How much is too much when it comes to diagrams in a research article?












3















This is actually specific to mathematics. In particular, in the sub field of category theory, differential geometry, algebraic geometry.



Question is as mentioned above.




How much is too much when it comes to diagrams in a research article?



Do more diagrams annoy a reader?




I did not expect this question to create so much confusion. May be some one who has experience (don’t ask how much) in reading research articles in mathematics (pure mathematics, if that makes some difference) can say something relevant as it differs from one field to another field.



By diagram, I do not mean graphs. I want to explain the setup in diagrams. I do not know if it reach correctly but, I want to add diagram of heart and not graph of case study how many times it beats in different persons of different age or something like that.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Praphulla Koushik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_without_words

    – JeffE
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    1,000,000 is too much. That is not a sharp upper bound. Anything that claims to be a sharp upper bound is probably absurd, hence your question lacks a precise answer. What sort of answer were you expecting?Something definite like 42?

    – John Coleman
    4 hours ago













  • @JohnColeman Please see edit.

    – Praphulla Koushik
    3 hours ago








  • 1





    In the three fields you mention, graphical explanations are very well-established. So "too many" is going to be entirely a matter of personal taste. I've seen plenty of of papers that seemed like they were half pictures.

    – Elizabeth Henning
    2 hours ago











  • @ElizabethHenning Thanks for your comment... I do feel the same, just wanted to see other persons view...

    – Praphulla Koushik
    2 hours ago
















3















This is actually specific to mathematics. In particular, in the sub field of category theory, differential geometry, algebraic geometry.



Question is as mentioned above.




How much is too much when it comes to diagrams in a research article?



Do more diagrams annoy a reader?




I did not expect this question to create so much confusion. May be some one who has experience (don’t ask how much) in reading research articles in mathematics (pure mathematics, if that makes some difference) can say something relevant as it differs from one field to another field.



By diagram, I do not mean graphs. I want to explain the setup in diagrams. I do not know if it reach correctly but, I want to add diagram of heart and not graph of case study how many times it beats in different persons of different age or something like that.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Praphulla Koushik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_without_words

    – JeffE
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    1,000,000 is too much. That is not a sharp upper bound. Anything that claims to be a sharp upper bound is probably absurd, hence your question lacks a precise answer. What sort of answer were you expecting?Something definite like 42?

    – John Coleman
    4 hours ago













  • @JohnColeman Please see edit.

    – Praphulla Koushik
    3 hours ago








  • 1





    In the three fields you mention, graphical explanations are very well-established. So "too many" is going to be entirely a matter of personal taste. I've seen plenty of of papers that seemed like they were half pictures.

    – Elizabeth Henning
    2 hours ago











  • @ElizabethHenning Thanks for your comment... I do feel the same, just wanted to see other persons view...

    – Praphulla Koushik
    2 hours ago














3












3








3








This is actually specific to mathematics. In particular, in the sub field of category theory, differential geometry, algebraic geometry.



Question is as mentioned above.




How much is too much when it comes to diagrams in a research article?



Do more diagrams annoy a reader?




I did not expect this question to create so much confusion. May be some one who has experience (don’t ask how much) in reading research articles in mathematics (pure mathematics, if that makes some difference) can say something relevant as it differs from one field to another field.



By diagram, I do not mean graphs. I want to explain the setup in diagrams. I do not know if it reach correctly but, I want to add diagram of heart and not graph of case study how many times it beats in different persons of different age or something like that.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Praphulla Koushik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












This is actually specific to mathematics. In particular, in the sub field of category theory, differential geometry, algebraic geometry.



Question is as mentioned above.




How much is too much when it comes to diagrams in a research article?



Do more diagrams annoy a reader?




I did not expect this question to create so much confusion. May be some one who has experience (don’t ask how much) in reading research articles in mathematics (pure mathematics, if that makes some difference) can say something relevant as it differs from one field to another field.



By diagram, I do not mean graphs. I want to explain the setup in diagrams. I do not know if it reach correctly but, I want to add diagram of heart and not graph of case study how many times it beats in different persons of different age or something like that.







publications mathematics






share|improve this question









New contributor




Praphulla Koushik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Praphulla Koushik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago







Praphulla Koushik













New contributor




Praphulla Koushik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 15 hours ago









Praphulla KoushikPraphulla Koushik

1194




1194




New contributor




Praphulla Koushik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Praphulla Koushik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Praphulla Koushik is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_without_words

    – JeffE
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    1,000,000 is too much. That is not a sharp upper bound. Anything that claims to be a sharp upper bound is probably absurd, hence your question lacks a precise answer. What sort of answer were you expecting?Something definite like 42?

    – John Coleman
    4 hours ago













  • @JohnColeman Please see edit.

    – Praphulla Koushik
    3 hours ago








  • 1





    In the three fields you mention, graphical explanations are very well-established. So "too many" is going to be entirely a matter of personal taste. I've seen plenty of of papers that seemed like they were half pictures.

    – Elizabeth Henning
    2 hours ago











  • @ElizabethHenning Thanks for your comment... I do feel the same, just wanted to see other persons view...

    – Praphulla Koushik
    2 hours ago



















  • en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_without_words

    – JeffE
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    1,000,000 is too much. That is not a sharp upper bound. Anything that claims to be a sharp upper bound is probably absurd, hence your question lacks a precise answer. What sort of answer were you expecting?Something definite like 42?

    – John Coleman
    4 hours ago













  • @JohnColeman Please see edit.

    – Praphulla Koushik
    3 hours ago








  • 1





    In the three fields you mention, graphical explanations are very well-established. So "too many" is going to be entirely a matter of personal taste. I've seen plenty of of papers that seemed like they were half pictures.

    – Elizabeth Henning
    2 hours ago











  • @ElizabethHenning Thanks for your comment... I do feel the same, just wanted to see other persons view...

    – Praphulla Koushik
    2 hours ago

















en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_without_words

– JeffE
6 hours ago





en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_without_words

– JeffE
6 hours ago




2




2





1,000,000 is too much. That is not a sharp upper bound. Anything that claims to be a sharp upper bound is probably absurd, hence your question lacks a precise answer. What sort of answer were you expecting?Something definite like 42?

– John Coleman
4 hours ago







1,000,000 is too much. That is not a sharp upper bound. Anything that claims to be a sharp upper bound is probably absurd, hence your question lacks a precise answer. What sort of answer were you expecting?Something definite like 42?

– John Coleman
4 hours ago















@JohnColeman Please see edit.

– Praphulla Koushik
3 hours ago







@JohnColeman Please see edit.

– Praphulla Koushik
3 hours ago






1




1





In the three fields you mention, graphical explanations are very well-established. So "too many" is going to be entirely a matter of personal taste. I've seen plenty of of papers that seemed like they were half pictures.

– Elizabeth Henning
2 hours ago





In the three fields you mention, graphical explanations are very well-established. So "too many" is going to be entirely a matter of personal taste. I've seen plenty of of papers that seemed like they were half pictures.

– Elizabeth Henning
2 hours ago













@ElizabethHenning Thanks for your comment... I do feel the same, just wanted to see other persons view...

– Praphulla Koushik
2 hours ago





@ElizabethHenning Thanks for your comment... I do feel the same, just wanted to see other persons view...

– Praphulla Koushik
2 hours ago










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















3














That entirely depends on the article itself. In some cases diagrams aid an explanation and make it clearer. In others they offer little insight. If an article depends on having many diagrams of the former kind, then I don't see that "too many" is an issue. But even a few of the latter kind may just get in the way of understanding.



Words and pictures can be complementary. It is a judgement call by the authors as to which is best in a given case. They may err a bit, but that is human nature.



In general, think about whether words or pictures/figures better convey your meaning and act accordingly. Sometimes both are needed. Examples illustrating (note the word) a concept are often best presented in figures. Imagine a Calculus textbook without figures. Now imagine one without formulae. Would either work?






share|improve this answer
























  • Thanks for your suggestion. I will keep in mind.. I have not much to ask on what you said...

    – Praphulla Koushik
    13 hours ago



















3














I looked at 5 papers of mine in experimental science. The results:



enter image description here



As you can see, it's about ~1-2 figures per typeset page. I did count "panels" (a), (b), etc. as separate figures even though not numbered that way as they are separate on the page.



I never got any push back or even questions on figures from journals or reviewers. Had one co-author on D ask me to pull 3 modeled regressions (or number would have been higher). But the objection was not visual impact but just that he disagreed we needed to show a negative relationship.



In terms of what to show, they were almost all just data graphs and are in the results section. Maybe once or twice I showed a "cartoon" in discussion. Intro, methods, and conclusion tend to be figure free. So the figures are concentrated in the middle of the paper.



I really never wondered what to show--felt intuitive.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Thanks for your suggestion. I will keep in mind.. I have not much to ask on what you said...

    – Praphulla Koushik
    13 hours ago











  • +1 thanks for the work, good approach, as you have to explain the figures also in the floating text

    – Michael Schmidt
    12 hours ago











  • Um yes. "Figure 1 shows the change in X with Y. It is linear from a to b. Blabla." I also use detailed figure captions that clearly mention axes, symbols and main insight. Figure captions are high gain text for a science paper reader. (This is normal practice in good experimental reports.)

    – guest
    12 hours ago











  • What do you mean by figure captions??

    – Praphulla Koushik
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    e-education.psu.edu/styleforstudents/c4_p12.html See examples here: cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.northwestern.edu/dist/f/44/files/…

    – guest
    12 hours ago



















2














I'm assuming by "diagrams" you mean computations done in graphical rather than inline symbolic form. In this case the answer depends on the field and on the reader--some people find a multi-page diagrammatic calculation annoying if it could be expressed more succinctly (if also more opaquely) using standard symbolic notation. However, there has been a general trend towards diagrammatic calculations, so it's a bit more au courant even if it annoys the old guard.



If on the other hand you mean "illustrating pictures," I think it's safe to say everybody likes looking at those.






share|improve this answer
























  • Thanks for your answer.... I like “it is a bit more au courant even if it annoys the old guard”.. :) :)

    – Praphulla Koushik
    3 hours ago



















2














Personally, I like more diagrams in a paper with good captions.
More complex mental visualization can be aided greatly with diagrams.
If I am skimming through a paper, a diagram will catch my attention more easily, and if the caption does a good job of explaining by itself (with fewer prerequisites from the text of the paper), I am more likely to read other portions of paper in more detail. This is especially true for experimental results. Conversely, not having good captions defeats the purpose of the diagram. My opinion is based on computer science research papers in my small area, however, one of my favorite example is from mathematics






share|improve this answer










New contributor




zimbra314 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




























    1














    I suspect there will be a practical limit related to experimental/theoretical sciences. You should also consider how peers start to read an article. This will vary a lot, I will often read the abstract first and then take immediately a look on the figures, then, maybe, I switch to conclusion, then, maybe, I start from the introduction. If your results are important and understandable easily, your paper will become cited many times in any way and peers are more inclined to read it, if you present a new method as a unknown researcher, I would apply a poster strategy and think thoroughly about what the 1-2 key statements/messages are you want to present instead of bombarding the reader with redundant figures. The attention span you get is the unknown parameter. Basically, there should be not much redundancy in your paper, therefore the the data/figures IMO should be compressed as much as possible withoug looking cluttered. This is an art and science you have to practice and you should carefully analyse how it can be improved whenever reading other papers. Asking how much figures are too much is leading away from the key problem here, which is attainable attention.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Michael Schmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















    • What do you think one should do for “attainable attention “

      – Praphulla Koushik
      11 hours ago











    • @PraphullaKoushik you cannot "do", you should be aware of limited attention and that some readers of your article only overfly it, so the quality/amount of your figures and that the reader is able to fastly deduce the main statements of your paper is really important to increase its chances to get cited!

      – Michael Schmidt
      7 hours ago



















    1














    There are fashions in these matters. When I was an undergraduate over 50 years ago, the presentation of pure mathematics was very strongly influenced by the Bourbaki school, which emphasised extreme abstraction. Diagrams were not allowed! If you wanted to study geometry in the two-dimensional Euclidean plane you first should master the geometries in n dimensions (no diagrams possible) and then set n=2.



    The reasoning behind this idea, which I must say rendered some of my courses incomprehensible, was that diagrams can mislead.



    The question to ask yourself is what you are trying to communicate and to whom. If you know your audience than you will know whether they like lots of pictures or, like the Bourbaki crowd, hate them. If, as is most likely, you do not know your audience, you can bet that what they most want from you is writing, with or without pictures, that is easy to understand.



    In short, put in graphics to aid understanding amongst your readers not just to make the paper look pretty.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "415"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Praphulla Koushik is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125440%2fhow-much-is-too-much-when-it-comes-to-diagrams-in-a-research-article%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes








      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      That entirely depends on the article itself. In some cases diagrams aid an explanation and make it clearer. In others they offer little insight. If an article depends on having many diagrams of the former kind, then I don't see that "too many" is an issue. But even a few of the latter kind may just get in the way of understanding.



      Words and pictures can be complementary. It is a judgement call by the authors as to which is best in a given case. They may err a bit, but that is human nature.



      In general, think about whether words or pictures/figures better convey your meaning and act accordingly. Sometimes both are needed. Examples illustrating (note the word) a concept are often best presented in figures. Imagine a Calculus textbook without figures. Now imagine one without formulae. Would either work?






      share|improve this answer
























      • Thanks for your suggestion. I will keep in mind.. I have not much to ask on what you said...

        – Praphulla Koushik
        13 hours ago
















      3














      That entirely depends on the article itself. In some cases diagrams aid an explanation and make it clearer. In others they offer little insight. If an article depends on having many diagrams of the former kind, then I don't see that "too many" is an issue. But even a few of the latter kind may just get in the way of understanding.



      Words and pictures can be complementary. It is a judgement call by the authors as to which is best in a given case. They may err a bit, but that is human nature.



      In general, think about whether words or pictures/figures better convey your meaning and act accordingly. Sometimes both are needed. Examples illustrating (note the word) a concept are often best presented in figures. Imagine a Calculus textbook without figures. Now imagine one without formulae. Would either work?






      share|improve this answer
























      • Thanks for your suggestion. I will keep in mind.. I have not much to ask on what you said...

        – Praphulla Koushik
        13 hours ago














      3












      3








      3







      That entirely depends on the article itself. In some cases diagrams aid an explanation and make it clearer. In others they offer little insight. If an article depends on having many diagrams of the former kind, then I don't see that "too many" is an issue. But even a few of the latter kind may just get in the way of understanding.



      Words and pictures can be complementary. It is a judgement call by the authors as to which is best in a given case. They may err a bit, but that is human nature.



      In general, think about whether words or pictures/figures better convey your meaning and act accordingly. Sometimes both are needed. Examples illustrating (note the word) a concept are often best presented in figures. Imagine a Calculus textbook without figures. Now imagine one without formulae. Would either work?






      share|improve this answer













      That entirely depends on the article itself. In some cases diagrams aid an explanation and make it clearer. In others they offer little insight. If an article depends on having many diagrams of the former kind, then I don't see that "too many" is an issue. But even a few of the latter kind may just get in the way of understanding.



      Words and pictures can be complementary. It is a judgement call by the authors as to which is best in a given case. They may err a bit, but that is human nature.



      In general, think about whether words or pictures/figures better convey your meaning and act accordingly. Sometimes both are needed. Examples illustrating (note the word) a concept are often best presented in figures. Imagine a Calculus textbook without figures. Now imagine one without formulae. Would either work?







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 14 hours ago









      BuffyBuffy

      48.3k13159242




      48.3k13159242













      • Thanks for your suggestion. I will keep in mind.. I have not much to ask on what you said...

        – Praphulla Koushik
        13 hours ago



















      • Thanks for your suggestion. I will keep in mind.. I have not much to ask on what you said...

        – Praphulla Koushik
        13 hours ago

















      Thanks for your suggestion. I will keep in mind.. I have not much to ask on what you said...

      – Praphulla Koushik
      13 hours ago





      Thanks for your suggestion. I will keep in mind.. I have not much to ask on what you said...

      – Praphulla Koushik
      13 hours ago











      3














      I looked at 5 papers of mine in experimental science. The results:



      enter image description here



      As you can see, it's about ~1-2 figures per typeset page. I did count "panels" (a), (b), etc. as separate figures even though not numbered that way as they are separate on the page.



      I never got any push back or even questions on figures from journals or reviewers. Had one co-author on D ask me to pull 3 modeled regressions (or number would have been higher). But the objection was not visual impact but just that he disagreed we needed to show a negative relationship.



      In terms of what to show, they were almost all just data graphs and are in the results section. Maybe once or twice I showed a "cartoon" in discussion. Intro, methods, and conclusion tend to be figure free. So the figures are concentrated in the middle of the paper.



      I really never wondered what to show--felt intuitive.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      • Thanks for your suggestion. I will keep in mind.. I have not much to ask on what you said...

        – Praphulla Koushik
        13 hours ago











      • +1 thanks for the work, good approach, as you have to explain the figures also in the floating text

        – Michael Schmidt
        12 hours ago











      • Um yes. "Figure 1 shows the change in X with Y. It is linear from a to b. Blabla." I also use detailed figure captions that clearly mention axes, symbols and main insight. Figure captions are high gain text for a science paper reader. (This is normal practice in good experimental reports.)

        – guest
        12 hours ago











      • What do you mean by figure captions??

        – Praphulla Koushik
        12 hours ago






      • 1





        e-education.psu.edu/styleforstudents/c4_p12.html See examples here: cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.northwestern.edu/dist/f/44/files/…

        – guest
        12 hours ago
















      3














      I looked at 5 papers of mine in experimental science. The results:



      enter image description here



      As you can see, it's about ~1-2 figures per typeset page. I did count "panels" (a), (b), etc. as separate figures even though not numbered that way as they are separate on the page.



      I never got any push back or even questions on figures from journals or reviewers. Had one co-author on D ask me to pull 3 modeled regressions (or number would have been higher). But the objection was not visual impact but just that he disagreed we needed to show a negative relationship.



      In terms of what to show, they were almost all just data graphs and are in the results section. Maybe once or twice I showed a "cartoon" in discussion. Intro, methods, and conclusion tend to be figure free. So the figures are concentrated in the middle of the paper.



      I really never wondered what to show--felt intuitive.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      • Thanks for your suggestion. I will keep in mind.. I have not much to ask on what you said...

        – Praphulla Koushik
        13 hours ago











      • +1 thanks for the work, good approach, as you have to explain the figures also in the floating text

        – Michael Schmidt
        12 hours ago











      • Um yes. "Figure 1 shows the change in X with Y. It is linear from a to b. Blabla." I also use detailed figure captions that clearly mention axes, symbols and main insight. Figure captions are high gain text for a science paper reader. (This is normal practice in good experimental reports.)

        – guest
        12 hours ago











      • What do you mean by figure captions??

        – Praphulla Koushik
        12 hours ago






      • 1





        e-education.psu.edu/styleforstudents/c4_p12.html See examples here: cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.northwestern.edu/dist/f/44/files/…

        – guest
        12 hours ago














      3












      3








      3







      I looked at 5 papers of mine in experimental science. The results:



      enter image description here



      As you can see, it's about ~1-2 figures per typeset page. I did count "panels" (a), (b), etc. as separate figures even though not numbered that way as they are separate on the page.



      I never got any push back or even questions on figures from journals or reviewers. Had one co-author on D ask me to pull 3 modeled regressions (or number would have been higher). But the objection was not visual impact but just that he disagreed we needed to show a negative relationship.



      In terms of what to show, they were almost all just data graphs and are in the results section. Maybe once or twice I showed a "cartoon" in discussion. Intro, methods, and conclusion tend to be figure free. So the figures are concentrated in the middle of the paper.



      I really never wondered what to show--felt intuitive.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      I looked at 5 papers of mine in experimental science. The results:



      enter image description here



      As you can see, it's about ~1-2 figures per typeset page. I did count "panels" (a), (b), etc. as separate figures even though not numbered that way as they are separate on the page.



      I never got any push back or even questions on figures from journals or reviewers. Had one co-author on D ask me to pull 3 modeled regressions (or number would have been higher). But the objection was not visual impact but just that he disagreed we needed to show a negative relationship.



      In terms of what to show, they were almost all just data graphs and are in the results section. Maybe once or twice I showed a "cartoon" in discussion. Intro, methods, and conclusion tend to be figure free. So the figures are concentrated in the middle of the paper.



      I really never wondered what to show--felt intuitive.







      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer






      New contributor




      guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      answered 13 hours ago









      guestguest

      1252




      1252




      New contributor




      guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.













      • Thanks for your suggestion. I will keep in mind.. I have not much to ask on what you said...

        – Praphulla Koushik
        13 hours ago











      • +1 thanks for the work, good approach, as you have to explain the figures also in the floating text

        – Michael Schmidt
        12 hours ago











      • Um yes. "Figure 1 shows the change in X with Y. It is linear from a to b. Blabla." I also use detailed figure captions that clearly mention axes, symbols and main insight. Figure captions are high gain text for a science paper reader. (This is normal practice in good experimental reports.)

        – guest
        12 hours ago











      • What do you mean by figure captions??

        – Praphulla Koushik
        12 hours ago






      • 1





        e-education.psu.edu/styleforstudents/c4_p12.html See examples here: cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.northwestern.edu/dist/f/44/files/…

        – guest
        12 hours ago



















      • Thanks for your suggestion. I will keep in mind.. I have not much to ask on what you said...

        – Praphulla Koushik
        13 hours ago











      • +1 thanks for the work, good approach, as you have to explain the figures also in the floating text

        – Michael Schmidt
        12 hours ago











      • Um yes. "Figure 1 shows the change in X with Y. It is linear from a to b. Blabla." I also use detailed figure captions that clearly mention axes, symbols and main insight. Figure captions are high gain text for a science paper reader. (This is normal practice in good experimental reports.)

        – guest
        12 hours ago











      • What do you mean by figure captions??

        – Praphulla Koushik
        12 hours ago






      • 1





        e-education.psu.edu/styleforstudents/c4_p12.html See examples here: cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.northwestern.edu/dist/f/44/files/…

        – guest
        12 hours ago

















      Thanks for your suggestion. I will keep in mind.. I have not much to ask on what you said...

      – Praphulla Koushik
      13 hours ago





      Thanks for your suggestion. I will keep in mind.. I have not much to ask on what you said...

      – Praphulla Koushik
      13 hours ago













      +1 thanks for the work, good approach, as you have to explain the figures also in the floating text

      – Michael Schmidt
      12 hours ago





      +1 thanks for the work, good approach, as you have to explain the figures also in the floating text

      – Michael Schmidt
      12 hours ago













      Um yes. "Figure 1 shows the change in X with Y. It is linear from a to b. Blabla." I also use detailed figure captions that clearly mention axes, symbols and main insight. Figure captions are high gain text for a science paper reader. (This is normal practice in good experimental reports.)

      – guest
      12 hours ago





      Um yes. "Figure 1 shows the change in X with Y. It is linear from a to b. Blabla." I also use detailed figure captions that clearly mention axes, symbols and main insight. Figure captions are high gain text for a science paper reader. (This is normal practice in good experimental reports.)

      – guest
      12 hours ago













      What do you mean by figure captions??

      – Praphulla Koushik
      12 hours ago





      What do you mean by figure captions??

      – Praphulla Koushik
      12 hours ago




      1




      1





      e-education.psu.edu/styleforstudents/c4_p12.html See examples here: cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.northwestern.edu/dist/f/44/files/…

      – guest
      12 hours ago





      e-education.psu.edu/styleforstudents/c4_p12.html See examples here: cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.northwestern.edu/dist/f/44/files/…

      – guest
      12 hours ago











      2














      I'm assuming by "diagrams" you mean computations done in graphical rather than inline symbolic form. In this case the answer depends on the field and on the reader--some people find a multi-page diagrammatic calculation annoying if it could be expressed more succinctly (if also more opaquely) using standard symbolic notation. However, there has been a general trend towards diagrammatic calculations, so it's a bit more au courant even if it annoys the old guard.



      If on the other hand you mean "illustrating pictures," I think it's safe to say everybody likes looking at those.






      share|improve this answer
























      • Thanks for your answer.... I like “it is a bit more au courant even if it annoys the old guard”.. :) :)

        – Praphulla Koushik
        3 hours ago
















      2














      I'm assuming by "diagrams" you mean computations done in graphical rather than inline symbolic form. In this case the answer depends on the field and on the reader--some people find a multi-page diagrammatic calculation annoying if it could be expressed more succinctly (if also more opaquely) using standard symbolic notation. However, there has been a general trend towards diagrammatic calculations, so it's a bit more au courant even if it annoys the old guard.



      If on the other hand you mean "illustrating pictures," I think it's safe to say everybody likes looking at those.






      share|improve this answer
























      • Thanks for your answer.... I like “it is a bit more au courant even if it annoys the old guard”.. :) :)

        – Praphulla Koushik
        3 hours ago














      2












      2








      2







      I'm assuming by "diagrams" you mean computations done in graphical rather than inline symbolic form. In this case the answer depends on the field and on the reader--some people find a multi-page diagrammatic calculation annoying if it could be expressed more succinctly (if also more opaquely) using standard symbolic notation. However, there has been a general trend towards diagrammatic calculations, so it's a bit more au courant even if it annoys the old guard.



      If on the other hand you mean "illustrating pictures," I think it's safe to say everybody likes looking at those.






      share|improve this answer













      I'm assuming by "diagrams" you mean computations done in graphical rather than inline symbolic form. In this case the answer depends on the field and on the reader--some people find a multi-page diagrammatic calculation annoying if it could be expressed more succinctly (if also more opaquely) using standard symbolic notation. However, there has been a general trend towards diagrammatic calculations, so it's a bit more au courant even if it annoys the old guard.



      If on the other hand you mean "illustrating pictures," I think it's safe to say everybody likes looking at those.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 6 hours ago









      Elizabeth HenningElizabeth Henning

      5,76211033




      5,76211033













      • Thanks for your answer.... I like “it is a bit more au courant even if it annoys the old guard”.. :) :)

        – Praphulla Koushik
        3 hours ago



















      • Thanks for your answer.... I like “it is a bit more au courant even if it annoys the old guard”.. :) :)

        – Praphulla Koushik
        3 hours ago

















      Thanks for your answer.... I like “it is a bit more au courant even if it annoys the old guard”.. :) :)

      – Praphulla Koushik
      3 hours ago





      Thanks for your answer.... I like “it is a bit more au courant even if it annoys the old guard”.. :) :)

      – Praphulla Koushik
      3 hours ago











      2














      Personally, I like more diagrams in a paper with good captions.
      More complex mental visualization can be aided greatly with diagrams.
      If I am skimming through a paper, a diagram will catch my attention more easily, and if the caption does a good job of explaining by itself (with fewer prerequisites from the text of the paper), I am more likely to read other portions of paper in more detail. This is especially true for experimental results. Conversely, not having good captions defeats the purpose of the diagram. My opinion is based on computer science research papers in my small area, however, one of my favorite example is from mathematics






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      zimbra314 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.

























        2














        Personally, I like more diagrams in a paper with good captions.
        More complex mental visualization can be aided greatly with diagrams.
        If I am skimming through a paper, a diagram will catch my attention more easily, and if the caption does a good job of explaining by itself (with fewer prerequisites from the text of the paper), I am more likely to read other portions of paper in more detail. This is especially true for experimental results. Conversely, not having good captions defeats the purpose of the diagram. My opinion is based on computer science research papers in my small area, however, one of my favorite example is from mathematics






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        zimbra314 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.























          2












          2








          2







          Personally, I like more diagrams in a paper with good captions.
          More complex mental visualization can be aided greatly with diagrams.
          If I am skimming through a paper, a diagram will catch my attention more easily, and if the caption does a good job of explaining by itself (with fewer prerequisites from the text of the paper), I am more likely to read other portions of paper in more detail. This is especially true for experimental results. Conversely, not having good captions defeats the purpose of the diagram. My opinion is based on computer science research papers in my small area, however, one of my favorite example is from mathematics






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          zimbra314 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.










          Personally, I like more diagrams in a paper with good captions.
          More complex mental visualization can be aided greatly with diagrams.
          If I am skimming through a paper, a diagram will catch my attention more easily, and if the caption does a good job of explaining by itself (with fewer prerequisites from the text of the paper), I am more likely to read other portions of paper in more detail. This is especially true for experimental results. Conversely, not having good captions defeats the purpose of the diagram. My opinion is based on computer science research papers in my small area, however, one of my favorite example is from mathematics







          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          zimbra314 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 6 hours ago





















          New contributor




          zimbra314 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 9 hours ago









          zimbra314zimbra314

          1213




          1213




          New contributor




          zimbra314 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          zimbra314 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          zimbra314 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.























              1














              I suspect there will be a practical limit related to experimental/theoretical sciences. You should also consider how peers start to read an article. This will vary a lot, I will often read the abstract first and then take immediately a look on the figures, then, maybe, I switch to conclusion, then, maybe, I start from the introduction. If your results are important and understandable easily, your paper will become cited many times in any way and peers are more inclined to read it, if you present a new method as a unknown researcher, I would apply a poster strategy and think thoroughly about what the 1-2 key statements/messages are you want to present instead of bombarding the reader with redundant figures. The attention span you get is the unknown parameter. Basically, there should be not much redundancy in your paper, therefore the the data/figures IMO should be compressed as much as possible withoug looking cluttered. This is an art and science you have to practice and you should carefully analyse how it can be improved whenever reading other papers. Asking how much figures are too much is leading away from the key problem here, which is attainable attention.






              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Michael Schmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





















              • What do you think one should do for “attainable attention “

                – Praphulla Koushik
                11 hours ago











              • @PraphullaKoushik you cannot "do", you should be aware of limited attention and that some readers of your article only overfly it, so the quality/amount of your figures and that the reader is able to fastly deduce the main statements of your paper is really important to increase its chances to get cited!

                – Michael Schmidt
                7 hours ago
















              1














              I suspect there will be a practical limit related to experimental/theoretical sciences. You should also consider how peers start to read an article. This will vary a lot, I will often read the abstract first and then take immediately a look on the figures, then, maybe, I switch to conclusion, then, maybe, I start from the introduction. If your results are important and understandable easily, your paper will become cited many times in any way and peers are more inclined to read it, if you present a new method as a unknown researcher, I would apply a poster strategy and think thoroughly about what the 1-2 key statements/messages are you want to present instead of bombarding the reader with redundant figures. The attention span you get is the unknown parameter. Basically, there should be not much redundancy in your paper, therefore the the data/figures IMO should be compressed as much as possible withoug looking cluttered. This is an art and science you have to practice and you should carefully analyse how it can be improved whenever reading other papers. Asking how much figures are too much is leading away from the key problem here, which is attainable attention.






              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Michael Schmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





















              • What do you think one should do for “attainable attention “

                – Praphulla Koushik
                11 hours ago











              • @PraphullaKoushik you cannot "do", you should be aware of limited attention and that some readers of your article only overfly it, so the quality/amount of your figures and that the reader is able to fastly deduce the main statements of your paper is really important to increase its chances to get cited!

                – Michael Schmidt
                7 hours ago














              1












              1








              1







              I suspect there will be a practical limit related to experimental/theoretical sciences. You should also consider how peers start to read an article. This will vary a lot, I will often read the abstract first and then take immediately a look on the figures, then, maybe, I switch to conclusion, then, maybe, I start from the introduction. If your results are important and understandable easily, your paper will become cited many times in any way and peers are more inclined to read it, if you present a new method as a unknown researcher, I would apply a poster strategy and think thoroughly about what the 1-2 key statements/messages are you want to present instead of bombarding the reader with redundant figures. The attention span you get is the unknown parameter. Basically, there should be not much redundancy in your paper, therefore the the data/figures IMO should be compressed as much as possible withoug looking cluttered. This is an art and science you have to practice and you should carefully analyse how it can be improved whenever reading other papers. Asking how much figures are too much is leading away from the key problem here, which is attainable attention.






              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Michael Schmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.










              I suspect there will be a practical limit related to experimental/theoretical sciences. You should also consider how peers start to read an article. This will vary a lot, I will often read the abstract first and then take immediately a look on the figures, then, maybe, I switch to conclusion, then, maybe, I start from the introduction. If your results are important and understandable easily, your paper will become cited many times in any way and peers are more inclined to read it, if you present a new method as a unknown researcher, I would apply a poster strategy and think thoroughly about what the 1-2 key statements/messages are you want to present instead of bombarding the reader with redundant figures. The attention span you get is the unknown parameter. Basically, there should be not much redundancy in your paper, therefore the the data/figures IMO should be compressed as much as possible withoug looking cluttered. This is an art and science you have to practice and you should carefully analyse how it can be improved whenever reading other papers. Asking how much figures are too much is leading away from the key problem here, which is attainable attention.







              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Michael Schmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 12 hours ago





















              New contributor




              Michael Schmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              answered 12 hours ago









              Michael SchmidtMichael Schmidt

              30317




              30317




              New contributor




              Michael Schmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              New contributor





              Michael Schmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              Michael Schmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.













              • What do you think one should do for “attainable attention “

                – Praphulla Koushik
                11 hours ago











              • @PraphullaKoushik you cannot "do", you should be aware of limited attention and that some readers of your article only overfly it, so the quality/amount of your figures and that the reader is able to fastly deduce the main statements of your paper is really important to increase its chances to get cited!

                – Michael Schmidt
                7 hours ago



















              • What do you think one should do for “attainable attention “

                – Praphulla Koushik
                11 hours ago











              • @PraphullaKoushik you cannot "do", you should be aware of limited attention and that some readers of your article only overfly it, so the quality/amount of your figures and that the reader is able to fastly deduce the main statements of your paper is really important to increase its chances to get cited!

                – Michael Schmidt
                7 hours ago

















              What do you think one should do for “attainable attention “

              – Praphulla Koushik
              11 hours ago





              What do you think one should do for “attainable attention “

              – Praphulla Koushik
              11 hours ago













              @PraphullaKoushik you cannot "do", you should be aware of limited attention and that some readers of your article only overfly it, so the quality/amount of your figures and that the reader is able to fastly deduce the main statements of your paper is really important to increase its chances to get cited!

              – Michael Schmidt
              7 hours ago





              @PraphullaKoushik you cannot "do", you should be aware of limited attention and that some readers of your article only overfly it, so the quality/amount of your figures and that the reader is able to fastly deduce the main statements of your paper is really important to increase its chances to get cited!

              – Michael Schmidt
              7 hours ago











              1














              There are fashions in these matters. When I was an undergraduate over 50 years ago, the presentation of pure mathematics was very strongly influenced by the Bourbaki school, which emphasised extreme abstraction. Diagrams were not allowed! If you wanted to study geometry in the two-dimensional Euclidean plane you first should master the geometries in n dimensions (no diagrams possible) and then set n=2.



              The reasoning behind this idea, which I must say rendered some of my courses incomprehensible, was that diagrams can mislead.



              The question to ask yourself is what you are trying to communicate and to whom. If you know your audience than you will know whether they like lots of pictures or, like the Bourbaki crowd, hate them. If, as is most likely, you do not know your audience, you can bet that what they most want from you is writing, with or without pictures, that is easy to understand.



              In short, put in graphics to aid understanding amongst your readers not just to make the paper look pretty.






              share|improve this answer




























                1














                There are fashions in these matters. When I was an undergraduate over 50 years ago, the presentation of pure mathematics was very strongly influenced by the Bourbaki school, which emphasised extreme abstraction. Diagrams were not allowed! If you wanted to study geometry in the two-dimensional Euclidean plane you first should master the geometries in n dimensions (no diagrams possible) and then set n=2.



                The reasoning behind this idea, which I must say rendered some of my courses incomprehensible, was that diagrams can mislead.



                The question to ask yourself is what you are trying to communicate and to whom. If you know your audience than you will know whether they like lots of pictures or, like the Bourbaki crowd, hate them. If, as is most likely, you do not know your audience, you can bet that what they most want from you is writing, with or without pictures, that is easy to understand.



                In short, put in graphics to aid understanding amongst your readers not just to make the paper look pretty.






                share|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  There are fashions in these matters. When I was an undergraduate over 50 years ago, the presentation of pure mathematics was very strongly influenced by the Bourbaki school, which emphasised extreme abstraction. Diagrams were not allowed! If you wanted to study geometry in the two-dimensional Euclidean plane you first should master the geometries in n dimensions (no diagrams possible) and then set n=2.



                  The reasoning behind this idea, which I must say rendered some of my courses incomprehensible, was that diagrams can mislead.



                  The question to ask yourself is what you are trying to communicate and to whom. If you know your audience than you will know whether they like lots of pictures or, like the Bourbaki crowd, hate them. If, as is most likely, you do not know your audience, you can bet that what they most want from you is writing, with or without pictures, that is easy to understand.



                  In short, put in graphics to aid understanding amongst your readers not just to make the paper look pretty.






                  share|improve this answer













                  There are fashions in these matters. When I was an undergraduate over 50 years ago, the presentation of pure mathematics was very strongly influenced by the Bourbaki school, which emphasised extreme abstraction. Diagrams were not allowed! If you wanted to study geometry in the two-dimensional Euclidean plane you first should master the geometries in n dimensions (no diagrams possible) and then set n=2.



                  The reasoning behind this idea, which I must say rendered some of my courses incomprehensible, was that diagrams can mislead.



                  The question to ask yourself is what you are trying to communicate and to whom. If you know your audience than you will know whether they like lots of pictures or, like the Bourbaki crowd, hate them. If, as is most likely, you do not know your audience, you can bet that what they most want from you is writing, with or without pictures, that is easy to understand.



                  In short, put in graphics to aid understanding amongst your readers not just to make the paper look pretty.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 3 hours ago









                  JeremyCJeremyC

                  1,00939




                  1,00939






















                      Praphulla Koushik is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Praphulla Koushik is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Praphulla Koushik is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Praphulla Koushik is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125440%2fhow-much-is-too-much-when-it-comes-to-diagrams-in-a-research-article%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      GameSpot

                      日野市

                      Tu-95轟炸機