FILE extension changing while copying from Ubuntu to windows
2
I downloaded data in Ubuntu which has an extension .text/plain bit when I copied it to my Windows 10 through USB the file extension is changed to '.file'. What should I do now to open it?
windows files file-format file-type
edited 3 hours ago
Arronical
13.2k84790
asked 8 hours ago
ammuammu
141
New contributor
ammu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
2
I downloaded data in Ubuntu which has an extension .text/plain bit when I copied it to my Windows 10 through USB the file extension is changed to '.file'. What should I do now to open it?
windows files file-format file-type
edited 3 hours ago
Arronical
13.2k84790
asked 8 hours ago
ammuammu
141
New contributor
ammu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. Ubuntu doesn't use extensions so it wouldn't be Ubuntu that is changing the name of the file. Whatever program you are using to copy/transfer the file to windows (most likely on the windows end) is changing the filename as a means of 'security' (as windows uses extension to control action; Ubuntu uses file contents). If youfile filename(where filename is the name of your file) you can view the type of file according to Ubuntu or any *nix)
– guiverc
8 hours ago
@guiverc Ubuntu certainly does use file extensions to the same extent Windows does. File extensions are standardised by IANA along with media types and shells such as Gnome and KDE use them for identifying icons and appropriate actions, which is exactly what Windows Explorer does.
– Ben
5 hours ago
1
@Ben NO. Linux does not. Extensions are there to make it easier for humans to see what the file is. There is software for the desktop (!= Linux) that expect files to be named with an extension but Linux in itself does not care about that. And even then: the extensions are matched with a mime-type list.
– Rinzwind
4 hours ago
@Rinzwind Ubuntu = linux distribution(s), and Ubuntu certainly does use extensions. Linux kernel also uses extensions for some limited purposes, e.g. loader locating so files. Overall Linux distributions use extensions for the same purposes as Windows, and used by the equivalent components, Windows Explorer being the equivalent of the Linux graphical shells like Gnome and KDE. It's possible to install Windows without the graphical shell, in which case most uses of file extensions will not occur.
– Ben
41 mins ago
The desktop does but only to make things speed up a little bit. If those desktop coders would follow the correct method they too would scan for the 1st few bytes like linux does. And no: linux and ubuntu is not the same. Ubuntu is the desktop built on top of Linux.Those few tweaks made to the kernel don't matter
– Rinzwind
5 mins ago
add a comment |
2
2
2
I downloaded data in Ubuntu which has an extension .text/plain bit when I copied it to my Windows 10 through USB the file extension is changed to '.file'. What should I do now to open it?
windows files file-format file-type
edited 3 hours ago
Arronical
13.2k84790
asked 8 hours ago
ammuammu
141
New contributor
ammu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I downloaded data in Ubuntu which has an extension .text/plain bit when I copied it to my Windows 10 through USB the file extension is changed to '.file'. What should I do now to open it?
windows files file-format file-type
windows files file-format file-type
edited 3 hours ago
Arronical
13.2k84790
asked 8 hours ago
ammuammu
141
New contributor
ammu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 3 hours ago
Arronical
13.2k84790
asked 8 hours ago
ammuammu
141
New contributor
ammu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 3 hours ago
Arronical
13.2k84790
edited 3 hours ago
Arronical
13.2k84790
edited 3 hours ago
Arronical
13.2k84790
13.2k84790
asked 8 hours ago
ammuammu
141
New contributor
ammu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
ammuammu
141
asked 8 hours ago
ammuammu
141
141
New contributor
ammu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
ammu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
ammu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. Ubuntu doesn't use extensions so it wouldn't be Ubuntu that is changing the name of the file. Whatever program you are using to copy/transfer the file to windows (most likely on the windows end) is changing the filename as a means of 'security' (as windows uses extension to control action; Ubuntu uses file contents). If youfile filename(where filename is the name of your file) you can view the type of file according to Ubuntu or any *nix)
– guiverc
8 hours ago
@guiverc Ubuntu certainly does use file extensions to the same extent Windows does. File extensions are standardised by IANA along with media types and shells such as Gnome and KDE use them for identifying icons and appropriate actions, which is exactly what Windows Explorer does.
– Ben
5 hours ago
1
@Ben NO. Linux does not. Extensions are there to make it easier for humans to see what the file is. There is software for the desktop (!= Linux) that expect files to be named with an extension but Linux in itself does not care about that. And even then: the extensions are matched with a mime-type list.
– Rinzwind
4 hours ago
@Rinzwind Ubuntu = linux distribution(s), and Ubuntu certainly does use extensions. Linux kernel also uses extensions for some limited purposes, e.g. loader locating so files. Overall Linux distributions use extensions for the same purposes as Windows, and used by the equivalent components, Windows Explorer being the equivalent of the Linux graphical shells like Gnome and KDE. It's possible to install Windows without the graphical shell, in which case most uses of file extensions will not occur.
– Ben
41 mins ago
The desktop does but only to make things speed up a little bit. If those desktop coders would follow the correct method they too would scan for the 1st few bytes like linux does. And no: linux and ubuntu is not the same. Ubuntu is the desktop built on top of Linux.Those few tweaks made to the kernel don't matter
– Rinzwind
5 mins ago
add a comment |
1
Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. Ubuntu doesn't use extensions so it wouldn't be Ubuntu that is changing the name of the file. Whatever program you are using to copy/transfer the file to windows (most likely on the windows end) is changing the filename as a means of 'security' (as windows uses extension to control action; Ubuntu uses file contents). If youfile filename(where filename is the name of your file) you can view the type of file according to Ubuntu or any *nix)
– guiverc
8 hours ago
@guiverc Ubuntu certainly does use file extensions to the same extent Windows does. File extensions are standardised by IANA along with media types and shells such as Gnome and KDE use them for identifying icons and appropriate actions, which is exactly what Windows Explorer does.
– Ben
5 hours ago
1
@Ben NO. Linux does not. Extensions are there to make it easier for humans to see what the file is. There is software for the desktop (!= Linux) that expect files to be named with an extension but Linux in itself does not care about that. And even then: the extensions are matched with a mime-type list.
– Rinzwind
4 hours ago
@Rinzwind Ubuntu = linux distribution(s), and Ubuntu certainly does use extensions. Linux kernel also uses extensions for some limited purposes, e.g. loader locating so files. Overall Linux distributions use extensions for the same purposes as Windows, and used by the equivalent components, Windows Explorer being the equivalent of the Linux graphical shells like Gnome and KDE. It's possible to install Windows without the graphical shell, in which case most uses of file extensions will not occur.
– Ben
41 mins ago
The desktop does but only to make things speed up a little bit. If those desktop coders would follow the correct method they too would scan for the 1st few bytes like linux does. And no: linux and ubuntu is not the same. Ubuntu is the desktop built on top of Linux.Those few tweaks made to the kernel don't matter
– Rinzwind
5 mins ago
1
1
Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. Ubuntu doesn't use extensions so it wouldn't be Ubuntu that is changing the name of the file. Whatever program you are using to copy/transfer the file to windows (most likely on the windows end) is changing the filename as a means of 'security' (as windows uses extension to control action; Ubuntu uses file contents). If you
file filename (where filename is the name of your file) you can view the type of file according to Ubuntu or any *nix)– guiverc
8 hours ago
Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. Ubuntu doesn't use extensions so it wouldn't be Ubuntu that is changing the name of the file. Whatever program you are using to copy/transfer the file to windows (most likely on the windows end) is changing the filename as a means of 'security' (as windows uses extension to control action; Ubuntu uses file contents). If you
file filename (where filename is the name of your file) you can view the type of file according to Ubuntu or any *nix)– guiverc
8 hours ago
@guiverc Ubuntu certainly does use file extensions to the same extent Windows does. File extensions are standardised by IANA along with media types and shells such as Gnome and KDE use them for identifying icons and appropriate actions, which is exactly what Windows Explorer does.
– Ben
5 hours ago
@guiverc Ubuntu certainly does use file extensions to the same extent Windows does. File extensions are standardised by IANA along with media types and shells such as Gnome and KDE use them for identifying icons and appropriate actions, which is exactly what Windows Explorer does.
– Ben
5 hours ago
1
1
@Ben NO. Linux does not. Extensions are there to make it easier for humans to see what the file is. There is software for the desktop (!= Linux) that expect files to be named with an extension but Linux in itself does not care about that. And even then: the extensions are matched with a mime-type list.
– Rinzwind
4 hours ago
@Ben NO. Linux does not. Extensions are there to make it easier for humans to see what the file is. There is software for the desktop (!= Linux) that expect files to be named with an extension but Linux in itself does not care about that. And even then: the extensions are matched with a mime-type list.
– Rinzwind
4 hours ago
@Rinzwind Ubuntu = linux distribution(s), and Ubuntu certainly does use extensions. Linux kernel also uses extensions for some limited purposes, e.g. loader locating so files. Overall Linux distributions use extensions for the same purposes as Windows, and used by the equivalent components, Windows Explorer being the equivalent of the Linux graphical shells like Gnome and KDE. It's possible to install Windows without the graphical shell, in which case most uses of file extensions will not occur.
– Ben
41 mins ago
@Rinzwind Ubuntu = linux distribution(s), and Ubuntu certainly does use extensions. Linux kernel also uses extensions for some limited purposes, e.g. loader locating so files. Overall Linux distributions use extensions for the same purposes as Windows, and used by the equivalent components, Windows Explorer being the equivalent of the Linux graphical shells like Gnome and KDE. It's possible to install Windows without the graphical shell, in which case most uses of file extensions will not occur.
– Ben
41 mins ago
The desktop does but only to make things speed up a little bit. If those desktop coders would follow the correct method they too would scan for the 1st few bytes like linux does. And no: linux and ubuntu is not the same. Ubuntu is the desktop built on top of Linux.Those few tweaks made to the kernel don't matter
– Rinzwind
5 mins ago
The desktop does but only to make things speed up a little bit. If those desktop coders would follow the correct method they too would scan for the 1st few bytes like linux does. And no: linux and ubuntu is not the same. Ubuntu is the desktop built on top of Linux.Those few tweaks made to the kernel don't matter
– Rinzwind
5 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
5
It appears that Windows adds the .file extension to any file with an extension it doesn't know/recognise. Understandable, because text/plain is not a file extension but rather a 'content type'.
It seems that opening the file has worked on Ubuntu, because GNOME can "associate a media type with a file by examining both the filename suffix and the contents of the file" (Wikipedia).
To open the file in Windows, you can simply change the extension from .file to .txt, which is the most likely filetype. However, depending on where and for what purpose you downloaded the file, it could also be a .dat (data) or other file. If you don't know how to change the file type, I'd advice to Google for it as that seems out of scope for this Ubuntu-oriented site :)
answered 8 hours ago
KoenKoen
322324
2
Nice one. Just a pointer you can always expand/modify your answer (by clicking 'edit' below it) instead of deleting it and posting a new one :) Similarly you can 'undelete' an answer you deleted.
– pomsky
7 hours ago
3
More to the point, in Windows the character/infilename.text/plainis not a valid character for a filename. In Windows, filenames are not arbitrary sequences of bytes but a user-interface element with restrictions placed upon them to serve that purpose. Therefore control characters, and special shell metacharacters are not allowed. Whatever utility the poster used to copy the file has taken care of this issue.
– Ben
5 hours ago
1
@Ben This restriction (no/in filenames) also holds for Linux. AFAIR, there are only two forbidden characters in a Linux filename:/and. This means the file the OP downloaded CANNOT have an extension of.plain/text.
– PerlDuck
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
ammu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1110765%2ffile-extension-changing-while-copying-from-ubuntu-to-windows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
5
It appears that Windows adds the .file extension to any file with an extension it doesn't know/recognise. Understandable, because text/plain is not a file extension but rather a 'content type'.
It seems that opening the file has worked on Ubuntu, because GNOME can "associate a media type with a file by examining both the filename suffix and the contents of the file" (Wikipedia).
To open the file in Windows, you can simply change the extension from .file to .txt, which is the most likely filetype. However, depending on where and for what purpose you downloaded the file, it could also be a .dat (data) or other file. If you don't know how to change the file type, I'd advice to Google for it as that seems out of scope for this Ubuntu-oriented site :)
answered 8 hours ago
KoenKoen
322324
2
Nice one. Just a pointer you can always expand/modify your answer (by clicking 'edit' below it) instead of deleting it and posting a new one :) Similarly you can 'undelete' an answer you deleted.
– pomsky
7 hours ago
3
More to the point, in Windows the character/infilename.text/plainis not a valid character for a filename. In Windows, filenames are not arbitrary sequences of bytes but a user-interface element with restrictions placed upon them to serve that purpose. Therefore control characters, and special shell metacharacters are not allowed. Whatever utility the poster used to copy the file has taken care of this issue.
– Ben
5 hours ago
1
@Ben This restriction (no/in filenames) also holds for Linux. AFAIR, there are only two forbidden characters in a Linux filename:/and. This means the file the OP downloaded CANNOT have an extension of.plain/text.
– PerlDuck
3 hours ago
add a comment |
5
It appears that Windows adds the .file extension to any file with an extension it doesn't know/recognise. Understandable, because text/plain is not a file extension but rather a 'content type'.
It seems that opening the file has worked on Ubuntu, because GNOME can "associate a media type with a file by examining both the filename suffix and the contents of the file" (Wikipedia).
To open the file in Windows, you can simply change the extension from .file to .txt, which is the most likely filetype. However, depending on where and for what purpose you downloaded the file, it could also be a .dat (data) or other file. If you don't know how to change the file type, I'd advice to Google for it as that seems out of scope for this Ubuntu-oriented site :)
answered 8 hours ago
KoenKoen
322324
2
Nice one. Just a pointer you can always expand/modify your answer (by clicking 'edit' below it) instead of deleting it and posting a new one :) Similarly you can 'undelete' an answer you deleted.
– pomsky
7 hours ago
3
More to the point, in Windows the character/infilename.text/plainis not a valid character for a filename. In Windows, filenames are not arbitrary sequences of bytes but a user-interface element with restrictions placed upon them to serve that purpose. Therefore control characters, and special shell metacharacters are not allowed. Whatever utility the poster used to copy the file has taken care of this issue.
– Ben
5 hours ago
1
@Ben This restriction (no/in filenames) also holds for Linux. AFAIR, there are only two forbidden characters in a Linux filename:/and. This means the file the OP downloaded CANNOT have an extension of.plain/text.
– PerlDuck
3 hours ago
add a comment |
5
5
5
It appears that Windows adds the .file extension to any file with an extension it doesn't know/recognise. Understandable, because text/plain is not a file extension but rather a 'content type'.
It seems that opening the file has worked on Ubuntu, because GNOME can "associate a media type with a file by examining both the filename suffix and the contents of the file" (Wikipedia).
To open the file in Windows, you can simply change the extension from .file to .txt, which is the most likely filetype. However, depending on where and for what purpose you downloaded the file, it could also be a .dat (data) or other file. If you don't know how to change the file type, I'd advice to Google for it as that seems out of scope for this Ubuntu-oriented site :)
answered 8 hours ago
KoenKoen
322324
It appears that Windows adds the .file extension to any file with an extension it doesn't know/recognise. Understandable, because text/plain is not a file extension but rather a 'content type'.
It seems that opening the file has worked on Ubuntu, because GNOME can "associate a media type with a file by examining both the filename suffix and the contents of the file" (Wikipedia).
To open the file in Windows, you can simply change the extension from .file to .txt, which is the most likely filetype. However, depending on where and for what purpose you downloaded the file, it could also be a .dat (data) or other file. If you don't know how to change the file type, I'd advice to Google for it as that seems out of scope for this Ubuntu-oriented site :)
answered 8 hours ago
KoenKoen
322324
answered 8 hours ago
KoenKoen
322324
answered 8 hours ago
KoenKoen
322324
answered 8 hours ago
KoenKoen
322324
322324
2
Nice one. Just a pointer you can always expand/modify your answer (by clicking 'edit' below it) instead of deleting it and posting a new one :) Similarly you can 'undelete' an answer you deleted.
– pomsky
7 hours ago
3
More to the point, in Windows the character/infilename.text/plainis not a valid character for a filename. In Windows, filenames are not arbitrary sequences of bytes but a user-interface element with restrictions placed upon them to serve that purpose. Therefore control characters, and special shell metacharacters are not allowed. Whatever utility the poster used to copy the file has taken care of this issue.
– Ben
5 hours ago
1
@Ben This restriction (no/in filenames) also holds for Linux. AFAIR, there are only two forbidden characters in a Linux filename:/and. This means the file the OP downloaded CANNOT have an extension of.plain/text.
– PerlDuck
3 hours ago
add a comment |
2
Nice one. Just a pointer you can always expand/modify your answer (by clicking 'edit' below it) instead of deleting it and posting a new one :) Similarly you can 'undelete' an answer you deleted.
– pomsky
7 hours ago
3
More to the point, in Windows the character/infilename.text/plainis not a valid character for a filename. In Windows, filenames are not arbitrary sequences of bytes but a user-interface element with restrictions placed upon them to serve that purpose. Therefore control characters, and special shell metacharacters are not allowed. Whatever utility the poster used to copy the file has taken care of this issue.
– Ben
5 hours ago
1
@Ben This restriction (no/in filenames) also holds for Linux. AFAIR, there are only two forbidden characters in a Linux filename:/and. This means the file the OP downloaded CANNOT have an extension of.plain/text.
– PerlDuck
3 hours ago
2
2
Nice one. Just a pointer you can always expand/modify your answer (by clicking 'edit' below it) instead of deleting it and posting a new one :) Similarly you can 'undelete' an answer you deleted.
– pomsky
7 hours ago
Nice one. Just a pointer you can always expand/modify your answer (by clicking 'edit' below it) instead of deleting it and posting a new one :) Similarly you can 'undelete' an answer you deleted.
– pomsky
7 hours ago
3
3
More to the point, in Windows the character
/ in filename.text/plain is not a valid character for a filename. In Windows, filenames are not arbitrary sequences of bytes but a user-interface element with restrictions placed upon them to serve that purpose. Therefore control characters, and special shell metacharacters are not allowed. Whatever utility the poster used to copy the file has taken care of this issue.– Ben
5 hours ago
More to the point, in Windows the character
/ in filename.text/plain is not a valid character for a filename. In Windows, filenames are not arbitrary sequences of bytes but a user-interface element with restrictions placed upon them to serve that purpose. Therefore control characters, and special shell metacharacters are not allowed. Whatever utility the poster used to copy the file has taken care of this issue.– Ben
5 hours ago
1
1
@Ben This restriction (no
/ in filenames) also holds for Linux. AFAIR, there are only two forbidden characters in a Linux filename: / and .plain/text.– PerlDuck
3 hours ago
@Ben This restriction (no
/ in filenames) also holds for Linux. AFAIR, there are only two forbidden characters in a Linux filename: / and .plain/text.– PerlDuck
3 hours ago
add a comment |
ammu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
ammu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
ammu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
ammu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1110765%2ffile-extension-changing-while-copying-from-ubuntu-to-windows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. Ubuntu doesn't use extensions so it wouldn't be Ubuntu that is changing the name of the file. Whatever program you are using to copy/transfer the file to windows (most likely on the windows end) is changing the filename as a means of 'security' (as windows uses extension to control action; Ubuntu uses file contents). If you
file filename(where filename is the name of your file) you can view the type of file according to Ubuntu or any *nix)– guiverc
8 hours ago
@guiverc Ubuntu certainly does use file extensions to the same extent Windows does. File extensions are standardised by IANA along with media types and shells such as Gnome and KDE use them for identifying icons and appropriate actions, which is exactly what Windows Explorer does.
– Ben
5 hours ago
1
@Ben NO. Linux does not. Extensions are there to make it easier for humans to see what the file is. There is software for the desktop (!= Linux) that expect files to be named with an extension but Linux in itself does not care about that. And even then: the extensions are matched with a mime-type list.
– Rinzwind
4 hours ago
@Rinzwind Ubuntu = linux distribution(s), and Ubuntu certainly does use extensions. Linux kernel also uses extensions for some limited purposes, e.g. loader locating so files. Overall Linux distributions use extensions for the same purposes as Windows, and used by the equivalent components, Windows Explorer being the equivalent of the Linux graphical shells like Gnome and KDE. It's possible to install Windows without the graphical shell, in which case most uses of file extensions will not occur.
– Ben
41 mins ago
The desktop does but only to make things speed up a little bit. If those desktop coders would follow the correct method they too would scan for the 1st few bytes like linux does. And no: linux and ubuntu is not the same. Ubuntu is the desktop built on top of Linux.Those few tweaks made to the kernel don't matter
– Rinzwind
5 mins ago