Why do TACANs not have a symbol for compulsory reporting on IFR Enroute Low Altitude charts?












4












$begingroup$


I am studying the IFR Enroute Low Altitude legend, and I noticed that all NAV Aids other than TACAN have a compulsory reporting point icon.



enter image description here




Edit: Plot twist:



They do appear on the STAR/DP legend.
enter image description here



Why do TACANs not have a compulsory reporting point icon on the STAR/DP, but not IFR Enroute Low Altitude?






aeronautical-charts ifr-navigation







share|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    I am studying the IFR Enroute Low Altitude legend, and I noticed that all NAV Aids other than TACAN have a compulsory reporting point icon.



    enter image description here




    Edit: Plot twist:



    They do appear on the STAR/DP legend.
    enter image description here



    Why do TACANs not have a compulsory reporting point icon on the STAR/DP, but not IFR Enroute Low Altitude?






    aeronautical-charts ifr-navigation







    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      I am studying the IFR Enroute Low Altitude legend, and I noticed that all NAV Aids other than TACAN have a compulsory reporting point icon.



      enter image description here




      Edit: Plot twist:



      They do appear on the STAR/DP legend.
      enter image description here



      Why do TACANs not have a compulsory reporting point icon on the STAR/DP, but not IFR Enroute Low Altitude?






      aeronautical-charts ifr-navigation







      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am studying the IFR Enroute Low Altitude legend, and I noticed that all NAV Aids other than TACAN have a compulsory reporting point icon.



      enter image description here




      Edit: Plot twist:



      They do appear on the STAR/DP legend.
      enter image description here



      Why do TACANs not have a compulsory reporting point icon on the STAR/DP, but not IFR Enroute Low Altitude?






      aeronautical-charts ifr-navigation




      aeronautical-charts ifr-navigation






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 40 mins ago







      Ryan Mortensen

















      asked 8 hours ago









      Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen

      3,515840




      3,515840






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$

          TACANs are for military use. VOR or VORTAC are the civilian equivalent. Civilians can't generally tune in TACAN.



          This wikipedia article has more details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
            $endgroup$
            – pericynthion
            2 hours ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "528"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f63801%2fwhy-do-tacans-not-have-a-symbol-for-compulsory-reporting-on-ifr-enroute-low-alti%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          6












          $begingroup$

          TACANs are for military use. VOR or VORTAC are the civilian equivalent. Civilians can't generally tune in TACAN.



          This wikipedia article has more details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
            $endgroup$
            – pericynthion
            2 hours ago
















          6












          $begingroup$

          TACANs are for military use. VOR or VORTAC are the civilian equivalent. Civilians can't generally tune in TACAN.



          This wikipedia article has more details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
            $endgroup$
            – pericynthion
            2 hours ago














          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          TACANs are for military use. VOR or VORTAC are the civilian equivalent. Civilians can't generally tune in TACAN.



          This wikipedia article has more details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          TACANs are for military use. VOR or VORTAC are the civilian equivalent. Civilians can't generally tune in TACAN.



          This wikipedia article has more details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          CrossRoadsCrossRoads

          5,1521919




          5,1521919












          • $begingroup$
            Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
            $endgroup$
            – pericynthion
            2 hours ago


















          • $begingroup$
            Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
            $endgroup$
            – pericynthion
            2 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
          $endgroup$
          – pericynthion
          2 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
          $endgroup$
          – pericynthion
          2 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f63801%2fwhy-do-tacans-not-have-a-symbol-for-compulsory-reporting-on-ifr-enroute-low-alti%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          GameSpot

          Image
          body.skin-minerva .mw-parser-output table.infobox caption{text-align:center} GameSpot 戰地風雲：惡名昭彰2在Gamespot的評論 网站类型 新聞 持有者 CBS 创始人 Pete Deemer Vince Broady Jon Epstein 网站 http://www.gamespot.com/ 注册 Optional (free and paid) 推出时间 1996年5月1日 [1] GameSpot （中国大陆：游戏基地），於1996年5月由Pete Deemer和Vince Broady創立，是一個提供新聞、評論、預告片、下載及其他的相關資訊的電子遊戲網站。GameSpot被一間後來被CNET收購的企業ZDNet所收購。根據Alexa，GameSpot.com是200個網路擁擠最嚴重的網站之一。 除了由GameSpot員工創作的內容，網站還允許用戶寫評論、網誌、之後在網路論壇分享。一些在CNET旗下的GameFAQs分享。 2004年， GameSpot被Spike TV的觀眾選上「電子遊戲賞節目」贏得「最傑出遊戲網站。 [2] 其他的遊戲網站還有IGN、1UP.com、GameSpy是它最大的競爭對手。2008年，根據Compete.com的統計，「gamespot.com」吸引了最少6000萬人的點擊率。 [3] GameSpot的主頁鏈結了到最近新聞、評論、預告、和一些有關遊戲機的入口：Wii、任天堂DS、電腦遊戲、Xbox 360、PSP、PlayStation 2、PlayStation 3。它還有一列「最受歡迎遊戲名單」，還有給用戶快速獲得遊戲資訊的搜尋器。GameSpot 還包括一些小範圍的遊戲機：任天堂64、GameCube、Game Boy Color、Game Boy Advance、Xbox、PlayStation、SEGA Saturn、Dreamcast、Neo Geo Pocket Color、N-Gage、手機遊戲。 目录 1 歷史 1.1 國際歷史 1.2 著名的員工 2 評論和分
          Read more

          connect to host localhost port 22: Connection refused

          Image
          .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 1 1 I created a Ubuntu Vagrant box and ssh'd into it. Now, created a ssh key and trying to ssh to my localhost but I get the following error. vagrant@vagrant-ubuntu-trusty-64:~$ ssh -vvvv localhost OpenSSH_6.6.1, OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 19: Applying options for * debug2: ssh_connect: needpriv 0 debug1: Connecting to localhost [127.0.0.1] port 22. debug1: connect to address 127.0.0.1 port 22: Connection refused ssh: connect to host localhost port 22: Connection refused When I check the list of ports opened as follows: vagrant@vagrant-ubuntu-trusty-64:~$ s
          Read more

          Getting a Wifi WPA2 wifi connection

          Image
          .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 0 I've been trying to get a simple wifi connection ! bu I have to admit I just can't get it done ! here is what I've tried: root@MYONE:/etc# clear root@MYONE:/etc# vi wpa_supplicant.conf ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant ctrl_interface_group=0 update_config=1 network={ ssid="Mi Engine" psk="7407352688e4" } root@MYONE:/etc# iw wlan0 link Not connected. root@MYONE:/etc# ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 74:FE:48:3A:55:AB inet addr:192.168.178.88 Bcast:192.168.178.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::76fe:48ff:fe3a:55ab%4804152/64 Scope:Link UP BRO
          Read more