In the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign, is it a problem to have PCs advance above level 5?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







5












$begingroup$


I'm currently planning to DM Lost Mine Of Phandelver as my first D&D game, and as explained in this question, I'd like to add more encounters than the scripted ones in the scenario.



This led me to a question:



Is it a problem to have PCs advance above level 5 in LMOP? (given that this scenario is designed for PCs from level 1 to 5)



I'd like answers supported by experiences with having higher-level PCs than they're supposed to be in a scenario, and ones based specifically on LMOP would be really great.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The question you linked has just a single answer recommending using milestone/story-based-leveling --- doesn't that solve this same issue?
    $endgroup$
    – kviiri
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kviiri It solves the other question, but even if I adopt milestones, I'm pretty curious about what could involve having PCs higher than level 5.
    $endgroup$
    – Zoma
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Are you aware of how long it takes to go from level 5 to level 6 during play? Have you experienced that progression at the table as a player?
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    @KorvinStarmast not at all, It will be my first DnD game, and first time DM/GM. I initially added new-gm tag, but I guess it wasn't relevant enought fo the question so it got removed. Even if it can take a long time, in the linked question I explain that with more encounters PCs may get a lot of EXP from "farm", so it could realistically happen (putting aside the answers to the linked question which are supposed to solve this problem).
    $endgroup$
    – Zoma
    yesterday








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    OK, just checking; given the significant XP increase between 5 and 6 (6500 to 14000) I am not convinced that you have a problem here as the PC's will be near the end of adventure at 5 ... but I'll let the answers address that.
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday


















5












$begingroup$


I'm currently planning to DM Lost Mine Of Phandelver as my first D&D game, and as explained in this question, I'd like to add more encounters than the scripted ones in the scenario.



This led me to a question:



Is it a problem to have PCs advance above level 5 in LMOP? (given that this scenario is designed for PCs from level 1 to 5)



I'd like answers supported by experiences with having higher-level PCs than they're supposed to be in a scenario, and ones based specifically on LMOP would be really great.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The question you linked has just a single answer recommending using milestone/story-based-leveling --- doesn't that solve this same issue?
    $endgroup$
    – kviiri
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kviiri It solves the other question, but even if I adopt milestones, I'm pretty curious about what could involve having PCs higher than level 5.
    $endgroup$
    – Zoma
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Are you aware of how long it takes to go from level 5 to level 6 during play? Have you experienced that progression at the table as a player?
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    @KorvinStarmast not at all, It will be my first DnD game, and first time DM/GM. I initially added new-gm tag, but I guess it wasn't relevant enought fo the question so it got removed. Even if it can take a long time, in the linked question I explain that with more encounters PCs may get a lot of EXP from "farm", so it could realistically happen (putting aside the answers to the linked question which are supposed to solve this problem).
    $endgroup$
    – Zoma
    yesterday








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    OK, just checking; given the significant XP increase between 5 and 6 (6500 to 14000) I am not convinced that you have a problem here as the PC's will be near the end of adventure at 5 ... but I'll let the answers address that.
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday














5












5








5





$begingroup$


I'm currently planning to DM Lost Mine Of Phandelver as my first D&D game, and as explained in this question, I'd like to add more encounters than the scripted ones in the scenario.



This led me to a question:



Is it a problem to have PCs advance above level 5 in LMOP? (given that this scenario is designed for PCs from level 1 to 5)



I'd like answers supported by experiences with having higher-level PCs than they're supposed to be in a scenario, and ones based specifically on LMOP would be really great.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm currently planning to DM Lost Mine Of Phandelver as my first D&D game, and as explained in this question, I'd like to add more encounters than the scripted ones in the scenario.



This led me to a question:



Is it a problem to have PCs advance above level 5 in LMOP? (given that this scenario is designed for PCs from level 1 to 5)



I'd like answers supported by experiences with having higher-level PCs than they're supposed to be in a scenario, and ones based specifically on LMOP would be really great.







dnd-5e published-adventures character-advancement character-levels lost-mine-of-phandelver






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









V2Blast

26.7k592162




26.7k592162










asked yesterday









ZomaZoma

670120




670120












  • $begingroup$
    The question you linked has just a single answer recommending using milestone/story-based-leveling --- doesn't that solve this same issue?
    $endgroup$
    – kviiri
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kviiri It solves the other question, but even if I adopt milestones, I'm pretty curious about what could involve having PCs higher than level 5.
    $endgroup$
    – Zoma
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Are you aware of how long it takes to go from level 5 to level 6 during play? Have you experienced that progression at the table as a player?
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    @KorvinStarmast not at all, It will be my first DnD game, and first time DM/GM. I initially added new-gm tag, but I guess it wasn't relevant enought fo the question so it got removed. Even if it can take a long time, in the linked question I explain that with more encounters PCs may get a lot of EXP from "farm", so it could realistically happen (putting aside the answers to the linked question which are supposed to solve this problem).
    $endgroup$
    – Zoma
    yesterday








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    OK, just checking; given the significant XP increase between 5 and 6 (6500 to 14000) I am not convinced that you have a problem here as the PC's will be near the end of adventure at 5 ... but I'll let the answers address that.
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday


















  • $begingroup$
    The question you linked has just a single answer recommending using milestone/story-based-leveling --- doesn't that solve this same issue?
    $endgroup$
    – kviiri
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kviiri It solves the other question, but even if I adopt milestones, I'm pretty curious about what could involve having PCs higher than level 5.
    $endgroup$
    – Zoma
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Are you aware of how long it takes to go from level 5 to level 6 during play? Have you experienced that progression at the table as a player?
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    @KorvinStarmast not at all, It will be my first DnD game, and first time DM/GM. I initially added new-gm tag, but I guess it wasn't relevant enought fo the question so it got removed. Even if it can take a long time, in the linked question I explain that with more encounters PCs may get a lot of EXP from "farm", so it could realistically happen (putting aside the answers to the linked question which are supposed to solve this problem).
    $endgroup$
    – Zoma
    yesterday








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    OK, just checking; given the significant XP increase between 5 and 6 (6500 to 14000) I am not convinced that you have a problem here as the PC's will be near the end of adventure at 5 ... but I'll let the answers address that.
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday
















$begingroup$
The question you linked has just a single answer recommending using milestone/story-based-leveling --- doesn't that solve this same issue?
$endgroup$
– kviiri
yesterday




$begingroup$
The question you linked has just a single answer recommending using milestone/story-based-leveling --- doesn't that solve this same issue?
$endgroup$
– kviiri
yesterday




1




1




$begingroup$
@kviiri It solves the other question, but even if I adopt milestones, I'm pretty curious about what could involve having PCs higher than level 5.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday




$begingroup$
@kviiri It solves the other question, but even if I adopt milestones, I'm pretty curious about what could involve having PCs higher than level 5.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday












$begingroup$
Are you aware of how long it takes to go from level 5 to level 6 during play? Have you experienced that progression at the table as a player?
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
yesterday






$begingroup$
Are you aware of how long it takes to go from level 5 to level 6 during play? Have you experienced that progression at the table as a player?
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
yesterday














$begingroup$
@KorvinStarmast not at all, It will be my first DnD game, and first time DM/GM. I initially added new-gm tag, but I guess it wasn't relevant enought fo the question so it got removed. Even if it can take a long time, in the linked question I explain that with more encounters PCs may get a lot of EXP from "farm", so it could realistically happen (putting aside the answers to the linked question which are supposed to solve this problem).
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday






$begingroup$
@KorvinStarmast not at all, It will be my first DnD game, and first time DM/GM. I initially added new-gm tag, but I guess it wasn't relevant enought fo the question so it got removed. Even if it can take a long time, in the linked question I explain that with more encounters PCs may get a lot of EXP from "farm", so it could realistically happen (putting aside the answers to the linked question which are supposed to solve this problem).
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday






1




1




$begingroup$
OK, just checking; given the significant XP increase between 5 and 6 (6500 to 14000) I am not convinced that you have a problem here as the PC's will be near the end of adventure at 5 ... but I'll let the answers address that.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
yesterday




$begingroup$
OK, just checking; given the significant XP increase between 5 and 6 (6500 to 14000) I am not convinced that you have a problem here as the PC's will be near the end of adventure at 5 ... but I'll let the answers address that.
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















15












$begingroup$

Because the combat is designed around the characters finishing the campaign at level 5, you would be faced with 2 options:




  • Allow the parts from level 5 onward to be easier than intended

  • Tweak the encounter to make it harder


Personally I would do a bit of both. As a GM it can be easy to think that harder combat = more exciting for the players, but this is not always the case. Sometimes, having a few easy encounters will give the players a sense of accomplishment.



For example, when the players cleared cragmaw hideout, they probably found that difficult. If you throw a similar combat at them at level 4 or 5, they will just blow through it. Some players may not find that interesting but others will look back and say "wow look at how much stronger we are".



When the combats are all difficult, it can be hard for the party to see that they have made any progress.



I have done this in the past, not with the LMoP, but with other adventures. The main goal here is to compensate for the extra power you have given them. Try to analyze how hard the encounter should have been. If you are new, you could try running the combat alone (using the PC character sheets) at the intended level. Then tweak the combat, put the characters at their current level and try again.



This might seem like a lot of work, but when I was first starting as a DM I found it very useful. CR is a guideline at best. The best way to tell if an encounter is too strong to too weak (as a beginner DM) is to play it out.



In conclusion, if you do nothing with the encounters as written, the party will just find the counters easier than the designer intended. I would recommend tweaking the encounters if you plan to have party go beyond level 5.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Nice answer, plus a really valuable tip for me as beginner DM. Thanks a lot.
    $endgroup$
    – Zoma
    yesterday












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145015%2fin-the-lost-mine-of-phandelver-campaign-is-it-a-problem-to-have-pcs-advance-abo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









15












$begingroup$

Because the combat is designed around the characters finishing the campaign at level 5, you would be faced with 2 options:




  • Allow the parts from level 5 onward to be easier than intended

  • Tweak the encounter to make it harder


Personally I would do a bit of both. As a GM it can be easy to think that harder combat = more exciting for the players, but this is not always the case. Sometimes, having a few easy encounters will give the players a sense of accomplishment.



For example, when the players cleared cragmaw hideout, they probably found that difficult. If you throw a similar combat at them at level 4 or 5, they will just blow through it. Some players may not find that interesting but others will look back and say "wow look at how much stronger we are".



When the combats are all difficult, it can be hard for the party to see that they have made any progress.



I have done this in the past, not with the LMoP, but with other adventures. The main goal here is to compensate for the extra power you have given them. Try to analyze how hard the encounter should have been. If you are new, you could try running the combat alone (using the PC character sheets) at the intended level. Then tweak the combat, put the characters at their current level and try again.



This might seem like a lot of work, but when I was first starting as a DM I found it very useful. CR is a guideline at best. The best way to tell if an encounter is too strong to too weak (as a beginner DM) is to play it out.



In conclusion, if you do nothing with the encounters as written, the party will just find the counters easier than the designer intended. I would recommend tweaking the encounters if you plan to have party go beyond level 5.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Nice answer, plus a really valuable tip for me as beginner DM. Thanks a lot.
    $endgroup$
    – Zoma
    yesterday
















15












$begingroup$

Because the combat is designed around the characters finishing the campaign at level 5, you would be faced with 2 options:




  • Allow the parts from level 5 onward to be easier than intended

  • Tweak the encounter to make it harder


Personally I would do a bit of both. As a GM it can be easy to think that harder combat = more exciting for the players, but this is not always the case. Sometimes, having a few easy encounters will give the players a sense of accomplishment.



For example, when the players cleared cragmaw hideout, they probably found that difficult. If you throw a similar combat at them at level 4 or 5, they will just blow through it. Some players may not find that interesting but others will look back and say "wow look at how much stronger we are".



When the combats are all difficult, it can be hard for the party to see that they have made any progress.



I have done this in the past, not with the LMoP, but with other adventures. The main goal here is to compensate for the extra power you have given them. Try to analyze how hard the encounter should have been. If you are new, you could try running the combat alone (using the PC character sheets) at the intended level. Then tweak the combat, put the characters at their current level and try again.



This might seem like a lot of work, but when I was first starting as a DM I found it very useful. CR is a guideline at best. The best way to tell if an encounter is too strong to too weak (as a beginner DM) is to play it out.



In conclusion, if you do nothing with the encounters as written, the party will just find the counters easier than the designer intended. I would recommend tweaking the encounters if you plan to have party go beyond level 5.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Nice answer, plus a really valuable tip for me as beginner DM. Thanks a lot.
    $endgroup$
    – Zoma
    yesterday














15












15








15





$begingroup$

Because the combat is designed around the characters finishing the campaign at level 5, you would be faced with 2 options:




  • Allow the parts from level 5 onward to be easier than intended

  • Tweak the encounter to make it harder


Personally I would do a bit of both. As a GM it can be easy to think that harder combat = more exciting for the players, but this is not always the case. Sometimes, having a few easy encounters will give the players a sense of accomplishment.



For example, when the players cleared cragmaw hideout, they probably found that difficult. If you throw a similar combat at them at level 4 or 5, they will just blow through it. Some players may not find that interesting but others will look back and say "wow look at how much stronger we are".



When the combats are all difficult, it can be hard for the party to see that they have made any progress.



I have done this in the past, not with the LMoP, but with other adventures. The main goal here is to compensate for the extra power you have given them. Try to analyze how hard the encounter should have been. If you are new, you could try running the combat alone (using the PC character sheets) at the intended level. Then tweak the combat, put the characters at their current level and try again.



This might seem like a lot of work, but when I was first starting as a DM I found it very useful. CR is a guideline at best. The best way to tell if an encounter is too strong to too weak (as a beginner DM) is to play it out.



In conclusion, if you do nothing with the encounters as written, the party will just find the counters easier than the designer intended. I would recommend tweaking the encounters if you plan to have party go beyond level 5.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Because the combat is designed around the characters finishing the campaign at level 5, you would be faced with 2 options:




  • Allow the parts from level 5 onward to be easier than intended

  • Tweak the encounter to make it harder


Personally I would do a bit of both. As a GM it can be easy to think that harder combat = more exciting for the players, but this is not always the case. Sometimes, having a few easy encounters will give the players a sense of accomplishment.



For example, when the players cleared cragmaw hideout, they probably found that difficult. If you throw a similar combat at them at level 4 or 5, they will just blow through it. Some players may not find that interesting but others will look back and say "wow look at how much stronger we are".



When the combats are all difficult, it can be hard for the party to see that they have made any progress.



I have done this in the past, not with the LMoP, but with other adventures. The main goal here is to compensate for the extra power you have given them. Try to analyze how hard the encounter should have been. If you are new, you could try running the combat alone (using the PC character sheets) at the intended level. Then tweak the combat, put the characters at their current level and try again.



This might seem like a lot of work, but when I was first starting as a DM I found it very useful. CR is a guideline at best. The best way to tell if an encounter is too strong to too weak (as a beginner DM) is to play it out.



In conclusion, if you do nothing with the encounters as written, the party will just find the counters easier than the designer intended. I would recommend tweaking the encounters if you plan to have party go beyond level 5.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday









Sdjz

14.1k468114




14.1k468114










answered yesterday









SaggingRufusSaggingRufus

2,61421833




2,61421833








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Nice answer, plus a really valuable tip for me as beginner DM. Thanks a lot.
    $endgroup$
    – Zoma
    yesterday














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Nice answer, plus a really valuable tip for me as beginner DM. Thanks a lot.
    $endgroup$
    – Zoma
    yesterday








2




2




$begingroup$
Nice answer, plus a really valuable tip for me as beginner DM. Thanks a lot.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday




$begingroup$
Nice answer, plus a really valuable tip for me as beginner DM. Thanks a lot.
$endgroup$
– Zoma
yesterday


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145015%2fin-the-lost-mine-of-phandelver-campaign-is-it-a-problem-to-have-pcs-advance-abo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

GameSpot

connect to host localhost port 22: Connection refused

Getting a Wifi WPA2 wifi connection