Client team has low performances and low technical skills: we always fix their work and now they stop...
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I work as a team leader in a team of 6 (2 very senior devs, 1 senior dev, 1 medium level dev, 1 junior dev and 1 senior graphic designer). Our client has his own internal team of 5 (1 architect, 2 senior devs and 2 junior devs).
The performance and the skills of the internal team are extremely low (commits that don’t compile, even tags, merges that break/remove working functionalities and that reach production untested, nonsense questions, months to complete simple changes, etc.) and we are always fixing their poor work. For example:
- We fixed dozens and dozens of bugs opened in the last year and a half and that were assigned to the internal team, spending less than 30 minutes on each (even in the part of the project we have never worked on before);
- A project was assigned to the internal team and was estimated at 3 months: after 6 months they admitted they were unable to complete it, so the client assigned it to us. In 6 months they did less than 10% of the required work. In a month and a half we closed this project;
- We had to spend more than a week to fix a mess in SVN they created
From the beginning of this year, the client more or less bypassed his own team and assigned everything directly to us (in fact our team will soon grow by at least 4 devs). The other team didn’t take it well and are trying to sabotage us; we need them to contact other suppliers because for their internal policy; 2 suppliers cannot speak directly without client mediation and they literally take weeks to simply forward an email. When we need clarifications on code they developed, they are elusive and don’t provide any useful explanation. They didn't give us resources or privileges that we required in order to complete our tasks, etc.
The client is well aware of the situation but he seems he wants to do nothing to solve it. Does anyone who went through a similar situation have some advice on how to solve this problem?
performance clients
New contributor
|
show 2 more comments
I work as a team leader in a team of 6 (2 very senior devs, 1 senior dev, 1 medium level dev, 1 junior dev and 1 senior graphic designer). Our client has his own internal team of 5 (1 architect, 2 senior devs and 2 junior devs).
The performance and the skills of the internal team are extremely low (commits that don’t compile, even tags, merges that break/remove working functionalities and that reach production untested, nonsense questions, months to complete simple changes, etc.) and we are always fixing their poor work. For example:
- We fixed dozens and dozens of bugs opened in the last year and a half and that were assigned to the internal team, spending less than 30 minutes on each (even in the part of the project we have never worked on before);
- A project was assigned to the internal team and was estimated at 3 months: after 6 months they admitted they were unable to complete it, so the client assigned it to us. In 6 months they did less than 10% of the required work. In a month and a half we closed this project;
- We had to spend more than a week to fix a mess in SVN they created
From the beginning of this year, the client more or less bypassed his own team and assigned everything directly to us (in fact our team will soon grow by at least 4 devs). The other team didn’t take it well and are trying to sabotage us; we need them to contact other suppliers because for their internal policy; 2 suppliers cannot speak directly without client mediation and they literally take weeks to simply forward an email. When we need clarifications on code they developed, they are elusive and don’t provide any useful explanation. They didn't give us resources or privileges that we required in order to complete our tasks, etc.
The client is well aware of the situation but he seems he wants to do nothing to solve it. Does anyone who went through a similar situation have some advice on how to solve this problem?
performance clients
New contributor
Maybe it will be useful to know the structure of client company. In my field there is a client (IT) who write details about the specifications and which we work with, but also there is a specialist division on client side (for who the software will be) which say "this task should be done, this not" and sort tasks according to priority. This division is authorized "above" both, the client IT and us. Is your client assimilable?
– Allerleirauh
20 hours ago
1
@Allerleirauh client is a big (mainly national) company with more or less 2000 employees. This company has an internal IT department but is not its main focus (about 100 people) My company is multinational with 20000 employees. I work in the IT division. Your client is not assimilable with ours: internal IT decides autonomously the tasks that should be done, at what priority and who will develop them (internally, externally and to which supplier)
– Elitot Confused
16 hours ago
12
Your company has 20,000 people? This is not something you should even attempt to manage yourself, as you are the team leader, not the one actually responsible for the contract. Tell your boss the issue; they will tell you what to do.
– MineR
14 hours ago
1
By "the client is well aware of the situation" do you mean that you, your management, or whoever is in charge of the contract in your company, has communicated with the person or persons in the other company who are in charge of the contract and responsible for approving payment of your company's invoices? From other things you have said, it sounds like you mean "I sent email more than once to the people I normally communicate with on their team". If that's what you really mean, then that's not "the client is well aware of the situation".
– Makyen
12 hours ago
2
The client is giving you additional work. One way to look at it is as a problem; the other way is as sales.
– John Wu
6 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
I work as a team leader in a team of 6 (2 very senior devs, 1 senior dev, 1 medium level dev, 1 junior dev and 1 senior graphic designer). Our client has his own internal team of 5 (1 architect, 2 senior devs and 2 junior devs).
The performance and the skills of the internal team are extremely low (commits that don’t compile, even tags, merges that break/remove working functionalities and that reach production untested, nonsense questions, months to complete simple changes, etc.) and we are always fixing their poor work. For example:
- We fixed dozens and dozens of bugs opened in the last year and a half and that were assigned to the internal team, spending less than 30 minutes on each (even in the part of the project we have never worked on before);
- A project was assigned to the internal team and was estimated at 3 months: after 6 months they admitted they were unable to complete it, so the client assigned it to us. In 6 months they did less than 10% of the required work. In a month and a half we closed this project;
- We had to spend more than a week to fix a mess in SVN they created
From the beginning of this year, the client more or less bypassed his own team and assigned everything directly to us (in fact our team will soon grow by at least 4 devs). The other team didn’t take it well and are trying to sabotage us; we need them to contact other suppliers because for their internal policy; 2 suppliers cannot speak directly without client mediation and they literally take weeks to simply forward an email. When we need clarifications on code they developed, they are elusive and don’t provide any useful explanation. They didn't give us resources or privileges that we required in order to complete our tasks, etc.
The client is well aware of the situation but he seems he wants to do nothing to solve it. Does anyone who went through a similar situation have some advice on how to solve this problem?
performance clients
New contributor
I work as a team leader in a team of 6 (2 very senior devs, 1 senior dev, 1 medium level dev, 1 junior dev and 1 senior graphic designer). Our client has his own internal team of 5 (1 architect, 2 senior devs and 2 junior devs).
The performance and the skills of the internal team are extremely low (commits that don’t compile, even tags, merges that break/remove working functionalities and that reach production untested, nonsense questions, months to complete simple changes, etc.) and we are always fixing their poor work. For example:
- We fixed dozens and dozens of bugs opened in the last year and a half and that were assigned to the internal team, spending less than 30 minutes on each (even in the part of the project we have never worked on before);
- A project was assigned to the internal team and was estimated at 3 months: after 6 months they admitted they were unable to complete it, so the client assigned it to us. In 6 months they did less than 10% of the required work. In a month and a half we closed this project;
- We had to spend more than a week to fix a mess in SVN they created
From the beginning of this year, the client more or less bypassed his own team and assigned everything directly to us (in fact our team will soon grow by at least 4 devs). The other team didn’t take it well and are trying to sabotage us; we need them to contact other suppliers because for their internal policy; 2 suppliers cannot speak directly without client mediation and they literally take weeks to simply forward an email. When we need clarifications on code they developed, they are elusive and don’t provide any useful explanation. They didn't give us resources or privileges that we required in order to complete our tasks, etc.
The client is well aware of the situation but he seems he wants to do nothing to solve it. Does anyone who went through a similar situation have some advice on how to solve this problem?
performance clients
performance clients
New contributor
New contributor
edited 6 hours ago
SeldomNeedy
1975
1975
New contributor
asked 21 hours ago
Elitot ConfusedElitot Confused
16425
16425
New contributor
New contributor
Maybe it will be useful to know the structure of client company. In my field there is a client (IT) who write details about the specifications and which we work with, but also there is a specialist division on client side (for who the software will be) which say "this task should be done, this not" and sort tasks according to priority. This division is authorized "above" both, the client IT and us. Is your client assimilable?
– Allerleirauh
20 hours ago
1
@Allerleirauh client is a big (mainly national) company with more or less 2000 employees. This company has an internal IT department but is not its main focus (about 100 people) My company is multinational with 20000 employees. I work in the IT division. Your client is not assimilable with ours: internal IT decides autonomously the tasks that should be done, at what priority and who will develop them (internally, externally and to which supplier)
– Elitot Confused
16 hours ago
12
Your company has 20,000 people? This is not something you should even attempt to manage yourself, as you are the team leader, not the one actually responsible for the contract. Tell your boss the issue; they will tell you what to do.
– MineR
14 hours ago
1
By "the client is well aware of the situation" do you mean that you, your management, or whoever is in charge of the contract in your company, has communicated with the person or persons in the other company who are in charge of the contract and responsible for approving payment of your company's invoices? From other things you have said, it sounds like you mean "I sent email more than once to the people I normally communicate with on their team". If that's what you really mean, then that's not "the client is well aware of the situation".
– Makyen
12 hours ago
2
The client is giving you additional work. One way to look at it is as a problem; the other way is as sales.
– John Wu
6 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Maybe it will be useful to know the structure of client company. In my field there is a client (IT) who write details about the specifications and which we work with, but also there is a specialist division on client side (for who the software will be) which say "this task should be done, this not" and sort tasks according to priority. This division is authorized "above" both, the client IT and us. Is your client assimilable?
– Allerleirauh
20 hours ago
1
@Allerleirauh client is a big (mainly national) company with more or less 2000 employees. This company has an internal IT department but is not its main focus (about 100 people) My company is multinational with 20000 employees. I work in the IT division. Your client is not assimilable with ours: internal IT decides autonomously the tasks that should be done, at what priority and who will develop them (internally, externally and to which supplier)
– Elitot Confused
16 hours ago
12
Your company has 20,000 people? This is not something you should even attempt to manage yourself, as you are the team leader, not the one actually responsible for the contract. Tell your boss the issue; they will tell you what to do.
– MineR
14 hours ago
1
By "the client is well aware of the situation" do you mean that you, your management, or whoever is in charge of the contract in your company, has communicated with the person or persons in the other company who are in charge of the contract and responsible for approving payment of your company's invoices? From other things you have said, it sounds like you mean "I sent email more than once to the people I normally communicate with on their team". If that's what you really mean, then that's not "the client is well aware of the situation".
– Makyen
12 hours ago
2
The client is giving you additional work. One way to look at it is as a problem; the other way is as sales.
– John Wu
6 hours ago
Maybe it will be useful to know the structure of client company. In my field there is a client (IT) who write details about the specifications and which we work with, but also there is a specialist division on client side (for who the software will be) which say "this task should be done, this not" and sort tasks according to priority. This division is authorized "above" both, the client IT and us. Is your client assimilable?
– Allerleirauh
20 hours ago
Maybe it will be useful to know the structure of client company. In my field there is a client (IT) who write details about the specifications and which we work with, but also there is a specialist division on client side (for who the software will be) which say "this task should be done, this not" and sort tasks according to priority. This division is authorized "above" both, the client IT and us. Is your client assimilable?
– Allerleirauh
20 hours ago
1
1
@Allerleirauh client is a big (mainly national) company with more or less 2000 employees. This company has an internal IT department but is not its main focus (about 100 people) My company is multinational with 20000 employees. I work in the IT division. Your client is not assimilable with ours: internal IT decides autonomously the tasks that should be done, at what priority and who will develop them (internally, externally and to which supplier)
– Elitot Confused
16 hours ago
@Allerleirauh client is a big (mainly national) company with more or less 2000 employees. This company has an internal IT department but is not its main focus (about 100 people) My company is multinational with 20000 employees. I work in the IT division. Your client is not assimilable with ours: internal IT decides autonomously the tasks that should be done, at what priority and who will develop them (internally, externally and to which supplier)
– Elitot Confused
16 hours ago
12
12
Your company has 20,000 people? This is not something you should even attempt to manage yourself, as you are the team leader, not the one actually responsible for the contract. Tell your boss the issue; they will tell you what to do.
– MineR
14 hours ago
Your company has 20,000 people? This is not something you should even attempt to manage yourself, as you are the team leader, not the one actually responsible for the contract. Tell your boss the issue; they will tell you what to do.
– MineR
14 hours ago
1
1
By "the client is well aware of the situation" do you mean that you, your management, or whoever is in charge of the contract in your company, has communicated with the person or persons in the other company who are in charge of the contract and responsible for approving payment of your company's invoices? From other things you have said, it sounds like you mean "I sent email more than once to the people I normally communicate with on their team". If that's what you really mean, then that's not "the client is well aware of the situation".
– Makyen
12 hours ago
By "the client is well aware of the situation" do you mean that you, your management, or whoever is in charge of the contract in your company, has communicated with the person or persons in the other company who are in charge of the contract and responsible for approving payment of your company's invoices? From other things you have said, it sounds like you mean "I sent email more than once to the people I normally communicate with on their team". If that's what you really mean, then that's not "the client is well aware of the situation".
– Makyen
12 hours ago
2
2
The client is giving you additional work. One way to look at it is as a problem; the other way is as sales.
– John Wu
6 hours ago
The client is giving you additional work. One way to look at it is as a problem; the other way is as sales.
– John Wu
6 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
Please don't mislead yourself, you are nothing more than an external contractor to the company. You are NOT part of the company, so there is no legal or moral reason to grant you anything more than you already have. You don't belong to the company, you are not their human resources, you work as a provider-client relationship.
You have been paid, right? There should not be any reason for you to go above the boundary, it's not your company. Please don't be emotional. If you're not given resources, simply ask. If not granted, it's not yours.
Someone that pass through a similar situation has some advice on how to solve this problem?
Simple. Send your invoice to your client for your time.
10
You are right! However, the poor performance on the client's internal team is making their job harder, so I understand the reason behind the question being posted
– asdf
19 hours ago
56
@asdf so charge for the extra time as they make the job harder...
– Solar Mike
19 hours ago
30
"The client is well aware of the situation" - this is the key factor. If you've made them aware, all that's left to do is send the bill. If they weren't aware, then make them aware... and then send the bill.
– UKMonkey
16 hours ago
4
I don' think this answer is in the best interest of the contractor, at least not if you are interested in working with company in the future. If you cannot get the job done because people in the company obstruct your work, you cannot just redirect the blame. Parts of it will stick.
– J. Fabian Meier
16 hours ago
9
@ElitotConfused Even if you are on a fixed price contract, you still have teh same answer. Make your higher ups aware of the problem. It is between your company's managers and the client company. Your company may pull people to work on other projects/clients. You cannot make the other team do anything.
– pboss3010
15 hours ago
|
show 12 more comments
This is normal. The client doesn't have a good development team, so they contract some of the work to you. Their development team realise that you are a threat to their jobs so they have no incentive to help you.
Their manager should have been aware that this was going to happen, and there are various things he can do to solve it, but that's not your problem.
Your problem is how to ensure that these delays don't make you look bad to the person paying the bill. Make sure he's aware that there are problems and ask how you can help him.
Maybe he'd like to know about email queries that are unanswered after a week, or maybe he'd like to be CC'd at the start. Maybe he'd like you to fix the other team's bugs and just bill him, but maybe he wants to approve each one.
2
Presumably there are formal contacts for the outsource company and the client company. Problems should be escalated to that level. The IT company should give regular feedback from that level. We completely X, and Y. Z will be completed in 3 weeks. "Elitot Confused" has been waiting two weeks for aaa so we do not have an estimated completion date for AAA. "Elitot Confused" has been waiting five weeks fo bbb and so we have stopped work on BBB. and so on. // Short version - Document everything!!!
– MaxW
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Email the requests to the client team, and follow up with an email after the amount of time it would have taken you to comply with that request. CC this (nicely worded) reminder to the boss of the client company. They will either ignore it or help you out. If they ignore it, you have the paper trail to prove you are not the ones slowing the project, if they help you, all the better. After some iterations the boss of the client company will think of a way to reduce his spam-load, and give you a quick pass through (Some person just passing along the messages, as your own personal VPN).
In parallel, try to establish a personal relationship with one or more members of the other team. The petty communication outages that they produce are a sign that they harbor personal resentment. This can often be remedied by face-to-face meet ups. I stress personal relationships. Not the 'let's implement X'-kind of conversation, but the 'public transport sure sucks, huh?'-common ground kind of conversation. Let them see the humans in your bunch of know-it-alls , and try yourself to see the humans in their bunch of nitwits.
Knowing the client, they will ignore the spam. We had a lot of chats and meeting with person of that team. Usually they stay on their ideas and we stay on ours. usually again ours proves to be correct and the client knows it (because we use solid proof to demonstrate our ideas)
– Elitot Confused
15 hours ago
1
@ElitotConfused If they ignore the spam, you will have a BS job, but a paid BS job - find the mental place to deal with that, or quit; --- about the meetups: I stress personal relationships. Not the 'let's implement X'-kind of conversation, but the 'public transport sure sucks, huh?' kind of conversation. Let them see the humans in your bunch of know-it-alls , and try yourself to see the humans in their bunch of nitwits.
– bukwyrm
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Client is well aware of the situation but he seems he wants to do
nothing to solve.
So, you've brought this to the attention of the "powers that be" and they're not interested in fixing the problem. I assume that they pay you for all of this "extra" work that you perform? If so, then either continue performing the work and continue getting paid for it or fire the client. There are no other options.
1
this is not helpful if for example boss of own company and boss of client insist on this relationship...
– Allerleirauh
20 hours ago
2
@Allerleirauh "there are no other options" may not be helpful but it is the right answer
– Pierre Arlaud
16 hours ago
1
We work on a body rental type of contract. There is no extra pay. the price is fixed at the beginning of the contract.
– Elitot Confused
15 hours ago
3
@ElitotConfused I understand you saying that the cost per hour is fixed, but is the number of hours fixed or the product delivered (or both)? If it is both, you should find a new job. Otherwise, the cost has been increased--either they are paying for more hours (overtime) or they are paying for more hours (because it will take longer to get their product delivered).
– user3067860
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Here is what I read:
- We are great
- Client not so much
- They don't like us
Pro-tip, sometimes it better to be liked than right. Who do you want to be friends with more, the boss man, or the workers? Boss man pays the bills so always be his friend. But sometimes it helps to be friends with the workers also.
So instead of "Us" versus "Them", try to make it "We".
Rule #1: BE NICE
I'm sure you are always very professional, but from what you said in your post, I'm doubting you are always nice.
Sometimes a friendly visit to the client, box of donuts/candy/meat-veg tray/ice cream/movie tickets/etc... can go along way. Basically say, "we want to get along, we want to help you, we are on your side."
Rule #2: Be in control
SVN? Really? If I was manager in this situation, I would say, "how can we manage the code better". Does Github let every Joe Haxxor commit their craptastic code the master repo? No. If possible, I'd maintain a separate Git repo, where you can add their contributions as separate pull requests. If they are stuck on SVN, so be it. You can give them your contributions as big single commits. Even if you have to move the code manually, its better than the client team screwing up the repo your team depends on.
Also, like the other posts said, document communications in case you need to CYA.
Good luck!
New contributor
add a comment |
Ask for a regular status meeting with the client (hopefully you have that already but I get the sense that you don't). (NOTE: By regular I mean at least weekly, if not 2-3 times a week. If you can swing it, a stand up every day would be ideal.) During this status meeting, talk about the roadblocks you currently have... list them one by one, what you need, what you are waiting for and from whom, and what the dangers are if the request isn't filled in a timely manner... the project quality will suffer, you will ship late, etc.
We sent an email last week that we need X from the suppliers and that we would need it within a week in order to not put the project deadline in danger. We are rapidly approaching a week since our request. Do you have any updates on when we might get X? If we don't get it by this Friday, we will have to push back the delivery date by a week.
We sent an email last week to Jim asking for clarification on the Widget code. We can't proceed until we get that clarification. When can we set up that meeting?
and so on. Don't be accusatory or emotional, be factual, be clear about what problems this issue is causing or will cause to the project. When you don't get X for 3 weeks and you needed it the next day, no one should be surprised when you state that the delivery date will slip by 3 weeks.
Once things start looking like you won't ship on the initially agreed upon time, start communicating regularly with the client management. Inform them that the X, Y, and Z delays that you have notified them of are of their teams' doing and will put you past the scheduled timeframe. Any additional work past X date will incur additional at the rate of $Z. (Maybe it's too late to do some of this but you can at least start dropping hints of contract renegotiation due to delays beyond your control and of the client company's making).
1
Yup. Status meeting should have the Joe Friday approach. "Just the facts sir..." It is not a place to brainstorm solutions. So the client contact takes a todo to have Joe at client's site respond or to find out when Joe will respond.
– MaxW
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Document each request, each complaint, and the hours wasted trying to work through the internal team to get the resources you need.
Right now, the internal team is fighting you because, so far, you have proven more capable of handling the application and are upstaging them - they are retaliating by making things more difficult for you.
Continue to provide the support you have thus far, and keep your client in the loop about all of these hang-ups. CC them, if you can, so that they are well aware of your attempts to keep things moving.
Eventually, they will have to confront this issue - but this is not your problem to solve. Your only concern should be getting your own work done, and showing that you are doing everything you can to get the resources for that work.
So long as you are doing your work to the degree you've described thus far, with the only complications being the internal team, they should have no reason to break off ties with you (though, they may want to consider restructuring that team - but again, this is not your problem to solve).
add a comment |
So I've read the existing answers and there's more to deal with.
Send your invoice to your client for your time.
Correct; however we also now have an employee morale problem on your side; or if we don't we will soon. Whatever cheapish things you can do to keep morale up, it's time to start doing them.
You may have to approach your customer with something along the lines of "Due to certain problems on your side causing an employee morale problem for us, we have to increase our future rates for you by about 10% so that we can buy perks for the employees." But please, find somebody more diplomatic than I.
1
OP is not the boss, so I don't think this answer makes sense for them.
– user87779
8 hours ago
@user87779: In which case the morale problem will have to propagate upwards until it does reach someone who can act on it.
– Joshua
6 hours ago
exactly, i agree. So maybe edit the answer to say that, and maybe a way for the OP to help if happen if you think they can.
– user87779
6 hours ago
@user87779: I don't suppose you could splice an edit in? I've ran out of ability (which is why my rep stays low...)
– Joshua
5 hours ago
huh, I'm not able to either. I wonder if the question was protected or something weird.
– user87779
3 hours ago
add a comment |
The customer (here: the client) is always right. As long as the customer pays. So as long as the customer pays for every hour you work, it doesn’t matter if their team is lazy and incompetent. If your job takes three times longer, you get paid three times as much.
Of course, as long as the customer pays. So you should have a log about anything you asked the client team to do, and when it was delivered, and with ho many bugs. So if the customer doesn’t want to pay, you can show them why things take so long.
1
The OP has said they get a fixed amount of money. I don't know exactly what that entails, but in a few other comments they seem to imply they don't get paid more for working longer. That seems crazy to me, but you may know more about situations like that.
– user87779
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Where is the client internal team located? Is there a possibility that somebody from your team can go to the site where the internal team is located? I have had experiences in the past with teams that were difficult to work with, and I find that the best solution is to just go down and talk with people directly. I have had to spend entire days tracking down information myself from internal teams, just because the communication and initiative was simply not there. There is no need to be abrasive, or confrontational, just show up and get the communication lines established. Find out if they have a weekly meeting and have someone attend it. The bottom line is that the other team is struggling and your work is showing that to everyone. They are defensive for a good reason, so just show up with the attitude of "how can we help each other?". Maybe you can start doing some mentoring, or help them improve their process. You are hired as consultants not just to deliver the project, but to enhance the company/team.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: false,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Elitot Confused is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f133309%2fclient-team-has-low-performances-and-low-technical-skills-we-always-fix-their-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(function () {
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
var showEditor = function() {
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
};
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True') {
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup({
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup) {
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
}
})
} else{
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
showEditor();
}
}
});
});
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Please don't mislead yourself, you are nothing more than an external contractor to the company. You are NOT part of the company, so there is no legal or moral reason to grant you anything more than you already have. You don't belong to the company, you are not their human resources, you work as a provider-client relationship.
You have been paid, right? There should not be any reason for you to go above the boundary, it's not your company. Please don't be emotional. If you're not given resources, simply ask. If not granted, it's not yours.
Someone that pass through a similar situation has some advice on how to solve this problem?
Simple. Send your invoice to your client for your time.
10
You are right! However, the poor performance on the client's internal team is making their job harder, so I understand the reason behind the question being posted
– asdf
19 hours ago
56
@asdf so charge for the extra time as they make the job harder...
– Solar Mike
19 hours ago
30
"The client is well aware of the situation" - this is the key factor. If you've made them aware, all that's left to do is send the bill. If they weren't aware, then make them aware... and then send the bill.
– UKMonkey
16 hours ago
4
I don' think this answer is in the best interest of the contractor, at least not if you are interested in working with company in the future. If you cannot get the job done because people in the company obstruct your work, you cannot just redirect the blame. Parts of it will stick.
– J. Fabian Meier
16 hours ago
9
@ElitotConfused Even if you are on a fixed price contract, you still have teh same answer. Make your higher ups aware of the problem. It is between your company's managers and the client company. Your company may pull people to work on other projects/clients. You cannot make the other team do anything.
– pboss3010
15 hours ago
|
show 12 more comments
Please don't mislead yourself, you are nothing more than an external contractor to the company. You are NOT part of the company, so there is no legal or moral reason to grant you anything more than you already have. You don't belong to the company, you are not their human resources, you work as a provider-client relationship.
You have been paid, right? There should not be any reason for you to go above the boundary, it's not your company. Please don't be emotional. If you're not given resources, simply ask. If not granted, it's not yours.
Someone that pass through a similar situation has some advice on how to solve this problem?
Simple. Send your invoice to your client for your time.
10
You are right! However, the poor performance on the client's internal team is making their job harder, so I understand the reason behind the question being posted
– asdf
19 hours ago
56
@asdf so charge for the extra time as they make the job harder...
– Solar Mike
19 hours ago
30
"The client is well aware of the situation" - this is the key factor. If you've made them aware, all that's left to do is send the bill. If they weren't aware, then make them aware... and then send the bill.
– UKMonkey
16 hours ago
4
I don' think this answer is in the best interest of the contractor, at least not if you are interested in working with company in the future. If you cannot get the job done because people in the company obstruct your work, you cannot just redirect the blame. Parts of it will stick.
– J. Fabian Meier
16 hours ago
9
@ElitotConfused Even if you are on a fixed price contract, you still have teh same answer. Make your higher ups aware of the problem. It is between your company's managers and the client company. Your company may pull people to work on other projects/clients. You cannot make the other team do anything.
– pboss3010
15 hours ago
|
show 12 more comments
Please don't mislead yourself, you are nothing more than an external contractor to the company. You are NOT part of the company, so there is no legal or moral reason to grant you anything more than you already have. You don't belong to the company, you are not their human resources, you work as a provider-client relationship.
You have been paid, right? There should not be any reason for you to go above the boundary, it's not your company. Please don't be emotional. If you're not given resources, simply ask. If not granted, it's not yours.
Someone that pass through a similar situation has some advice on how to solve this problem?
Simple. Send your invoice to your client for your time.
Please don't mislead yourself, you are nothing more than an external contractor to the company. You are NOT part of the company, so there is no legal or moral reason to grant you anything more than you already have. You don't belong to the company, you are not their human resources, you work as a provider-client relationship.
You have been paid, right? There should not be any reason for you to go above the boundary, it's not your company. Please don't be emotional. If you're not given resources, simply ask. If not granted, it's not yours.
Someone that pass through a similar situation has some advice on how to solve this problem?
Simple. Send your invoice to your client for your time.
edited 13 hours ago
AndreiROM
46k23108178
46k23108178
answered 20 hours ago
SmallChessSmallChess
1,3785924
1,3785924
10
You are right! However, the poor performance on the client's internal team is making their job harder, so I understand the reason behind the question being posted
– asdf
19 hours ago
56
@asdf so charge for the extra time as they make the job harder...
– Solar Mike
19 hours ago
30
"The client is well aware of the situation" - this is the key factor. If you've made them aware, all that's left to do is send the bill. If they weren't aware, then make them aware... and then send the bill.
– UKMonkey
16 hours ago
4
I don' think this answer is in the best interest of the contractor, at least not if you are interested in working with company in the future. If you cannot get the job done because people in the company obstruct your work, you cannot just redirect the blame. Parts of it will stick.
– J. Fabian Meier
16 hours ago
9
@ElitotConfused Even if you are on a fixed price contract, you still have teh same answer. Make your higher ups aware of the problem. It is between your company's managers and the client company. Your company may pull people to work on other projects/clients. You cannot make the other team do anything.
– pboss3010
15 hours ago
|
show 12 more comments
10
You are right! However, the poor performance on the client's internal team is making their job harder, so I understand the reason behind the question being posted
– asdf
19 hours ago
56
@asdf so charge for the extra time as they make the job harder...
– Solar Mike
19 hours ago
30
"The client is well aware of the situation" - this is the key factor. If you've made them aware, all that's left to do is send the bill. If they weren't aware, then make them aware... and then send the bill.
– UKMonkey
16 hours ago
4
I don' think this answer is in the best interest of the contractor, at least not if you are interested in working with company in the future. If you cannot get the job done because people in the company obstruct your work, you cannot just redirect the blame. Parts of it will stick.
– J. Fabian Meier
16 hours ago
9
@ElitotConfused Even if you are on a fixed price contract, you still have teh same answer. Make your higher ups aware of the problem. It is between your company's managers and the client company. Your company may pull people to work on other projects/clients. You cannot make the other team do anything.
– pboss3010
15 hours ago
10
10
You are right! However, the poor performance on the client's internal team is making their job harder, so I understand the reason behind the question being posted
– asdf
19 hours ago
You are right! However, the poor performance on the client's internal team is making their job harder, so I understand the reason behind the question being posted
– asdf
19 hours ago
56
56
@asdf so charge for the extra time as they make the job harder...
– Solar Mike
19 hours ago
@asdf so charge for the extra time as they make the job harder...
– Solar Mike
19 hours ago
30
30
"The client is well aware of the situation" - this is the key factor. If you've made them aware, all that's left to do is send the bill. If they weren't aware, then make them aware... and then send the bill.
– UKMonkey
16 hours ago
"The client is well aware of the situation" - this is the key factor. If you've made them aware, all that's left to do is send the bill. If they weren't aware, then make them aware... and then send the bill.
– UKMonkey
16 hours ago
4
4
I don' think this answer is in the best interest of the contractor, at least not if you are interested in working with company in the future. If you cannot get the job done because people in the company obstruct your work, you cannot just redirect the blame. Parts of it will stick.
– J. Fabian Meier
16 hours ago
I don' think this answer is in the best interest of the contractor, at least not if you are interested in working with company in the future. If you cannot get the job done because people in the company obstruct your work, you cannot just redirect the blame. Parts of it will stick.
– J. Fabian Meier
16 hours ago
9
9
@ElitotConfused Even if you are on a fixed price contract, you still have teh same answer. Make your higher ups aware of the problem. It is between your company's managers and the client company. Your company may pull people to work on other projects/clients. You cannot make the other team do anything.
– pboss3010
15 hours ago
@ElitotConfused Even if you are on a fixed price contract, you still have teh same answer. Make your higher ups aware of the problem. It is between your company's managers and the client company. Your company may pull people to work on other projects/clients. You cannot make the other team do anything.
– pboss3010
15 hours ago
|
show 12 more comments
This is normal. The client doesn't have a good development team, so they contract some of the work to you. Their development team realise that you are a threat to their jobs so they have no incentive to help you.
Their manager should have been aware that this was going to happen, and there are various things he can do to solve it, but that's not your problem.
Your problem is how to ensure that these delays don't make you look bad to the person paying the bill. Make sure he's aware that there are problems and ask how you can help him.
Maybe he'd like to know about email queries that are unanswered after a week, or maybe he'd like to be CC'd at the start. Maybe he'd like you to fix the other team's bugs and just bill him, but maybe he wants to approve each one.
2
Presumably there are formal contacts for the outsource company and the client company. Problems should be escalated to that level. The IT company should give regular feedback from that level. We completely X, and Y. Z will be completed in 3 weeks. "Elitot Confused" has been waiting two weeks for aaa so we do not have an estimated completion date for AAA. "Elitot Confused" has been waiting five weeks fo bbb and so we have stopped work on BBB. and so on. // Short version - Document everything!!!
– MaxW
10 hours ago
add a comment |
This is normal. The client doesn't have a good development team, so they contract some of the work to you. Their development team realise that you are a threat to their jobs so they have no incentive to help you.
Their manager should have been aware that this was going to happen, and there are various things he can do to solve it, but that's not your problem.
Your problem is how to ensure that these delays don't make you look bad to the person paying the bill. Make sure he's aware that there are problems and ask how you can help him.
Maybe he'd like to know about email queries that are unanswered after a week, or maybe he'd like to be CC'd at the start. Maybe he'd like you to fix the other team's bugs and just bill him, but maybe he wants to approve each one.
2
Presumably there are formal contacts for the outsource company and the client company. Problems should be escalated to that level. The IT company should give regular feedback from that level. We completely X, and Y. Z will be completed in 3 weeks. "Elitot Confused" has been waiting two weeks for aaa so we do not have an estimated completion date for AAA. "Elitot Confused" has been waiting five weeks fo bbb and so we have stopped work on BBB. and so on. // Short version - Document everything!!!
– MaxW
10 hours ago
add a comment |
This is normal. The client doesn't have a good development team, so they contract some of the work to you. Their development team realise that you are a threat to their jobs so they have no incentive to help you.
Their manager should have been aware that this was going to happen, and there are various things he can do to solve it, but that's not your problem.
Your problem is how to ensure that these delays don't make you look bad to the person paying the bill. Make sure he's aware that there are problems and ask how you can help him.
Maybe he'd like to know about email queries that are unanswered after a week, or maybe he'd like to be CC'd at the start. Maybe he'd like you to fix the other team's bugs and just bill him, but maybe he wants to approve each one.
This is normal. The client doesn't have a good development team, so they contract some of the work to you. Their development team realise that you are a threat to their jobs so they have no incentive to help you.
Their manager should have been aware that this was going to happen, and there are various things he can do to solve it, but that's not your problem.
Your problem is how to ensure that these delays don't make you look bad to the person paying the bill. Make sure he's aware that there are problems and ask how you can help him.
Maybe he'd like to know about email queries that are unanswered after a week, or maybe he'd like to be CC'd at the start. Maybe he'd like you to fix the other team's bugs and just bill him, but maybe he wants to approve each one.
answered 15 hours ago
Robin BennettRobin Bennett
35115
35115
2
Presumably there are formal contacts for the outsource company and the client company. Problems should be escalated to that level. The IT company should give regular feedback from that level. We completely X, and Y. Z will be completed in 3 weeks. "Elitot Confused" has been waiting two weeks for aaa so we do not have an estimated completion date for AAA. "Elitot Confused" has been waiting five weeks fo bbb and so we have stopped work on BBB. and so on. // Short version - Document everything!!!
– MaxW
10 hours ago
add a comment |
2
Presumably there are formal contacts for the outsource company and the client company. Problems should be escalated to that level. The IT company should give regular feedback from that level. We completely X, and Y. Z will be completed in 3 weeks. "Elitot Confused" has been waiting two weeks for aaa so we do not have an estimated completion date for AAA. "Elitot Confused" has been waiting five weeks fo bbb and so we have stopped work on BBB. and so on. // Short version - Document everything!!!
– MaxW
10 hours ago
2
2
Presumably there are formal contacts for the outsource company and the client company. Problems should be escalated to that level. The IT company should give regular feedback from that level. We completely X, and Y. Z will be completed in 3 weeks. "Elitot Confused" has been waiting two weeks for aaa so we do not have an estimated completion date for AAA. "Elitot Confused" has been waiting five weeks fo bbb and so we have stopped work on BBB. and so on. // Short version - Document everything!!!
– MaxW
10 hours ago
Presumably there are formal contacts for the outsource company and the client company. Problems should be escalated to that level. The IT company should give regular feedback from that level. We completely X, and Y. Z will be completed in 3 weeks. "Elitot Confused" has been waiting two weeks for aaa so we do not have an estimated completion date for AAA. "Elitot Confused" has been waiting five weeks fo bbb and so we have stopped work on BBB. and so on. // Short version - Document everything!!!
– MaxW
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Email the requests to the client team, and follow up with an email after the amount of time it would have taken you to comply with that request. CC this (nicely worded) reminder to the boss of the client company. They will either ignore it or help you out. If they ignore it, you have the paper trail to prove you are not the ones slowing the project, if they help you, all the better. After some iterations the boss of the client company will think of a way to reduce his spam-load, and give you a quick pass through (Some person just passing along the messages, as your own personal VPN).
In parallel, try to establish a personal relationship with one or more members of the other team. The petty communication outages that they produce are a sign that they harbor personal resentment. This can often be remedied by face-to-face meet ups. I stress personal relationships. Not the 'let's implement X'-kind of conversation, but the 'public transport sure sucks, huh?'-common ground kind of conversation. Let them see the humans in your bunch of know-it-alls , and try yourself to see the humans in their bunch of nitwits.
Knowing the client, they will ignore the spam. We had a lot of chats and meeting with person of that team. Usually they stay on their ideas and we stay on ours. usually again ours proves to be correct and the client knows it (because we use solid proof to demonstrate our ideas)
– Elitot Confused
15 hours ago
1
@ElitotConfused If they ignore the spam, you will have a BS job, but a paid BS job - find the mental place to deal with that, or quit; --- about the meetups: I stress personal relationships. Not the 'let's implement X'-kind of conversation, but the 'public transport sure sucks, huh?' kind of conversation. Let them see the humans in your bunch of know-it-alls , and try yourself to see the humans in their bunch of nitwits.
– bukwyrm
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Email the requests to the client team, and follow up with an email after the amount of time it would have taken you to comply with that request. CC this (nicely worded) reminder to the boss of the client company. They will either ignore it or help you out. If they ignore it, you have the paper trail to prove you are not the ones slowing the project, if they help you, all the better. After some iterations the boss of the client company will think of a way to reduce his spam-load, and give you a quick pass through (Some person just passing along the messages, as your own personal VPN).
In parallel, try to establish a personal relationship with one or more members of the other team. The petty communication outages that they produce are a sign that they harbor personal resentment. This can often be remedied by face-to-face meet ups. I stress personal relationships. Not the 'let's implement X'-kind of conversation, but the 'public transport sure sucks, huh?'-common ground kind of conversation. Let them see the humans in your bunch of know-it-alls , and try yourself to see the humans in their bunch of nitwits.
Knowing the client, they will ignore the spam. We had a lot of chats and meeting with person of that team. Usually they stay on their ideas and we stay on ours. usually again ours proves to be correct and the client knows it (because we use solid proof to demonstrate our ideas)
– Elitot Confused
15 hours ago
1
@ElitotConfused If they ignore the spam, you will have a BS job, but a paid BS job - find the mental place to deal with that, or quit; --- about the meetups: I stress personal relationships. Not the 'let's implement X'-kind of conversation, but the 'public transport sure sucks, huh?' kind of conversation. Let them see the humans in your bunch of know-it-alls , and try yourself to see the humans in their bunch of nitwits.
– bukwyrm
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Email the requests to the client team, and follow up with an email after the amount of time it would have taken you to comply with that request. CC this (nicely worded) reminder to the boss of the client company. They will either ignore it or help you out. If they ignore it, you have the paper trail to prove you are not the ones slowing the project, if they help you, all the better. After some iterations the boss of the client company will think of a way to reduce his spam-load, and give you a quick pass through (Some person just passing along the messages, as your own personal VPN).
In parallel, try to establish a personal relationship with one or more members of the other team. The petty communication outages that they produce are a sign that they harbor personal resentment. This can often be remedied by face-to-face meet ups. I stress personal relationships. Not the 'let's implement X'-kind of conversation, but the 'public transport sure sucks, huh?'-common ground kind of conversation. Let them see the humans in your bunch of know-it-alls , and try yourself to see the humans in their bunch of nitwits.
Email the requests to the client team, and follow up with an email after the amount of time it would have taken you to comply with that request. CC this (nicely worded) reminder to the boss of the client company. They will either ignore it or help you out. If they ignore it, you have the paper trail to prove you are not the ones slowing the project, if they help you, all the better. After some iterations the boss of the client company will think of a way to reduce his spam-load, and give you a quick pass through (Some person just passing along the messages, as your own personal VPN).
In parallel, try to establish a personal relationship with one or more members of the other team. The petty communication outages that they produce are a sign that they harbor personal resentment. This can often be remedied by face-to-face meet ups. I stress personal relationships. Not the 'let's implement X'-kind of conversation, but the 'public transport sure sucks, huh?'-common ground kind of conversation. Let them see the humans in your bunch of know-it-alls , and try yourself to see the humans in their bunch of nitwits.
edited 15 hours ago
answered 19 hours ago
bukwyrmbukwyrm
62838
62838
Knowing the client, they will ignore the spam. We had a lot of chats and meeting with person of that team. Usually they stay on their ideas and we stay on ours. usually again ours proves to be correct and the client knows it (because we use solid proof to demonstrate our ideas)
– Elitot Confused
15 hours ago
1
@ElitotConfused If they ignore the spam, you will have a BS job, but a paid BS job - find the mental place to deal with that, or quit; --- about the meetups: I stress personal relationships. Not the 'let's implement X'-kind of conversation, but the 'public transport sure sucks, huh?' kind of conversation. Let them see the humans in your bunch of know-it-alls , and try yourself to see the humans in their bunch of nitwits.
– bukwyrm
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Knowing the client, they will ignore the spam. We had a lot of chats and meeting with person of that team. Usually they stay on their ideas and we stay on ours. usually again ours proves to be correct and the client knows it (because we use solid proof to demonstrate our ideas)
– Elitot Confused
15 hours ago
1
@ElitotConfused If they ignore the spam, you will have a BS job, but a paid BS job - find the mental place to deal with that, or quit; --- about the meetups: I stress personal relationships. Not the 'let's implement X'-kind of conversation, but the 'public transport sure sucks, huh?' kind of conversation. Let them see the humans in your bunch of know-it-alls , and try yourself to see the humans in their bunch of nitwits.
– bukwyrm
15 hours ago
Knowing the client, they will ignore the spam. We had a lot of chats and meeting with person of that team. Usually they stay on their ideas and we stay on ours. usually again ours proves to be correct and the client knows it (because we use solid proof to demonstrate our ideas)
– Elitot Confused
15 hours ago
Knowing the client, they will ignore the spam. We had a lot of chats and meeting with person of that team. Usually they stay on their ideas and we stay on ours. usually again ours proves to be correct and the client knows it (because we use solid proof to demonstrate our ideas)
– Elitot Confused
15 hours ago
1
1
@ElitotConfused If they ignore the spam, you will have a BS job, but a paid BS job - find the mental place to deal with that, or quit; --- about the meetups: I stress personal relationships. Not the 'let's implement X'-kind of conversation, but the 'public transport sure sucks, huh?' kind of conversation. Let them see the humans in your bunch of know-it-alls , and try yourself to see the humans in their bunch of nitwits.
– bukwyrm
15 hours ago
@ElitotConfused If they ignore the spam, you will have a BS job, but a paid BS job - find the mental place to deal with that, or quit; --- about the meetups: I stress personal relationships. Not the 'let's implement X'-kind of conversation, but the 'public transport sure sucks, huh?' kind of conversation. Let them see the humans in your bunch of know-it-alls , and try yourself to see the humans in their bunch of nitwits.
– bukwyrm
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Client is well aware of the situation but he seems he wants to do
nothing to solve.
So, you've brought this to the attention of the "powers that be" and they're not interested in fixing the problem. I assume that they pay you for all of this "extra" work that you perform? If so, then either continue performing the work and continue getting paid for it or fire the client. There are no other options.
1
this is not helpful if for example boss of own company and boss of client insist on this relationship...
– Allerleirauh
20 hours ago
2
@Allerleirauh "there are no other options" may not be helpful but it is the right answer
– Pierre Arlaud
16 hours ago
1
We work on a body rental type of contract. There is no extra pay. the price is fixed at the beginning of the contract.
– Elitot Confused
15 hours ago
3
@ElitotConfused I understand you saying that the cost per hour is fixed, but is the number of hours fixed or the product delivered (or both)? If it is both, you should find a new job. Otherwise, the cost has been increased--either they are paying for more hours (overtime) or they are paying for more hours (because it will take longer to get their product delivered).
– user3067860
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Client is well aware of the situation but he seems he wants to do
nothing to solve.
So, you've brought this to the attention of the "powers that be" and they're not interested in fixing the problem. I assume that they pay you for all of this "extra" work that you perform? If so, then either continue performing the work and continue getting paid for it or fire the client. There are no other options.
1
this is not helpful if for example boss of own company and boss of client insist on this relationship...
– Allerleirauh
20 hours ago
2
@Allerleirauh "there are no other options" may not be helpful but it is the right answer
– Pierre Arlaud
16 hours ago
1
We work on a body rental type of contract. There is no extra pay. the price is fixed at the beginning of the contract.
– Elitot Confused
15 hours ago
3
@ElitotConfused I understand you saying that the cost per hour is fixed, but is the number of hours fixed or the product delivered (or both)? If it is both, you should find a new job. Otherwise, the cost has been increased--either they are paying for more hours (overtime) or they are paying for more hours (because it will take longer to get their product delivered).
– user3067860
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Client is well aware of the situation but he seems he wants to do
nothing to solve.
So, you've brought this to the attention of the "powers that be" and they're not interested in fixing the problem. I assume that they pay you for all of this "extra" work that you perform? If so, then either continue performing the work and continue getting paid for it or fire the client. There are no other options.
Client is well aware of the situation but he seems he wants to do
nothing to solve.
So, you've brought this to the attention of the "powers that be" and they're not interested in fixing the problem. I assume that they pay you for all of this "extra" work that you perform? If so, then either continue performing the work and continue getting paid for it or fire the client. There are no other options.
answered 20 hours ago
joeqwertyjoeqwerty
2,364516
2,364516
1
this is not helpful if for example boss of own company and boss of client insist on this relationship...
– Allerleirauh
20 hours ago
2
@Allerleirauh "there are no other options" may not be helpful but it is the right answer
– Pierre Arlaud
16 hours ago
1
We work on a body rental type of contract. There is no extra pay. the price is fixed at the beginning of the contract.
– Elitot Confused
15 hours ago
3
@ElitotConfused I understand you saying that the cost per hour is fixed, but is the number of hours fixed or the product delivered (or both)? If it is both, you should find a new job. Otherwise, the cost has been increased--either they are paying for more hours (overtime) or they are paying for more hours (because it will take longer to get their product delivered).
– user3067860
9 hours ago
add a comment |
1
this is not helpful if for example boss of own company and boss of client insist on this relationship...
– Allerleirauh
20 hours ago
2
@Allerleirauh "there are no other options" may not be helpful but it is the right answer
– Pierre Arlaud
16 hours ago
1
We work on a body rental type of contract. There is no extra pay. the price is fixed at the beginning of the contract.
– Elitot Confused
15 hours ago
3
@ElitotConfused I understand you saying that the cost per hour is fixed, but is the number of hours fixed or the product delivered (or both)? If it is both, you should find a new job. Otherwise, the cost has been increased--either they are paying for more hours (overtime) or they are paying for more hours (because it will take longer to get their product delivered).
– user3067860
9 hours ago
1
1
this is not helpful if for example boss of own company and boss of client insist on this relationship...
– Allerleirauh
20 hours ago
this is not helpful if for example boss of own company and boss of client insist on this relationship...
– Allerleirauh
20 hours ago
2
2
@Allerleirauh "there are no other options" may not be helpful but it is the right answer
– Pierre Arlaud
16 hours ago
@Allerleirauh "there are no other options" may not be helpful but it is the right answer
– Pierre Arlaud
16 hours ago
1
1
We work on a body rental type of contract. There is no extra pay. the price is fixed at the beginning of the contract.
– Elitot Confused
15 hours ago
We work on a body rental type of contract. There is no extra pay. the price is fixed at the beginning of the contract.
– Elitot Confused
15 hours ago
3
3
@ElitotConfused I understand you saying that the cost per hour is fixed, but is the number of hours fixed or the product delivered (or both)? If it is both, you should find a new job. Otherwise, the cost has been increased--either they are paying for more hours (overtime) or they are paying for more hours (because it will take longer to get their product delivered).
– user3067860
9 hours ago
@ElitotConfused I understand you saying that the cost per hour is fixed, but is the number of hours fixed or the product delivered (or both)? If it is both, you should find a new job. Otherwise, the cost has been increased--either they are paying for more hours (overtime) or they are paying for more hours (because it will take longer to get their product delivered).
– user3067860
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Here is what I read:
- We are great
- Client not so much
- They don't like us
Pro-tip, sometimes it better to be liked than right. Who do you want to be friends with more, the boss man, or the workers? Boss man pays the bills so always be his friend. But sometimes it helps to be friends with the workers also.
So instead of "Us" versus "Them", try to make it "We".
Rule #1: BE NICE
I'm sure you are always very professional, but from what you said in your post, I'm doubting you are always nice.
Sometimes a friendly visit to the client, box of donuts/candy/meat-veg tray/ice cream/movie tickets/etc... can go along way. Basically say, "we want to get along, we want to help you, we are on your side."
Rule #2: Be in control
SVN? Really? If I was manager in this situation, I would say, "how can we manage the code better". Does Github let every Joe Haxxor commit their craptastic code the master repo? No. If possible, I'd maintain a separate Git repo, where you can add their contributions as separate pull requests. If they are stuck on SVN, so be it. You can give them your contributions as big single commits. Even if you have to move the code manually, its better than the client team screwing up the repo your team depends on.
Also, like the other posts said, document communications in case you need to CYA.
Good luck!
New contributor
add a comment |
Here is what I read:
- We are great
- Client not so much
- They don't like us
Pro-tip, sometimes it better to be liked than right. Who do you want to be friends with more, the boss man, or the workers? Boss man pays the bills so always be his friend. But sometimes it helps to be friends with the workers also.
So instead of "Us" versus "Them", try to make it "We".
Rule #1: BE NICE
I'm sure you are always very professional, but from what you said in your post, I'm doubting you are always nice.
Sometimes a friendly visit to the client, box of donuts/candy/meat-veg tray/ice cream/movie tickets/etc... can go along way. Basically say, "we want to get along, we want to help you, we are on your side."
Rule #2: Be in control
SVN? Really? If I was manager in this situation, I would say, "how can we manage the code better". Does Github let every Joe Haxxor commit their craptastic code the master repo? No. If possible, I'd maintain a separate Git repo, where you can add their contributions as separate pull requests. If they are stuck on SVN, so be it. You can give them your contributions as big single commits. Even if you have to move the code manually, its better than the client team screwing up the repo your team depends on.
Also, like the other posts said, document communications in case you need to CYA.
Good luck!
New contributor
add a comment |
Here is what I read:
- We are great
- Client not so much
- They don't like us
Pro-tip, sometimes it better to be liked than right. Who do you want to be friends with more, the boss man, or the workers? Boss man pays the bills so always be his friend. But sometimes it helps to be friends with the workers also.
So instead of "Us" versus "Them", try to make it "We".
Rule #1: BE NICE
I'm sure you are always very professional, but from what you said in your post, I'm doubting you are always nice.
Sometimes a friendly visit to the client, box of donuts/candy/meat-veg tray/ice cream/movie tickets/etc... can go along way. Basically say, "we want to get along, we want to help you, we are on your side."
Rule #2: Be in control
SVN? Really? If I was manager in this situation, I would say, "how can we manage the code better". Does Github let every Joe Haxxor commit their craptastic code the master repo? No. If possible, I'd maintain a separate Git repo, where you can add their contributions as separate pull requests. If they are stuck on SVN, so be it. You can give them your contributions as big single commits. Even if you have to move the code manually, its better than the client team screwing up the repo your team depends on.
Also, like the other posts said, document communications in case you need to CYA.
Good luck!
New contributor
Here is what I read:
- We are great
- Client not so much
- They don't like us
Pro-tip, sometimes it better to be liked than right. Who do you want to be friends with more, the boss man, or the workers? Boss man pays the bills so always be his friend. But sometimes it helps to be friends with the workers also.
So instead of "Us" versus "Them", try to make it "We".
Rule #1: BE NICE
I'm sure you are always very professional, but from what you said in your post, I'm doubting you are always nice.
Sometimes a friendly visit to the client, box of donuts/candy/meat-veg tray/ice cream/movie tickets/etc... can go along way. Basically say, "we want to get along, we want to help you, we are on your side."
Rule #2: Be in control
SVN? Really? If I was manager in this situation, I would say, "how can we manage the code better". Does Github let every Joe Haxxor commit their craptastic code the master repo? No. If possible, I'd maintain a separate Git repo, where you can add their contributions as separate pull requests. If they are stuck on SVN, so be it. You can give them your contributions as big single commits. Even if you have to move the code manually, its better than the client team screwing up the repo your team depends on.
Also, like the other posts said, document communications in case you need to CYA.
Good luck!
New contributor
New contributor
answered 6 hours ago
Turtle1363Turtle1363
1313
1313
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Ask for a regular status meeting with the client (hopefully you have that already but I get the sense that you don't). (NOTE: By regular I mean at least weekly, if not 2-3 times a week. If you can swing it, a stand up every day would be ideal.) During this status meeting, talk about the roadblocks you currently have... list them one by one, what you need, what you are waiting for and from whom, and what the dangers are if the request isn't filled in a timely manner... the project quality will suffer, you will ship late, etc.
We sent an email last week that we need X from the suppliers and that we would need it within a week in order to not put the project deadline in danger. We are rapidly approaching a week since our request. Do you have any updates on when we might get X? If we don't get it by this Friday, we will have to push back the delivery date by a week.
We sent an email last week to Jim asking for clarification on the Widget code. We can't proceed until we get that clarification. When can we set up that meeting?
and so on. Don't be accusatory or emotional, be factual, be clear about what problems this issue is causing or will cause to the project. When you don't get X for 3 weeks and you needed it the next day, no one should be surprised when you state that the delivery date will slip by 3 weeks.
Once things start looking like you won't ship on the initially agreed upon time, start communicating regularly with the client management. Inform them that the X, Y, and Z delays that you have notified them of are of their teams' doing and will put you past the scheduled timeframe. Any additional work past X date will incur additional at the rate of $Z. (Maybe it's too late to do some of this but you can at least start dropping hints of contract renegotiation due to delays beyond your control and of the client company's making).
1
Yup. Status meeting should have the Joe Friday approach. "Just the facts sir..." It is not a place to brainstorm solutions. So the client contact takes a todo to have Joe at client's site respond or to find out when Joe will respond.
– MaxW
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Ask for a regular status meeting with the client (hopefully you have that already but I get the sense that you don't). (NOTE: By regular I mean at least weekly, if not 2-3 times a week. If you can swing it, a stand up every day would be ideal.) During this status meeting, talk about the roadblocks you currently have... list them one by one, what you need, what you are waiting for and from whom, and what the dangers are if the request isn't filled in a timely manner... the project quality will suffer, you will ship late, etc.
We sent an email last week that we need X from the suppliers and that we would need it within a week in order to not put the project deadline in danger. We are rapidly approaching a week since our request. Do you have any updates on when we might get X? If we don't get it by this Friday, we will have to push back the delivery date by a week.
We sent an email last week to Jim asking for clarification on the Widget code. We can't proceed until we get that clarification. When can we set up that meeting?
and so on. Don't be accusatory or emotional, be factual, be clear about what problems this issue is causing or will cause to the project. When you don't get X for 3 weeks and you needed it the next day, no one should be surprised when you state that the delivery date will slip by 3 weeks.
Once things start looking like you won't ship on the initially agreed upon time, start communicating regularly with the client management. Inform them that the X, Y, and Z delays that you have notified them of are of their teams' doing and will put you past the scheduled timeframe. Any additional work past X date will incur additional at the rate of $Z. (Maybe it's too late to do some of this but you can at least start dropping hints of contract renegotiation due to delays beyond your control and of the client company's making).
1
Yup. Status meeting should have the Joe Friday approach. "Just the facts sir..." It is not a place to brainstorm solutions. So the client contact takes a todo to have Joe at client's site respond or to find out when Joe will respond.
– MaxW
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Ask for a regular status meeting with the client (hopefully you have that already but I get the sense that you don't). (NOTE: By regular I mean at least weekly, if not 2-3 times a week. If you can swing it, a stand up every day would be ideal.) During this status meeting, talk about the roadblocks you currently have... list them one by one, what you need, what you are waiting for and from whom, and what the dangers are if the request isn't filled in a timely manner... the project quality will suffer, you will ship late, etc.
We sent an email last week that we need X from the suppliers and that we would need it within a week in order to not put the project deadline in danger. We are rapidly approaching a week since our request. Do you have any updates on when we might get X? If we don't get it by this Friday, we will have to push back the delivery date by a week.
We sent an email last week to Jim asking for clarification on the Widget code. We can't proceed until we get that clarification. When can we set up that meeting?
and so on. Don't be accusatory or emotional, be factual, be clear about what problems this issue is causing or will cause to the project. When you don't get X for 3 weeks and you needed it the next day, no one should be surprised when you state that the delivery date will slip by 3 weeks.
Once things start looking like you won't ship on the initially agreed upon time, start communicating regularly with the client management. Inform them that the X, Y, and Z delays that you have notified them of are of their teams' doing and will put you past the scheduled timeframe. Any additional work past X date will incur additional at the rate of $Z. (Maybe it's too late to do some of this but you can at least start dropping hints of contract renegotiation due to delays beyond your control and of the client company's making).
Ask for a regular status meeting with the client (hopefully you have that already but I get the sense that you don't). (NOTE: By regular I mean at least weekly, if not 2-3 times a week. If you can swing it, a stand up every day would be ideal.) During this status meeting, talk about the roadblocks you currently have... list them one by one, what you need, what you are waiting for and from whom, and what the dangers are if the request isn't filled in a timely manner... the project quality will suffer, you will ship late, etc.
We sent an email last week that we need X from the suppliers and that we would need it within a week in order to not put the project deadline in danger. We are rapidly approaching a week since our request. Do you have any updates on when we might get X? If we don't get it by this Friday, we will have to push back the delivery date by a week.
We sent an email last week to Jim asking for clarification on the Widget code. We can't proceed until we get that clarification. When can we set up that meeting?
and so on. Don't be accusatory or emotional, be factual, be clear about what problems this issue is causing or will cause to the project. When you don't get X for 3 weeks and you needed it the next day, no one should be surprised when you state that the delivery date will slip by 3 weeks.
Once things start looking like you won't ship on the initially agreed upon time, start communicating regularly with the client management. Inform them that the X, Y, and Z delays that you have notified them of are of their teams' doing and will put you past the scheduled timeframe. Any additional work past X date will incur additional at the rate of $Z. (Maybe it's too late to do some of this but you can at least start dropping hints of contract renegotiation due to delays beyond your control and of the client company's making).
answered 12 hours ago
JeffCJeffC
1,6271513
1,6271513
1
Yup. Status meeting should have the Joe Friday approach. "Just the facts sir..." It is not a place to brainstorm solutions. So the client contact takes a todo to have Joe at client's site respond or to find out when Joe will respond.
– MaxW
10 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Yup. Status meeting should have the Joe Friday approach. "Just the facts sir..." It is not a place to brainstorm solutions. So the client contact takes a todo to have Joe at client's site respond or to find out when Joe will respond.
– MaxW
10 hours ago
1
1
Yup. Status meeting should have the Joe Friday approach. "Just the facts sir..." It is not a place to brainstorm solutions. So the client contact takes a todo to have Joe at client's site respond or to find out when Joe will respond.
– MaxW
10 hours ago
Yup. Status meeting should have the Joe Friday approach. "Just the facts sir..." It is not a place to brainstorm solutions. So the client contact takes a todo to have Joe at client's site respond or to find out when Joe will respond.
– MaxW
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Document each request, each complaint, and the hours wasted trying to work through the internal team to get the resources you need.
Right now, the internal team is fighting you because, so far, you have proven more capable of handling the application and are upstaging them - they are retaliating by making things more difficult for you.
Continue to provide the support you have thus far, and keep your client in the loop about all of these hang-ups. CC them, if you can, so that they are well aware of your attempts to keep things moving.
Eventually, they will have to confront this issue - but this is not your problem to solve. Your only concern should be getting your own work done, and showing that you are doing everything you can to get the resources for that work.
So long as you are doing your work to the degree you've described thus far, with the only complications being the internal team, they should have no reason to break off ties with you (though, they may want to consider restructuring that team - but again, this is not your problem to solve).
add a comment |
Document each request, each complaint, and the hours wasted trying to work through the internal team to get the resources you need.
Right now, the internal team is fighting you because, so far, you have proven more capable of handling the application and are upstaging them - they are retaliating by making things more difficult for you.
Continue to provide the support you have thus far, and keep your client in the loop about all of these hang-ups. CC them, if you can, so that they are well aware of your attempts to keep things moving.
Eventually, they will have to confront this issue - but this is not your problem to solve. Your only concern should be getting your own work done, and showing that you are doing everything you can to get the resources for that work.
So long as you are doing your work to the degree you've described thus far, with the only complications being the internal team, they should have no reason to break off ties with you (though, they may want to consider restructuring that team - but again, this is not your problem to solve).
add a comment |
Document each request, each complaint, and the hours wasted trying to work through the internal team to get the resources you need.
Right now, the internal team is fighting you because, so far, you have proven more capable of handling the application and are upstaging them - they are retaliating by making things more difficult for you.
Continue to provide the support you have thus far, and keep your client in the loop about all of these hang-ups. CC them, if you can, so that they are well aware of your attempts to keep things moving.
Eventually, they will have to confront this issue - but this is not your problem to solve. Your only concern should be getting your own work done, and showing that you are doing everything you can to get the resources for that work.
So long as you are doing your work to the degree you've described thus far, with the only complications being the internal team, they should have no reason to break off ties with you (though, they may want to consider restructuring that team - but again, this is not your problem to solve).
Document each request, each complaint, and the hours wasted trying to work through the internal team to get the resources you need.
Right now, the internal team is fighting you because, so far, you have proven more capable of handling the application and are upstaging them - they are retaliating by making things more difficult for you.
Continue to provide the support you have thus far, and keep your client in the loop about all of these hang-ups. CC them, if you can, so that they are well aware of your attempts to keep things moving.
Eventually, they will have to confront this issue - but this is not your problem to solve. Your only concern should be getting your own work done, and showing that you are doing everything you can to get the resources for that work.
So long as you are doing your work to the degree you've described thus far, with the only complications being the internal team, they should have no reason to break off ties with you (though, they may want to consider restructuring that team - but again, this is not your problem to solve).
answered 12 hours ago
ZibbobzZibbobz
7,12952656
7,12952656
add a comment |
add a comment |
So I've read the existing answers and there's more to deal with.
Send your invoice to your client for your time.
Correct; however we also now have an employee morale problem on your side; or if we don't we will soon. Whatever cheapish things you can do to keep morale up, it's time to start doing them.
You may have to approach your customer with something along the lines of "Due to certain problems on your side causing an employee morale problem for us, we have to increase our future rates for you by about 10% so that we can buy perks for the employees." But please, find somebody more diplomatic than I.
1
OP is not the boss, so I don't think this answer makes sense for them.
– user87779
8 hours ago
@user87779: In which case the morale problem will have to propagate upwards until it does reach someone who can act on it.
– Joshua
6 hours ago
exactly, i agree. So maybe edit the answer to say that, and maybe a way for the OP to help if happen if you think they can.
– user87779
6 hours ago
@user87779: I don't suppose you could splice an edit in? I've ran out of ability (which is why my rep stays low...)
– Joshua
5 hours ago
huh, I'm not able to either. I wonder if the question was protected or something weird.
– user87779
3 hours ago
add a comment |
So I've read the existing answers and there's more to deal with.
Send your invoice to your client for your time.
Correct; however we also now have an employee morale problem on your side; or if we don't we will soon. Whatever cheapish things you can do to keep morale up, it's time to start doing them.
You may have to approach your customer with something along the lines of "Due to certain problems on your side causing an employee morale problem for us, we have to increase our future rates for you by about 10% so that we can buy perks for the employees." But please, find somebody more diplomatic than I.
1
OP is not the boss, so I don't think this answer makes sense for them.
– user87779
8 hours ago
@user87779: In which case the morale problem will have to propagate upwards until it does reach someone who can act on it.
– Joshua
6 hours ago
exactly, i agree. So maybe edit the answer to say that, and maybe a way for the OP to help if happen if you think they can.
– user87779
6 hours ago
@user87779: I don't suppose you could splice an edit in? I've ran out of ability (which is why my rep stays low...)
– Joshua
5 hours ago
huh, I'm not able to either. I wonder if the question was protected or something weird.
– user87779
3 hours ago
add a comment |
So I've read the existing answers and there's more to deal with.
Send your invoice to your client for your time.
Correct; however we also now have an employee morale problem on your side; or if we don't we will soon. Whatever cheapish things you can do to keep morale up, it's time to start doing them.
You may have to approach your customer with something along the lines of "Due to certain problems on your side causing an employee morale problem for us, we have to increase our future rates for you by about 10% so that we can buy perks for the employees." But please, find somebody more diplomatic than I.
So I've read the existing answers and there's more to deal with.
Send your invoice to your client for your time.
Correct; however we also now have an employee morale problem on your side; or if we don't we will soon. Whatever cheapish things you can do to keep morale up, it's time to start doing them.
You may have to approach your customer with something along the lines of "Due to certain problems on your side causing an employee morale problem for us, we have to increase our future rates for you by about 10% so that we can buy perks for the employees." But please, find somebody more diplomatic than I.
answered 12 hours ago
JoshuaJoshua
525412
525412
1
OP is not the boss, so I don't think this answer makes sense for them.
– user87779
8 hours ago
@user87779: In which case the morale problem will have to propagate upwards until it does reach someone who can act on it.
– Joshua
6 hours ago
exactly, i agree. So maybe edit the answer to say that, and maybe a way for the OP to help if happen if you think they can.
– user87779
6 hours ago
@user87779: I don't suppose you could splice an edit in? I've ran out of ability (which is why my rep stays low...)
– Joshua
5 hours ago
huh, I'm not able to either. I wonder if the question was protected or something weird.
– user87779
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
OP is not the boss, so I don't think this answer makes sense for them.
– user87779
8 hours ago
@user87779: In which case the morale problem will have to propagate upwards until it does reach someone who can act on it.
– Joshua
6 hours ago
exactly, i agree. So maybe edit the answer to say that, and maybe a way for the OP to help if happen if you think they can.
– user87779
6 hours ago
@user87779: I don't suppose you could splice an edit in? I've ran out of ability (which is why my rep stays low...)
– Joshua
5 hours ago
huh, I'm not able to either. I wonder if the question was protected or something weird.
– user87779
3 hours ago
1
1
OP is not the boss, so I don't think this answer makes sense for them.
– user87779
8 hours ago
OP is not the boss, so I don't think this answer makes sense for them.
– user87779
8 hours ago
@user87779: In which case the morale problem will have to propagate upwards until it does reach someone who can act on it.
– Joshua
6 hours ago
@user87779: In which case the morale problem will have to propagate upwards until it does reach someone who can act on it.
– Joshua
6 hours ago
exactly, i agree. So maybe edit the answer to say that, and maybe a way for the OP to help if happen if you think they can.
– user87779
6 hours ago
exactly, i agree. So maybe edit the answer to say that, and maybe a way for the OP to help if happen if you think they can.
– user87779
6 hours ago
@user87779: I don't suppose you could splice an edit in? I've ran out of ability (which is why my rep stays low...)
– Joshua
5 hours ago
@user87779: I don't suppose you could splice an edit in? I've ran out of ability (which is why my rep stays low...)
– Joshua
5 hours ago
huh, I'm not able to either. I wonder if the question was protected or something weird.
– user87779
3 hours ago
huh, I'm not able to either. I wonder if the question was protected or something weird.
– user87779
3 hours ago
add a comment |
The customer (here: the client) is always right. As long as the customer pays. So as long as the customer pays for every hour you work, it doesn’t matter if their team is lazy and incompetent. If your job takes three times longer, you get paid three times as much.
Of course, as long as the customer pays. So you should have a log about anything you asked the client team to do, and when it was delivered, and with ho many bugs. So if the customer doesn’t want to pay, you can show them why things take so long.
1
The OP has said they get a fixed amount of money. I don't know exactly what that entails, but in a few other comments they seem to imply they don't get paid more for working longer. That seems crazy to me, but you may know more about situations like that.
– user87779
5 hours ago
add a comment |
The customer (here: the client) is always right. As long as the customer pays. So as long as the customer pays for every hour you work, it doesn’t matter if their team is lazy and incompetent. If your job takes three times longer, you get paid three times as much.
Of course, as long as the customer pays. So you should have a log about anything you asked the client team to do, and when it was delivered, and with ho many bugs. So if the customer doesn’t want to pay, you can show them why things take so long.
1
The OP has said they get a fixed amount of money. I don't know exactly what that entails, but in a few other comments they seem to imply they don't get paid more for working longer. That seems crazy to me, but you may know more about situations like that.
– user87779
5 hours ago
add a comment |
The customer (here: the client) is always right. As long as the customer pays. So as long as the customer pays for every hour you work, it doesn’t matter if their team is lazy and incompetent. If your job takes three times longer, you get paid three times as much.
Of course, as long as the customer pays. So you should have a log about anything you asked the client team to do, and when it was delivered, and with ho many bugs. So if the customer doesn’t want to pay, you can show them why things take so long.
The customer (here: the client) is always right. As long as the customer pays. So as long as the customer pays for every hour you work, it doesn’t matter if their team is lazy and incompetent. If your job takes three times longer, you get paid three times as much.
Of course, as long as the customer pays. So you should have a log about anything you asked the client team to do, and when it was delivered, and with ho many bugs. So if the customer doesn’t want to pay, you can show them why things take so long.
answered 6 hours ago
gnasher729gnasher729
90.9k41161285
90.9k41161285
1
The OP has said they get a fixed amount of money. I don't know exactly what that entails, but in a few other comments they seem to imply they don't get paid more for working longer. That seems crazy to me, but you may know more about situations like that.
– user87779
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1
The OP has said they get a fixed amount of money. I don't know exactly what that entails, but in a few other comments they seem to imply they don't get paid more for working longer. That seems crazy to me, but you may know more about situations like that.
– user87779
5 hours ago
1
1
The OP has said they get a fixed amount of money. I don't know exactly what that entails, but in a few other comments they seem to imply they don't get paid more for working longer. That seems crazy to me, but you may know more about situations like that.
– user87779
5 hours ago
The OP has said they get a fixed amount of money. I don't know exactly what that entails, but in a few other comments they seem to imply they don't get paid more for working longer. That seems crazy to me, but you may know more about situations like that.
– user87779
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Where is the client internal team located? Is there a possibility that somebody from your team can go to the site where the internal team is located? I have had experiences in the past with teams that were difficult to work with, and I find that the best solution is to just go down and talk with people directly. I have had to spend entire days tracking down information myself from internal teams, just because the communication and initiative was simply not there. There is no need to be abrasive, or confrontational, just show up and get the communication lines established. Find out if they have a weekly meeting and have someone attend it. The bottom line is that the other team is struggling and your work is showing that to everyone. They are defensive for a good reason, so just show up with the attitude of "how can we help each other?". Maybe you can start doing some mentoring, or help them improve their process. You are hired as consultants not just to deliver the project, but to enhance the company/team.
New contributor
add a comment |
Where is the client internal team located? Is there a possibility that somebody from your team can go to the site where the internal team is located? I have had experiences in the past with teams that were difficult to work with, and I find that the best solution is to just go down and talk with people directly. I have had to spend entire days tracking down information myself from internal teams, just because the communication and initiative was simply not there. There is no need to be abrasive, or confrontational, just show up and get the communication lines established. Find out if they have a weekly meeting and have someone attend it. The bottom line is that the other team is struggling and your work is showing that to everyone. They are defensive for a good reason, so just show up with the attitude of "how can we help each other?". Maybe you can start doing some mentoring, or help them improve their process. You are hired as consultants not just to deliver the project, but to enhance the company/team.
New contributor
add a comment |
Where is the client internal team located? Is there a possibility that somebody from your team can go to the site where the internal team is located? I have had experiences in the past with teams that were difficult to work with, and I find that the best solution is to just go down and talk with people directly. I have had to spend entire days tracking down information myself from internal teams, just because the communication and initiative was simply not there. There is no need to be abrasive, or confrontational, just show up and get the communication lines established. Find out if they have a weekly meeting and have someone attend it. The bottom line is that the other team is struggling and your work is showing that to everyone. They are defensive for a good reason, so just show up with the attitude of "how can we help each other?". Maybe you can start doing some mentoring, or help them improve their process. You are hired as consultants not just to deliver the project, but to enhance the company/team.
New contributor
Where is the client internal team located? Is there a possibility that somebody from your team can go to the site where the internal team is located? I have had experiences in the past with teams that were difficult to work with, and I find that the best solution is to just go down and talk with people directly. I have had to spend entire days tracking down information myself from internal teams, just because the communication and initiative was simply not there. There is no need to be abrasive, or confrontational, just show up and get the communication lines established. Find out if they have a weekly meeting and have someone attend it. The bottom line is that the other team is struggling and your work is showing that to everyone. They are defensive for a good reason, so just show up with the attitude of "how can we help each other?". Maybe you can start doing some mentoring, or help them improve their process. You are hired as consultants not just to deliver the project, but to enhance the company/team.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 5 hours ago
Brian YBrian Y
1011
1011
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Elitot Confused is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Elitot Confused is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Elitot Confused is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Elitot Confused is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f133309%2fclient-team-has-low-performances-and-low-technical-skills-we-always-fix-their-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Maybe it will be useful to know the structure of client company. In my field there is a client (IT) who write details about the specifications and which we work with, but also there is a specialist division on client side (for who the software will be) which say "this task should be done, this not" and sort tasks according to priority. This division is authorized "above" both, the client IT and us. Is your client assimilable?
– Allerleirauh
20 hours ago
1
@Allerleirauh client is a big (mainly national) company with more or less 2000 employees. This company has an internal IT department but is not its main focus (about 100 people) My company is multinational with 20000 employees. I work in the IT division. Your client is not assimilable with ours: internal IT decides autonomously the tasks that should be done, at what priority and who will develop them (internally, externally and to which supplier)
– Elitot Confused
16 hours ago
12
Your company has 20,000 people? This is not something you should even attempt to manage yourself, as you are the team leader, not the one actually responsible for the contract. Tell your boss the issue; they will tell you what to do.
– MineR
14 hours ago
1
By "the client is well aware of the situation" do you mean that you, your management, or whoever is in charge of the contract in your company, has communicated with the person or persons in the other company who are in charge of the contract and responsible for approving payment of your company's invoices? From other things you have said, it sounds like you mean "I sent email more than once to the people I normally communicate with on their team". If that's what you really mean, then that's not "the client is well aware of the situation".
– Makyen
12 hours ago
2
The client is giving you additional work. One way to look at it is as a problem; the other way is as sales.
– John Wu
6 hours ago