What type of postprocessing gives the effect of people standing out












2















Below are real photographs, I was present when they were shot. The photographs were taken between 12:00 to 14:00 on a slightly overcast day. The photographer may have taken many frames.



What postprocessing was likely done, such that the people stand out in the photographs?



Meirav in orchid



Cohen family in orchid










share|improve this question









New contributor




Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    its a shame that the photographer has not included the Metadata with his exports, so it is not possible to say precisely what he did, but at a guess, it seems that he has chosen a location that when coupled with a very shallow depth of field, gives an almost surreal effect. pretty much everything at subject level seems in focus and then gradually falls out of focus.

    – Abdul Quraishi
    11 hours ago








  • 5





    It looks like the people were just "photoshopped" onto a different background.

    – Mike Sowsun
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    There seems to be halos and jaggies around the people, especially when the foreground/background colours are very different. Seems like creative cut and paste.

    – jdv
    11 hours ago






  • 4





    There’s a fine line between “stand out” and “appear green screen fake”...

    – Hueco
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    @Martha - You need to read more carefully what I wrote. I didn't say no serious photographer would use green-screen, I said they wouldn't use it to produce an image that 'looks like it's been obviously green-screened'. The 'art' in the OP's pictures are that they are not green-screened. I can't say I've seen what a schools photographer does for a living these days, so I can't really comment on that, but needs must & income is income.

    – Tetsujin
    9 hours ago
















2















Below are real photographs, I was present when they were shot. The photographs were taken between 12:00 to 14:00 on a slightly overcast day. The photographer may have taken many frames.



What postprocessing was likely done, such that the people stand out in the photographs?



Meirav in orchid



Cohen family in orchid










share|improve this question









New contributor




Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    its a shame that the photographer has not included the Metadata with his exports, so it is not possible to say precisely what he did, but at a guess, it seems that he has chosen a location that when coupled with a very shallow depth of field, gives an almost surreal effect. pretty much everything at subject level seems in focus and then gradually falls out of focus.

    – Abdul Quraishi
    11 hours ago








  • 5





    It looks like the people were just "photoshopped" onto a different background.

    – Mike Sowsun
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    There seems to be halos and jaggies around the people, especially when the foreground/background colours are very different. Seems like creative cut and paste.

    – jdv
    11 hours ago






  • 4





    There’s a fine line between “stand out” and “appear green screen fake”...

    – Hueco
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    @Martha - You need to read more carefully what I wrote. I didn't say no serious photographer would use green-screen, I said they wouldn't use it to produce an image that 'looks like it's been obviously green-screened'. The 'art' in the OP's pictures are that they are not green-screened. I can't say I've seen what a schools photographer does for a living these days, so I can't really comment on that, but needs must & income is income.

    – Tetsujin
    9 hours ago














2












2








2








Below are real photographs, I was present when they were shot. The photographs were taken between 12:00 to 14:00 on a slightly overcast day. The photographer may have taken many frames.



What postprocessing was likely done, such that the people stand out in the photographs?



Meirav in orchid



Cohen family in orchid










share|improve this question









New contributor




Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Below are real photographs, I was present when they were shot. The photographs were taken between 12:00 to 14:00 on a slightly overcast day. The photographer may have taken many frames.



What postprocessing was likely done, such that the people stand out in the photographs?



Meirav in orchid



Cohen family in orchid







post-processing software






share|improve this question









New contributor




Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 10 hours ago









Tetsujin

7,89421948




7,89421948






New contributor




Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 11 hours ago









Happy PhantomHappy Phantom

113




113




New contributor




Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2





    its a shame that the photographer has not included the Metadata with his exports, so it is not possible to say precisely what he did, but at a guess, it seems that he has chosen a location that when coupled with a very shallow depth of field, gives an almost surreal effect. pretty much everything at subject level seems in focus and then gradually falls out of focus.

    – Abdul Quraishi
    11 hours ago








  • 5





    It looks like the people were just "photoshopped" onto a different background.

    – Mike Sowsun
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    There seems to be halos and jaggies around the people, especially when the foreground/background colours are very different. Seems like creative cut and paste.

    – jdv
    11 hours ago






  • 4





    There’s a fine line between “stand out” and “appear green screen fake”...

    – Hueco
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    @Martha - You need to read more carefully what I wrote. I didn't say no serious photographer would use green-screen, I said they wouldn't use it to produce an image that 'looks like it's been obviously green-screened'. The 'art' in the OP's pictures are that they are not green-screened. I can't say I've seen what a schools photographer does for a living these days, so I can't really comment on that, but needs must & income is income.

    – Tetsujin
    9 hours ago














  • 2





    its a shame that the photographer has not included the Metadata with his exports, so it is not possible to say precisely what he did, but at a guess, it seems that he has chosen a location that when coupled with a very shallow depth of field, gives an almost surreal effect. pretty much everything at subject level seems in focus and then gradually falls out of focus.

    – Abdul Quraishi
    11 hours ago








  • 5





    It looks like the people were just "photoshopped" onto a different background.

    – Mike Sowsun
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    There seems to be halos and jaggies around the people, especially when the foreground/background colours are very different. Seems like creative cut and paste.

    – jdv
    11 hours ago






  • 4





    There’s a fine line between “stand out” and “appear green screen fake”...

    – Hueco
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    @Martha - You need to read more carefully what I wrote. I didn't say no serious photographer would use green-screen, I said they wouldn't use it to produce an image that 'looks like it's been obviously green-screened'. The 'art' in the OP's pictures are that they are not green-screened. I can't say I've seen what a schools photographer does for a living these days, so I can't really comment on that, but needs must & income is income.

    – Tetsujin
    9 hours ago








2




2





its a shame that the photographer has not included the Metadata with his exports, so it is not possible to say precisely what he did, but at a guess, it seems that he has chosen a location that when coupled with a very shallow depth of field, gives an almost surreal effect. pretty much everything at subject level seems in focus and then gradually falls out of focus.

– Abdul Quraishi
11 hours ago







its a shame that the photographer has not included the Metadata with his exports, so it is not possible to say precisely what he did, but at a guess, it seems that he has chosen a location that when coupled with a very shallow depth of field, gives an almost surreal effect. pretty much everything at subject level seems in focus and then gradually falls out of focus.

– Abdul Quraishi
11 hours ago






5




5





It looks like the people were just "photoshopped" onto a different background.

– Mike Sowsun
11 hours ago





It looks like the people were just "photoshopped" onto a different background.

– Mike Sowsun
11 hours ago




1




1





There seems to be halos and jaggies around the people, especially when the foreground/background colours are very different. Seems like creative cut and paste.

– jdv
11 hours ago





There seems to be halos and jaggies around the people, especially when the foreground/background colours are very different. Seems like creative cut and paste.

– jdv
11 hours ago




4




4





There’s a fine line between “stand out” and “appear green screen fake”...

– Hueco
10 hours ago





There’s a fine line between “stand out” and “appear green screen fake”...

– Hueco
10 hours ago




1




1





@Martha - You need to read more carefully what I wrote. I didn't say no serious photographer would use green-screen, I said they wouldn't use it to produce an image that 'looks like it's been obviously green-screened'. The 'art' in the OP's pictures are that they are not green-screened. I can't say I've seen what a schools photographer does for a living these days, so I can't really comment on that, but needs must & income is income.

– Tetsujin
9 hours ago





@Martha - You need to read more carefully what I wrote. I didn't say no serious photographer would use green-screen, I said they wouldn't use it to produce an image that 'looks like it's been obviously green-screened'. The 'art' in the OP's pictures are that they are not green-screened. I can't say I've seen what a schools photographer does for a living these days, so I can't really comment on that, but needs must & income is income.

– Tetsujin
9 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















12














I'd guess it's as simple as selecting the subject in Photoshop - with a tad more care & attention than I've used below, then leeching out the saturation in the background & tonally balancing towards a sepia effect.



As a very quick demo I did the same thing but made it a pretty garish purple instead.



enter image description here



Once you have your mask you can treat inside & outside of it in totally different ways.



The subjects have been left with realistic colouration, which I think is what is providing the majority of the visual separation - that & the physical separation from the ground, which pushes them into the unsharp area of the background. Note how the effect is less emphatic on the small boy, especially lower, where he's connected to the equally sharp ground at that distance.



I don't think the focus has been played with. I think it was shot on a wide enough aperture that the background is blurred by simple distance. The ground underneath them is still reasonably sharp.

I also don't think it would be compulsory to be using flash, so long as enough light was getting in, or set to a high-enough ISO, to use a short exposure.

The light on the people & the trees seems to match - little to no shadow at all, which matches the OP's description & the almost 'white-out' cloud cover in the back of the shot.






share|improve this answer





















  • 4





    If you’re going to go full fake, you may as well go full Disney child pop star album cover with it. +1

    – Hueco
    10 hours ago



















2














Didn't the photographer use flash?



A common practice to make subjects "stand out" is to use flash for proper subject exposure, and to use camera settings to slightly underexposure the background. That is my guess here, instead of post processing.






share|improve this answer
























  • There was another photographer who was using a flash, but the woman in this photograph insists that there was no external flash used for these images. There may have been a flash on the camera itself.

    – dotancohen
    10 hours ago



















0














There area few ways of making such photographs. You could, for instance, use a large aperture to create a shallow depth of field whereby you blur out the background. The human eye doesn't like to look at things that out of focus. By creating a shallow DOF, you will put visual emphasis on your subject.



Another way is by creating contrast between your subject and the background. One way to do this is by having your subject brighter than the background. You could use fill flash or simply place your subject in a scene where they have more light falling onto them than the background.



Combining these two methods would be even better.



What the photographer has done with the images that you've posted is to create a composite. The images are apparently a combination of a background and the people were placed over it. The photographer either took the background image out of focus, or used a blur filter (i.e. Gaussian blur)..






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "61"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Happy Phantom is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105645%2fwhat-type-of-postprocessing-gives-the-effect-of-people-standing-out%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    12














    I'd guess it's as simple as selecting the subject in Photoshop - with a tad more care & attention than I've used below, then leeching out the saturation in the background & tonally balancing towards a sepia effect.



    As a very quick demo I did the same thing but made it a pretty garish purple instead.



    enter image description here



    Once you have your mask you can treat inside & outside of it in totally different ways.



    The subjects have been left with realistic colouration, which I think is what is providing the majority of the visual separation - that & the physical separation from the ground, which pushes them into the unsharp area of the background. Note how the effect is less emphatic on the small boy, especially lower, where he's connected to the equally sharp ground at that distance.



    I don't think the focus has been played with. I think it was shot on a wide enough aperture that the background is blurred by simple distance. The ground underneath them is still reasonably sharp.

    I also don't think it would be compulsory to be using flash, so long as enough light was getting in, or set to a high-enough ISO, to use a short exposure.

    The light on the people & the trees seems to match - little to no shadow at all, which matches the OP's description & the almost 'white-out' cloud cover in the back of the shot.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 4





      If you’re going to go full fake, you may as well go full Disney child pop star album cover with it. +1

      – Hueco
      10 hours ago
















    12














    I'd guess it's as simple as selecting the subject in Photoshop - with a tad more care & attention than I've used below, then leeching out the saturation in the background & tonally balancing towards a sepia effect.



    As a very quick demo I did the same thing but made it a pretty garish purple instead.



    enter image description here



    Once you have your mask you can treat inside & outside of it in totally different ways.



    The subjects have been left with realistic colouration, which I think is what is providing the majority of the visual separation - that & the physical separation from the ground, which pushes them into the unsharp area of the background. Note how the effect is less emphatic on the small boy, especially lower, where he's connected to the equally sharp ground at that distance.



    I don't think the focus has been played with. I think it was shot on a wide enough aperture that the background is blurred by simple distance. The ground underneath them is still reasonably sharp.

    I also don't think it would be compulsory to be using flash, so long as enough light was getting in, or set to a high-enough ISO, to use a short exposure.

    The light on the people & the trees seems to match - little to no shadow at all, which matches the OP's description & the almost 'white-out' cloud cover in the back of the shot.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 4





      If you’re going to go full fake, you may as well go full Disney child pop star album cover with it. +1

      – Hueco
      10 hours ago














    12












    12








    12







    I'd guess it's as simple as selecting the subject in Photoshop - with a tad more care & attention than I've used below, then leeching out the saturation in the background & tonally balancing towards a sepia effect.



    As a very quick demo I did the same thing but made it a pretty garish purple instead.



    enter image description here



    Once you have your mask you can treat inside & outside of it in totally different ways.



    The subjects have been left with realistic colouration, which I think is what is providing the majority of the visual separation - that & the physical separation from the ground, which pushes them into the unsharp area of the background. Note how the effect is less emphatic on the small boy, especially lower, where he's connected to the equally sharp ground at that distance.



    I don't think the focus has been played with. I think it was shot on a wide enough aperture that the background is blurred by simple distance. The ground underneath them is still reasonably sharp.

    I also don't think it would be compulsory to be using flash, so long as enough light was getting in, or set to a high-enough ISO, to use a short exposure.

    The light on the people & the trees seems to match - little to no shadow at all, which matches the OP's description & the almost 'white-out' cloud cover in the back of the shot.






    share|improve this answer















    I'd guess it's as simple as selecting the subject in Photoshop - with a tad more care & attention than I've used below, then leeching out the saturation in the background & tonally balancing towards a sepia effect.



    As a very quick demo I did the same thing but made it a pretty garish purple instead.



    enter image description here



    Once you have your mask you can treat inside & outside of it in totally different ways.



    The subjects have been left with realistic colouration, which I think is what is providing the majority of the visual separation - that & the physical separation from the ground, which pushes them into the unsharp area of the background. Note how the effect is less emphatic on the small boy, especially lower, where he's connected to the equally sharp ground at that distance.



    I don't think the focus has been played with. I think it was shot on a wide enough aperture that the background is blurred by simple distance. The ground underneath them is still reasonably sharp.

    I also don't think it would be compulsory to be using flash, so long as enough light was getting in, or set to a high-enough ISO, to use a short exposure.

    The light on the people & the trees seems to match - little to no shadow at all, which matches the OP's description & the almost 'white-out' cloud cover in the back of the shot.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 9 hours ago

























    answered 10 hours ago









    TetsujinTetsujin

    7,89421948




    7,89421948








    • 4





      If you’re going to go full fake, you may as well go full Disney child pop star album cover with it. +1

      – Hueco
      10 hours ago














    • 4





      If you’re going to go full fake, you may as well go full Disney child pop star album cover with it. +1

      – Hueco
      10 hours ago








    4




    4





    If you’re going to go full fake, you may as well go full Disney child pop star album cover with it. +1

    – Hueco
    10 hours ago





    If you’re going to go full fake, you may as well go full Disney child pop star album cover with it. +1

    – Hueco
    10 hours ago













    2














    Didn't the photographer use flash?



    A common practice to make subjects "stand out" is to use flash for proper subject exposure, and to use camera settings to slightly underexposure the background. That is my guess here, instead of post processing.






    share|improve this answer
























    • There was another photographer who was using a flash, but the woman in this photograph insists that there was no external flash used for these images. There may have been a flash on the camera itself.

      – dotancohen
      10 hours ago
















    2














    Didn't the photographer use flash?



    A common practice to make subjects "stand out" is to use flash for proper subject exposure, and to use camera settings to slightly underexposure the background. That is my guess here, instead of post processing.






    share|improve this answer
























    • There was another photographer who was using a flash, but the woman in this photograph insists that there was no external flash used for these images. There may have been a flash on the camera itself.

      – dotancohen
      10 hours ago














    2












    2








    2







    Didn't the photographer use flash?



    A common practice to make subjects "stand out" is to use flash for proper subject exposure, and to use camera settings to slightly underexposure the background. That is my guess here, instead of post processing.






    share|improve this answer













    Didn't the photographer use flash?



    A common practice to make subjects "stand out" is to use flash for proper subject exposure, and to use camera settings to slightly underexposure the background. That is my guess here, instead of post processing.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 11 hours ago









    WayneFWayneF

    9,9751924




    9,9751924













    • There was another photographer who was using a flash, but the woman in this photograph insists that there was no external flash used for these images. There may have been a flash on the camera itself.

      – dotancohen
      10 hours ago



















    • There was another photographer who was using a flash, but the woman in this photograph insists that there was no external flash used for these images. There may have been a flash on the camera itself.

      – dotancohen
      10 hours ago

















    There was another photographer who was using a flash, but the woman in this photograph insists that there was no external flash used for these images. There may have been a flash on the camera itself.

    – dotancohen
    10 hours ago





    There was another photographer who was using a flash, but the woman in this photograph insists that there was no external flash used for these images. There may have been a flash on the camera itself.

    – dotancohen
    10 hours ago











    0














    There area few ways of making such photographs. You could, for instance, use a large aperture to create a shallow depth of field whereby you blur out the background. The human eye doesn't like to look at things that out of focus. By creating a shallow DOF, you will put visual emphasis on your subject.



    Another way is by creating contrast between your subject and the background. One way to do this is by having your subject brighter than the background. You could use fill flash or simply place your subject in a scene where they have more light falling onto them than the background.



    Combining these two methods would be even better.



    What the photographer has done with the images that you've posted is to create a composite. The images are apparently a combination of a background and the people were placed over it. The photographer either took the background image out of focus, or used a blur filter (i.e. Gaussian blur)..






    share|improve this answer




























      0














      There area few ways of making such photographs. You could, for instance, use a large aperture to create a shallow depth of field whereby you blur out the background. The human eye doesn't like to look at things that out of focus. By creating a shallow DOF, you will put visual emphasis on your subject.



      Another way is by creating contrast between your subject and the background. One way to do this is by having your subject brighter than the background. You could use fill flash or simply place your subject in a scene where they have more light falling onto them than the background.



      Combining these two methods would be even better.



      What the photographer has done with the images that you've posted is to create a composite. The images are apparently a combination of a background and the people were placed over it. The photographer either took the background image out of focus, or used a blur filter (i.e. Gaussian blur)..






      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        There area few ways of making such photographs. You could, for instance, use a large aperture to create a shallow depth of field whereby you blur out the background. The human eye doesn't like to look at things that out of focus. By creating a shallow DOF, you will put visual emphasis on your subject.



        Another way is by creating contrast between your subject and the background. One way to do this is by having your subject brighter than the background. You could use fill flash or simply place your subject in a scene where they have more light falling onto them than the background.



        Combining these two methods would be even better.



        What the photographer has done with the images that you've posted is to create a composite. The images are apparently a combination of a background and the people were placed over it. The photographer either took the background image out of focus, or used a blur filter (i.e. Gaussian blur)..






        share|improve this answer













        There area few ways of making such photographs. You could, for instance, use a large aperture to create a shallow depth of field whereby you blur out the background. The human eye doesn't like to look at things that out of focus. By creating a shallow DOF, you will put visual emphasis on your subject.



        Another way is by creating contrast between your subject and the background. One way to do this is by having your subject brighter than the background. You could use fill flash or simply place your subject in a scene where they have more light falling onto them than the background.



        Combining these two methods would be even better.



        What the photographer has done with the images that you've posted is to create a composite. The images are apparently a combination of a background and the people were placed over it. The photographer either took the background image out of focus, or used a blur filter (i.e. Gaussian blur)..







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 7 hours ago









        FrankFrank

        6047




        6047






















            Happy Phantom is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Happy Phantom is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Happy Phantom is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Happy Phantom is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105645%2fwhat-type-of-postprocessing-gives-the-effect-of-people-standing-out%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            GameSpot

            connect to host localhost port 22: Connection refused

            Getting a Wifi WPA2 wifi connection