Radeon HD 2000, 3000, 4000 on Ubuntu 12.04.2 and higher: fglrx (legacy) unsupported, what to do?
After upgrading to 12.10 quantal, the packaged version of fglrx no longer works. I discovered that this is because there is a separate 'legacy' fglrx driver for the HD 2k-4k series cards, but it is incompatible with the xorg server on 12.10.
This is the most current version of the driver for HD 2000 through HD 4000 series cards. You can't use the non-legacy fglrx driver, but you can use the open-source radeon driver if you prefer your WM compositing to be laggy and your YouTube videos to play like they would on a Pentium MMX series:
http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/catalyst126legacyproducts.aspx
Usually this driver can be installed in the following way, necessary because apt-get install fglrx
would pull in the non-legacy driver:
wget http://www2.ati.com/drivers/legacy/amd-driver-installer-12.6-legacy-x86.x86_64.zip
unzip amd-driver-installer-*
sudo sh ./amd-driver-installer-*.run --buildpkg Ubuntu/quantal
sudo dpkg -i fglrx*.deb
sudo aticonfig --initial -f
If you use a different version of fglrx (for example, a newer 12.9 that doesn't support those cards) then the final command will give you an error no supported hardware detected
or something similar. However, everything works at this point and you will get a reasonable xorg.conf:
... other stuff
Section "Device"
Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
Driver "fglrx"
BusID "PCI:1:5:0"
EndSection
... other stuff
At this point you're supposed to reboot and everything will be working with the fglrx driver. However, upon rebooting, you'll be treated to the following errors in Xorg.0.log
when fglrx
attempts to load:
(EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: undefined symbol: noXFree86DRIExtension
Some searching around will show that this is a problem with the legacy ATI drivers not supporting xserver 1.13 or newer. (Arch Linux thread) ATI has released a fixed driver for its most recent (HD 5000 series or later) cards, but not for the 'legacy' cards yet. The non-legacy ATI drivers can't be used with the old cards.
What should an Ubuntu user, using one of these HD 2000-4000 series cards, do?
- Wait for an updated 'legacy' ATI driver that properly works with xserver 1.13?
- Downgrade back to 12.04 Precise, which uses xserver 1.11?
- Try to downgrade xserver on 12.10 Quantal to 1.12, which could possibly break Unity and GNOME?
- Forced upgrade to HD 5000 series or later card? (Not possible with integrated graphics...)
- Some other 1337 action that fixes this problem painlessly?
drivers ati xorg radeon fglrx
add a comment |
After upgrading to 12.10 quantal, the packaged version of fglrx no longer works. I discovered that this is because there is a separate 'legacy' fglrx driver for the HD 2k-4k series cards, but it is incompatible with the xorg server on 12.10.
This is the most current version of the driver for HD 2000 through HD 4000 series cards. You can't use the non-legacy fglrx driver, but you can use the open-source radeon driver if you prefer your WM compositing to be laggy and your YouTube videos to play like they would on a Pentium MMX series:
http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/catalyst126legacyproducts.aspx
Usually this driver can be installed in the following way, necessary because apt-get install fglrx
would pull in the non-legacy driver:
wget http://www2.ati.com/drivers/legacy/amd-driver-installer-12.6-legacy-x86.x86_64.zip
unzip amd-driver-installer-*
sudo sh ./amd-driver-installer-*.run --buildpkg Ubuntu/quantal
sudo dpkg -i fglrx*.deb
sudo aticonfig --initial -f
If you use a different version of fglrx (for example, a newer 12.9 that doesn't support those cards) then the final command will give you an error no supported hardware detected
or something similar. However, everything works at this point and you will get a reasonable xorg.conf:
... other stuff
Section "Device"
Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
Driver "fglrx"
BusID "PCI:1:5:0"
EndSection
... other stuff
At this point you're supposed to reboot and everything will be working with the fglrx driver. However, upon rebooting, you'll be treated to the following errors in Xorg.0.log
when fglrx
attempts to load:
(EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: undefined symbol: noXFree86DRIExtension
Some searching around will show that this is a problem with the legacy ATI drivers not supporting xserver 1.13 or newer. (Arch Linux thread) ATI has released a fixed driver for its most recent (HD 5000 series or later) cards, but not for the 'legacy' cards yet. The non-legacy ATI drivers can't be used with the old cards.
What should an Ubuntu user, using one of these HD 2000-4000 series cards, do?
- Wait for an updated 'legacy' ATI driver that properly works with xserver 1.13?
- Downgrade back to 12.04 Precise, which uses xserver 1.11?
- Try to downgrade xserver on 12.10 Quantal to 1.12, which could possibly break Unity and GNOME?
- Forced upgrade to HD 5000 series or later card? (Not possible with integrated graphics...)
- Some other 1337 action that fixes this problem painlessly?
drivers ati xorg radeon fglrx
My answer in a related thread. Might help you.
– Glutanimate
Oct 26 '12 at 17:25
askubuntu.com/questions/78906/…
– Gerard
Apr 25 '14 at 16:11
add a comment |
After upgrading to 12.10 quantal, the packaged version of fglrx no longer works. I discovered that this is because there is a separate 'legacy' fglrx driver for the HD 2k-4k series cards, but it is incompatible with the xorg server on 12.10.
This is the most current version of the driver for HD 2000 through HD 4000 series cards. You can't use the non-legacy fglrx driver, but you can use the open-source radeon driver if you prefer your WM compositing to be laggy and your YouTube videos to play like they would on a Pentium MMX series:
http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/catalyst126legacyproducts.aspx
Usually this driver can be installed in the following way, necessary because apt-get install fglrx
would pull in the non-legacy driver:
wget http://www2.ati.com/drivers/legacy/amd-driver-installer-12.6-legacy-x86.x86_64.zip
unzip amd-driver-installer-*
sudo sh ./amd-driver-installer-*.run --buildpkg Ubuntu/quantal
sudo dpkg -i fglrx*.deb
sudo aticonfig --initial -f
If you use a different version of fglrx (for example, a newer 12.9 that doesn't support those cards) then the final command will give you an error no supported hardware detected
or something similar. However, everything works at this point and you will get a reasonable xorg.conf:
... other stuff
Section "Device"
Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
Driver "fglrx"
BusID "PCI:1:5:0"
EndSection
... other stuff
At this point you're supposed to reboot and everything will be working with the fglrx driver. However, upon rebooting, you'll be treated to the following errors in Xorg.0.log
when fglrx
attempts to load:
(EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: undefined symbol: noXFree86DRIExtension
Some searching around will show that this is a problem with the legacy ATI drivers not supporting xserver 1.13 or newer. (Arch Linux thread) ATI has released a fixed driver for its most recent (HD 5000 series or later) cards, but not for the 'legacy' cards yet. The non-legacy ATI drivers can't be used with the old cards.
What should an Ubuntu user, using one of these HD 2000-4000 series cards, do?
- Wait for an updated 'legacy' ATI driver that properly works with xserver 1.13?
- Downgrade back to 12.04 Precise, which uses xserver 1.11?
- Try to downgrade xserver on 12.10 Quantal to 1.12, which could possibly break Unity and GNOME?
- Forced upgrade to HD 5000 series or later card? (Not possible with integrated graphics...)
- Some other 1337 action that fixes this problem painlessly?
drivers ati xorg radeon fglrx
After upgrading to 12.10 quantal, the packaged version of fglrx no longer works. I discovered that this is because there is a separate 'legacy' fglrx driver for the HD 2k-4k series cards, but it is incompatible with the xorg server on 12.10.
This is the most current version of the driver for HD 2000 through HD 4000 series cards. You can't use the non-legacy fglrx driver, but you can use the open-source radeon driver if you prefer your WM compositing to be laggy and your YouTube videos to play like they would on a Pentium MMX series:
http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/catalyst126legacyproducts.aspx
Usually this driver can be installed in the following way, necessary because apt-get install fglrx
would pull in the non-legacy driver:
wget http://www2.ati.com/drivers/legacy/amd-driver-installer-12.6-legacy-x86.x86_64.zip
unzip amd-driver-installer-*
sudo sh ./amd-driver-installer-*.run --buildpkg Ubuntu/quantal
sudo dpkg -i fglrx*.deb
sudo aticonfig --initial -f
If you use a different version of fglrx (for example, a newer 12.9 that doesn't support those cards) then the final command will give you an error no supported hardware detected
or something similar. However, everything works at this point and you will get a reasonable xorg.conf:
... other stuff
Section "Device"
Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
Driver "fglrx"
BusID "PCI:1:5:0"
EndSection
... other stuff
At this point you're supposed to reboot and everything will be working with the fglrx driver. However, upon rebooting, you'll be treated to the following errors in Xorg.0.log
when fglrx
attempts to load:
(EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: undefined symbol: noXFree86DRIExtension
Some searching around will show that this is a problem with the legacy ATI drivers not supporting xserver 1.13 or newer. (Arch Linux thread) ATI has released a fixed driver for its most recent (HD 5000 series or later) cards, but not for the 'legacy' cards yet. The non-legacy ATI drivers can't be used with the old cards.
What should an Ubuntu user, using one of these HD 2000-4000 series cards, do?
- Wait for an updated 'legacy' ATI driver that properly works with xserver 1.13?
- Downgrade back to 12.04 Precise, which uses xserver 1.11?
- Try to downgrade xserver on 12.10 Quantal to 1.12, which could possibly break Unity and GNOME?
- Forced upgrade to HD 5000 series or later card? (Not possible with integrated graphics...)
- Some other 1337 action that fixes this problem painlessly?
drivers ati xorg radeon fglrx
drivers ati xorg radeon fglrx
edited Aug 6 '14 at 11:53
bain
9,15323042
9,15323042
asked Oct 19 '12 at 21:39
Andrew MaoAndrew Mao
98611018
98611018
My answer in a related thread. Might help you.
– Glutanimate
Oct 26 '12 at 17:25
askubuntu.com/questions/78906/…
– Gerard
Apr 25 '14 at 16:11
add a comment |
My answer in a related thread. Might help you.
– Glutanimate
Oct 26 '12 at 17:25
askubuntu.com/questions/78906/…
– Gerard
Apr 25 '14 at 16:11
My answer in a related thread. Might help you.
– Glutanimate
Oct 26 '12 at 17:25
My answer in a related thread. Might help you.
– Glutanimate
Oct 26 '12 at 17:25
askubuntu.com/questions/78906/…
– Gerard
Apr 25 '14 at 16:11
askubuntu.com/questions/78906/…
– Gerard
Apr 25 '14 at 16:11
add a comment |
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
There's the ppa:makson96/fglrx PPA that has the legacy driver. It will also downgrade your Kernel and X server to older versions, as the legacy driver is not compatible with newer Kernels nor X servers. However, please read the release notes from the link as the driver isn't fully compatible with the Unity used in Ubuntu 13.04.
If you want to use the PPA, run these commands from the terminal to downgrade the Kernel and X server and to install the legacy driver:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:makson96/fglrx
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get install fglrx-legacy
add a comment |
I have ATI Mobility 4650 HD and installing this broke my unity and opengl. I got things working with this (found here):
sudo sh /usr/share/ati/fglrx-uninstall.sh
sudo apt-get remove --purge fglrx fglrx_* fglrx-amdcccle* fglrx-dev*
sudo rm /etc/X11/xorg.conf
sudo apt-get install --reinstall xserver-xorg-core libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri
sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
sudo reboot
I hope this helps until there is an official driver release by ATI.
I think you had the opposite problem. This will help because ATI is no longer supported cards less than 5000. This works because you purged the proprietary driver, allowing the better built-in open source driver to do its thing. I didn't have any desktop at all after upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04, and this fixed everything for me.
– Cerin
Jan 3 '15 at 6:20
add a comment |
If using AMD/ATI GPU drivers: Run the following command to remove them, and reboot:
sudo apt-get purge fglrx
Don't reinstall them as ATI cards (rather AMD Catalyst) currently don't support Unity-3D.
As to the optionsyou have, I'd suggest #1: Wait for AMD/ATI to catch up.
1
I have 12.04, and since this summer I am using RADEON drivers which for normal desktop use, in gnome-shell, works quite well. My card is:(--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro" (ChipID = 0x94c3)
– Rmano
Oct 24 '12 at 9:49
@Rmano I've used ATI Radeon drivers on 12.04 myself without qualms. But the same drivers fail MISERABLY on 12.10. The reason behinds this are: a. New variant of Unity in 12.10. b. Unity-2D has been discontinued with 12.10.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 12:29
this is dire news. Do you know if Radeon drivers works with gnome shell? I had my hand on the "update" button seconds before reading this.
– Rmano
Oct 24 '12 at 13:47
1
@Rmano The Radeon drivers (calledfglrx
) work well with gnome-shell, but not the new xserver. However, I believe that using open-source drivers for the time being should not be an issue. You can do pretty much decent gaming with them as well. Just wait for AMD to release something like an update or patch or for Canonical or other FOSS communities/developers to release something. I too let gotfglrx
for open drivers to upgrade to 12.10 and have no regrets whatsoever.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 17:07
1
Yes, open-source drivers work fine with xserver, Unity (3D) and gnome-shell.
– TomKat
Oct 25 '12 at 14:09
|
show 1 more comment
I have a Compaq Presario CQ56, with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250. Tried to use the ppa repository (as mentioned by lienmeat) and breaks my system with the legacy driver.
Actually, downgrading Xserver works well, but the fglrx not :S. In fact, ubuntu doesn't detect my card, son I can't even download the "privative driver" that the OS always suggested me.
In other words, I don't recommend install legacy with the method menciones above, the best desition us to wait for a fix
(Sorry for my bad english, i'm from Costa Rica, my english is not that good as my spanish xD)
Don't download the driver that the OS suggests. Install the catalyst 12.6 legacy driver that I linked to in my original question, then use the commands to install it.
– Andrew Mao
Oct 23 '12 at 14:43
@egamboau If using 12.10, just don't install ATI drivers. They've failed on all the systems with 12.10 I've tried. Works like a charm in 12.04, though. The new xserver & Unity are not supported by fglrx, and Unity-2D has been discontinued.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 12:35
add a comment |
Open source driver would work for me even considering less perfomance than fglrx, if it had a proper power consuption management.
I have Dell Inspiron 1545 with ATi Radeon 4350, and unfortunately open source driver seems not to manage GPU cooler state. The cooler was always on and running loud, nevertheless the system/graphics load. Once I downgraded the X server to 1.12.3 and installed legacy driver, as suggested by Fglrx on Launchpad (the same as lienmeat suggested us to do), GPU cooler started to work only if needed. Bless you silence of the coolers.
However, it would be great if AMD released legacy drivers supporting newer X server(s), though now I'm not sure they really care.
Eh, my laptop is this one: forum.notebookreview.com/acer/… Terrible design. Right now i have temp1: +57.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) on the gpu idling with nothing but firefox, about 10+ degrees than the closed drivers, and that's on always 'min' power setting, on 'medium' it crashes sometimes during the first minutes (a process that is doing a mimetype file database).
– i30817
Mar 23 '13 at 9:05
add a comment |
I have an ATI Radeon HD 4770 and the open source drivers are working quite nicely. I don't know which card you have, but you may end up having better luck than with fglrx and downgrading your xorg. I used fglrx for years and this summer switched over to the open source drivers and haven't looked back.
Granted, some effects in Compiz are slower using the open source drivers. Also, 3D gaming is noticeably slower without fglrx. However, for most of your desktop use, the open source drivers are much easier to use than fglrx, with the added bonus of being actually supported.
(Incidentally, the Gnome Shell packaged in 12.10 works very nicely with the open source drivers, and is much faster than Compiz/Unity!)
I have a chipset integrated Radeon HD 4290 which is in dire need of fglrx. I think with more powerful cards like your 4770, there is some breathing room for the open source drivers to be somewhat blah and the compositing to still work well...but not the case for my low end integrated card.
– Andrew Mao
Oct 23 '12 at 18:48
add a comment |
Repo for putting last good proprietary driver : http://www.ubuntuvibes.com/2012/10/how-to-install-amd-catalyst-legacy.html
1
Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.
– fossfreedom♦
Nov 4 '12 at 22:59
add a comment |
A workaround for this problem is posted at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2073279
2
Welcome to Ask Ubuntu! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.
– fossfreedom♦
Nov 4 '12 at 22:58
This thread helped me fix fglrx-legacy install after using the recommended approach above. By doing these: sudo apt-get purge fglrx-amdcccle-legacy fglrx-legacy-dev fglrx-legacy sudo rm -R /usr/lib/fglrx sudo rm -R /usr/share/ati
– gare
Feb 15 '13 at 14:28
add a comment |
I have an old Radeon Mobility HD 2600 on 13.04. It did not suffice for me to install the above repository (makson), because when checking Xorg -version it had not downgraded Xorg.
What I finally ended up doing was rebooting into recovery, removing all xorg packages (which triggered removal of the package ubuntu-desktop (gulp)) and then reinstalling the packages again. This triggering the retrieving of the packages from the repository.
Something like:
sudo apt-get remove xserver-*
sudo apt-get autoremove
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Have to play around with it! After that I got into a high-resolution desktop. Just reset Unity, enable the OpenGL plugin in ccsm and we're good to go!
add a comment |
Guys If You Have any Graphics Resolution problem.
Just go to update manager-->Additional drivers-->select the default driver and reboot.
You might want to tell folks how to do this without a GUI since having no GUI is what got them here in the first place.
– Dale E. Moore
Dec 25 '13 at 3:50
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f203232%2fradeon-hd-2000-3000-4000-on-ubuntu-12-04-2-and-higher-fglrx-legacy-unsuppor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There's the ppa:makson96/fglrx PPA that has the legacy driver. It will also downgrade your Kernel and X server to older versions, as the legacy driver is not compatible with newer Kernels nor X servers. However, please read the release notes from the link as the driver isn't fully compatible with the Unity used in Ubuntu 13.04.
If you want to use the PPA, run these commands from the terminal to downgrade the Kernel and X server and to install the legacy driver:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:makson96/fglrx
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get install fglrx-legacy
add a comment |
There's the ppa:makson96/fglrx PPA that has the legacy driver. It will also downgrade your Kernel and X server to older versions, as the legacy driver is not compatible with newer Kernels nor X servers. However, please read the release notes from the link as the driver isn't fully compatible with the Unity used in Ubuntu 13.04.
If you want to use the PPA, run these commands from the terminal to downgrade the Kernel and X server and to install the legacy driver:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:makson96/fglrx
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get install fglrx-legacy
add a comment |
There's the ppa:makson96/fglrx PPA that has the legacy driver. It will also downgrade your Kernel and X server to older versions, as the legacy driver is not compatible with newer Kernels nor X servers. However, please read the release notes from the link as the driver isn't fully compatible with the Unity used in Ubuntu 13.04.
If you want to use the PPA, run these commands from the terminal to downgrade the Kernel and X server and to install the legacy driver:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:makson96/fglrx
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get install fglrx-legacy
There's the ppa:makson96/fglrx PPA that has the legacy driver. It will also downgrade your Kernel and X server to older versions, as the legacy driver is not compatible with newer Kernels nor X servers. However, please read the release notes from the link as the driver isn't fully compatible with the Unity used in Ubuntu 13.04.
If you want to use the PPA, run these commands from the terminal to downgrade the Kernel and X server and to install the legacy driver:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:makson96/fglrx
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get install fglrx-legacy
answered Jul 6 '13 at 11:36
papukaijapapukaija
2,3092024
2,3092024
add a comment |
add a comment |
I have ATI Mobility 4650 HD and installing this broke my unity and opengl. I got things working with this (found here):
sudo sh /usr/share/ati/fglrx-uninstall.sh
sudo apt-get remove --purge fglrx fglrx_* fglrx-amdcccle* fglrx-dev*
sudo rm /etc/X11/xorg.conf
sudo apt-get install --reinstall xserver-xorg-core libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri
sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
sudo reboot
I hope this helps until there is an official driver release by ATI.
I think you had the opposite problem. This will help because ATI is no longer supported cards less than 5000. This works because you purged the proprietary driver, allowing the better built-in open source driver to do its thing. I didn't have any desktop at all after upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04, and this fixed everything for me.
– Cerin
Jan 3 '15 at 6:20
add a comment |
I have ATI Mobility 4650 HD and installing this broke my unity and opengl. I got things working with this (found here):
sudo sh /usr/share/ati/fglrx-uninstall.sh
sudo apt-get remove --purge fglrx fglrx_* fglrx-amdcccle* fglrx-dev*
sudo rm /etc/X11/xorg.conf
sudo apt-get install --reinstall xserver-xorg-core libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri
sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
sudo reboot
I hope this helps until there is an official driver release by ATI.
I think you had the opposite problem. This will help because ATI is no longer supported cards less than 5000. This works because you purged the proprietary driver, allowing the better built-in open source driver to do its thing. I didn't have any desktop at all after upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04, and this fixed everything for me.
– Cerin
Jan 3 '15 at 6:20
add a comment |
I have ATI Mobility 4650 HD and installing this broke my unity and opengl. I got things working with this (found here):
sudo sh /usr/share/ati/fglrx-uninstall.sh
sudo apt-get remove --purge fglrx fglrx_* fglrx-amdcccle* fglrx-dev*
sudo rm /etc/X11/xorg.conf
sudo apt-get install --reinstall xserver-xorg-core libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri
sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
sudo reboot
I hope this helps until there is an official driver release by ATI.
I have ATI Mobility 4650 HD and installing this broke my unity and opengl. I got things working with this (found here):
sudo sh /usr/share/ati/fglrx-uninstall.sh
sudo apt-get remove --purge fglrx fglrx_* fglrx-amdcccle* fglrx-dev*
sudo rm /etc/X11/xorg.conf
sudo apt-get install --reinstall xserver-xorg-core libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri
sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
sudo reboot
I hope this helps until there is an official driver release by ATI.
edited Nov 2 '12 at 14:18
Evandro Silva
6,48852944
6,48852944
answered Nov 1 '12 at 19:59
SpirosSpiros
211
211
I think you had the opposite problem. This will help because ATI is no longer supported cards less than 5000. This works because you purged the proprietary driver, allowing the better built-in open source driver to do its thing. I didn't have any desktop at all after upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04, and this fixed everything for me.
– Cerin
Jan 3 '15 at 6:20
add a comment |
I think you had the opposite problem. This will help because ATI is no longer supported cards less than 5000. This works because you purged the proprietary driver, allowing the better built-in open source driver to do its thing. I didn't have any desktop at all after upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04, and this fixed everything for me.
– Cerin
Jan 3 '15 at 6:20
I think you had the opposite problem. This will help because ATI is no longer supported cards less than 5000. This works because you purged the proprietary driver, allowing the better built-in open source driver to do its thing. I didn't have any desktop at all after upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04, and this fixed everything for me.
– Cerin
Jan 3 '15 at 6:20
I think you had the opposite problem. This will help because ATI is no longer supported cards less than 5000. This works because you purged the proprietary driver, allowing the better built-in open source driver to do its thing. I didn't have any desktop at all after upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04, and this fixed everything for me.
– Cerin
Jan 3 '15 at 6:20
add a comment |
If using AMD/ATI GPU drivers: Run the following command to remove them, and reboot:
sudo apt-get purge fglrx
Don't reinstall them as ATI cards (rather AMD Catalyst) currently don't support Unity-3D.
As to the optionsyou have, I'd suggest #1: Wait for AMD/ATI to catch up.
1
I have 12.04, and since this summer I am using RADEON drivers which for normal desktop use, in gnome-shell, works quite well. My card is:(--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro" (ChipID = 0x94c3)
– Rmano
Oct 24 '12 at 9:49
@Rmano I've used ATI Radeon drivers on 12.04 myself without qualms. But the same drivers fail MISERABLY on 12.10. The reason behinds this are: a. New variant of Unity in 12.10. b. Unity-2D has been discontinued with 12.10.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 12:29
this is dire news. Do you know if Radeon drivers works with gnome shell? I had my hand on the "update" button seconds before reading this.
– Rmano
Oct 24 '12 at 13:47
1
@Rmano The Radeon drivers (calledfglrx
) work well with gnome-shell, but not the new xserver. However, I believe that using open-source drivers for the time being should not be an issue. You can do pretty much decent gaming with them as well. Just wait for AMD to release something like an update or patch or for Canonical or other FOSS communities/developers to release something. I too let gotfglrx
for open drivers to upgrade to 12.10 and have no regrets whatsoever.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 17:07
1
Yes, open-source drivers work fine with xserver, Unity (3D) and gnome-shell.
– TomKat
Oct 25 '12 at 14:09
|
show 1 more comment
If using AMD/ATI GPU drivers: Run the following command to remove them, and reboot:
sudo apt-get purge fglrx
Don't reinstall them as ATI cards (rather AMD Catalyst) currently don't support Unity-3D.
As to the optionsyou have, I'd suggest #1: Wait for AMD/ATI to catch up.
1
I have 12.04, and since this summer I am using RADEON drivers which for normal desktop use, in gnome-shell, works quite well. My card is:(--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro" (ChipID = 0x94c3)
– Rmano
Oct 24 '12 at 9:49
@Rmano I've used ATI Radeon drivers on 12.04 myself without qualms. But the same drivers fail MISERABLY on 12.10. The reason behinds this are: a. New variant of Unity in 12.10. b. Unity-2D has been discontinued with 12.10.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 12:29
this is dire news. Do you know if Radeon drivers works with gnome shell? I had my hand on the "update" button seconds before reading this.
– Rmano
Oct 24 '12 at 13:47
1
@Rmano The Radeon drivers (calledfglrx
) work well with gnome-shell, but not the new xserver. However, I believe that using open-source drivers for the time being should not be an issue. You can do pretty much decent gaming with them as well. Just wait for AMD to release something like an update or patch or for Canonical or other FOSS communities/developers to release something. I too let gotfglrx
for open drivers to upgrade to 12.10 and have no regrets whatsoever.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 17:07
1
Yes, open-source drivers work fine with xserver, Unity (3D) and gnome-shell.
– TomKat
Oct 25 '12 at 14:09
|
show 1 more comment
If using AMD/ATI GPU drivers: Run the following command to remove them, and reboot:
sudo apt-get purge fglrx
Don't reinstall them as ATI cards (rather AMD Catalyst) currently don't support Unity-3D.
As to the optionsyou have, I'd suggest #1: Wait for AMD/ATI to catch up.
If using AMD/ATI GPU drivers: Run the following command to remove them, and reboot:
sudo apt-get purge fglrx
Don't reinstall them as ATI cards (rather AMD Catalyst) currently don't support Unity-3D.
As to the optionsyou have, I'd suggest #1: Wait for AMD/ATI to catch up.
edited 11 mins ago
clearkimura
3,98511956
3,98511956
answered Oct 24 '12 at 7:07
TomKatTomKat
3,7801332
3,7801332
1
I have 12.04, and since this summer I am using RADEON drivers which for normal desktop use, in gnome-shell, works quite well. My card is:(--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro" (ChipID = 0x94c3)
– Rmano
Oct 24 '12 at 9:49
@Rmano I've used ATI Radeon drivers on 12.04 myself without qualms. But the same drivers fail MISERABLY on 12.10. The reason behinds this are: a. New variant of Unity in 12.10. b. Unity-2D has been discontinued with 12.10.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 12:29
this is dire news. Do you know if Radeon drivers works with gnome shell? I had my hand on the "update" button seconds before reading this.
– Rmano
Oct 24 '12 at 13:47
1
@Rmano The Radeon drivers (calledfglrx
) work well with gnome-shell, but not the new xserver. However, I believe that using open-source drivers for the time being should not be an issue. You can do pretty much decent gaming with them as well. Just wait for AMD to release something like an update or patch or for Canonical or other FOSS communities/developers to release something. I too let gotfglrx
for open drivers to upgrade to 12.10 and have no regrets whatsoever.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 17:07
1
Yes, open-source drivers work fine with xserver, Unity (3D) and gnome-shell.
– TomKat
Oct 25 '12 at 14:09
|
show 1 more comment
1
I have 12.04, and since this summer I am using RADEON drivers which for normal desktop use, in gnome-shell, works quite well. My card is:(--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro" (ChipID = 0x94c3)
– Rmano
Oct 24 '12 at 9:49
@Rmano I've used ATI Radeon drivers on 12.04 myself without qualms. But the same drivers fail MISERABLY on 12.10. The reason behinds this are: a. New variant of Unity in 12.10. b. Unity-2D has been discontinued with 12.10.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 12:29
this is dire news. Do you know if Radeon drivers works with gnome shell? I had my hand on the "update" button seconds before reading this.
– Rmano
Oct 24 '12 at 13:47
1
@Rmano The Radeon drivers (calledfglrx
) work well with gnome-shell, but not the new xserver. However, I believe that using open-source drivers for the time being should not be an issue. You can do pretty much decent gaming with them as well. Just wait for AMD to release something like an update or patch or for Canonical or other FOSS communities/developers to release something. I too let gotfglrx
for open drivers to upgrade to 12.10 and have no regrets whatsoever.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 17:07
1
Yes, open-source drivers work fine with xserver, Unity (3D) and gnome-shell.
– TomKat
Oct 25 '12 at 14:09
1
1
I have 12.04, and since this summer I am using RADEON drivers which for normal desktop use, in gnome-shell, works quite well. My card is:
(--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro" (ChipID = 0x94c3)
– Rmano
Oct 24 '12 at 9:49
I have 12.04, and since this summer I am using RADEON drivers which for normal desktop use, in gnome-shell, works quite well. My card is:
(--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro" (ChipID = 0x94c3)
– Rmano
Oct 24 '12 at 9:49
@Rmano I've used ATI Radeon drivers on 12.04 myself without qualms. But the same drivers fail MISERABLY on 12.10. The reason behinds this are: a. New variant of Unity in 12.10. b. Unity-2D has been discontinued with 12.10.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 12:29
@Rmano I've used ATI Radeon drivers on 12.04 myself without qualms. But the same drivers fail MISERABLY on 12.10. The reason behinds this are: a. New variant of Unity in 12.10. b. Unity-2D has been discontinued with 12.10.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 12:29
this is dire news. Do you know if Radeon drivers works with gnome shell? I had my hand on the "update" button seconds before reading this.
– Rmano
Oct 24 '12 at 13:47
this is dire news. Do you know if Radeon drivers works with gnome shell? I had my hand on the "update" button seconds before reading this.
– Rmano
Oct 24 '12 at 13:47
1
1
@Rmano The Radeon drivers (called
fglrx
) work well with gnome-shell, but not the new xserver. However, I believe that using open-source drivers for the time being should not be an issue. You can do pretty much decent gaming with them as well. Just wait for AMD to release something like an update or patch or for Canonical or other FOSS communities/developers to release something. I too let got fglrx
for open drivers to upgrade to 12.10 and have no regrets whatsoever.– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 17:07
@Rmano The Radeon drivers (called
fglrx
) work well with gnome-shell, but not the new xserver. However, I believe that using open-source drivers for the time being should not be an issue. You can do pretty much decent gaming with them as well. Just wait for AMD to release something like an update or patch or for Canonical or other FOSS communities/developers to release something. I too let got fglrx
for open drivers to upgrade to 12.10 and have no regrets whatsoever.– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 17:07
1
1
Yes, open-source drivers work fine with xserver, Unity (3D) and gnome-shell.
– TomKat
Oct 25 '12 at 14:09
Yes, open-source drivers work fine with xserver, Unity (3D) and gnome-shell.
– TomKat
Oct 25 '12 at 14:09
|
show 1 more comment
I have a Compaq Presario CQ56, with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250. Tried to use the ppa repository (as mentioned by lienmeat) and breaks my system with the legacy driver.
Actually, downgrading Xserver works well, but the fglrx not :S. In fact, ubuntu doesn't detect my card, son I can't even download the "privative driver" that the OS always suggested me.
In other words, I don't recommend install legacy with the method menciones above, the best desition us to wait for a fix
(Sorry for my bad english, i'm from Costa Rica, my english is not that good as my spanish xD)
Don't download the driver that the OS suggests. Install the catalyst 12.6 legacy driver that I linked to in my original question, then use the commands to install it.
– Andrew Mao
Oct 23 '12 at 14:43
@egamboau If using 12.10, just don't install ATI drivers. They've failed on all the systems with 12.10 I've tried. Works like a charm in 12.04, though. The new xserver & Unity are not supported by fglrx, and Unity-2D has been discontinued.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 12:35
add a comment |
I have a Compaq Presario CQ56, with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250. Tried to use the ppa repository (as mentioned by lienmeat) and breaks my system with the legacy driver.
Actually, downgrading Xserver works well, but the fglrx not :S. In fact, ubuntu doesn't detect my card, son I can't even download the "privative driver" that the OS always suggested me.
In other words, I don't recommend install legacy with the method menciones above, the best desition us to wait for a fix
(Sorry for my bad english, i'm from Costa Rica, my english is not that good as my spanish xD)
Don't download the driver that the OS suggests. Install the catalyst 12.6 legacy driver that I linked to in my original question, then use the commands to install it.
– Andrew Mao
Oct 23 '12 at 14:43
@egamboau If using 12.10, just don't install ATI drivers. They've failed on all the systems with 12.10 I've tried. Works like a charm in 12.04, though. The new xserver & Unity are not supported by fglrx, and Unity-2D has been discontinued.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 12:35
add a comment |
I have a Compaq Presario CQ56, with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250. Tried to use the ppa repository (as mentioned by lienmeat) and breaks my system with the legacy driver.
Actually, downgrading Xserver works well, but the fglrx not :S. In fact, ubuntu doesn't detect my card, son I can't even download the "privative driver" that the OS always suggested me.
In other words, I don't recommend install legacy with the method menciones above, the best desition us to wait for a fix
(Sorry for my bad english, i'm from Costa Rica, my english is not that good as my spanish xD)
I have a Compaq Presario CQ56, with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250. Tried to use the ppa repository (as mentioned by lienmeat) and breaks my system with the legacy driver.
Actually, downgrading Xserver works well, but the fglrx not :S. In fact, ubuntu doesn't detect my card, son I can't even download the "privative driver" that the OS always suggested me.
In other words, I don't recommend install legacy with the method menciones above, the best desition us to wait for a fix
(Sorry for my bad english, i'm from Costa Rica, my english is not that good as my spanish xD)
answered Oct 23 '12 at 3:22
egamboauegamboau
111
111
Don't download the driver that the OS suggests. Install the catalyst 12.6 legacy driver that I linked to in my original question, then use the commands to install it.
– Andrew Mao
Oct 23 '12 at 14:43
@egamboau If using 12.10, just don't install ATI drivers. They've failed on all the systems with 12.10 I've tried. Works like a charm in 12.04, though. The new xserver & Unity are not supported by fglrx, and Unity-2D has been discontinued.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 12:35
add a comment |
Don't download the driver that the OS suggests. Install the catalyst 12.6 legacy driver that I linked to in my original question, then use the commands to install it.
– Andrew Mao
Oct 23 '12 at 14:43
@egamboau If using 12.10, just don't install ATI drivers. They've failed on all the systems with 12.10 I've tried. Works like a charm in 12.04, though. The new xserver & Unity are not supported by fglrx, and Unity-2D has been discontinued.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 12:35
Don't download the driver that the OS suggests. Install the catalyst 12.6 legacy driver that I linked to in my original question, then use the commands to install it.
– Andrew Mao
Oct 23 '12 at 14:43
Don't download the driver that the OS suggests. Install the catalyst 12.6 legacy driver that I linked to in my original question, then use the commands to install it.
– Andrew Mao
Oct 23 '12 at 14:43
@egamboau If using 12.10, just don't install ATI drivers. They've failed on all the systems with 12.10 I've tried. Works like a charm in 12.04, though. The new xserver & Unity are not supported by fglrx, and Unity-2D has been discontinued.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 12:35
@egamboau If using 12.10, just don't install ATI drivers. They've failed on all the systems with 12.10 I've tried. Works like a charm in 12.04, though. The new xserver & Unity are not supported by fglrx, and Unity-2D has been discontinued.
– TomKat
Oct 24 '12 at 12:35
add a comment |
Open source driver would work for me even considering less perfomance than fglrx, if it had a proper power consuption management.
I have Dell Inspiron 1545 with ATi Radeon 4350, and unfortunately open source driver seems not to manage GPU cooler state. The cooler was always on and running loud, nevertheless the system/graphics load. Once I downgraded the X server to 1.12.3 and installed legacy driver, as suggested by Fglrx on Launchpad (the same as lienmeat suggested us to do), GPU cooler started to work only if needed. Bless you silence of the coolers.
However, it would be great if AMD released legacy drivers supporting newer X server(s), though now I'm not sure they really care.
Eh, my laptop is this one: forum.notebookreview.com/acer/… Terrible design. Right now i have temp1: +57.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) on the gpu idling with nothing but firefox, about 10+ degrees than the closed drivers, and that's on always 'min' power setting, on 'medium' it crashes sometimes during the first minutes (a process that is doing a mimetype file database).
– i30817
Mar 23 '13 at 9:05
add a comment |
Open source driver would work for me even considering less perfomance than fglrx, if it had a proper power consuption management.
I have Dell Inspiron 1545 with ATi Radeon 4350, and unfortunately open source driver seems not to manage GPU cooler state. The cooler was always on and running loud, nevertheless the system/graphics load. Once I downgraded the X server to 1.12.3 and installed legacy driver, as suggested by Fglrx on Launchpad (the same as lienmeat suggested us to do), GPU cooler started to work only if needed. Bless you silence of the coolers.
However, it would be great if AMD released legacy drivers supporting newer X server(s), though now I'm not sure they really care.
Eh, my laptop is this one: forum.notebookreview.com/acer/… Terrible design. Right now i have temp1: +57.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) on the gpu idling with nothing but firefox, about 10+ degrees than the closed drivers, and that's on always 'min' power setting, on 'medium' it crashes sometimes during the first minutes (a process that is doing a mimetype file database).
– i30817
Mar 23 '13 at 9:05
add a comment |
Open source driver would work for me even considering less perfomance than fglrx, if it had a proper power consuption management.
I have Dell Inspiron 1545 with ATi Radeon 4350, and unfortunately open source driver seems not to manage GPU cooler state. The cooler was always on and running loud, nevertheless the system/graphics load. Once I downgraded the X server to 1.12.3 and installed legacy driver, as suggested by Fglrx on Launchpad (the same as lienmeat suggested us to do), GPU cooler started to work only if needed. Bless you silence of the coolers.
However, it would be great if AMD released legacy drivers supporting newer X server(s), though now I'm not sure they really care.
Open source driver would work for me even considering less perfomance than fglrx, if it had a proper power consuption management.
I have Dell Inspiron 1545 with ATi Radeon 4350, and unfortunately open source driver seems not to manage GPU cooler state. The cooler was always on and running loud, nevertheless the system/graphics load. Once I downgraded the X server to 1.12.3 and installed legacy driver, as suggested by Fglrx on Launchpad (the same as lienmeat suggested us to do), GPU cooler started to work only if needed. Bless you silence of the coolers.
However, it would be great if AMD released legacy drivers supporting newer X server(s), though now I'm not sure they really care.
edited Oct 30 '12 at 12:32
lambda23
1,55362643
1,55362643
answered Oct 24 '12 at 6:59
Lexx T.B.Lexx T.B.
111
111
Eh, my laptop is this one: forum.notebookreview.com/acer/… Terrible design. Right now i have temp1: +57.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) on the gpu idling with nothing but firefox, about 10+ degrees than the closed drivers, and that's on always 'min' power setting, on 'medium' it crashes sometimes during the first minutes (a process that is doing a mimetype file database).
– i30817
Mar 23 '13 at 9:05
add a comment |
Eh, my laptop is this one: forum.notebookreview.com/acer/… Terrible design. Right now i have temp1: +57.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) on the gpu idling with nothing but firefox, about 10+ degrees than the closed drivers, and that's on always 'min' power setting, on 'medium' it crashes sometimes during the first minutes (a process that is doing a mimetype file database).
– i30817
Mar 23 '13 at 9:05
Eh, my laptop is this one: forum.notebookreview.com/acer/… Terrible design. Right now i have temp1: +57.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) on the gpu idling with nothing but firefox, about 10+ degrees than the closed drivers, and that's on always 'min' power setting, on 'medium' it crashes sometimes during the first minutes (a process that is doing a mimetype file database).
– i30817
Mar 23 '13 at 9:05
Eh, my laptop is this one: forum.notebookreview.com/acer/… Terrible design. Right now i have temp1: +57.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) on the gpu idling with nothing but firefox, about 10+ degrees than the closed drivers, and that's on always 'min' power setting, on 'medium' it crashes sometimes during the first minutes (a process that is doing a mimetype file database).
– i30817
Mar 23 '13 at 9:05
add a comment |
I have an ATI Radeon HD 4770 and the open source drivers are working quite nicely. I don't know which card you have, but you may end up having better luck than with fglrx and downgrading your xorg. I used fglrx for years and this summer switched over to the open source drivers and haven't looked back.
Granted, some effects in Compiz are slower using the open source drivers. Also, 3D gaming is noticeably slower without fglrx. However, for most of your desktop use, the open source drivers are much easier to use than fglrx, with the added bonus of being actually supported.
(Incidentally, the Gnome Shell packaged in 12.10 works very nicely with the open source drivers, and is much faster than Compiz/Unity!)
I have a chipset integrated Radeon HD 4290 which is in dire need of fglrx. I think with more powerful cards like your 4770, there is some breathing room for the open source drivers to be somewhat blah and the compositing to still work well...but not the case for my low end integrated card.
– Andrew Mao
Oct 23 '12 at 18:48
add a comment |
I have an ATI Radeon HD 4770 and the open source drivers are working quite nicely. I don't know which card you have, but you may end up having better luck than with fglrx and downgrading your xorg. I used fglrx for years and this summer switched over to the open source drivers and haven't looked back.
Granted, some effects in Compiz are slower using the open source drivers. Also, 3D gaming is noticeably slower without fglrx. However, for most of your desktop use, the open source drivers are much easier to use than fglrx, with the added bonus of being actually supported.
(Incidentally, the Gnome Shell packaged in 12.10 works very nicely with the open source drivers, and is much faster than Compiz/Unity!)
I have a chipset integrated Radeon HD 4290 which is in dire need of fglrx. I think with more powerful cards like your 4770, there is some breathing room for the open source drivers to be somewhat blah and the compositing to still work well...but not the case for my low end integrated card.
– Andrew Mao
Oct 23 '12 at 18:48
add a comment |
I have an ATI Radeon HD 4770 and the open source drivers are working quite nicely. I don't know which card you have, but you may end up having better luck than with fglrx and downgrading your xorg. I used fglrx for years and this summer switched over to the open source drivers and haven't looked back.
Granted, some effects in Compiz are slower using the open source drivers. Also, 3D gaming is noticeably slower without fglrx. However, for most of your desktop use, the open source drivers are much easier to use than fglrx, with the added bonus of being actually supported.
(Incidentally, the Gnome Shell packaged in 12.10 works very nicely with the open source drivers, and is much faster than Compiz/Unity!)
I have an ATI Radeon HD 4770 and the open source drivers are working quite nicely. I don't know which card you have, but you may end up having better luck than with fglrx and downgrading your xorg. I used fglrx for years and this summer switched over to the open source drivers and haven't looked back.
Granted, some effects in Compiz are slower using the open source drivers. Also, 3D gaming is noticeably slower without fglrx. However, for most of your desktop use, the open source drivers are much easier to use than fglrx, with the added bonus of being actually supported.
(Incidentally, the Gnome Shell packaged in 12.10 works very nicely with the open source drivers, and is much faster than Compiz/Unity!)
answered Oct 23 '12 at 18:43
osarusanosarusan
12218
12218
I have a chipset integrated Radeon HD 4290 which is in dire need of fglrx. I think with more powerful cards like your 4770, there is some breathing room for the open source drivers to be somewhat blah and the compositing to still work well...but not the case for my low end integrated card.
– Andrew Mao
Oct 23 '12 at 18:48
add a comment |
I have a chipset integrated Radeon HD 4290 which is in dire need of fglrx. I think with more powerful cards like your 4770, there is some breathing room for the open source drivers to be somewhat blah and the compositing to still work well...but not the case for my low end integrated card.
– Andrew Mao
Oct 23 '12 at 18:48
I have a chipset integrated Radeon HD 4290 which is in dire need of fglrx. I think with more powerful cards like your 4770, there is some breathing room for the open source drivers to be somewhat blah and the compositing to still work well...but not the case for my low end integrated card.
– Andrew Mao
Oct 23 '12 at 18:48
I have a chipset integrated Radeon HD 4290 which is in dire need of fglrx. I think with more powerful cards like your 4770, there is some breathing room for the open source drivers to be somewhat blah and the compositing to still work well...but not the case for my low end integrated card.
– Andrew Mao
Oct 23 '12 at 18:48
add a comment |
Repo for putting last good proprietary driver : http://www.ubuntuvibes.com/2012/10/how-to-install-amd-catalyst-legacy.html
1
Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.
– fossfreedom♦
Nov 4 '12 at 22:59
add a comment |
Repo for putting last good proprietary driver : http://www.ubuntuvibes.com/2012/10/how-to-install-amd-catalyst-legacy.html
1
Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.
– fossfreedom♦
Nov 4 '12 at 22:59
add a comment |
Repo for putting last good proprietary driver : http://www.ubuntuvibes.com/2012/10/how-to-install-amd-catalyst-legacy.html
Repo for putting last good proprietary driver : http://www.ubuntuvibes.com/2012/10/how-to-install-amd-catalyst-legacy.html
answered Oct 30 '12 at 14:48
lalejandlalejand
191
191
1
Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.
– fossfreedom♦
Nov 4 '12 at 22:59
add a comment |
1
Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.
– fossfreedom♦
Nov 4 '12 at 22:59
1
1
Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.
– fossfreedom♦
Nov 4 '12 at 22:59
Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.
– fossfreedom♦
Nov 4 '12 at 22:59
add a comment |
A workaround for this problem is posted at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2073279
2
Welcome to Ask Ubuntu! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.
– fossfreedom♦
Nov 4 '12 at 22:58
This thread helped me fix fglrx-legacy install after using the recommended approach above. By doing these: sudo apt-get purge fglrx-amdcccle-legacy fglrx-legacy-dev fglrx-legacy sudo rm -R /usr/lib/fglrx sudo rm -R /usr/share/ati
– gare
Feb 15 '13 at 14:28
add a comment |
A workaround for this problem is posted at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2073279
2
Welcome to Ask Ubuntu! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.
– fossfreedom♦
Nov 4 '12 at 22:58
This thread helped me fix fglrx-legacy install after using the recommended approach above. By doing these: sudo apt-get purge fglrx-amdcccle-legacy fglrx-legacy-dev fglrx-legacy sudo rm -R /usr/lib/fglrx sudo rm -R /usr/share/ati
– gare
Feb 15 '13 at 14:28
add a comment |
A workaround for this problem is posted at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2073279
A workaround for this problem is posted at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2073279
answered Nov 4 '12 at 22:38
Glen StewartGlen Stewart
91
91
2
Welcome to Ask Ubuntu! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.
– fossfreedom♦
Nov 4 '12 at 22:58
This thread helped me fix fglrx-legacy install after using the recommended approach above. By doing these: sudo apt-get purge fglrx-amdcccle-legacy fglrx-legacy-dev fglrx-legacy sudo rm -R /usr/lib/fglrx sudo rm -R /usr/share/ati
– gare
Feb 15 '13 at 14:28
add a comment |
2
Welcome to Ask Ubuntu! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.
– fossfreedom♦
Nov 4 '12 at 22:58
This thread helped me fix fglrx-legacy install after using the recommended approach above. By doing these: sudo apt-get purge fglrx-amdcccle-legacy fglrx-legacy-dev fglrx-legacy sudo rm -R /usr/lib/fglrx sudo rm -R /usr/share/ati
– gare
Feb 15 '13 at 14:28
2
2
Welcome to Ask Ubuntu! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.
– fossfreedom♦
Nov 4 '12 at 22:58
Welcome to Ask Ubuntu! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.
– fossfreedom♦
Nov 4 '12 at 22:58
This thread helped me fix fglrx-legacy install after using the recommended approach above. By doing these: sudo apt-get purge fglrx-amdcccle-legacy fglrx-legacy-dev fglrx-legacy sudo rm -R /usr/lib/fglrx sudo rm -R /usr/share/ati
– gare
Feb 15 '13 at 14:28
This thread helped me fix fglrx-legacy install after using the recommended approach above. By doing these: sudo apt-get purge fglrx-amdcccle-legacy fglrx-legacy-dev fglrx-legacy sudo rm -R /usr/lib/fglrx sudo rm -R /usr/share/ati
– gare
Feb 15 '13 at 14:28
add a comment |
I have an old Radeon Mobility HD 2600 on 13.04. It did not suffice for me to install the above repository (makson), because when checking Xorg -version it had not downgraded Xorg.
What I finally ended up doing was rebooting into recovery, removing all xorg packages (which triggered removal of the package ubuntu-desktop (gulp)) and then reinstalling the packages again. This triggering the retrieving of the packages from the repository.
Something like:
sudo apt-get remove xserver-*
sudo apt-get autoremove
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Have to play around with it! After that I got into a high-resolution desktop. Just reset Unity, enable the OpenGL plugin in ccsm and we're good to go!
add a comment |
I have an old Radeon Mobility HD 2600 on 13.04. It did not suffice for me to install the above repository (makson), because when checking Xorg -version it had not downgraded Xorg.
What I finally ended up doing was rebooting into recovery, removing all xorg packages (which triggered removal of the package ubuntu-desktop (gulp)) and then reinstalling the packages again. This triggering the retrieving of the packages from the repository.
Something like:
sudo apt-get remove xserver-*
sudo apt-get autoremove
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Have to play around with it! After that I got into a high-resolution desktop. Just reset Unity, enable the OpenGL plugin in ccsm and we're good to go!
add a comment |
I have an old Radeon Mobility HD 2600 on 13.04. It did not suffice for me to install the above repository (makson), because when checking Xorg -version it had not downgraded Xorg.
What I finally ended up doing was rebooting into recovery, removing all xorg packages (which triggered removal of the package ubuntu-desktop (gulp)) and then reinstalling the packages again. This triggering the retrieving of the packages from the repository.
Something like:
sudo apt-get remove xserver-*
sudo apt-get autoremove
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Have to play around with it! After that I got into a high-resolution desktop. Just reset Unity, enable the OpenGL plugin in ccsm and we're good to go!
I have an old Radeon Mobility HD 2600 on 13.04. It did not suffice for me to install the above repository (makson), because when checking Xorg -version it had not downgraded Xorg.
What I finally ended up doing was rebooting into recovery, removing all xorg packages (which triggered removal of the package ubuntu-desktop (gulp)) and then reinstalling the packages again. This triggering the retrieving of the packages from the repository.
Something like:
sudo apt-get remove xserver-*
sudo apt-get autoremove
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop
Have to play around with it! After that I got into a high-resolution desktop. Just reset Unity, enable the OpenGL plugin in ccsm and we're good to go!
edited Aug 30 '13 at 7:27
Kevin Bowen
14.5k155970
14.5k155970
answered Aug 30 '13 at 6:36
PoyanPoyan
1011
1011
add a comment |
add a comment |
Guys If You Have any Graphics Resolution problem.
Just go to update manager-->Additional drivers-->select the default driver and reboot.
You might want to tell folks how to do this without a GUI since having no GUI is what got them here in the first place.
– Dale E. Moore
Dec 25 '13 at 3:50
add a comment |
Guys If You Have any Graphics Resolution problem.
Just go to update manager-->Additional drivers-->select the default driver and reboot.
You might want to tell folks how to do this without a GUI since having no GUI is what got them here in the first place.
– Dale E. Moore
Dec 25 '13 at 3:50
add a comment |
Guys If You Have any Graphics Resolution problem.
Just go to update manager-->Additional drivers-->select the default driver and reboot.
Guys If You Have any Graphics Resolution problem.
Just go to update manager-->Additional drivers-->select the default driver and reboot.
edited May 7 '13 at 16:28
hs.chandra
299111
299111
answered May 7 '13 at 15:05
Mohamed Naser TntjMohamed Naser Tntj
1
1
You might want to tell folks how to do this without a GUI since having no GUI is what got them here in the first place.
– Dale E. Moore
Dec 25 '13 at 3:50
add a comment |
You might want to tell folks how to do this without a GUI since having no GUI is what got them here in the first place.
– Dale E. Moore
Dec 25 '13 at 3:50
You might want to tell folks how to do this without a GUI since having no GUI is what got them here in the first place.
– Dale E. Moore
Dec 25 '13 at 3:50
You might want to tell folks how to do this without a GUI since having no GUI is what got them here in the first place.
– Dale E. Moore
Dec 25 '13 at 3:50
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f203232%2fradeon-hd-2000-3000-4000-on-ubuntu-12-04-2-and-higher-fglrx-legacy-unsuppor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
My answer in a related thread. Might help you.
– Glutanimate
Oct 26 '12 at 17:25
askubuntu.com/questions/78906/…
– Gerard
Apr 25 '14 at 16:11