Is there an updated solution for avidemux on Ubuntu 16.04
I saw this answer - Guide me to a dependable subtitling software that also hard-codes subtitles, but the getdeb links seem to be broken or gone.
I also tried the appImage file for Linux here - Download Avidemux latest release, but it would not execute at all. (I did set the file properties to "executable".)
Also no results on Ubuntu package search.
So is there any currently available solution to run this on 16.04?
16.04 avidemux
asked 49 mins ago
user3169user3169
1811110
add a comment |
I saw this answer - Guide me to a dependable subtitling software that also hard-codes subtitles, but the getdeb links seem to be broken or gone.
I also tried the appImage file for Linux here - Download Avidemux latest release, but it would not execute at all. (I did set the file properties to "executable".)
Also no results on Ubuntu package search.
So is there any currently available solution to run this on 16.04?
16.04 avidemux
asked 49 mins ago
user3169user3169
1811110
appimage files first have to be marked as executable before they will run. You can right click the file and go to properties, then permissions and check the box that says "Allow executing the file as a program". You can also do it in the terminal with just chmod u+x filename
– Gerowen
46 mins ago
@Gerowen Yes I did that but still no activity. Even iotop shows no disk activity when double-clicking from the desktop.
– user3169
15 mins ago
You could try executing it from the terminal to see if you get any kind of output; just run it like you would any other executable from the terminal: ./filename.AppImage
– Gerowen
14 mins ago
@Gerowen Then I get "bash: ./avidemux_2.7.1v2.appImage: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error".
– user3169
3 mins ago
add a comment |
I saw this answer - Guide me to a dependable subtitling software that also hard-codes subtitles, but the getdeb links seem to be broken or gone.
I also tried the appImage file for Linux here - Download Avidemux latest release, but it would not execute at all. (I did set the file properties to "executable".)
Also no results on Ubuntu package search.
So is there any currently available solution to run this on 16.04?
16.04 avidemux
asked 49 mins ago
user3169user3169
1811110
I saw this answer - Guide me to a dependable subtitling software that also hard-codes subtitles, but the getdeb links seem to be broken or gone.
I also tried the appImage file for Linux here - Download Avidemux latest release, but it would not execute at all. (I did set the file properties to "executable".)
Also no results on Ubuntu package search.
So is there any currently available solution to run this on 16.04?
16.04 avidemux
16.04 avidemux
asked 49 mins ago
user3169user3169
1811110
asked 49 mins ago
user3169user3169
1811110
edited 13 mins ago
user3169
asked 49 mins ago
user3169user3169
1811110
asked 49 mins ago
user3169user3169
1811110
asked 49 mins ago
user3169user3169
1811110
1811110
appimage files first have to be marked as executable before they will run. You can right click the file and go to properties, then permissions and check the box that says "Allow executing the file as a program". You can also do it in the terminal with just chmod u+x filename
– Gerowen
46 mins ago
@Gerowen Yes I did that but still no activity. Even iotop shows no disk activity when double-clicking from the desktop.
– user3169
15 mins ago
You could try executing it from the terminal to see if you get any kind of output; just run it like you would any other executable from the terminal: ./filename.AppImage
– Gerowen
14 mins ago
@Gerowen Then I get "bash: ./avidemux_2.7.1v2.appImage: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error".
– user3169
3 mins ago
add a comment |
appimage files first have to be marked as executable before they will run. You can right click the file and go to properties, then permissions and check the box that says "Allow executing the file as a program". You can also do it in the terminal with just chmod u+x filename
– Gerowen
46 mins ago
@Gerowen Yes I did that but still no activity. Even iotop shows no disk activity when double-clicking from the desktop.
– user3169
15 mins ago
You could try executing it from the terminal to see if you get any kind of output; just run it like you would any other executable from the terminal: ./filename.AppImage
– Gerowen
14 mins ago
@Gerowen Then I get "bash: ./avidemux_2.7.1v2.appImage: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error".
– user3169
3 mins ago
appimage files first have to be marked as executable before they will run. You can right click the file and go to properties, then permissions and check the box that says "Allow executing the file as a program". You can also do it in the terminal with just chmod u+x filename
– Gerowen
46 mins ago
appimage files first have to be marked as executable before they will run. You can right click the file and go to properties, then permissions and check the box that says "Allow executing the file as a program". You can also do it in the terminal with just chmod u+x filename
– Gerowen
46 mins ago
@Gerowen Yes I did that but still no activity. Even iotop shows no disk activity when double-clicking from the desktop.
– user3169
15 mins ago
@Gerowen Yes I did that but still no activity. Even iotop shows no disk activity when double-clicking from the desktop.
– user3169
15 mins ago
You could try executing it from the terminal to see if you get any kind of output; just run it like you would any other executable from the terminal: ./filename.AppImage
– Gerowen
14 mins ago
You could try executing it from the terminal to see if you get any kind of output; just run it like you would any other executable from the terminal: ./filename.AppImage
– Gerowen
14 mins ago
@Gerowen Then I get "bash: ./avidemux_2.7.1v2.appImage: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error".
– user3169
3 mins ago
@Gerowen Then I get "bash: ./avidemux_2.7.1v2.appImage: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error".
– user3169
3 mins ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1126480%2fis-there-an-updated-solution-for-avidemux-on-ubuntu-16-04%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1126480%2fis-there-an-updated-solution-for-avidemux-on-ubuntu-16-04%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
appimage files first have to be marked as executable before they will run. You can right click the file and go to properties, then permissions and check the box that says "Allow executing the file as a program". You can also do it in the terminal with just chmod u+x filename
– Gerowen
46 mins ago
@Gerowen Yes I did that but still no activity. Even iotop shows no disk activity when double-clicking from the desktop.
– user3169
15 mins ago
You could try executing it from the terminal to see if you get any kind of output; just run it like you would any other executable from the terminal: ./filename.AppImage
– Gerowen
14 mins ago
@Gerowen Then I get "bash: ./avidemux_2.7.1v2.appImage: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error".
– user3169
3 mins ago