Is “accuse people to be racist” grammatical?












1















I am not sure if you can use the infinitive here.



I would rather say:




Accuse people of being racist.




The other question is if you can say:




Accuse people of being racists.



Accuse people to be racists.




I sometimes use words like "racist" as noun instead of adjective. Are both ok?










share|improve this question



























    1















    I am not sure if you can use the infinitive here.



    I would rather say:




    Accuse people of being racist.




    The other question is if you can say:




    Accuse people of being racists.



    Accuse people to be racists.




    I sometimes use words like "racist" as noun instead of adjective. Are both ok?










    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1








      I am not sure if you can use the infinitive here.



      I would rather say:




      Accuse people of being racist.




      The other question is if you can say:




      Accuse people of being racists.



      Accuse people to be racists.




      I sometimes use words like "racist" as noun instead of adjective. Are both ok?










      share|improve this question














      I am not sure if you can use the infinitive here.



      I would rather say:




      Accuse people of being racist.




      The other question is if you can say:




      Accuse people of being racists.



      Accuse people to be racists.




      I sometimes use words like "racist" as noun instead of adjective. Are both ok?







      grammar idiomatic-language






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 6 hours ago









      repomonsterrepomonster

      58311




      58311






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          to is for purpose or a place.




          • I went to the field to play football.

          • I wanted to do the work.


          To accuse someone of being something is idiomatic.



          Therefore,to accuse people of being racist.



          racist can be a noun or an adjective.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            The reasoning in this answer seems wrong. You say "to" can be only for a purpose or a place and not a person - but what about "I asked John to be my best man"?

            – Astralbee
            5 hours ago











          • I asked John [purpose] to be my best man. I asked him for that purpose: being my best man.

            – Lambie
            5 hours ago








          • 1





            yes but that doesn't answer the question. The OP doesn't know why "to" can't be used in place of "of" and you've said it is because it isn't a purpose or a place. That isn't the reason at all. What about simply "I went to John (no purpose yet) to to discuss our earlier football game"?

            – Astralbee
            5 hours ago











          • I went to John [place, here a person] to discuss [purpose].Unless you have a place or purpose, you can't use to. It is the reason. You basically say the same thing. Another is: "being racist" can't come after that.

            – Lambie
            2 hours ago



















          3














          "To" is used to express motion or direction either to a literal place, person or thing, or toward a stated goal or a situation.



          When you accuse somebody you are calling them out for something they have done and that "crime" usually has a name. It is correct therefore to say:




          I accused him of being racist.




          or




          I accused him of racism.




          It would be incorrect to say "accuse... to" because there is no implied direction or motion towards something; you are labelling something they have already done.



          There are some other ways you could use "to" with an accusation, however - if you were indicating some kind of movement towards the act.



          Examples:




          Trump's xenophobic vision of America is inciting people to racism.




          This is correct because it suggests that people are moving towards being racist through the process of incitement.




          I consider him to be racist.




          This is correct because consideration is a process of thought so it is described as having motion or direction. Idiomatically this is pretty much the same as accusing someone of something because you are saying that you think they are something.






          share|improve this answer


























          • toward a stated goal= purpose, same thing.

            – Lambie
            5 hours ago



















          2














          The existing answers are right that "accuse people to be racist" doesn't mean the same as "accuse people of being racist".



          It is not entirely incorrect or ungrammatical, however. It just means something different. 'To' indicates direction or purpose. Therefore you could say "I accuse people to be racist" if you are accusing them of something (not stated in that phrase, perhaps not the sentence) in order to be racist yourself.



          So, you could be asked why you keep accusing people (presumably of some specific ethnicity) of some crime, and you could reply:




          I accuse them to be racist.




          Which would mean your purpose in laying the accusations was "to be racist".






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "481"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198011%2fis-accuse-people-to-be-racist-grammatical%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            to is for purpose or a place.




            • I went to the field to play football.

            • I wanted to do the work.


            To accuse someone of being something is idiomatic.



            Therefore,to accuse people of being racist.



            racist can be a noun or an adjective.






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              The reasoning in this answer seems wrong. You say "to" can be only for a purpose or a place and not a person - but what about "I asked John to be my best man"?

              – Astralbee
              5 hours ago











            • I asked John [purpose] to be my best man. I asked him for that purpose: being my best man.

              – Lambie
              5 hours ago








            • 1





              yes but that doesn't answer the question. The OP doesn't know why "to" can't be used in place of "of" and you've said it is because it isn't a purpose or a place. That isn't the reason at all. What about simply "I went to John (no purpose yet) to to discuss our earlier football game"?

              – Astralbee
              5 hours ago











            • I went to John [place, here a person] to discuss [purpose].Unless you have a place or purpose, you can't use to. It is the reason. You basically say the same thing. Another is: "being racist" can't come after that.

              – Lambie
              2 hours ago
















            1














            to is for purpose or a place.




            • I went to the field to play football.

            • I wanted to do the work.


            To accuse someone of being something is idiomatic.



            Therefore,to accuse people of being racist.



            racist can be a noun or an adjective.






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              The reasoning in this answer seems wrong. You say "to" can be only for a purpose or a place and not a person - but what about "I asked John to be my best man"?

              – Astralbee
              5 hours ago











            • I asked John [purpose] to be my best man. I asked him for that purpose: being my best man.

              – Lambie
              5 hours ago








            • 1





              yes but that doesn't answer the question. The OP doesn't know why "to" can't be used in place of "of" and you've said it is because it isn't a purpose or a place. That isn't the reason at all. What about simply "I went to John (no purpose yet) to to discuss our earlier football game"?

              – Astralbee
              5 hours ago











            • I went to John [place, here a person] to discuss [purpose].Unless you have a place or purpose, you can't use to. It is the reason. You basically say the same thing. Another is: "being racist" can't come after that.

              – Lambie
              2 hours ago














            1












            1








            1







            to is for purpose or a place.




            • I went to the field to play football.

            • I wanted to do the work.


            To accuse someone of being something is idiomatic.



            Therefore,to accuse people of being racist.



            racist can be a noun or an adjective.






            share|improve this answer















            to is for purpose or a place.




            • I went to the field to play football.

            • I wanted to do the work.


            To accuse someone of being something is idiomatic.



            Therefore,to accuse people of being racist.



            racist can be a noun or an adjective.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 5 hours ago

























            answered 6 hours ago









            LambieLambie

            15.6k1432




            15.6k1432








            • 1





              The reasoning in this answer seems wrong. You say "to" can be only for a purpose or a place and not a person - but what about "I asked John to be my best man"?

              – Astralbee
              5 hours ago











            • I asked John [purpose] to be my best man. I asked him for that purpose: being my best man.

              – Lambie
              5 hours ago








            • 1





              yes but that doesn't answer the question. The OP doesn't know why "to" can't be used in place of "of" and you've said it is because it isn't a purpose or a place. That isn't the reason at all. What about simply "I went to John (no purpose yet) to to discuss our earlier football game"?

              – Astralbee
              5 hours ago











            • I went to John [place, here a person] to discuss [purpose].Unless you have a place or purpose, you can't use to. It is the reason. You basically say the same thing. Another is: "being racist" can't come after that.

              – Lambie
              2 hours ago














            • 1





              The reasoning in this answer seems wrong. You say "to" can be only for a purpose or a place and not a person - but what about "I asked John to be my best man"?

              – Astralbee
              5 hours ago











            • I asked John [purpose] to be my best man. I asked him for that purpose: being my best man.

              – Lambie
              5 hours ago








            • 1





              yes but that doesn't answer the question. The OP doesn't know why "to" can't be used in place of "of" and you've said it is because it isn't a purpose or a place. That isn't the reason at all. What about simply "I went to John (no purpose yet) to to discuss our earlier football game"?

              – Astralbee
              5 hours ago











            • I went to John [place, here a person] to discuss [purpose].Unless you have a place or purpose, you can't use to. It is the reason. You basically say the same thing. Another is: "being racist" can't come after that.

              – Lambie
              2 hours ago








            1




            1





            The reasoning in this answer seems wrong. You say "to" can be only for a purpose or a place and not a person - but what about "I asked John to be my best man"?

            – Astralbee
            5 hours ago





            The reasoning in this answer seems wrong. You say "to" can be only for a purpose or a place and not a person - but what about "I asked John to be my best man"?

            – Astralbee
            5 hours ago













            I asked John [purpose] to be my best man. I asked him for that purpose: being my best man.

            – Lambie
            5 hours ago







            I asked John [purpose] to be my best man. I asked him for that purpose: being my best man.

            – Lambie
            5 hours ago






            1




            1





            yes but that doesn't answer the question. The OP doesn't know why "to" can't be used in place of "of" and you've said it is because it isn't a purpose or a place. That isn't the reason at all. What about simply "I went to John (no purpose yet) to to discuss our earlier football game"?

            – Astralbee
            5 hours ago





            yes but that doesn't answer the question. The OP doesn't know why "to" can't be used in place of "of" and you've said it is because it isn't a purpose or a place. That isn't the reason at all. What about simply "I went to John (no purpose yet) to to discuss our earlier football game"?

            – Astralbee
            5 hours ago













            I went to John [place, here a person] to discuss [purpose].Unless you have a place or purpose, you can't use to. It is the reason. You basically say the same thing. Another is: "being racist" can't come after that.

            – Lambie
            2 hours ago





            I went to John [place, here a person] to discuss [purpose].Unless you have a place or purpose, you can't use to. It is the reason. You basically say the same thing. Another is: "being racist" can't come after that.

            – Lambie
            2 hours ago













            3














            "To" is used to express motion or direction either to a literal place, person or thing, or toward a stated goal or a situation.



            When you accuse somebody you are calling them out for something they have done and that "crime" usually has a name. It is correct therefore to say:




            I accused him of being racist.




            or




            I accused him of racism.




            It would be incorrect to say "accuse... to" because there is no implied direction or motion towards something; you are labelling something they have already done.



            There are some other ways you could use "to" with an accusation, however - if you were indicating some kind of movement towards the act.



            Examples:




            Trump's xenophobic vision of America is inciting people to racism.




            This is correct because it suggests that people are moving towards being racist through the process of incitement.




            I consider him to be racist.




            This is correct because consideration is a process of thought so it is described as having motion or direction. Idiomatically this is pretty much the same as accusing someone of something because you are saying that you think they are something.






            share|improve this answer


























            • toward a stated goal= purpose, same thing.

              – Lambie
              5 hours ago
















            3














            "To" is used to express motion or direction either to a literal place, person or thing, or toward a stated goal or a situation.



            When you accuse somebody you are calling them out for something they have done and that "crime" usually has a name. It is correct therefore to say:




            I accused him of being racist.




            or




            I accused him of racism.




            It would be incorrect to say "accuse... to" because there is no implied direction or motion towards something; you are labelling something they have already done.



            There are some other ways you could use "to" with an accusation, however - if you were indicating some kind of movement towards the act.



            Examples:




            Trump's xenophobic vision of America is inciting people to racism.




            This is correct because it suggests that people are moving towards being racist through the process of incitement.




            I consider him to be racist.




            This is correct because consideration is a process of thought so it is described as having motion or direction. Idiomatically this is pretty much the same as accusing someone of something because you are saying that you think they are something.






            share|improve this answer


























            • toward a stated goal= purpose, same thing.

              – Lambie
              5 hours ago














            3












            3








            3







            "To" is used to express motion or direction either to a literal place, person or thing, or toward a stated goal or a situation.



            When you accuse somebody you are calling them out for something they have done and that "crime" usually has a name. It is correct therefore to say:




            I accused him of being racist.




            or




            I accused him of racism.




            It would be incorrect to say "accuse... to" because there is no implied direction or motion towards something; you are labelling something they have already done.



            There are some other ways you could use "to" with an accusation, however - if you were indicating some kind of movement towards the act.



            Examples:




            Trump's xenophobic vision of America is inciting people to racism.




            This is correct because it suggests that people are moving towards being racist through the process of incitement.




            I consider him to be racist.




            This is correct because consideration is a process of thought so it is described as having motion or direction. Idiomatically this is pretty much the same as accusing someone of something because you are saying that you think they are something.






            share|improve this answer















            "To" is used to express motion or direction either to a literal place, person or thing, or toward a stated goal or a situation.



            When you accuse somebody you are calling them out for something they have done and that "crime" usually has a name. It is correct therefore to say:




            I accused him of being racist.




            or




            I accused him of racism.




            It would be incorrect to say "accuse... to" because there is no implied direction or motion towards something; you are labelling something they have already done.



            There are some other ways you could use "to" with an accusation, however - if you were indicating some kind of movement towards the act.



            Examples:




            Trump's xenophobic vision of America is inciting people to racism.




            This is correct because it suggests that people are moving towards being racist through the process of incitement.




            I consider him to be racist.




            This is correct because consideration is a process of thought so it is described as having motion or direction. Idiomatically this is pretty much the same as accusing someone of something because you are saying that you think they are something.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 5 hours ago

























            answered 5 hours ago









            AstralbeeAstralbee

            12k1045




            12k1045













            • toward a stated goal= purpose, same thing.

              – Lambie
              5 hours ago



















            • toward a stated goal= purpose, same thing.

              – Lambie
              5 hours ago

















            toward a stated goal= purpose, same thing.

            – Lambie
            5 hours ago





            toward a stated goal= purpose, same thing.

            – Lambie
            5 hours ago











            2














            The existing answers are right that "accuse people to be racist" doesn't mean the same as "accuse people of being racist".



            It is not entirely incorrect or ungrammatical, however. It just means something different. 'To' indicates direction or purpose. Therefore you could say "I accuse people to be racist" if you are accusing them of something (not stated in that phrase, perhaps not the sentence) in order to be racist yourself.



            So, you could be asked why you keep accusing people (presumably of some specific ethnicity) of some crime, and you could reply:




            I accuse them to be racist.




            Which would mean your purpose in laying the accusations was "to be racist".






            share|improve this answer




























              2














              The existing answers are right that "accuse people to be racist" doesn't mean the same as "accuse people of being racist".



              It is not entirely incorrect or ungrammatical, however. It just means something different. 'To' indicates direction or purpose. Therefore you could say "I accuse people to be racist" if you are accusing them of something (not stated in that phrase, perhaps not the sentence) in order to be racist yourself.



              So, you could be asked why you keep accusing people (presumably of some specific ethnicity) of some crime, and you could reply:




              I accuse them to be racist.




              Which would mean your purpose in laying the accusations was "to be racist".






              share|improve this answer


























                2












                2








                2







                The existing answers are right that "accuse people to be racist" doesn't mean the same as "accuse people of being racist".



                It is not entirely incorrect or ungrammatical, however. It just means something different. 'To' indicates direction or purpose. Therefore you could say "I accuse people to be racist" if you are accusing them of something (not stated in that phrase, perhaps not the sentence) in order to be racist yourself.



                So, you could be asked why you keep accusing people (presumably of some specific ethnicity) of some crime, and you could reply:




                I accuse them to be racist.




                Which would mean your purpose in laying the accusations was "to be racist".






                share|improve this answer













                The existing answers are right that "accuse people to be racist" doesn't mean the same as "accuse people of being racist".



                It is not entirely incorrect or ungrammatical, however. It just means something different. 'To' indicates direction or purpose. Therefore you could say "I accuse people to be racist" if you are accusing them of something (not stated in that phrase, perhaps not the sentence) in order to be racist yourself.



                So, you could be asked why you keep accusing people (presumably of some specific ethnicity) of some crime, and you could reply:




                I accuse them to be racist.




                Which would mean your purpose in laying the accusations was "to be racist".







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 hours ago









                SamBCSamBC

                6,109426




                6,109426






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198011%2fis-accuse-people-to-be-racist-grammatical%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    GameSpot

                    日野市

                    Tu-95轟炸機