How to resolve E: Internal Error when using apt-get remove?
I use:
apt-get remove
To remove some software, but it displays:
error:E: Internal Error, No file name for libssl1.0.0 .
I also try this to resolve the error:
wget http://launchpadlibrarian.net/102991621/libssl1.0.0_1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.5_i386.deb
sudo dpkg -i libssl1.0.0_1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.5_i386.deb
But it also gives an error :
libssl1.0.0:i386 1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.5 cannot be configured because libssl1.0.0:amd64 is in a different version (1.0.1-4ubuntu5.3)
I want know the correct way to solve this problem.
apt dpkg
add a comment |
I use:
apt-get remove
To remove some software, but it displays:
error:E: Internal Error, No file name for libssl1.0.0 .
I also try this to resolve the error:
wget http://launchpadlibrarian.net/102991621/libssl1.0.0_1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.5_i386.deb
sudo dpkg -i libssl1.0.0_1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.5_i386.deb
But it also gives an error :
libssl1.0.0:i386 1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.5 cannot be configured because libssl1.0.0:amd64 is in a different version (1.0.1-4ubuntu5.3)
I want know the correct way to solve this problem.
apt dpkg
add a comment |
I use:
apt-get remove
To remove some software, but it displays:
error:E: Internal Error, No file name for libssl1.0.0 .
I also try this to resolve the error:
wget http://launchpadlibrarian.net/102991621/libssl1.0.0_1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.5_i386.deb
sudo dpkg -i libssl1.0.0_1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.5_i386.deb
But it also gives an error :
libssl1.0.0:i386 1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.5 cannot be configured because libssl1.0.0:amd64 is in a different version (1.0.1-4ubuntu5.3)
I want know the correct way to solve this problem.
apt dpkg
I use:
apt-get remove
To remove some software, but it displays:
error:E: Internal Error, No file name for libssl1.0.0 .
I also try this to resolve the error:
wget http://launchpadlibrarian.net/102991621/libssl1.0.0_1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.5_i386.deb
sudo dpkg -i libssl1.0.0_1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.5_i386.deb
But it also gives an error :
libssl1.0.0:i386 1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.5 cannot be configured because libssl1.0.0:amd64 is in a different version (1.0.1-4ubuntu5.3)
I want know the correct way to solve this problem.
apt dpkg
apt dpkg
edited Aug 1 '13 at 5:11
Kevin Bowen
14.4k155970
14.4k155970
asked Jul 25 '12 at 3:24
yueyue
76113
76113
add a comment |
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
For me this works:
sudo dpkg --configure -a
Src: E: dpkg was interrupted... run 'sudo dpkg --configure -a'
Reboot then,
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
I hope it works for you too!
2
Worked for me. The installation of an update was interrupted by a full disk and after making room 'dpkg --configure -a' was enough to continue the installation.
– Martijn Heemels
Jun 10 '14 at 10:31
add a comment |
use dpkg -i on both of these:
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/o/openssl/libssl1.0.0_1.0.1-4ubuntu5.3_i386.deb
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/o/openssl/libssl1.0.0_1.0.1-4ubuntu5.3_amd64.deb
add a comment |
I also encountered this error on Ubuntu 12.04. I fixed it with the following commands:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get install -f
sudo dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb
sudo dpkg --configure -a
sudo apt-get install -f
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
3
installing all packages in /var/cache/apt/archives is dangerous and unnecessary.
– user72421
Jul 29 '12 at 20:27
might be dangerous but it worked like a charm. Thank you Eliah Kagan and user80001. I sure hope this dependancy hell with multiarch get's solved quickly. This is the second system that has been hosed by this problem and cost me several valueable hours to fix.
– Kat Amsterdam
Jul 31 '12 at 18:46
remember that with multi-arch all arches of the same package must be the same version.
– user72421
Aug 2 '12 at 18:24
Worked for me too. And I don't think installing all packages from that directory is dangerous in this case. The apt-get clean takes care of that.
– Pablo
Oct 5 '12 at 10:57
add a comment |
My problem stemmed from an unmet dependency for rhythmbox. Just the following 3 commands got rid of the dependency and error. These are from a previous posting.
error: E: Internal Error, No file name for libssl1.0.0
I just entered
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get install -f
add a comment |
If the suggestion
sudo dpkg --configure -a
does not work for you, try to reinstall both packages libssl1.0.0:i386
and libssl1.0.0:amd64
. You might have to force this because you temporarily break dependencies until these packages will have been reinstalled with the fourth of the followting command:
sudo dpkg --purge --force-depends libssl1.0.0:i386
sudo dpkg --purge --force-depends libssl1.0.0:amd64
sudo dpkg --configure -a
sudo apt-get -f install
add a comment |
sudo apt --fix-broken install
ubuntu 18.04
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f167784%2fhow-to-resolve-e-internal-error-when-using-apt-get-remove%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
For me this works:
sudo dpkg --configure -a
Src: E: dpkg was interrupted... run 'sudo dpkg --configure -a'
Reboot then,
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
I hope it works for you too!
2
Worked for me. The installation of an update was interrupted by a full disk and after making room 'dpkg --configure -a' was enough to continue the installation.
– Martijn Heemels
Jun 10 '14 at 10:31
add a comment |
For me this works:
sudo dpkg --configure -a
Src: E: dpkg was interrupted... run 'sudo dpkg --configure -a'
Reboot then,
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
I hope it works for you too!
2
Worked for me. The installation of an update was interrupted by a full disk and after making room 'dpkg --configure -a' was enough to continue the installation.
– Martijn Heemels
Jun 10 '14 at 10:31
add a comment |
For me this works:
sudo dpkg --configure -a
Src: E: dpkg was interrupted... run 'sudo dpkg --configure -a'
Reboot then,
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
I hope it works for you too!
For me this works:
sudo dpkg --configure -a
Src: E: dpkg was interrupted... run 'sudo dpkg --configure -a'
Reboot then,
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
I hope it works for you too!
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:25
Community♦
1
1
answered Mar 18 '13 at 16:55
Alejandro IllecasAlejandro Illecas
32123
32123
2
Worked for me. The installation of an update was interrupted by a full disk and after making room 'dpkg --configure -a' was enough to continue the installation.
– Martijn Heemels
Jun 10 '14 at 10:31
add a comment |
2
Worked for me. The installation of an update was interrupted by a full disk and after making room 'dpkg --configure -a' was enough to continue the installation.
– Martijn Heemels
Jun 10 '14 at 10:31
2
2
Worked for me. The installation of an update was interrupted by a full disk and after making room 'dpkg --configure -a' was enough to continue the installation.
– Martijn Heemels
Jun 10 '14 at 10:31
Worked for me. The installation of an update was interrupted by a full disk and after making room 'dpkg --configure -a' was enough to continue the installation.
– Martijn Heemels
Jun 10 '14 at 10:31
add a comment |
use dpkg -i on both of these:
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/o/openssl/libssl1.0.0_1.0.1-4ubuntu5.3_i386.deb
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/o/openssl/libssl1.0.0_1.0.1-4ubuntu5.3_amd64.deb
add a comment |
use dpkg -i on both of these:
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/o/openssl/libssl1.0.0_1.0.1-4ubuntu5.3_i386.deb
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/o/openssl/libssl1.0.0_1.0.1-4ubuntu5.3_amd64.deb
add a comment |
use dpkg -i on both of these:
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/o/openssl/libssl1.0.0_1.0.1-4ubuntu5.3_i386.deb
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/o/openssl/libssl1.0.0_1.0.1-4ubuntu5.3_amd64.deb
use dpkg -i on both of these:
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/o/openssl/libssl1.0.0_1.0.1-4ubuntu5.3_i386.deb
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/o/openssl/libssl1.0.0_1.0.1-4ubuntu5.3_amd64.deb
edited Mar 18 '13 at 16:57
Thomas Ward♦
44.1k23122174
44.1k23122174
answered Jul 29 '12 at 20:28
user72421user72421
2,261188
2,261188
add a comment |
add a comment |
I also encountered this error on Ubuntu 12.04. I fixed it with the following commands:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get install -f
sudo dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb
sudo dpkg --configure -a
sudo apt-get install -f
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
3
installing all packages in /var/cache/apt/archives is dangerous and unnecessary.
– user72421
Jul 29 '12 at 20:27
might be dangerous but it worked like a charm. Thank you Eliah Kagan and user80001. I sure hope this dependancy hell with multiarch get's solved quickly. This is the second system that has been hosed by this problem and cost me several valueable hours to fix.
– Kat Amsterdam
Jul 31 '12 at 18:46
remember that with multi-arch all arches of the same package must be the same version.
– user72421
Aug 2 '12 at 18:24
Worked for me too. And I don't think installing all packages from that directory is dangerous in this case. The apt-get clean takes care of that.
– Pablo
Oct 5 '12 at 10:57
add a comment |
I also encountered this error on Ubuntu 12.04. I fixed it with the following commands:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get install -f
sudo dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb
sudo dpkg --configure -a
sudo apt-get install -f
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
3
installing all packages in /var/cache/apt/archives is dangerous and unnecessary.
– user72421
Jul 29 '12 at 20:27
might be dangerous but it worked like a charm. Thank you Eliah Kagan and user80001. I sure hope this dependancy hell with multiarch get's solved quickly. This is the second system that has been hosed by this problem and cost me several valueable hours to fix.
– Kat Amsterdam
Jul 31 '12 at 18:46
remember that with multi-arch all arches of the same package must be the same version.
– user72421
Aug 2 '12 at 18:24
Worked for me too. And I don't think installing all packages from that directory is dangerous in this case. The apt-get clean takes care of that.
– Pablo
Oct 5 '12 at 10:57
add a comment |
I also encountered this error on Ubuntu 12.04. I fixed it with the following commands:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get install -f
sudo dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb
sudo dpkg --configure -a
sudo apt-get install -f
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
I also encountered this error on Ubuntu 12.04. I fixed it with the following commands:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get install -f
sudo dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb
sudo dpkg --configure -a
sudo apt-get install -f
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
edited Apr 21 '18 at 23:51
mchid
22.8k25184
22.8k25184
answered Jul 29 '12 at 6:36
user80001user80001
511
511
3
installing all packages in /var/cache/apt/archives is dangerous and unnecessary.
– user72421
Jul 29 '12 at 20:27
might be dangerous but it worked like a charm. Thank you Eliah Kagan and user80001. I sure hope this dependancy hell with multiarch get's solved quickly. This is the second system that has been hosed by this problem and cost me several valueable hours to fix.
– Kat Amsterdam
Jul 31 '12 at 18:46
remember that with multi-arch all arches of the same package must be the same version.
– user72421
Aug 2 '12 at 18:24
Worked for me too. And I don't think installing all packages from that directory is dangerous in this case. The apt-get clean takes care of that.
– Pablo
Oct 5 '12 at 10:57
add a comment |
3
installing all packages in /var/cache/apt/archives is dangerous and unnecessary.
– user72421
Jul 29 '12 at 20:27
might be dangerous but it worked like a charm. Thank you Eliah Kagan and user80001. I sure hope this dependancy hell with multiarch get's solved quickly. This is the second system that has been hosed by this problem and cost me several valueable hours to fix.
– Kat Amsterdam
Jul 31 '12 at 18:46
remember that with multi-arch all arches of the same package must be the same version.
– user72421
Aug 2 '12 at 18:24
Worked for me too. And I don't think installing all packages from that directory is dangerous in this case. The apt-get clean takes care of that.
– Pablo
Oct 5 '12 at 10:57
3
3
installing all packages in /var/cache/apt/archives is dangerous and unnecessary.
– user72421
Jul 29 '12 at 20:27
installing all packages in /var/cache/apt/archives is dangerous and unnecessary.
– user72421
Jul 29 '12 at 20:27
might be dangerous but it worked like a charm. Thank you Eliah Kagan and user80001. I sure hope this dependancy hell with multiarch get's solved quickly. This is the second system that has been hosed by this problem and cost me several valueable hours to fix.
– Kat Amsterdam
Jul 31 '12 at 18:46
might be dangerous but it worked like a charm. Thank you Eliah Kagan and user80001. I sure hope this dependancy hell with multiarch get's solved quickly. This is the second system that has been hosed by this problem and cost me several valueable hours to fix.
– Kat Amsterdam
Jul 31 '12 at 18:46
remember that with multi-arch all arches of the same package must be the same version.
– user72421
Aug 2 '12 at 18:24
remember that with multi-arch all arches of the same package must be the same version.
– user72421
Aug 2 '12 at 18:24
Worked for me too. And I don't think installing all packages from that directory is dangerous in this case. The apt-get clean takes care of that.
– Pablo
Oct 5 '12 at 10:57
Worked for me too. And I don't think installing all packages from that directory is dangerous in this case. The apt-get clean takes care of that.
– Pablo
Oct 5 '12 at 10:57
add a comment |
My problem stemmed from an unmet dependency for rhythmbox. Just the following 3 commands got rid of the dependency and error. These are from a previous posting.
error: E: Internal Error, No file name for libssl1.0.0
I just entered
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get install -f
add a comment |
My problem stemmed from an unmet dependency for rhythmbox. Just the following 3 commands got rid of the dependency and error. These are from a previous posting.
error: E: Internal Error, No file name for libssl1.0.0
I just entered
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get install -f
add a comment |
My problem stemmed from an unmet dependency for rhythmbox. Just the following 3 commands got rid of the dependency and error. These are from a previous posting.
error: E: Internal Error, No file name for libssl1.0.0
I just entered
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get install -f
My problem stemmed from an unmet dependency for rhythmbox. Just the following 3 commands got rid of the dependency and error. These are from a previous posting.
error: E: Internal Error, No file name for libssl1.0.0
I just entered
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get install -f
edited Apr 21 '18 at 23:50
mchid
22.8k25184
22.8k25184
answered Feb 4 '14 at 15:13
ratmanratman
111
111
add a comment |
add a comment |
If the suggestion
sudo dpkg --configure -a
does not work for you, try to reinstall both packages libssl1.0.0:i386
and libssl1.0.0:amd64
. You might have to force this because you temporarily break dependencies until these packages will have been reinstalled with the fourth of the followting command:
sudo dpkg --purge --force-depends libssl1.0.0:i386
sudo dpkg --purge --force-depends libssl1.0.0:amd64
sudo dpkg --configure -a
sudo apt-get -f install
add a comment |
If the suggestion
sudo dpkg --configure -a
does not work for you, try to reinstall both packages libssl1.0.0:i386
and libssl1.0.0:amd64
. You might have to force this because you temporarily break dependencies until these packages will have been reinstalled with the fourth of the followting command:
sudo dpkg --purge --force-depends libssl1.0.0:i386
sudo dpkg --purge --force-depends libssl1.0.0:amd64
sudo dpkg --configure -a
sudo apt-get -f install
add a comment |
If the suggestion
sudo dpkg --configure -a
does not work for you, try to reinstall both packages libssl1.0.0:i386
and libssl1.0.0:amd64
. You might have to force this because you temporarily break dependencies until these packages will have been reinstalled with the fourth of the followting command:
sudo dpkg --purge --force-depends libssl1.0.0:i386
sudo dpkg --purge --force-depends libssl1.0.0:amd64
sudo dpkg --configure -a
sudo apt-get -f install
If the suggestion
sudo dpkg --configure -a
does not work for you, try to reinstall both packages libssl1.0.0:i386
and libssl1.0.0:amd64
. You might have to force this because you temporarily break dependencies until these packages will have been reinstalled with the fourth of the followting command:
sudo dpkg --purge --force-depends libssl1.0.0:i386
sudo dpkg --purge --force-depends libssl1.0.0:amd64
sudo dpkg --configure -a
sudo apt-get -f install
answered Jun 16 '15 at 10:17
Alex1357Alex1357
52759
52759
add a comment |
add a comment |
sudo apt --fix-broken install
ubuntu 18.04
add a comment |
sudo apt --fix-broken install
ubuntu 18.04
add a comment |
sudo apt --fix-broken install
ubuntu 18.04
sudo apt --fix-broken install
ubuntu 18.04
answered 9 mins ago
MasterJMasterJ
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f167784%2fhow-to-resolve-e-internal-error-when-using-apt-get-remove%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown