Why does the author believe that the central mass that gas cloud HCN-0.009-0.044 orbits is smaller than our...












6












$begingroup$


Phys.org's Hiding black hole found says:




A research team led by Shunya Takekawa at the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan noticed HCN-0.009-0.044, a gas cloud moving strangely near the center of the galaxy 25,000 light-years away from Earth in the constellation Sagittarius. They used ALMA (Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array) to perform high-resolution observations of the cloud and found that it is swirling around a massive invisible object.



Takekawa says, "Detailed kinematic analyses revealed that an enormous mass, 30,000 times that of the sun, was concentrated in a region much smaller than our solar system. This and the lack of any observed object at that location strongly suggests an intermediate-mass black hole. By analyzing other anomalous clouds, we hope to expose other quiet black holes."




The paper is Indication of Another Intermediate-mass Black Hole in the Galactic Center and is open access.



The quote in the second paragraph is all over the internet. I have found that sciencedaily and iflscience both link back to the same quote on an official NAO page here.




Takekawa explains, “Detailed kinematic analyses revealed that an enormous mass, 30,000 times that of the Sun, was concentrated in a region much smaller than our Solar System.”




Questions: How do they know that the central mass is "concentrated in a region much smaller than our Solar System"?



This answer about the paper and subsequent discussions below it don't seem to shed any light on this particular question. The NAO page does not indicate the origin of the quote, I'm wondering if it is a translation of a corresponding Japanese language page on the same site that explains further.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    6












    $begingroup$


    Phys.org's Hiding black hole found says:




    A research team led by Shunya Takekawa at the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan noticed HCN-0.009-0.044, a gas cloud moving strangely near the center of the galaxy 25,000 light-years away from Earth in the constellation Sagittarius. They used ALMA (Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array) to perform high-resolution observations of the cloud and found that it is swirling around a massive invisible object.



    Takekawa says, "Detailed kinematic analyses revealed that an enormous mass, 30,000 times that of the sun, was concentrated in a region much smaller than our solar system. This and the lack of any observed object at that location strongly suggests an intermediate-mass black hole. By analyzing other anomalous clouds, we hope to expose other quiet black holes."




    The paper is Indication of Another Intermediate-mass Black Hole in the Galactic Center and is open access.



    The quote in the second paragraph is all over the internet. I have found that sciencedaily and iflscience both link back to the same quote on an official NAO page here.




    Takekawa explains, “Detailed kinematic analyses revealed that an enormous mass, 30,000 times that of the Sun, was concentrated in a region much smaller than our Solar System.”




    Questions: How do they know that the central mass is "concentrated in a region much smaller than our Solar System"?



    This answer about the paper and subsequent discussions below it don't seem to shed any light on this particular question. The NAO page does not indicate the origin of the quote, I'm wondering if it is a translation of a corresponding Japanese language page on the same site that explains further.










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      6












      6








      6





      $begingroup$


      Phys.org's Hiding black hole found says:




      A research team led by Shunya Takekawa at the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan noticed HCN-0.009-0.044, a gas cloud moving strangely near the center of the galaxy 25,000 light-years away from Earth in the constellation Sagittarius. They used ALMA (Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array) to perform high-resolution observations of the cloud and found that it is swirling around a massive invisible object.



      Takekawa says, "Detailed kinematic analyses revealed that an enormous mass, 30,000 times that of the sun, was concentrated in a region much smaller than our solar system. This and the lack of any observed object at that location strongly suggests an intermediate-mass black hole. By analyzing other anomalous clouds, we hope to expose other quiet black holes."




      The paper is Indication of Another Intermediate-mass Black Hole in the Galactic Center and is open access.



      The quote in the second paragraph is all over the internet. I have found that sciencedaily and iflscience both link back to the same quote on an official NAO page here.




      Takekawa explains, “Detailed kinematic analyses revealed that an enormous mass, 30,000 times that of the Sun, was concentrated in a region much smaller than our Solar System.”




      Questions: How do they know that the central mass is "concentrated in a region much smaller than our Solar System"?



      This answer about the paper and subsequent discussions below it don't seem to shed any light on this particular question. The NAO page does not indicate the origin of the quote, I'm wondering if it is a translation of a corresponding Japanese language page on the same site that explains further.










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Phys.org's Hiding black hole found says:




      A research team led by Shunya Takekawa at the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan noticed HCN-0.009-0.044, a gas cloud moving strangely near the center of the galaxy 25,000 light-years away from Earth in the constellation Sagittarius. They used ALMA (Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array) to perform high-resolution observations of the cloud and found that it is swirling around a massive invisible object.



      Takekawa says, "Detailed kinematic analyses revealed that an enormous mass, 30,000 times that of the sun, was concentrated in a region much smaller than our solar system. This and the lack of any observed object at that location strongly suggests an intermediate-mass black hole. By analyzing other anomalous clouds, we hope to expose other quiet black holes."




      The paper is Indication of Another Intermediate-mass Black Hole in the Galactic Center and is open access.



      The quote in the second paragraph is all over the internet. I have found that sciencedaily and iflscience both link back to the same quote on an official NAO page here.




      Takekawa explains, “Detailed kinematic analyses revealed that an enormous mass, 30,000 times that of the Sun, was concentrated in a region much smaller than our Solar System.”




      Questions: How do they know that the central mass is "concentrated in a region much smaller than our Solar System"?



      This answer about the paper and subsequent discussions below it don't seem to shed any light on this particular question. The NAO page does not indicate the origin of the quote, I'm wondering if it is a translation of a corresponding Japanese language page on the same site that explains further.







      black-hole observational-astronomy radio-astronomy






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 14 hours ago









      uhohuhoh

      6,13221761




      6,13221761






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          11












          $begingroup$

          The authors were able to successfully model the motion of the gas streams as Keplerian orbits around an object of $sim30000M_{odot}$. In doing so, they derived some key quantities, such as the pericentric distances of these two gas components (the "Balloon" and the "Stream"). One has its closest approach at $sim0.21$ pc; the other has its closest approach at $sim0.07$ pc ($14000text{ AU}$). This places the pericenter well inside the Oort Cloud, and therefore inside the Solar System.



          Therefore, given that it's highly unlikely that the Balloon skims the surface of the central object, we can say that the object's radius is certainly less than that of the Oort Cloud, and by extension, the Solar System. This is a key part of the argument that the object is, in fact, an intermediate mass black hole, as they note on Page 5. It's basically the same logic used to constrain the size of Sagittarius A* based on those infrared flares observed last year.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Ah, thanks! I was thinking circa 100 AU, but that's not the right number. I guess by the time the quote made it to popular media it should have had an explainer attached. I think that the general public still thinks that Pluto is the edge of the solar system.
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            12 hours ago













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "514"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29853%2fwhy-does-the-author-believe-that-the-central-mass-that-gas-cloud-hcn-0-009-0-044%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          11












          $begingroup$

          The authors were able to successfully model the motion of the gas streams as Keplerian orbits around an object of $sim30000M_{odot}$. In doing so, they derived some key quantities, such as the pericentric distances of these two gas components (the "Balloon" and the "Stream"). One has its closest approach at $sim0.21$ pc; the other has its closest approach at $sim0.07$ pc ($14000text{ AU}$). This places the pericenter well inside the Oort Cloud, and therefore inside the Solar System.



          Therefore, given that it's highly unlikely that the Balloon skims the surface of the central object, we can say that the object's radius is certainly less than that of the Oort Cloud, and by extension, the Solar System. This is a key part of the argument that the object is, in fact, an intermediate mass black hole, as they note on Page 5. It's basically the same logic used to constrain the size of Sagittarius A* based on those infrared flares observed last year.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Ah, thanks! I was thinking circa 100 AU, but that's not the right number. I guess by the time the quote made it to popular media it should have had an explainer attached. I think that the general public still thinks that Pluto is the edge of the solar system.
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            12 hours ago


















          11












          $begingroup$

          The authors were able to successfully model the motion of the gas streams as Keplerian orbits around an object of $sim30000M_{odot}$. In doing so, they derived some key quantities, such as the pericentric distances of these two gas components (the "Balloon" and the "Stream"). One has its closest approach at $sim0.21$ pc; the other has its closest approach at $sim0.07$ pc ($14000text{ AU}$). This places the pericenter well inside the Oort Cloud, and therefore inside the Solar System.



          Therefore, given that it's highly unlikely that the Balloon skims the surface of the central object, we can say that the object's radius is certainly less than that of the Oort Cloud, and by extension, the Solar System. This is a key part of the argument that the object is, in fact, an intermediate mass black hole, as they note on Page 5. It's basically the same logic used to constrain the size of Sagittarius A* based on those infrared flares observed last year.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Ah, thanks! I was thinking circa 100 AU, but that's not the right number. I guess by the time the quote made it to popular media it should have had an explainer attached. I think that the general public still thinks that Pluto is the edge of the solar system.
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            12 hours ago
















          11












          11








          11





          $begingroup$

          The authors were able to successfully model the motion of the gas streams as Keplerian orbits around an object of $sim30000M_{odot}$. In doing so, they derived some key quantities, such as the pericentric distances of these two gas components (the "Balloon" and the "Stream"). One has its closest approach at $sim0.21$ pc; the other has its closest approach at $sim0.07$ pc ($14000text{ AU}$). This places the pericenter well inside the Oort Cloud, and therefore inside the Solar System.



          Therefore, given that it's highly unlikely that the Balloon skims the surface of the central object, we can say that the object's radius is certainly less than that of the Oort Cloud, and by extension, the Solar System. This is a key part of the argument that the object is, in fact, an intermediate mass black hole, as they note on Page 5. It's basically the same logic used to constrain the size of Sagittarius A* based on those infrared flares observed last year.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The authors were able to successfully model the motion of the gas streams as Keplerian orbits around an object of $sim30000M_{odot}$. In doing so, they derived some key quantities, such as the pericentric distances of these two gas components (the "Balloon" and the "Stream"). One has its closest approach at $sim0.21$ pc; the other has its closest approach at $sim0.07$ pc ($14000text{ AU}$). This places the pericenter well inside the Oort Cloud, and therefore inside the Solar System.



          Therefore, given that it's highly unlikely that the Balloon skims the surface of the central object, we can say that the object's radius is certainly less than that of the Oort Cloud, and by extension, the Solar System. This is a key part of the argument that the object is, in fact, an intermediate mass black hole, as they note on Page 5. It's basically the same logic used to constrain the size of Sagittarius A* based on those infrared flares observed last year.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 12 hours ago

























          answered 12 hours ago









          HDE 226868HDE 226868

          20k265125




          20k265125








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Ah, thanks! I was thinking circa 100 AU, but that's not the right number. I guess by the time the quote made it to popular media it should have had an explainer attached. I think that the general public still thinks that Pluto is the edge of the solar system.
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            12 hours ago
















          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Ah, thanks! I was thinking circa 100 AU, but that's not the right number. I guess by the time the quote made it to popular media it should have had an explainer attached. I think that the general public still thinks that Pluto is the edge of the solar system.
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            12 hours ago










          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Ah, thanks! I was thinking circa 100 AU, but that's not the right number. I guess by the time the quote made it to popular media it should have had an explainer attached. I think that the general public still thinks that Pluto is the edge of the solar system.
          $endgroup$
          – uhoh
          12 hours ago






          $begingroup$
          Ah, thanks! I was thinking circa 100 AU, but that's not the right number. I guess by the time the quote made it to popular media it should have had an explainer attached. I think that the general public still thinks that Pluto is the edge of the solar system.
          $endgroup$
          – uhoh
          12 hours ago




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Astronomy Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29853%2fwhy-does-the-author-believe-that-the-central-mass-that-gas-cloud-hcn-0-009-0-044%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          GameSpot

          日野市

          Tu-95轟炸機