes, though these potential amendments fall outside the scope of this question. They may become relevant to a similar question next week, though, depending on what happens then.
– Joe C
yesterday
It has, though, been confirmed by the European Court that the UK Government has the right, up to 29th March 2019, unilaterally, to cancel the Article 50 notification. My understanding is that this would not require an Act of Parliament. The Government can also negotiate with the EU to defer the date of departure.
– WS2
8 hours ago
It might be worth referring to the specific "meaningful vote" section of the act (section 13) as well.
– origimbo
yesterday
It might be worth referring to the specific "meaningful vote" section of the act (section 13) as well.
– origimbo
yesterday
As far as I can see, Section 13 doesn't make any mention of "exit day". Which would therefore confirm that it doesn't change as a result of this vote.
– Joe C
yesterday
As far as I can see, Section 13 doesn't make any mention of "exit day". Which would therefore confirm that it doesn't change as a result of this vote.
– Joe C
yesterday
4
4
Indeed. Although it does guarantee there will be an open motion brought by a government minister within 21 days (actually on Monday 21st January [for Reasons]) onto which members of the house will attempt to hang all kinds of interesting amendments.
– origimbo
yesterday
Indeed. Although it does guarantee there will be an open motion brought by a government minister within 21 days (actually on Monday 21st January [for Reasons]) onto which members of the house will attempt to hang all kinds of interesting amendments.
– origimbo
yesterday
2
2
Yes, though these potential amendments fall outside the scope of this question. They may become relevant to a similar question next week, though, depending on what happens then.
– Joe C
yesterday
Yes, though these potential amendments fall outside the scope of this question. They may become relevant to a similar question next week, though, depending on what happens then.
– Joe C
yesterday
It has, though, been confirmed by the European Court that the UK Government has the right, up to 29th March 2019, unilaterally, to cancel the Article 50 notification. My understanding is that this would not require an Act of Parliament. The Government can also negotiate with the EU to defer the date of departure.
– WS2
8 hours ago
It has, though, been confirmed by the European Court that the UK Government has the right, up to 29th March 2019, unilaterally, to cancel the Article 50 notification. My understanding is that this would not require an Act of Parliament. The Government can also negotiate with the EU to defer the date of departure.
– WS2
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Assuming a government can be formed after tomorrows' vote of no confidence or the the vote fails. Under the recent amendment controversially allowed by the speaker the prime minister will be required to go back to the house with a new plan or plans for consideration. with that said the PM may still try to continue with a version of the current arrangement.
The following options exist
- Brexit is delayed until a deal can be reached that parliament can agree on (or for as long as the EU will allow it if they will at all).
- No agreement will be reached and the UK will leave the EU on the 29th of march. Note this is currently the default position.
- Parliament will pass a bill to withdraw article 50 and the UK will reamain in the EU (IMO it seems like this might happen so that brexit can be retried with more proper understanding of what is possible etc)
- Parliament will eventually agree to the current deal (given the scale of the defeat this may be unlikely)
In order to reach one of the above there may well be a referendum either considering no deal brexit v the current deal or no deal brexit v the current deal v remain. There may also be a general election if the vote of no confidence is successful.
3
There is a fifth option that somehow a whole new withdrawal is negotiated before 11pm (UK time) on the 29th and voted through by parliament. This is almost certainly cloudcuckooland, but it might just be conceivable for a government of national unity with different red lines than Mrs May's administration.
– origimbo
yesterday
2
@origimbo - Or Mrs May could simply prorogue (suspend) Parliament until March 30th, thus neatly dealing with any opposition. Unlikely to happen, but not beyond the realms of reality
– Valorum
yesterday
2
@Valorum It's already been decided that and deal must have the blessing of Parliament; as per section 13. Suspending Parliament doesn't remove anything other than the possibility of a deal.
– UKMonkey
15 hours ago
2
@UKMonkey - If she prorogues parliament, all current business is ended. Since the default position is that the UK will be leaving at the end of March, no further 'blessing' is required of parliament. She won't be able to ram her deal through though, since that requires (multiple) votes in favour but she can stymie any attempts to block Brexit from happening. As I said though, it's unlikely in the extreme that she'd take this course of action.
– Valorum
15 hours ago
2
@Valorum reading up on it, May couldn't prorogue Parliament either; it requires the Queens doing.
– UKMonkey
15 hours ago
|
show 15 more comments
Assuming a government can be formed after tomorrows' vote of no confidence or the the vote fails. Under the recent amendment controversially allowed by the speaker the prime minister will be required to go back to the house with a new plan or plans for consideration. with that said the PM may still try to continue with a version of the current arrangement.
The following options exist
- Brexit is delayed until a deal can be reached that parliament can agree on (or for as long as the EU will allow it if they will at all).
- No agreement will be reached and the UK will leave the EU on the 29th of march. Note this is currently the default position.
- Parliament will pass a bill to withdraw article 50 and the UK will reamain in the EU (IMO it seems like this might happen so that brexit can be retried with more proper understanding of what is possible etc)
- Parliament will eventually agree to the current deal (given the scale of the defeat this may be unlikely)
In order to reach one of the above there may well be a referendum either considering no deal brexit v the current deal or no deal brexit v the current deal v remain. There may also be a general election if the vote of no confidence is successful.
3
There is a fifth option that somehow a whole new withdrawal is negotiated before 11pm (UK time) on the 29th and voted through by parliament. This is almost certainly cloudcuckooland, but it might just be conceivable for a government of national unity with different red lines than Mrs May's administration.
– origimbo
yesterday
2
@origimbo - Or Mrs May could simply prorogue (suspend) Parliament until March 30th, thus neatly dealing with any opposition. Unlikely to happen, but not beyond the realms of reality
– Valorum
yesterday
2
@Valorum It's already been decided that and deal must have the blessing of Parliament; as per section 13. Suspending Parliament doesn't remove anything other than the possibility of a deal.
– UKMonkey
15 hours ago
2
@UKMonkey - If she prorogues parliament, all current business is ended. Since the default position is that the UK will be leaving at the end of March, no further 'blessing' is required of parliament. She won't be able to ram her deal through though, since that requires (multiple) votes in favour but she can stymie any attempts to block Brexit from happening. As I said though, it's unlikely in the extreme that she'd take this course of action.
– Valorum
15 hours ago
2
@Valorum reading up on it, May couldn't prorogue Parliament either; it requires the Queens doing.
– UKMonkey
15 hours ago
|
show 15 more comments
Assuming a government can be formed after tomorrows' vote of no confidence or the the vote fails. Under the recent amendment controversially allowed by the speaker the prime minister will be required to go back to the house with a new plan or plans for consideration. with that said the PM may still try to continue with a version of the current arrangement.
The following options exist
- Brexit is delayed until a deal can be reached that parliament can agree on (or for as long as the EU will allow it if they will at all).
- No agreement will be reached and the UK will leave the EU on the 29th of march. Note this is currently the default position.
- Parliament will pass a bill to withdraw article 50 and the UK will reamain in the EU (IMO it seems like this might happen so that brexit can be retried with more proper understanding of what is possible etc)
- Parliament will eventually agree to the current deal (given the scale of the defeat this may be unlikely)
In order to reach one of the above there may well be a referendum either considering no deal brexit v the current deal or no deal brexit v the current deal v remain. There may also be a general election if the vote of no confidence is successful.
Assuming a government can be formed after tomorrows' vote of no confidence or the the vote fails. Under the recent amendment controversially allowed by the speaker the prime minister will be required to go back to the house with a new plan or plans for consideration. with that said the PM may still try to continue with a version of the current arrangement.
The following options exist
- Brexit is delayed until a deal can be reached that parliament can agree on (or for as long as the EU will allow it if they will at all).
- No agreement will be reached and the UK will leave the EU on the 29th of march. Note this is currently the default position.
- Parliament will pass a bill to withdraw article 50 and the UK will reamain in the EU (IMO it seems like this might happen so that brexit can be retried with more proper understanding of what is possible etc)
- Parliament will eventually agree to the current deal (given the scale of the defeat this may be unlikely)
In order to reach one of the above there may well be a referendum either considering no deal brexit v the current deal or no deal brexit v the current deal v remain. There may also be a general election if the vote of no confidence is successful.
answered yesterday
Steve SmithSteve Smith
1,740216
1,740216
3
There is a fifth option that somehow a whole new withdrawal is negotiated before 11pm (UK time) on the 29th and voted through by parliament. This is almost certainly cloudcuckooland, but it might just be conceivable for a government of national unity with different red lines than Mrs May's administration.
– origimbo
yesterday
2
@origimbo - Or Mrs May could simply prorogue (suspend) Parliament until March 30th, thus neatly dealing with any opposition. Unlikely to happen, but not beyond the realms of reality
– Valorum
yesterday
2
@Valorum It's already been decided that and deal must have the blessing of Parliament; as per section 13. Suspending Parliament doesn't remove anything other than the possibility of a deal.
– UKMonkey
15 hours ago
2
@UKMonkey - If she prorogues parliament, all current business is ended. Since the default position is that the UK will be leaving at the end of March, no further 'blessing' is required of parliament. She won't be able to ram her deal through though, since that requires (multiple) votes in favour but she can stymie any attempts to block Brexit from happening. As I said though, it's unlikely in the extreme that she'd take this course of action.
– Valorum
15 hours ago
2
@Valorum reading up on it, May couldn't prorogue Parliament either; it requires the Queens doing.
– UKMonkey
15 hours ago
|
show 15 more comments
3
There is a fifth option that somehow a whole new withdrawal is negotiated before 11pm (UK time) on the 29th and voted through by parliament. This is almost certainly cloudcuckooland, but it might just be conceivable for a government of national unity with different red lines than Mrs May's administration.
– origimbo
yesterday
2
@origimbo - Or Mrs May could simply prorogue (suspend) Parliament until March 30th, thus neatly dealing with any opposition. Unlikely to happen, but not beyond the realms of reality
– Valorum
yesterday
2
@Valorum It's already been decided that and deal must have the blessing of Parliament; as per section 13. Suspending Parliament doesn't remove anything other than the possibility of a deal.
– UKMonkey
15 hours ago
2
@UKMonkey - If she prorogues parliament, all current business is ended. Since the default position is that the UK will be leaving at the end of March, no further 'blessing' is required of parliament. She won't be able to ram her deal through though, since that requires (multiple) votes in favour but she can stymie any attempts to block Brexit from happening. As I said though, it's unlikely in the extreme that she'd take this course of action.
– Valorum
15 hours ago
2
@Valorum reading up on it, May couldn't prorogue Parliament either; it requires the Queens doing.
– UKMonkey
15 hours ago
3
3
There is a fifth option that somehow a whole new withdrawal is negotiated before 11pm (UK time) on the 29th and voted through by parliament. This is almost certainly cloudcuckooland, but it might just be conceivable for a government of national unity with different red lines than Mrs May's administration.
– origimbo
yesterday
There is a fifth option that somehow a whole new withdrawal is negotiated before 11pm (UK time) on the 29th and voted through by parliament. This is almost certainly cloudcuckooland, but it might just be conceivable for a government of national unity with different red lines than Mrs May's administration.
– origimbo
yesterday
2
2
@origimbo - Or Mrs May could simply prorogue (suspend) Parliament until March 30th, thus neatly dealing with any opposition. Unlikely to happen, but not beyond the realms of reality
– Valorum
yesterday
@origimbo - Or Mrs May could simply prorogue (suspend) Parliament until March 30th, thus neatly dealing with any opposition. Unlikely to happen, but not beyond the realms of reality
– Valorum
yesterday
2
2
@Valorum It's already been decided that and deal must have the blessing of Parliament; as per section 13. Suspending Parliament doesn't remove anything other than the possibility of a deal.
– UKMonkey
15 hours ago
@Valorum It's already been decided that and deal must have the blessing of Parliament; as per section 13. Suspending Parliament doesn't remove anything other than the possibility of a deal.
– UKMonkey
15 hours ago
2
2
@UKMonkey - If she prorogues parliament, all current business is ended. Since the default position is that the UK will be leaving at the end of March, no further 'blessing' is required of parliament. She won't be able to ram her deal through though, since that requires (multiple) votes in favour but she can stymie any attempts to block Brexit from happening. As I said though, it's unlikely in the extreme that she'd take this course of action.
– Valorum
15 hours ago
@UKMonkey - If she prorogues parliament, all current business is ended. Since the default position is that the UK will be leaving at the end of March, no further 'blessing' is required of parliament. She won't be able to ram her deal through though, since that requires (multiple) votes in favour but she can stymie any attempts to block Brexit from happening. As I said though, it's unlikely in the extreme that she'd take this course of action.
– Valorum
15 hours ago
2
2
@Valorum reading up on it, May couldn't prorogue Parliament either; it requires the Queens doing.
– UKMonkey
15 hours ago
@Valorum reading up on it, May couldn't prorogue Parliament either; it requires the Queens doing.
– UKMonkey
15 hours ago
|
show 15 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38011%2fdoes-the-brexit-deal-being-voted-down-imply-that-brexit-is-not-going-to-happen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I've voted to close this as off-topic because you're asking about the broad spectrum of future events that may fall out from the vote on the plan. There branch cases for what could now happen with brexit are multitudinous.
– Drunk Cynic
yesterday
9
@DrunkCynic - I am asking if Parliament's decision involves (logically / legally) that Brexit is not going to happen or there are many other possibilities. Your comment suggests that the answer to my question is: no, this does not mean that Brexit process is automatically cancelled.
– Alexei
yesterday
1
@DrunkCynic The core of the question is whether the Parliament vote concerns the terms of the deal or the Brexit itself, which makes it pretty narrow and definitely answerable.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
20 hours ago
1
@MartijnHeemels - yes, I have edited it. Thanks.
– Alexei
19 hours ago
1
Let us hope and pray that my definitely-not-a-slave friends across the pond start to understand how much they don't want to undo the progress of World War 2.
– Spencer Williams
13 hours ago