Can the Flaming Sphere spell be rammed into multiple Tiny creatures that are in the same 5-foot square?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
The text of the Flaming Sphere spell says that "If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage".
Can I ram a Flaming Sphere into multiple tiny creatures, if they occupy the same 5' by 5' square?
I see nothing forbidding the sphere from being simultaneously rammed into more than one creature.
dnd-5e spells creature-size battle-map
asked 3 hours ago
MerudoMerudo
515116
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The text of the Flaming Sphere spell says that "If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage".
Can I ram a Flaming Sphere into multiple tiny creatures, if they occupy the same 5' by 5' square?
I see nothing forbidding the sphere from being simultaneously rammed into more than one creature.
dnd-5e spells creature-size battle-map
asked 3 hours ago
MerudoMerudo
515116
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The text of the Flaming Sphere spell says that "If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage".
Can I ram a Flaming Sphere into multiple tiny creatures, if they occupy the same 5' by 5' square?
I see nothing forbidding the sphere from being simultaneously rammed into more than one creature.
dnd-5e spells creature-size battle-map
asked 3 hours ago
MerudoMerudo
515116
$endgroup$
The text of the Flaming Sphere spell says that "If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage".
Can I ram a Flaming Sphere into multiple tiny creatures, if they occupy the same 5' by 5' square?
I see nothing forbidding the sphere from being simultaneously rammed into more than one creature.
dnd-5e spells creature-size battle-map
dnd-5e spells creature-size battle-map
asked 3 hours ago
MerudoMerudo
515116
asked 3 hours ago
MerudoMerudo
515116
edited 2 hours ago
Merudo
asked 3 hours ago
MerudoMerudo
515116
asked 3 hours ago
MerudoMerudo
515116
asked 3 hours ago
MerudoMerudo
515116
515116
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No. Choose one creature to ram into.
The wording of the spell indicates a single creature. Once it rams into a single creature, the sphere stops. As such, it can only hit one creature before stopping.
As a bonus action, you can move the sphere up to 30 feet. If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage, and the sphere stops moving this turn.
The others will take damage if they are 5' of the sphere when they end their turn.
answered 3 hours ago
GcLGcL
13.1k13886
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I'd agree with you if the wording was "You can ram the sphere into a creature". But the wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly. I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
$endgroup$
– Merudo
2 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@Merudo that sounds like a logical line of reasoning. I urge you to submit that as a separate answer.
$endgroup$
– GcL
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, you can.
The wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly by the spell.
I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
answered 40 mins ago
MerudoMerudo
515116
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can you expand on how you'd argue it can hit multiple enemies if the first time it hits something, it stops moving?
$endgroup$
– William Mariager
1 min ago
$begingroup$
@WilliamMariager I feel like your question would be addressed if Merudo added the word "simultaneously" to the phrase "both are simultaneously rammed by the sphere." But I'm not sure that's Merudo's underlying reasoning, so I'll leave it to them to edit.
$endgroup$
– nitsua60♦
6 secs ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145493%2fcan-the-flaming-sphere-spell-be-rammed-into-multiple-tiny-creatures-that-are-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No. Choose one creature to ram into.
The wording of the spell indicates a single creature. Once it rams into a single creature, the sphere stops. As such, it can only hit one creature before stopping.
As a bonus action, you can move the sphere up to 30 feet. If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage, and the sphere stops moving this turn.
The others will take damage if they are 5' of the sphere when they end their turn.
answered 3 hours ago
GcLGcL
13.1k13886
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I'd agree with you if the wording was "You can ram the sphere into a creature". But the wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly. I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
$endgroup$
– Merudo
2 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@Merudo that sounds like a logical line of reasoning. I urge you to submit that as a separate answer.
$endgroup$
– GcL
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No. Choose one creature to ram into.
The wording of the spell indicates a single creature. Once it rams into a single creature, the sphere stops. As such, it can only hit one creature before stopping.
As a bonus action, you can move the sphere up to 30 feet. If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage, and the sphere stops moving this turn.
The others will take damage if they are 5' of the sphere when they end their turn.
answered 3 hours ago
GcLGcL
13.1k13886
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I'd agree with you if the wording was "You can ram the sphere into a creature". But the wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly. I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
$endgroup$
– Merudo
2 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@Merudo that sounds like a logical line of reasoning. I urge you to submit that as a separate answer.
$endgroup$
– GcL
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No. Choose one creature to ram into.
The wording of the spell indicates a single creature. Once it rams into a single creature, the sphere stops. As such, it can only hit one creature before stopping.
As a bonus action, you can move the sphere up to 30 feet. If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage, and the sphere stops moving this turn.
The others will take damage if they are 5' of the sphere when they end their turn.
answered 3 hours ago
GcLGcL
13.1k13886
$endgroup$
No. Choose one creature to ram into.
The wording of the spell indicates a single creature. Once it rams into a single creature, the sphere stops. As such, it can only hit one creature before stopping.
As a bonus action, you can move the sphere up to 30 feet. If you ram the sphere into a creature, that creature must make the saving throw against the sphere's damage, and the sphere stops moving this turn.
The others will take damage if they are 5' of the sphere when they end their turn.
answered 3 hours ago
GcLGcL
13.1k13886
edited 2 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
GcLGcL
13.1k13886
answered 3 hours ago
GcLGcL
13.1k13886
answered 3 hours ago
GcLGcL
13.1k13886
13.1k13886
3
$begingroup$
I'd agree with you if the wording was "You can ram the sphere into a creature". But the wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly. I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
$endgroup$
– Merudo
2 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@Merudo that sounds like a logical line of reasoning. I urge you to submit that as a separate answer.
$endgroup$
– GcL
2 hours ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
I'd agree with you if the wording was "You can ram the sphere into a creature". But the wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly. I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
$endgroup$
– Merudo
2 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@Merudo that sounds like a logical line of reasoning. I urge you to submit that as a separate answer.
$endgroup$
– GcL
2 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
I'd agree with you if the wording was "You can ram the sphere into a creature". But the wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly. I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
$endgroup$
– Merudo
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'd agree with you if the wording was "You can ram the sphere into a creature". But the wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly. I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
$endgroup$
– Merudo
2 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
@Merudo that sounds like a logical line of reasoning. I urge you to submit that as a separate answer.
$endgroup$
– GcL
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Merudo that sounds like a logical line of reasoning. I urge you to submit that as a separate answer.
$endgroup$
– GcL
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, you can.
The wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly by the spell.
I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
answered 40 mins ago
MerudoMerudo
515116
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can you expand on how you'd argue it can hit multiple enemies if the first time it hits something, it stops moving?
$endgroup$
– William Mariager
1 min ago
$begingroup$
@WilliamMariager I feel like your question would be addressed if Merudo added the word "simultaneously" to the phrase "both are simultaneously rammed by the sphere." But I'm not sure that's Merudo's underlying reasoning, so I'll leave it to them to edit.
$endgroup$
– nitsua60♦
6 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, you can.
The wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly by the spell.
I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
answered 40 mins ago
MerudoMerudo
515116
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can you expand on how you'd argue it can hit multiple enemies if the first time it hits something, it stops moving?
$endgroup$
– William Mariager
1 min ago
$begingroup$
@WilliamMariager I feel like your question would be addressed if Merudo added the word "simultaneously" to the phrase "both are simultaneously rammed by the sphere." But I'm not sure that's Merudo's underlying reasoning, so I'll leave it to them to edit.
$endgroup$
– nitsua60♦
6 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, you can.
The wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly by the spell.
I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
answered 40 mins ago
MerudoMerudo
515116
$endgroup$
Yes, you can.
The wording is "If you ram the sphere into a creature". The ability to ram the sphere is assumed to exist outside of the spell description, and is not defined explicitly by the spell.
I'd argue that if you move a sphere into 2 tiny creatures, both are rammed by the sphere, and the condition "if you ram the sphere into a creature" is triggered twice.
answered 40 mins ago
MerudoMerudo
515116
answered 40 mins ago
MerudoMerudo
515116
answered 40 mins ago
MerudoMerudo
515116
answered 40 mins ago
MerudoMerudo
515116
515116
$begingroup$
Can you expand on how you'd argue it can hit multiple enemies if the first time it hits something, it stops moving?
$endgroup$
– William Mariager
1 min ago
$begingroup$
@WilliamMariager I feel like your question would be addressed if Merudo added the word "simultaneously" to the phrase "both are simultaneously rammed by the sphere." But I'm not sure that's Merudo's underlying reasoning, so I'll leave it to them to edit.
$endgroup$
– nitsua60♦
6 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can you expand on how you'd argue it can hit multiple enemies if the first time it hits something, it stops moving?
$endgroup$
– William Mariager
1 min ago
$begingroup$
@WilliamMariager I feel like your question would be addressed if Merudo added the word "simultaneously" to the phrase "both are simultaneously rammed by the sphere." But I'm not sure that's Merudo's underlying reasoning, so I'll leave it to them to edit.
$endgroup$
– nitsua60♦
6 secs ago
$begingroup$
Can you expand on how you'd argue it can hit multiple enemies if the first time it hits something, it stops moving?
$endgroup$
– William Mariager
1 min ago
$begingroup$
Can you expand on how you'd argue it can hit multiple enemies if the first time it hits something, it stops moving?
$endgroup$
– William Mariager
1 min ago
$begingroup$
@WilliamMariager I feel like your question would be addressed if Merudo added the word "simultaneously" to the phrase "both are simultaneously rammed by the sphere." But I'm not sure that's Merudo's underlying reasoning, so I'll leave it to them to edit.
$endgroup$
– nitsua60♦
6 secs ago
$begingroup$
@WilliamMariager I feel like your question would be addressed if Merudo added the word "simultaneously" to the phrase "both are simultaneously rammed by the sphere." But I'm not sure that's Merudo's underlying reasoning, so I'll leave it to them to edit.
$endgroup$
– nitsua60♦
6 secs ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145493%2fcan-the-flaming-sphere-spell-be-rammed-into-multiple-tiny-creatures-that-are-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
