Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS app running on i9-9980XE twice as slow as older, smaller PC
Is the reason that our new i9-9980XE, 128GB RAM, X-299 MB, 18cores is running the application on Ubuntu 14.04.5 in 10 hours versus and older i7, 64GB RAM, 4 cores in 5 hours because of the old kernel? What is the newest kernel that I can install in 14.04.5 and still have it function? The application must run on 14.04.5.
drivers kernel
New contributor
add a comment |
Is the reason that our new i9-9980XE, 128GB RAM, X-299 MB, 18cores is running the application on Ubuntu 14.04.5 in 10 hours versus and older i7, 64GB RAM, 4 cores in 5 hours because of the old kernel? What is the newest kernel that I can install in 14.04.5 and still have it function? The application must run on 14.04.5.
drivers kernel
New contributor
Titling your question in all caps makes it seem like you are yelling.
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
What is the app that you are running to compare? Also, was the app written to be optimized on an 18 core system? Having more cores doesn't mean that the app will run faster.
– Terrance
1 hour ago
The app is processing 3D point cloud scans, merging/cleaning them and uses as many core/threads available plus approximately 3 GB of RAM per thread. So theoretically it should be running 36/8 times faster but is taking twice as long to complete. Cpus are both overclocked at 4.2GHz.
– D.Hirota
1 hour ago
If you use the system monitor to look at the cpu cores/threads, are they all busy?
– ubfan1
37 secs ago
add a comment |
Is the reason that our new i9-9980XE, 128GB RAM, X-299 MB, 18cores is running the application on Ubuntu 14.04.5 in 10 hours versus and older i7, 64GB RAM, 4 cores in 5 hours because of the old kernel? What is the newest kernel that I can install in 14.04.5 and still have it function? The application must run on 14.04.5.
drivers kernel
New contributor
Is the reason that our new i9-9980XE, 128GB RAM, X-299 MB, 18cores is running the application on Ubuntu 14.04.5 in 10 hours versus and older i7, 64GB RAM, 4 cores in 5 hours because of the old kernel? What is the newest kernel that I can install in 14.04.5 and still have it function? The application must run on 14.04.5.
drivers kernel
drivers kernel
New contributor
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
anonymous2
3,33741847
3,33741847
New contributor
asked 2 hours ago
D.HirotaD.Hirota
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
Titling your question in all caps makes it seem like you are yelling.
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
What is the app that you are running to compare? Also, was the app written to be optimized on an 18 core system? Having more cores doesn't mean that the app will run faster.
– Terrance
1 hour ago
The app is processing 3D point cloud scans, merging/cleaning them and uses as many core/threads available plus approximately 3 GB of RAM per thread. So theoretically it should be running 36/8 times faster but is taking twice as long to complete. Cpus are both overclocked at 4.2GHz.
– D.Hirota
1 hour ago
If you use the system monitor to look at the cpu cores/threads, are they all busy?
– ubfan1
37 secs ago
add a comment |
Titling your question in all caps makes it seem like you are yelling.
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
What is the app that you are running to compare? Also, was the app written to be optimized on an 18 core system? Having more cores doesn't mean that the app will run faster.
– Terrance
1 hour ago
The app is processing 3D point cloud scans, merging/cleaning them and uses as many core/threads available plus approximately 3 GB of RAM per thread. So theoretically it should be running 36/8 times faster but is taking twice as long to complete. Cpus are both overclocked at 4.2GHz.
– D.Hirota
1 hour ago
If you use the system monitor to look at the cpu cores/threads, are they all busy?
– ubfan1
37 secs ago
Titling your question in all caps makes it seem like you are yelling.
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
Titling your question in all caps makes it seem like you are yelling.
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
What is the app that you are running to compare? Also, was the app written to be optimized on an 18 core system? Having more cores doesn't mean that the app will run faster.
– Terrance
1 hour ago
What is the app that you are running to compare? Also, was the app written to be optimized on an 18 core system? Having more cores doesn't mean that the app will run faster.
– Terrance
1 hour ago
The app is processing 3D point cloud scans, merging/cleaning them and uses as many core/threads available plus approximately 3 GB of RAM per thread. So theoretically it should be running 36/8 times faster but is taking twice as long to complete. Cpus are both overclocked at 4.2GHz.
– D.Hirota
1 hour ago
The app is processing 3D point cloud scans, merging/cleaning them and uses as many core/threads available plus approximately 3 GB of RAM per thread. So theoretically it should be running 36/8 times faster but is taking twice as long to complete. Cpus are both overclocked at 4.2GHz.
– D.Hirota
1 hour ago
If you use the system monitor to look at the cpu cores/threads, are they all busy?
– ubfan1
37 secs ago
If you use the system monitor to look at the cpu cores/threads, are they all busy?
– ubfan1
37 secs ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
D.Hirota is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1121836%2fubuntu-14-04-5-lts-app-running-on-i9-9980xe-twice-as-slow-as-older-smaller-pc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
D.Hirota is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
D.Hirota is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
D.Hirota is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
D.Hirota is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1121836%2fubuntu-14-04-5-lts-app-running-on-i9-9980xe-twice-as-slow-as-older-smaller-pc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Titling your question in all caps makes it seem like you are yelling.
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
What is the app that you are running to compare? Also, was the app written to be optimized on an 18 core system? Having more cores doesn't mean that the app will run faster.
– Terrance
1 hour ago
The app is processing 3D point cloud scans, merging/cleaning them and uses as many core/threads available plus approximately 3 GB of RAM per thread. So theoretically it should be running 36/8 times faster but is taking twice as long to complete. Cpus are both overclocked at 4.2GHz.
– D.Hirota
1 hour ago
If you use the system monitor to look at the cpu cores/threads, are they all busy?
– ubfan1
37 secs ago