Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS app running on i9-9980XE twice as slow as older, smaller PC












0















Is the reason that our new i9-9980XE, 128GB RAM, X-299 MB, 18cores is running the application on Ubuntu 14.04.5 in 10 hours versus and older i7, 64GB RAM, 4 cores in 5 hours because of the old kernel? What is the newest kernel that I can install in 14.04.5 and still have it function? The application must run on 14.04.5.










share|improve this question









New contributor




D.Hirota is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Titling your question in all caps makes it seem like you are yelling.

    – Organic Marble
    1 hour ago











  • What is the app that you are running to compare? Also, was the app written to be optimized on an 18 core system? Having more cores doesn't mean that the app will run faster.

    – Terrance
    1 hour ago











  • The app is processing 3D point cloud scans, merging/cleaning them and uses as many core/threads available plus approximately 3 GB of RAM per thread. So theoretically it should be running 36/8 times faster but is taking twice as long to complete. Cpus are both overclocked at 4.2GHz.

    – D.Hirota
    1 hour ago











  • If you use the system monitor to look at the cpu cores/threads, are they all busy?

    – ubfan1
    37 secs ago
















0















Is the reason that our new i9-9980XE, 128GB RAM, X-299 MB, 18cores is running the application on Ubuntu 14.04.5 in 10 hours versus and older i7, 64GB RAM, 4 cores in 5 hours because of the old kernel? What is the newest kernel that I can install in 14.04.5 and still have it function? The application must run on 14.04.5.










share|improve this question









New contributor




D.Hirota is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Titling your question in all caps makes it seem like you are yelling.

    – Organic Marble
    1 hour ago











  • What is the app that you are running to compare? Also, was the app written to be optimized on an 18 core system? Having more cores doesn't mean that the app will run faster.

    – Terrance
    1 hour ago











  • The app is processing 3D point cloud scans, merging/cleaning them and uses as many core/threads available plus approximately 3 GB of RAM per thread. So theoretically it should be running 36/8 times faster but is taking twice as long to complete. Cpus are both overclocked at 4.2GHz.

    – D.Hirota
    1 hour ago











  • If you use the system monitor to look at the cpu cores/threads, are they all busy?

    – ubfan1
    37 secs ago














0












0








0








Is the reason that our new i9-9980XE, 128GB RAM, X-299 MB, 18cores is running the application on Ubuntu 14.04.5 in 10 hours versus and older i7, 64GB RAM, 4 cores in 5 hours because of the old kernel? What is the newest kernel that I can install in 14.04.5 and still have it function? The application must run on 14.04.5.










share|improve this question









New contributor




D.Hirota is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Is the reason that our new i9-9980XE, 128GB RAM, X-299 MB, 18cores is running the application on Ubuntu 14.04.5 in 10 hours versus and older i7, 64GB RAM, 4 cores in 5 hours because of the old kernel? What is the newest kernel that I can install in 14.04.5 and still have it function? The application must run on 14.04.5.







drivers kernel






share|improve this question









New contributor




D.Hirota is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




D.Hirota is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









anonymous2

3,33741847




3,33741847






New contributor




D.Hirota is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









D.HirotaD.Hirota

1




1




New contributor




D.Hirota is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





D.Hirota is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






D.Hirota is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • Titling your question in all caps makes it seem like you are yelling.

    – Organic Marble
    1 hour ago











  • What is the app that you are running to compare? Also, was the app written to be optimized on an 18 core system? Having more cores doesn't mean that the app will run faster.

    – Terrance
    1 hour ago











  • The app is processing 3D point cloud scans, merging/cleaning them and uses as many core/threads available plus approximately 3 GB of RAM per thread. So theoretically it should be running 36/8 times faster but is taking twice as long to complete. Cpus are both overclocked at 4.2GHz.

    – D.Hirota
    1 hour ago











  • If you use the system monitor to look at the cpu cores/threads, are they all busy?

    – ubfan1
    37 secs ago



















  • Titling your question in all caps makes it seem like you are yelling.

    – Organic Marble
    1 hour ago











  • What is the app that you are running to compare? Also, was the app written to be optimized on an 18 core system? Having more cores doesn't mean that the app will run faster.

    – Terrance
    1 hour ago











  • The app is processing 3D point cloud scans, merging/cleaning them and uses as many core/threads available plus approximately 3 GB of RAM per thread. So theoretically it should be running 36/8 times faster but is taking twice as long to complete. Cpus are both overclocked at 4.2GHz.

    – D.Hirota
    1 hour ago











  • If you use the system monitor to look at the cpu cores/threads, are they all busy?

    – ubfan1
    37 secs ago

















Titling your question in all caps makes it seem like you are yelling.

– Organic Marble
1 hour ago





Titling your question in all caps makes it seem like you are yelling.

– Organic Marble
1 hour ago













What is the app that you are running to compare? Also, was the app written to be optimized on an 18 core system? Having more cores doesn't mean that the app will run faster.

– Terrance
1 hour ago





What is the app that you are running to compare? Also, was the app written to be optimized on an 18 core system? Having more cores doesn't mean that the app will run faster.

– Terrance
1 hour ago













The app is processing 3D point cloud scans, merging/cleaning them and uses as many core/threads available plus approximately 3 GB of RAM per thread. So theoretically it should be running 36/8 times faster but is taking twice as long to complete. Cpus are both overclocked at 4.2GHz.

– D.Hirota
1 hour ago





The app is processing 3D point cloud scans, merging/cleaning them and uses as many core/threads available plus approximately 3 GB of RAM per thread. So theoretically it should be running 36/8 times faster but is taking twice as long to complete. Cpus are both overclocked at 4.2GHz.

– D.Hirota
1 hour ago













If you use the system monitor to look at the cpu cores/threads, are they all busy?

– ubfan1
37 secs ago





If you use the system monitor to look at the cpu cores/threads, are they all busy?

– ubfan1
37 secs ago










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






D.Hirota is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1121836%2fubuntu-14-04-5-lts-app-running-on-i9-9980xe-twice-as-slow-as-older-smaller-pc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








D.Hirota is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















D.Hirota is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













D.Hirota is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












D.Hirota is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1121836%2fubuntu-14-04-5-lts-app-running-on-i9-9980xe-twice-as-slow-as-older-smaller-pc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

GameSpot

connect to host localhost port 22: Connection refused

Getting a Wifi WPA2 wifi connection