Copying drive with windows installation under Ubuntu 18












0















I got a virus on my computer Win 10. So I decided to do full reinstall. To save files I installed new hard drive, created USB Ubuntu stick, booted from it and I am trying to copy files under Ubuntu. I am getting the following error message while copying:



Error while copying
There was an error reading folder "LocalCache"
Error opening directory
'/media/ubuntu/CCB411EEB411DC30/Users/some_user/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.SkypeApp_kzf8qxf38zg5c/LocalCache': No such file or directory


There are options to cancel, skip all, skip and retry



Retry does not work, but I can always skip.
But I curious where this error is coming from and how to fix it?



Update 1:
I found the problem file/folder on the original drive. Here is some info on it.



Name: LocalCache
Type: Link (broken) (inode/symlink)
Link target: unsupported reparse point
Size: 25 bytes


Update 2:



Running terminal stat command on this file returned:



File: LocalCache -> unsupported reparse point
Size: 25 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 symbolic link
Device: 824h/2084d Inode: 918487 Links: 2
Access: (0777/lrwxrwxrwx) Uid: ( 999/ ubuntu) Gid: ( 999/ ubuntu)
Access: 2019-02-24 00:33:56.728640800 +0000
Modify: 2018-10-30 17:29:05.927748100 +0000
Change: 2018-10-30 17:29:05.927748100 +0000
Birth: -









share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Have you looked at what the actual file is (& directory in which it resides); ie. what is in that directory? If you see the file, what type (file) of file is it? can you stat it? to view attributes for clues etc. If you're happy with keeping it I'd them mv or rename it to rename it IF i believed it safe & wanted; otherwise I'd just rm it & restore a backup. these are random thoughts - I alter where I go by what I see in prior step...

    – guiverc
    2 hours ago











  • @guiverc, Thank you for reply! I added update. I am not even sure if it is file or folder. I would rather keep it if possible.

    – user1700890
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    the commands used do not change if it's a file or folder. file would have reported it's a folder if you'd use that (file is a command to determine file type [using contents of file and not it's name]) I'd also suggest when you copy/paste output you provide context (ie. command used to create output; you saw the command, we didn't & may make false assumptions...)

    – guiverc
    1 hour ago













  • @guiverc Sorry I did not clarify, I am copying them using standard Ubuntu GUI, I do not remember proper name of it

    – user1700890
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Okay, I use command usually (not nautilus which is probably what you're using). It's not a real file, but a file-entry pointing to a inode (block/cluster) used by another file ... stat would have provided this info (i'm used to looking at command line). Since it's not a Ubuntu fs, it may not see everything windows sees, but I'd skip it (you could manually ln -s it later, but to be useful in windows it would need to be done within windows.

    – guiverc
    1 hour ago
















0















I got a virus on my computer Win 10. So I decided to do full reinstall. To save files I installed new hard drive, created USB Ubuntu stick, booted from it and I am trying to copy files under Ubuntu. I am getting the following error message while copying:



Error while copying
There was an error reading folder "LocalCache"
Error opening directory
'/media/ubuntu/CCB411EEB411DC30/Users/some_user/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.SkypeApp_kzf8qxf38zg5c/LocalCache': No such file or directory


There are options to cancel, skip all, skip and retry



Retry does not work, but I can always skip.
But I curious where this error is coming from and how to fix it?



Update 1:
I found the problem file/folder on the original drive. Here is some info on it.



Name: LocalCache
Type: Link (broken) (inode/symlink)
Link target: unsupported reparse point
Size: 25 bytes


Update 2:



Running terminal stat command on this file returned:



File: LocalCache -> unsupported reparse point
Size: 25 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 symbolic link
Device: 824h/2084d Inode: 918487 Links: 2
Access: (0777/lrwxrwxrwx) Uid: ( 999/ ubuntu) Gid: ( 999/ ubuntu)
Access: 2019-02-24 00:33:56.728640800 +0000
Modify: 2018-10-30 17:29:05.927748100 +0000
Change: 2018-10-30 17:29:05.927748100 +0000
Birth: -









share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Have you looked at what the actual file is (& directory in which it resides); ie. what is in that directory? If you see the file, what type (file) of file is it? can you stat it? to view attributes for clues etc. If you're happy with keeping it I'd them mv or rename it to rename it IF i believed it safe & wanted; otherwise I'd just rm it & restore a backup. these are random thoughts - I alter where I go by what I see in prior step...

    – guiverc
    2 hours ago











  • @guiverc, Thank you for reply! I added update. I am not even sure if it is file or folder. I would rather keep it if possible.

    – user1700890
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    the commands used do not change if it's a file or folder. file would have reported it's a folder if you'd use that (file is a command to determine file type [using contents of file and not it's name]) I'd also suggest when you copy/paste output you provide context (ie. command used to create output; you saw the command, we didn't & may make false assumptions...)

    – guiverc
    1 hour ago













  • @guiverc Sorry I did not clarify, I am copying them using standard Ubuntu GUI, I do not remember proper name of it

    – user1700890
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Okay, I use command usually (not nautilus which is probably what you're using). It's not a real file, but a file-entry pointing to a inode (block/cluster) used by another file ... stat would have provided this info (i'm used to looking at command line). Since it's not a Ubuntu fs, it may not see everything windows sees, but I'd skip it (you could manually ln -s it later, but to be useful in windows it would need to be done within windows.

    – guiverc
    1 hour ago














0












0








0








I got a virus on my computer Win 10. So I decided to do full reinstall. To save files I installed new hard drive, created USB Ubuntu stick, booted from it and I am trying to copy files under Ubuntu. I am getting the following error message while copying:



Error while copying
There was an error reading folder "LocalCache"
Error opening directory
'/media/ubuntu/CCB411EEB411DC30/Users/some_user/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.SkypeApp_kzf8qxf38zg5c/LocalCache': No such file or directory


There are options to cancel, skip all, skip and retry



Retry does not work, but I can always skip.
But I curious where this error is coming from and how to fix it?



Update 1:
I found the problem file/folder on the original drive. Here is some info on it.



Name: LocalCache
Type: Link (broken) (inode/symlink)
Link target: unsupported reparse point
Size: 25 bytes


Update 2:



Running terminal stat command on this file returned:



File: LocalCache -> unsupported reparse point
Size: 25 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 symbolic link
Device: 824h/2084d Inode: 918487 Links: 2
Access: (0777/lrwxrwxrwx) Uid: ( 999/ ubuntu) Gid: ( 999/ ubuntu)
Access: 2019-02-24 00:33:56.728640800 +0000
Modify: 2018-10-30 17:29:05.927748100 +0000
Change: 2018-10-30 17:29:05.927748100 +0000
Birth: -









share|improve this question
















I got a virus on my computer Win 10. So I decided to do full reinstall. To save files I installed new hard drive, created USB Ubuntu stick, booted from it and I am trying to copy files under Ubuntu. I am getting the following error message while copying:



Error while copying
There was an error reading folder "LocalCache"
Error opening directory
'/media/ubuntu/CCB411EEB411DC30/Users/some_user/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.SkypeApp_kzf8qxf38zg5c/LocalCache': No such file or directory


There are options to cancel, skip all, skip and retry



Retry does not work, but I can always skip.
But I curious where this error is coming from and how to fix it?



Update 1:
I found the problem file/folder on the original drive. Here is some info on it.



Name: LocalCache
Type: Link (broken) (inode/symlink)
Link target: unsupported reparse point
Size: 25 bytes


Update 2:



Running terminal stat command on this file returned:



File: LocalCache -> unsupported reparse point
Size: 25 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 symbolic link
Device: 824h/2084d Inode: 918487 Links: 2
Access: (0777/lrwxrwxrwx) Uid: ( 999/ ubuntu) Gid: ( 999/ ubuntu)
Access: 2019-02-24 00:33:56.728640800 +0000
Modify: 2018-10-30 17:29:05.927748100 +0000
Change: 2018-10-30 17:29:05.927748100 +0000
Birth: -






boot windows-10 copy






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago







user1700890

















asked 2 hours ago









user1700890user1700890

135139




135139








  • 1





    Have you looked at what the actual file is (& directory in which it resides); ie. what is in that directory? If you see the file, what type (file) of file is it? can you stat it? to view attributes for clues etc. If you're happy with keeping it I'd them mv or rename it to rename it IF i believed it safe & wanted; otherwise I'd just rm it & restore a backup. these are random thoughts - I alter where I go by what I see in prior step...

    – guiverc
    2 hours ago











  • @guiverc, Thank you for reply! I added update. I am not even sure if it is file or folder. I would rather keep it if possible.

    – user1700890
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    the commands used do not change if it's a file or folder. file would have reported it's a folder if you'd use that (file is a command to determine file type [using contents of file and not it's name]) I'd also suggest when you copy/paste output you provide context (ie. command used to create output; you saw the command, we didn't & may make false assumptions...)

    – guiverc
    1 hour ago













  • @guiverc Sorry I did not clarify, I am copying them using standard Ubuntu GUI, I do not remember proper name of it

    – user1700890
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Okay, I use command usually (not nautilus which is probably what you're using). It's not a real file, but a file-entry pointing to a inode (block/cluster) used by another file ... stat would have provided this info (i'm used to looking at command line). Since it's not a Ubuntu fs, it may not see everything windows sees, but I'd skip it (you could manually ln -s it later, but to be useful in windows it would need to be done within windows.

    – guiverc
    1 hour ago














  • 1





    Have you looked at what the actual file is (& directory in which it resides); ie. what is in that directory? If you see the file, what type (file) of file is it? can you stat it? to view attributes for clues etc. If you're happy with keeping it I'd them mv or rename it to rename it IF i believed it safe & wanted; otherwise I'd just rm it & restore a backup. these are random thoughts - I alter where I go by what I see in prior step...

    – guiverc
    2 hours ago











  • @guiverc, Thank you for reply! I added update. I am not even sure if it is file or folder. I would rather keep it if possible.

    – user1700890
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    the commands used do not change if it's a file or folder. file would have reported it's a folder if you'd use that (file is a command to determine file type [using contents of file and not it's name]) I'd also suggest when you copy/paste output you provide context (ie. command used to create output; you saw the command, we didn't & may make false assumptions...)

    – guiverc
    1 hour ago













  • @guiverc Sorry I did not clarify, I am copying them using standard Ubuntu GUI, I do not remember proper name of it

    – user1700890
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Okay, I use command usually (not nautilus which is probably what you're using). It's not a real file, but a file-entry pointing to a inode (block/cluster) used by another file ... stat would have provided this info (i'm used to looking at command line). Since it's not a Ubuntu fs, it may not see everything windows sees, but I'd skip it (you could manually ln -s it later, but to be useful in windows it would need to be done within windows.

    – guiverc
    1 hour ago








1




1





Have you looked at what the actual file is (& directory in which it resides); ie. what is in that directory? If you see the file, what type (file) of file is it? can you stat it? to view attributes for clues etc. If you're happy with keeping it I'd them mv or rename it to rename it IF i believed it safe & wanted; otherwise I'd just rm it & restore a backup. these are random thoughts - I alter where I go by what I see in prior step...

– guiverc
2 hours ago





Have you looked at what the actual file is (& directory in which it resides); ie. what is in that directory? If you see the file, what type (file) of file is it? can you stat it? to view attributes for clues etc. If you're happy with keeping it I'd them mv or rename it to rename it IF i believed it safe & wanted; otherwise I'd just rm it & restore a backup. these are random thoughts - I alter where I go by what I see in prior step...

– guiverc
2 hours ago













@guiverc, Thank you for reply! I added update. I am not even sure if it is file or folder. I would rather keep it if possible.

– user1700890
1 hour ago





@guiverc, Thank you for reply! I added update. I am not even sure if it is file or folder. I would rather keep it if possible.

– user1700890
1 hour ago




1




1





the commands used do not change if it's a file or folder. file would have reported it's a folder if you'd use that (file is a command to determine file type [using contents of file and not it's name]) I'd also suggest when you copy/paste output you provide context (ie. command used to create output; you saw the command, we didn't & may make false assumptions...)

– guiverc
1 hour ago







the commands used do not change if it's a file or folder. file would have reported it's a folder if you'd use that (file is a command to determine file type [using contents of file and not it's name]) I'd also suggest when you copy/paste output you provide context (ie. command used to create output; you saw the command, we didn't & may make false assumptions...)

– guiverc
1 hour ago















@guiverc Sorry I did not clarify, I am copying them using standard Ubuntu GUI, I do not remember proper name of it

– user1700890
1 hour ago





@guiverc Sorry I did not clarify, I am copying them using standard Ubuntu GUI, I do not remember proper name of it

– user1700890
1 hour ago




1




1





Okay, I use command usually (not nautilus which is probably what you're using). It's not a real file, but a file-entry pointing to a inode (block/cluster) used by another file ... stat would have provided this info (i'm used to looking at command line). Since it's not a Ubuntu fs, it may not see everything windows sees, but I'd skip it (you could manually ln -s it later, but to be useful in windows it would need to be done within windows.

– guiverc
1 hour ago





Okay, I use command usually (not nautilus which is probably what you're using). It's not a real file, but a file-entry pointing to a inode (block/cluster) used by another file ... stat would have provided this info (i'm used to looking at command line). Since it's not a Ubuntu fs, it may not see everything windows sees, but I'd skip it (you could manually ln -s it later, but to be useful in windows it would need to be done within windows.

– guiverc
1 hour ago










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1120752%2fcopying-drive-with-windows-installation-under-ubuntu-18%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1120752%2fcopying-drive-with-windows-installation-under-ubuntu-18%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

GameSpot

日野市

Tu-95轟炸機