Radeon HD 2000, 3000, 4000 on Ubuntu 12.04.2 and higher: fglrx (legacy) unsupported, what to do?












32















After upgrading to 12.10 quantal, the packaged version of fglrx no longer works. I discovered that this is because there is a separate 'legacy' fglrx driver for the HD 2k-4k series cards, but it is incompatible with the xorg server on 12.10.



This is the most current version of the driver for HD 2000 through HD 4000 series cards. You can't use the non-legacy fglrx driver, but you can use the open-source radeon driver if you prefer your WM compositing to be laggy and your YouTube videos to play like they would on a Pentium MMX series:



http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/catalyst126legacyproducts.aspx



Usually this driver can be installed in the following way, necessary because apt-get install fglrx would pull in the non-legacy driver:



wget http://www2.ati.com/drivers/legacy/amd-driver-installer-12.6-legacy-x86.x86_64.zip
unzip amd-driver-installer-*
sudo sh ./amd-driver-installer-*.run --buildpkg Ubuntu/quantal
sudo dpkg -i fglrx*.deb
sudo aticonfig --initial -f


If you use a different version of fglrx (for example, a newer 12.9 that doesn't support those cards) then the final command will give you an error no supported hardware detected or something similar. However, everything works at this point and you will get a reasonable xorg.conf:



... other stuff

Section "Device"
Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
Driver "fglrx"
BusID "PCI:1:5:0"
EndSection

... other stuff


At this point you're supposed to reboot and everything will be working with the fglrx driver. However, upon rebooting, you'll be treated to the following errors in Xorg.0.log when fglrx attempts to load:



(EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: undefined symbol: noXFree86DRIExtension


Some searching around will show that this is a problem with the legacy ATI drivers not supporting xserver 1.13 or newer. (Arch Linux thread) ATI has released a fixed driver for its most recent (HD 5000 series or later) cards, but not for the 'legacy' cards yet. The non-legacy ATI drivers can't be used with the old cards.



What should an Ubuntu user, using one of these HD 2000-4000 series cards, do?




  1. Wait for an updated 'legacy' ATI driver that properly works with xserver 1.13?

  2. Downgrade back to 12.04 Precise, which uses xserver 1.11?

  3. Try to downgrade xserver on 12.10 Quantal to 1.12, which could possibly break Unity and GNOME?

  4. Forced upgrade to HD 5000 series or later card? (Not possible with integrated graphics...)

  5. Some other 1337 action that fixes this problem painlessly?










share|improve this question

























  • My answer in a related thread. Might help you.

    – Glutanimate
    Oct 26 '12 at 17:25











  • askubuntu.com/questions/78906/…

    – Gerard
    Apr 25 '14 at 16:11
















32















After upgrading to 12.10 quantal, the packaged version of fglrx no longer works. I discovered that this is because there is a separate 'legacy' fglrx driver for the HD 2k-4k series cards, but it is incompatible with the xorg server on 12.10.



This is the most current version of the driver for HD 2000 through HD 4000 series cards. You can't use the non-legacy fglrx driver, but you can use the open-source radeon driver if you prefer your WM compositing to be laggy and your YouTube videos to play like they would on a Pentium MMX series:



http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/catalyst126legacyproducts.aspx



Usually this driver can be installed in the following way, necessary because apt-get install fglrx would pull in the non-legacy driver:



wget http://www2.ati.com/drivers/legacy/amd-driver-installer-12.6-legacy-x86.x86_64.zip
unzip amd-driver-installer-*
sudo sh ./amd-driver-installer-*.run --buildpkg Ubuntu/quantal
sudo dpkg -i fglrx*.deb
sudo aticonfig --initial -f


If you use a different version of fglrx (for example, a newer 12.9 that doesn't support those cards) then the final command will give you an error no supported hardware detected or something similar. However, everything works at this point and you will get a reasonable xorg.conf:



... other stuff

Section "Device"
Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
Driver "fglrx"
BusID "PCI:1:5:0"
EndSection

... other stuff


At this point you're supposed to reboot and everything will be working with the fglrx driver. However, upon rebooting, you'll be treated to the following errors in Xorg.0.log when fglrx attempts to load:



(EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: undefined symbol: noXFree86DRIExtension


Some searching around will show that this is a problem with the legacy ATI drivers not supporting xserver 1.13 or newer. (Arch Linux thread) ATI has released a fixed driver for its most recent (HD 5000 series or later) cards, but not for the 'legacy' cards yet. The non-legacy ATI drivers can't be used with the old cards.



What should an Ubuntu user, using one of these HD 2000-4000 series cards, do?




  1. Wait for an updated 'legacy' ATI driver that properly works with xserver 1.13?

  2. Downgrade back to 12.04 Precise, which uses xserver 1.11?

  3. Try to downgrade xserver on 12.10 Quantal to 1.12, which could possibly break Unity and GNOME?

  4. Forced upgrade to HD 5000 series or later card? (Not possible with integrated graphics...)

  5. Some other 1337 action that fixes this problem painlessly?










share|improve this question

























  • My answer in a related thread. Might help you.

    – Glutanimate
    Oct 26 '12 at 17:25











  • askubuntu.com/questions/78906/…

    – Gerard
    Apr 25 '14 at 16:11














32












32








32


13






After upgrading to 12.10 quantal, the packaged version of fglrx no longer works. I discovered that this is because there is a separate 'legacy' fglrx driver for the HD 2k-4k series cards, but it is incompatible with the xorg server on 12.10.



This is the most current version of the driver for HD 2000 through HD 4000 series cards. You can't use the non-legacy fglrx driver, but you can use the open-source radeon driver if you prefer your WM compositing to be laggy and your YouTube videos to play like they would on a Pentium MMX series:



http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/catalyst126legacyproducts.aspx



Usually this driver can be installed in the following way, necessary because apt-get install fglrx would pull in the non-legacy driver:



wget http://www2.ati.com/drivers/legacy/amd-driver-installer-12.6-legacy-x86.x86_64.zip
unzip amd-driver-installer-*
sudo sh ./amd-driver-installer-*.run --buildpkg Ubuntu/quantal
sudo dpkg -i fglrx*.deb
sudo aticonfig --initial -f


If you use a different version of fglrx (for example, a newer 12.9 that doesn't support those cards) then the final command will give you an error no supported hardware detected or something similar. However, everything works at this point and you will get a reasonable xorg.conf:



... other stuff

Section "Device"
Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
Driver "fglrx"
BusID "PCI:1:5:0"
EndSection

... other stuff


At this point you're supposed to reboot and everything will be working with the fglrx driver. However, upon rebooting, you'll be treated to the following errors in Xorg.0.log when fglrx attempts to load:



(EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: undefined symbol: noXFree86DRIExtension


Some searching around will show that this is a problem with the legacy ATI drivers not supporting xserver 1.13 or newer. (Arch Linux thread) ATI has released a fixed driver for its most recent (HD 5000 series or later) cards, but not for the 'legacy' cards yet. The non-legacy ATI drivers can't be used with the old cards.



What should an Ubuntu user, using one of these HD 2000-4000 series cards, do?




  1. Wait for an updated 'legacy' ATI driver that properly works with xserver 1.13?

  2. Downgrade back to 12.04 Precise, which uses xserver 1.11?

  3. Try to downgrade xserver on 12.10 Quantal to 1.12, which could possibly break Unity and GNOME?

  4. Forced upgrade to HD 5000 series or later card? (Not possible with integrated graphics...)

  5. Some other 1337 action that fixes this problem painlessly?










share|improve this question
















After upgrading to 12.10 quantal, the packaged version of fglrx no longer works. I discovered that this is because there is a separate 'legacy' fglrx driver for the HD 2k-4k series cards, but it is incompatible with the xorg server on 12.10.



This is the most current version of the driver for HD 2000 through HD 4000 series cards. You can't use the non-legacy fglrx driver, but you can use the open-source radeon driver if you prefer your WM compositing to be laggy and your YouTube videos to play like they would on a Pentium MMX series:



http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/catalyst126legacyproducts.aspx



Usually this driver can be installed in the following way, necessary because apt-get install fglrx would pull in the non-legacy driver:



wget http://www2.ati.com/drivers/legacy/amd-driver-installer-12.6-legacy-x86.x86_64.zip
unzip amd-driver-installer-*
sudo sh ./amd-driver-installer-*.run --buildpkg Ubuntu/quantal
sudo dpkg -i fglrx*.deb
sudo aticonfig --initial -f


If you use a different version of fglrx (for example, a newer 12.9 that doesn't support those cards) then the final command will give you an error no supported hardware detected or something similar. However, everything works at this point and you will get a reasonable xorg.conf:



... other stuff

Section "Device"
Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
Driver "fglrx"
BusID "PCI:1:5:0"
EndSection

... other stuff


At this point you're supposed to reboot and everything will be working with the fglrx driver. However, upon rebooting, you'll be treated to the following errors in Xorg.0.log when fglrx attempts to load:



(EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so: undefined symbol: noXFree86DRIExtension


Some searching around will show that this is a problem with the legacy ATI drivers not supporting xserver 1.13 or newer. (Arch Linux thread) ATI has released a fixed driver for its most recent (HD 5000 series or later) cards, but not for the 'legacy' cards yet. The non-legacy ATI drivers can't be used with the old cards.



What should an Ubuntu user, using one of these HD 2000-4000 series cards, do?




  1. Wait for an updated 'legacy' ATI driver that properly works with xserver 1.13?

  2. Downgrade back to 12.04 Precise, which uses xserver 1.11?

  3. Try to downgrade xserver on 12.10 Quantal to 1.12, which could possibly break Unity and GNOME?

  4. Forced upgrade to HD 5000 series or later card? (Not possible with integrated graphics...)

  5. Some other 1337 action that fixes this problem painlessly?







drivers ati xorg radeon fglrx






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 6 '14 at 11:53









bain

9,15323042




9,15323042










asked Oct 19 '12 at 21:39









Andrew MaoAndrew Mao

98611018




98611018













  • My answer in a related thread. Might help you.

    – Glutanimate
    Oct 26 '12 at 17:25











  • askubuntu.com/questions/78906/…

    – Gerard
    Apr 25 '14 at 16:11



















  • My answer in a related thread. Might help you.

    – Glutanimate
    Oct 26 '12 at 17:25











  • askubuntu.com/questions/78906/…

    – Gerard
    Apr 25 '14 at 16:11

















My answer in a related thread. Might help you.

– Glutanimate
Oct 26 '12 at 17:25





My answer in a related thread. Might help you.

– Glutanimate
Oct 26 '12 at 17:25













askubuntu.com/questions/78906/…

– Gerard
Apr 25 '14 at 16:11





askubuntu.com/questions/78906/…

– Gerard
Apr 25 '14 at 16:11










10 Answers
10






active

oldest

votes


















1














There's the ppa:makson96/fglrx PPA that has the legacy driver. It will also downgrade your Kernel and X server to older versions, as the legacy driver is not compatible with newer Kernels nor X servers. However, please read the release notes from the link as the driver isn't fully compatible with the Unity used in Ubuntu 13.04.



If you want to use the PPA, run these commands from the terminal to downgrade the Kernel and X server and to install the legacy driver:



sudo add-apt-repository ppa:makson96/fglrx
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get install fglrx-legacy





share|improve this answer































    2














    I have ATI Mobility 4650 HD and installing this broke my unity and opengl. I got things working with this (found here):



    sudo sh /usr/share/ati/fglrx-uninstall.sh
    sudo apt-get remove --purge fglrx fglrx_* fglrx-amdcccle* fglrx-dev*

    sudo rm /etc/X11/xorg.conf

    sudo apt-get install --reinstall xserver-xorg-core libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri
    sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg

    sudo reboot


    I hope this helps until there is an official driver release by ATI.






    share|improve this answer


























    • I think you had the opposite problem. This will help because ATI is no longer supported cards less than 5000. This works because you purged the proprietary driver, allowing the better built-in open source driver to do its thing. I didn't have any desktop at all after upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04, and this fixed everything for me.

      – Cerin
      Jan 3 '15 at 6:20





















    2














    If using AMD/ATI GPU drivers: Run the following command to remove them, and reboot:



    sudo apt-get purge fglrx


    Don't reinstall them as ATI cards (rather AMD Catalyst) currently don't support Unity-3D.



    As to the optionsyou have, I'd suggest #1: Wait for AMD/ATI to catch up.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      I have 12.04, and since this summer I am using RADEON drivers which for normal desktop use, in gnome-shell, works quite well. My card is: (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro" (ChipID = 0x94c3)

      – Rmano
      Oct 24 '12 at 9:49













    • @Rmano I've used ATI Radeon drivers on 12.04 myself without qualms. But the same drivers fail MISERABLY on 12.10. The reason behinds this are: a. New variant of Unity in 12.10. b. Unity-2D has been discontinued with 12.10.

      – TomKat
      Oct 24 '12 at 12:29











    • this is dire news. Do you know if Radeon drivers works with gnome shell? I had my hand on the "update" button seconds before reading this.

      – Rmano
      Oct 24 '12 at 13:47






    • 1





      @Rmano The Radeon drivers (called fglrx) work well with gnome-shell, but not the new xserver. However, I believe that using open-source drivers for the time being should not be an issue. You can do pretty much decent gaming with them as well. Just wait for AMD to release something like an update or patch or for Canonical or other FOSS communities/developers to release something. I too let got fglrx for open drivers to upgrade to 12.10 and have no regrets whatsoever.

      – TomKat
      Oct 24 '12 at 17:07






    • 1





      Yes, open-source drivers work fine with xserver, Unity (3D) and gnome-shell.

      – TomKat
      Oct 25 '12 at 14:09



















    1














    I have a Compaq Presario CQ56, with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250. Tried to use the ppa repository (as mentioned by lienmeat) and breaks my system with the legacy driver.



    Actually, downgrading Xserver works well, but the fglrx not :S. In fact, ubuntu doesn't detect my card, son I can't even download the "privative driver" that the OS always suggested me.



    In other words, I don't recommend install legacy with the method menciones above, the best desition us to wait for a fix



    (Sorry for my bad english, i'm from Costa Rica, my english is not that good as my spanish xD)






    share|improve this answer
























    • Don't download the driver that the OS suggests. Install the catalyst 12.6 legacy driver that I linked to in my original question, then use the commands to install it.

      – Andrew Mao
      Oct 23 '12 at 14:43











    • @egamboau If using 12.10, just don't install ATI drivers. They've failed on all the systems with 12.10 I've tried. Works like a charm in 12.04, though. The new xserver & Unity are not supported by fglrx, and Unity-2D has been discontinued.

      – TomKat
      Oct 24 '12 at 12:35



















    1














    Open source driver would work for me even considering less perfomance than fglrx, if it had a proper power consuption management.



    I have Dell Inspiron 1545 with ATi Radeon 4350, and unfortunately open source driver seems not to manage GPU cooler state. The cooler was always on and running loud, nevertheless the system/graphics load. Once I downgraded the X server to 1.12.3 and installed legacy driver, as suggested by Fglrx on Launchpad (the same as lienmeat suggested us to do), GPU cooler started to work only if needed. Bless you silence of the coolers.



    However, it would be great if AMD released legacy drivers supporting newer X server(s), though now I'm not sure they really care.






    share|improve this answer


























    • Eh, my laptop is this one: forum.notebookreview.com/acer/… Terrible design. Right now i have temp1: +57.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) on the gpu idling with nothing but firefox, about 10+ degrees than the closed drivers, and that's on always 'min' power setting, on 'medium' it crashes sometimes during the first minutes (a process that is doing a mimetype file database).

      – i30817
      Mar 23 '13 at 9:05





















    0














    I have an ATI Radeon HD 4770 and the open source drivers are working quite nicely. I don't know which card you have, but you may end up having better luck than with fglrx and downgrading your xorg. I used fglrx for years and this summer switched over to the open source drivers and haven't looked back.



    Granted, some effects in Compiz are slower using the open source drivers. Also, 3D gaming is noticeably slower without fglrx. However, for most of your desktop use, the open source drivers are much easier to use than fglrx, with the added bonus of being actually supported.



    (Incidentally, the Gnome Shell packaged in 12.10 works very nicely with the open source drivers, and is much faster than Compiz/Unity!)






    share|improve this answer
























    • I have a chipset integrated Radeon HD 4290 which is in dire need of fglrx. I think with more powerful cards like your 4770, there is some breathing room for the open source drivers to be somewhat blah and the compositing to still work well...but not the case for my low end integrated card.

      – Andrew Mao
      Oct 23 '12 at 18:48



















    0














    Repo for putting last good proprietary driver : http://www.ubuntuvibes.com/2012/10/how-to-install-amd-catalyst-legacy.html






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

      – fossfreedom
      Nov 4 '12 at 22:59





















    0














    A workaround for this problem is posted at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2073279






    share|improve this answer



















    • 2





      Welcome to Ask Ubuntu! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

      – fossfreedom
      Nov 4 '12 at 22:58













    • This thread helped me fix fglrx-legacy install after using the recommended approach above. By doing these: sudo apt-get purge fglrx-amdcccle-legacy fglrx-legacy-dev fglrx-legacy sudo rm -R /usr/lib/fglrx sudo rm -R /usr/share/ati

      – gare
      Feb 15 '13 at 14:28





















    0














    I have an old Radeon Mobility HD 2600 on 13.04. It did not suffice for me to install the above repository (makson), because when checking Xorg -version it had not downgraded Xorg.



    What I finally ended up doing was rebooting into recovery, removing all xorg packages (which triggered removal of the package ubuntu-desktop (gulp)) and then reinstalling the packages again. This triggering the retrieving of the packages from the repository.



    Something like:



    sudo apt-get remove xserver-*
    sudo apt-get autoremove
    sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop


    Have to play around with it! After that I got into a high-resolution desktop. Just reset Unity, enable the OpenGL plugin in ccsm and we're good to go!






    share|improve this answer

































      -2














      Guys If You Have any Graphics Resolution problem.



      Just go to update manager-->Additional drivers-->select the default driver and reboot.






      share|improve this answer


























      • You might want to tell folks how to do this without a GUI since having no GUI is what got them here in the first place.

        – Dale E. Moore
        Dec 25 '13 at 3:50











      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "89"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f203232%2fradeon-hd-2000-3000-4000-on-ubuntu-12-04-2-and-higher-fglrx-legacy-unsuppor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      10 Answers
      10






      active

      oldest

      votes








      10 Answers
      10






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      There's the ppa:makson96/fglrx PPA that has the legacy driver. It will also downgrade your Kernel and X server to older versions, as the legacy driver is not compatible with newer Kernels nor X servers. However, please read the release notes from the link as the driver isn't fully compatible with the Unity used in Ubuntu 13.04.



      If you want to use the PPA, run these commands from the terminal to downgrade the Kernel and X server and to install the legacy driver:



      sudo add-apt-repository ppa:makson96/fglrx
      sudo apt-get update
      sudo apt-get upgrade
      sudo apt-get install fglrx-legacy





      share|improve this answer




























        1














        There's the ppa:makson96/fglrx PPA that has the legacy driver. It will also downgrade your Kernel and X server to older versions, as the legacy driver is not compatible with newer Kernels nor X servers. However, please read the release notes from the link as the driver isn't fully compatible with the Unity used in Ubuntu 13.04.



        If you want to use the PPA, run these commands from the terminal to downgrade the Kernel and X server and to install the legacy driver:



        sudo add-apt-repository ppa:makson96/fglrx
        sudo apt-get update
        sudo apt-get upgrade
        sudo apt-get install fglrx-legacy





        share|improve this answer


























          1












          1








          1







          There's the ppa:makson96/fglrx PPA that has the legacy driver. It will also downgrade your Kernel and X server to older versions, as the legacy driver is not compatible with newer Kernels nor X servers. However, please read the release notes from the link as the driver isn't fully compatible with the Unity used in Ubuntu 13.04.



          If you want to use the PPA, run these commands from the terminal to downgrade the Kernel and X server and to install the legacy driver:



          sudo add-apt-repository ppa:makson96/fglrx
          sudo apt-get update
          sudo apt-get upgrade
          sudo apt-get install fglrx-legacy





          share|improve this answer













          There's the ppa:makson96/fglrx PPA that has the legacy driver. It will also downgrade your Kernel and X server to older versions, as the legacy driver is not compatible with newer Kernels nor X servers. However, please read the release notes from the link as the driver isn't fully compatible with the Unity used in Ubuntu 13.04.



          If you want to use the PPA, run these commands from the terminal to downgrade the Kernel and X server and to install the legacy driver:



          sudo add-apt-repository ppa:makson96/fglrx
          sudo apt-get update
          sudo apt-get upgrade
          sudo apt-get install fglrx-legacy






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jul 6 '13 at 11:36









          papukaijapapukaija

          2,3092024




          2,3092024

























              2














              I have ATI Mobility 4650 HD and installing this broke my unity and opengl. I got things working with this (found here):



              sudo sh /usr/share/ati/fglrx-uninstall.sh
              sudo apt-get remove --purge fglrx fglrx_* fglrx-amdcccle* fglrx-dev*

              sudo rm /etc/X11/xorg.conf

              sudo apt-get install --reinstall xserver-xorg-core libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri
              sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg

              sudo reboot


              I hope this helps until there is an official driver release by ATI.






              share|improve this answer


























              • I think you had the opposite problem. This will help because ATI is no longer supported cards less than 5000. This works because you purged the proprietary driver, allowing the better built-in open source driver to do its thing. I didn't have any desktop at all after upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04, and this fixed everything for me.

                – Cerin
                Jan 3 '15 at 6:20


















              2














              I have ATI Mobility 4650 HD and installing this broke my unity and opengl. I got things working with this (found here):



              sudo sh /usr/share/ati/fglrx-uninstall.sh
              sudo apt-get remove --purge fglrx fglrx_* fglrx-amdcccle* fglrx-dev*

              sudo rm /etc/X11/xorg.conf

              sudo apt-get install --reinstall xserver-xorg-core libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri
              sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg

              sudo reboot


              I hope this helps until there is an official driver release by ATI.






              share|improve this answer


























              • I think you had the opposite problem. This will help because ATI is no longer supported cards less than 5000. This works because you purged the proprietary driver, allowing the better built-in open source driver to do its thing. I didn't have any desktop at all after upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04, and this fixed everything for me.

                – Cerin
                Jan 3 '15 at 6:20
















              2












              2








              2







              I have ATI Mobility 4650 HD and installing this broke my unity and opengl. I got things working with this (found here):



              sudo sh /usr/share/ati/fglrx-uninstall.sh
              sudo apt-get remove --purge fglrx fglrx_* fglrx-amdcccle* fglrx-dev*

              sudo rm /etc/X11/xorg.conf

              sudo apt-get install --reinstall xserver-xorg-core libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri
              sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg

              sudo reboot


              I hope this helps until there is an official driver release by ATI.






              share|improve this answer















              I have ATI Mobility 4650 HD and installing this broke my unity and opengl. I got things working with this (found here):



              sudo sh /usr/share/ati/fglrx-uninstall.sh
              sudo apt-get remove --purge fglrx fglrx_* fglrx-amdcccle* fglrx-dev*

              sudo rm /etc/X11/xorg.conf

              sudo apt-get install --reinstall xserver-xorg-core libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri
              sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg

              sudo reboot


              I hope this helps until there is an official driver release by ATI.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Nov 2 '12 at 14:18









              Evandro Silva

              6,48852944




              6,48852944










              answered Nov 1 '12 at 19:59









              SpirosSpiros

              211




              211













              • I think you had the opposite problem. This will help because ATI is no longer supported cards less than 5000. This works because you purged the proprietary driver, allowing the better built-in open source driver to do its thing. I didn't have any desktop at all after upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04, and this fixed everything for me.

                – Cerin
                Jan 3 '15 at 6:20





















              • I think you had the opposite problem. This will help because ATI is no longer supported cards less than 5000. This works because you purged the proprietary driver, allowing the better built-in open source driver to do its thing. I didn't have any desktop at all after upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04, and this fixed everything for me.

                – Cerin
                Jan 3 '15 at 6:20



















              I think you had the opposite problem. This will help because ATI is no longer supported cards less than 5000. This works because you purged the proprietary driver, allowing the better built-in open source driver to do its thing. I didn't have any desktop at all after upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04, and this fixed everything for me.

              – Cerin
              Jan 3 '15 at 6:20







              I think you had the opposite problem. This will help because ATI is no longer supported cards less than 5000. This works because you purged the proprietary driver, allowing the better built-in open source driver to do its thing. I didn't have any desktop at all after upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04, and this fixed everything for me.

              – Cerin
              Jan 3 '15 at 6:20













              2














              If using AMD/ATI GPU drivers: Run the following command to remove them, and reboot:



              sudo apt-get purge fglrx


              Don't reinstall them as ATI cards (rather AMD Catalyst) currently don't support Unity-3D.



              As to the optionsyou have, I'd suggest #1: Wait for AMD/ATI to catch up.






              share|improve this answer





















              • 1





                I have 12.04, and since this summer I am using RADEON drivers which for normal desktop use, in gnome-shell, works quite well. My card is: (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro" (ChipID = 0x94c3)

                – Rmano
                Oct 24 '12 at 9:49













              • @Rmano I've used ATI Radeon drivers on 12.04 myself without qualms. But the same drivers fail MISERABLY on 12.10. The reason behinds this are: a. New variant of Unity in 12.10. b. Unity-2D has been discontinued with 12.10.

                – TomKat
                Oct 24 '12 at 12:29











              • this is dire news. Do you know if Radeon drivers works with gnome shell? I had my hand on the "update" button seconds before reading this.

                – Rmano
                Oct 24 '12 at 13:47






              • 1





                @Rmano The Radeon drivers (called fglrx) work well with gnome-shell, but not the new xserver. However, I believe that using open-source drivers for the time being should not be an issue. You can do pretty much decent gaming with them as well. Just wait for AMD to release something like an update or patch or for Canonical or other FOSS communities/developers to release something. I too let got fglrx for open drivers to upgrade to 12.10 and have no regrets whatsoever.

                – TomKat
                Oct 24 '12 at 17:07






              • 1





                Yes, open-source drivers work fine with xserver, Unity (3D) and gnome-shell.

                – TomKat
                Oct 25 '12 at 14:09
















              2














              If using AMD/ATI GPU drivers: Run the following command to remove them, and reboot:



              sudo apt-get purge fglrx


              Don't reinstall them as ATI cards (rather AMD Catalyst) currently don't support Unity-3D.



              As to the optionsyou have, I'd suggest #1: Wait for AMD/ATI to catch up.






              share|improve this answer





















              • 1





                I have 12.04, and since this summer I am using RADEON drivers which for normal desktop use, in gnome-shell, works quite well. My card is: (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro" (ChipID = 0x94c3)

                – Rmano
                Oct 24 '12 at 9:49













              • @Rmano I've used ATI Radeon drivers on 12.04 myself without qualms. But the same drivers fail MISERABLY on 12.10. The reason behinds this are: a. New variant of Unity in 12.10. b. Unity-2D has been discontinued with 12.10.

                – TomKat
                Oct 24 '12 at 12:29











              • this is dire news. Do you know if Radeon drivers works with gnome shell? I had my hand on the "update" button seconds before reading this.

                – Rmano
                Oct 24 '12 at 13:47






              • 1





                @Rmano The Radeon drivers (called fglrx) work well with gnome-shell, but not the new xserver. However, I believe that using open-source drivers for the time being should not be an issue. You can do pretty much decent gaming with them as well. Just wait for AMD to release something like an update or patch or for Canonical or other FOSS communities/developers to release something. I too let got fglrx for open drivers to upgrade to 12.10 and have no regrets whatsoever.

                – TomKat
                Oct 24 '12 at 17:07






              • 1





                Yes, open-source drivers work fine with xserver, Unity (3D) and gnome-shell.

                – TomKat
                Oct 25 '12 at 14:09














              2












              2








              2







              If using AMD/ATI GPU drivers: Run the following command to remove them, and reboot:



              sudo apt-get purge fglrx


              Don't reinstall them as ATI cards (rather AMD Catalyst) currently don't support Unity-3D.



              As to the optionsyou have, I'd suggest #1: Wait for AMD/ATI to catch up.






              share|improve this answer















              If using AMD/ATI GPU drivers: Run the following command to remove them, and reboot:



              sudo apt-get purge fglrx


              Don't reinstall them as ATI cards (rather AMD Catalyst) currently don't support Unity-3D.



              As to the optionsyou have, I'd suggest #1: Wait for AMD/ATI to catch up.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 11 mins ago









              clearkimura

              3,98511956




              3,98511956










              answered Oct 24 '12 at 7:07









              TomKatTomKat

              3,7801332




              3,7801332








              • 1





                I have 12.04, and since this summer I am using RADEON drivers which for normal desktop use, in gnome-shell, works quite well. My card is: (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro" (ChipID = 0x94c3)

                – Rmano
                Oct 24 '12 at 9:49













              • @Rmano I've used ATI Radeon drivers on 12.04 myself without qualms. But the same drivers fail MISERABLY on 12.10. The reason behinds this are: a. New variant of Unity in 12.10. b. Unity-2D has been discontinued with 12.10.

                – TomKat
                Oct 24 '12 at 12:29











              • this is dire news. Do you know if Radeon drivers works with gnome shell? I had my hand on the "update" button seconds before reading this.

                – Rmano
                Oct 24 '12 at 13:47






              • 1





                @Rmano The Radeon drivers (called fglrx) work well with gnome-shell, but not the new xserver. However, I believe that using open-source drivers for the time being should not be an issue. You can do pretty much decent gaming with them as well. Just wait for AMD to release something like an update or patch or for Canonical or other FOSS communities/developers to release something. I too let got fglrx for open drivers to upgrade to 12.10 and have no regrets whatsoever.

                – TomKat
                Oct 24 '12 at 17:07






              • 1





                Yes, open-source drivers work fine with xserver, Unity (3D) and gnome-shell.

                – TomKat
                Oct 25 '12 at 14:09














              • 1





                I have 12.04, and since this summer I am using RADEON drivers which for normal desktop use, in gnome-shell, works quite well. My card is: (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro" (ChipID = 0x94c3)

                – Rmano
                Oct 24 '12 at 9:49













              • @Rmano I've used ATI Radeon drivers on 12.04 myself without qualms. But the same drivers fail MISERABLY on 12.10. The reason behinds this are: a. New variant of Unity in 12.10. b. Unity-2D has been discontinued with 12.10.

                – TomKat
                Oct 24 '12 at 12:29











              • this is dire news. Do you know if Radeon drivers works with gnome shell? I had my hand on the "update" button seconds before reading this.

                – Rmano
                Oct 24 '12 at 13:47






              • 1





                @Rmano The Radeon drivers (called fglrx) work well with gnome-shell, but not the new xserver. However, I believe that using open-source drivers for the time being should not be an issue. You can do pretty much decent gaming with them as well. Just wait for AMD to release something like an update or patch or for Canonical or other FOSS communities/developers to release something. I too let got fglrx for open drivers to upgrade to 12.10 and have no regrets whatsoever.

                – TomKat
                Oct 24 '12 at 17:07






              • 1





                Yes, open-source drivers work fine with xserver, Unity (3D) and gnome-shell.

                – TomKat
                Oct 25 '12 at 14:09








              1




              1





              I have 12.04, and since this summer I am using RADEON drivers which for normal desktop use, in gnome-shell, works quite well. My card is: (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro" (ChipID = 0x94c3)

              – Rmano
              Oct 24 '12 at 9:49







              I have 12.04, and since this summer I am using RADEON drivers which for normal desktop use, in gnome-shell, works quite well. My card is: (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro" (ChipID = 0x94c3)

              – Rmano
              Oct 24 '12 at 9:49















              @Rmano I've used ATI Radeon drivers on 12.04 myself without qualms. But the same drivers fail MISERABLY on 12.10. The reason behinds this are: a. New variant of Unity in 12.10. b. Unity-2D has been discontinued with 12.10.

              – TomKat
              Oct 24 '12 at 12:29





              @Rmano I've used ATI Radeon drivers on 12.04 myself without qualms. But the same drivers fail MISERABLY on 12.10. The reason behinds this are: a. New variant of Unity in 12.10. b. Unity-2D has been discontinued with 12.10.

              – TomKat
              Oct 24 '12 at 12:29













              this is dire news. Do you know if Radeon drivers works with gnome shell? I had my hand on the "update" button seconds before reading this.

              – Rmano
              Oct 24 '12 at 13:47





              this is dire news. Do you know if Radeon drivers works with gnome shell? I had my hand on the "update" button seconds before reading this.

              – Rmano
              Oct 24 '12 at 13:47




              1




              1





              @Rmano The Radeon drivers (called fglrx) work well with gnome-shell, but not the new xserver. However, I believe that using open-source drivers for the time being should not be an issue. You can do pretty much decent gaming with them as well. Just wait for AMD to release something like an update or patch or for Canonical or other FOSS communities/developers to release something. I too let got fglrx for open drivers to upgrade to 12.10 and have no regrets whatsoever.

              – TomKat
              Oct 24 '12 at 17:07





              @Rmano The Radeon drivers (called fglrx) work well with gnome-shell, but not the new xserver. However, I believe that using open-source drivers for the time being should not be an issue. You can do pretty much decent gaming with them as well. Just wait for AMD to release something like an update or patch or for Canonical or other FOSS communities/developers to release something. I too let got fglrx for open drivers to upgrade to 12.10 and have no regrets whatsoever.

              – TomKat
              Oct 24 '12 at 17:07




              1




              1





              Yes, open-source drivers work fine with xserver, Unity (3D) and gnome-shell.

              – TomKat
              Oct 25 '12 at 14:09





              Yes, open-source drivers work fine with xserver, Unity (3D) and gnome-shell.

              – TomKat
              Oct 25 '12 at 14:09











              1














              I have a Compaq Presario CQ56, with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250. Tried to use the ppa repository (as mentioned by lienmeat) and breaks my system with the legacy driver.



              Actually, downgrading Xserver works well, but the fglrx not :S. In fact, ubuntu doesn't detect my card, son I can't even download the "privative driver" that the OS always suggested me.



              In other words, I don't recommend install legacy with the method menciones above, the best desition us to wait for a fix



              (Sorry for my bad english, i'm from Costa Rica, my english is not that good as my spanish xD)






              share|improve this answer
























              • Don't download the driver that the OS suggests. Install the catalyst 12.6 legacy driver that I linked to in my original question, then use the commands to install it.

                – Andrew Mao
                Oct 23 '12 at 14:43











              • @egamboau If using 12.10, just don't install ATI drivers. They've failed on all the systems with 12.10 I've tried. Works like a charm in 12.04, though. The new xserver & Unity are not supported by fglrx, and Unity-2D has been discontinued.

                – TomKat
                Oct 24 '12 at 12:35
















              1














              I have a Compaq Presario CQ56, with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250. Tried to use the ppa repository (as mentioned by lienmeat) and breaks my system with the legacy driver.



              Actually, downgrading Xserver works well, but the fglrx not :S. In fact, ubuntu doesn't detect my card, son I can't even download the "privative driver" that the OS always suggested me.



              In other words, I don't recommend install legacy with the method menciones above, the best desition us to wait for a fix



              (Sorry for my bad english, i'm from Costa Rica, my english is not that good as my spanish xD)






              share|improve this answer
























              • Don't download the driver that the OS suggests. Install the catalyst 12.6 legacy driver that I linked to in my original question, then use the commands to install it.

                – Andrew Mao
                Oct 23 '12 at 14:43











              • @egamboau If using 12.10, just don't install ATI drivers. They've failed on all the systems with 12.10 I've tried. Works like a charm in 12.04, though. The new xserver & Unity are not supported by fglrx, and Unity-2D has been discontinued.

                – TomKat
                Oct 24 '12 at 12:35














              1












              1








              1







              I have a Compaq Presario CQ56, with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250. Tried to use the ppa repository (as mentioned by lienmeat) and breaks my system with the legacy driver.



              Actually, downgrading Xserver works well, but the fglrx not :S. In fact, ubuntu doesn't detect my card, son I can't even download the "privative driver" that the OS always suggested me.



              In other words, I don't recommend install legacy with the method menciones above, the best desition us to wait for a fix



              (Sorry for my bad english, i'm from Costa Rica, my english is not that good as my spanish xD)






              share|improve this answer













              I have a Compaq Presario CQ56, with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250. Tried to use the ppa repository (as mentioned by lienmeat) and breaks my system with the legacy driver.



              Actually, downgrading Xserver works well, but the fglrx not :S. In fact, ubuntu doesn't detect my card, son I can't even download the "privative driver" that the OS always suggested me.



              In other words, I don't recommend install legacy with the method menciones above, the best desition us to wait for a fix



              (Sorry for my bad english, i'm from Costa Rica, my english is not that good as my spanish xD)







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Oct 23 '12 at 3:22









              egamboauegamboau

              111




              111













              • Don't download the driver that the OS suggests. Install the catalyst 12.6 legacy driver that I linked to in my original question, then use the commands to install it.

                – Andrew Mao
                Oct 23 '12 at 14:43











              • @egamboau If using 12.10, just don't install ATI drivers. They've failed on all the systems with 12.10 I've tried. Works like a charm in 12.04, though. The new xserver & Unity are not supported by fglrx, and Unity-2D has been discontinued.

                – TomKat
                Oct 24 '12 at 12:35



















              • Don't download the driver that the OS suggests. Install the catalyst 12.6 legacy driver that I linked to in my original question, then use the commands to install it.

                – Andrew Mao
                Oct 23 '12 at 14:43











              • @egamboau If using 12.10, just don't install ATI drivers. They've failed on all the systems with 12.10 I've tried. Works like a charm in 12.04, though. The new xserver & Unity are not supported by fglrx, and Unity-2D has been discontinued.

                – TomKat
                Oct 24 '12 at 12:35

















              Don't download the driver that the OS suggests. Install the catalyst 12.6 legacy driver that I linked to in my original question, then use the commands to install it.

              – Andrew Mao
              Oct 23 '12 at 14:43





              Don't download the driver that the OS suggests. Install the catalyst 12.6 legacy driver that I linked to in my original question, then use the commands to install it.

              – Andrew Mao
              Oct 23 '12 at 14:43













              @egamboau If using 12.10, just don't install ATI drivers. They've failed on all the systems with 12.10 I've tried. Works like a charm in 12.04, though. The new xserver & Unity are not supported by fglrx, and Unity-2D has been discontinued.

              – TomKat
              Oct 24 '12 at 12:35





              @egamboau If using 12.10, just don't install ATI drivers. They've failed on all the systems with 12.10 I've tried. Works like a charm in 12.04, though. The new xserver & Unity are not supported by fglrx, and Unity-2D has been discontinued.

              – TomKat
              Oct 24 '12 at 12:35











              1














              Open source driver would work for me even considering less perfomance than fglrx, if it had a proper power consuption management.



              I have Dell Inspiron 1545 with ATi Radeon 4350, and unfortunately open source driver seems not to manage GPU cooler state. The cooler was always on and running loud, nevertheless the system/graphics load. Once I downgraded the X server to 1.12.3 and installed legacy driver, as suggested by Fglrx on Launchpad (the same as lienmeat suggested us to do), GPU cooler started to work only if needed. Bless you silence of the coolers.



              However, it would be great if AMD released legacy drivers supporting newer X server(s), though now I'm not sure they really care.






              share|improve this answer


























              • Eh, my laptop is this one: forum.notebookreview.com/acer/… Terrible design. Right now i have temp1: +57.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) on the gpu idling with nothing but firefox, about 10+ degrees than the closed drivers, and that's on always 'min' power setting, on 'medium' it crashes sometimes during the first minutes (a process that is doing a mimetype file database).

                – i30817
                Mar 23 '13 at 9:05


















              1














              Open source driver would work for me even considering less perfomance than fglrx, if it had a proper power consuption management.



              I have Dell Inspiron 1545 with ATi Radeon 4350, and unfortunately open source driver seems not to manage GPU cooler state. The cooler was always on and running loud, nevertheless the system/graphics load. Once I downgraded the X server to 1.12.3 and installed legacy driver, as suggested by Fglrx on Launchpad (the same as lienmeat suggested us to do), GPU cooler started to work only if needed. Bless you silence of the coolers.



              However, it would be great if AMD released legacy drivers supporting newer X server(s), though now I'm not sure they really care.






              share|improve this answer


























              • Eh, my laptop is this one: forum.notebookreview.com/acer/… Terrible design. Right now i have temp1: +57.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) on the gpu idling with nothing but firefox, about 10+ degrees than the closed drivers, and that's on always 'min' power setting, on 'medium' it crashes sometimes during the first minutes (a process that is doing a mimetype file database).

                – i30817
                Mar 23 '13 at 9:05
















              1












              1








              1







              Open source driver would work for me even considering less perfomance than fglrx, if it had a proper power consuption management.



              I have Dell Inspiron 1545 with ATi Radeon 4350, and unfortunately open source driver seems not to manage GPU cooler state. The cooler was always on and running loud, nevertheless the system/graphics load. Once I downgraded the X server to 1.12.3 and installed legacy driver, as suggested by Fglrx on Launchpad (the same as lienmeat suggested us to do), GPU cooler started to work only if needed. Bless you silence of the coolers.



              However, it would be great if AMD released legacy drivers supporting newer X server(s), though now I'm not sure they really care.






              share|improve this answer















              Open source driver would work for me even considering less perfomance than fglrx, if it had a proper power consuption management.



              I have Dell Inspiron 1545 with ATi Radeon 4350, and unfortunately open source driver seems not to manage GPU cooler state. The cooler was always on and running loud, nevertheless the system/graphics load. Once I downgraded the X server to 1.12.3 and installed legacy driver, as suggested by Fglrx on Launchpad (the same as lienmeat suggested us to do), GPU cooler started to work only if needed. Bless you silence of the coolers.



              However, it would be great if AMD released legacy drivers supporting newer X server(s), though now I'm not sure they really care.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Oct 30 '12 at 12:32









              lambda23

              1,55362643




              1,55362643










              answered Oct 24 '12 at 6:59









              Lexx T.B.Lexx T.B.

              111




              111













              • Eh, my laptop is this one: forum.notebookreview.com/acer/… Terrible design. Right now i have temp1: +57.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) on the gpu idling with nothing but firefox, about 10+ degrees than the closed drivers, and that's on always 'min' power setting, on 'medium' it crashes sometimes during the first minutes (a process that is doing a mimetype file database).

                – i30817
                Mar 23 '13 at 9:05





















              • Eh, my laptop is this one: forum.notebookreview.com/acer/… Terrible design. Right now i have temp1: +57.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) on the gpu idling with nothing but firefox, about 10+ degrees than the closed drivers, and that's on always 'min' power setting, on 'medium' it crashes sometimes during the first minutes (a process that is doing a mimetype file database).

                – i30817
                Mar 23 '13 at 9:05



















              Eh, my laptop is this one: forum.notebookreview.com/acer/… Terrible design. Right now i have temp1: +57.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) on the gpu idling with nothing but firefox, about 10+ degrees than the closed drivers, and that's on always 'min' power setting, on 'medium' it crashes sometimes during the first minutes (a process that is doing a mimetype file database).

              – i30817
              Mar 23 '13 at 9:05







              Eh, my laptop is this one: forum.notebookreview.com/acer/… Terrible design. Right now i have temp1: +57.0°C (crit = +90.0°C) on the gpu idling with nothing but firefox, about 10+ degrees than the closed drivers, and that's on always 'min' power setting, on 'medium' it crashes sometimes during the first minutes (a process that is doing a mimetype file database).

              – i30817
              Mar 23 '13 at 9:05













              0














              I have an ATI Radeon HD 4770 and the open source drivers are working quite nicely. I don't know which card you have, but you may end up having better luck than with fglrx and downgrading your xorg. I used fglrx for years and this summer switched over to the open source drivers and haven't looked back.



              Granted, some effects in Compiz are slower using the open source drivers. Also, 3D gaming is noticeably slower without fglrx. However, for most of your desktop use, the open source drivers are much easier to use than fglrx, with the added bonus of being actually supported.



              (Incidentally, the Gnome Shell packaged in 12.10 works very nicely with the open source drivers, and is much faster than Compiz/Unity!)






              share|improve this answer
























              • I have a chipset integrated Radeon HD 4290 which is in dire need of fglrx. I think with more powerful cards like your 4770, there is some breathing room for the open source drivers to be somewhat blah and the compositing to still work well...but not the case for my low end integrated card.

                – Andrew Mao
                Oct 23 '12 at 18:48
















              0














              I have an ATI Radeon HD 4770 and the open source drivers are working quite nicely. I don't know which card you have, but you may end up having better luck than with fglrx and downgrading your xorg. I used fglrx for years and this summer switched over to the open source drivers and haven't looked back.



              Granted, some effects in Compiz are slower using the open source drivers. Also, 3D gaming is noticeably slower without fglrx. However, for most of your desktop use, the open source drivers are much easier to use than fglrx, with the added bonus of being actually supported.



              (Incidentally, the Gnome Shell packaged in 12.10 works very nicely with the open source drivers, and is much faster than Compiz/Unity!)






              share|improve this answer
























              • I have a chipset integrated Radeon HD 4290 which is in dire need of fglrx. I think with more powerful cards like your 4770, there is some breathing room for the open source drivers to be somewhat blah and the compositing to still work well...but not the case for my low end integrated card.

                – Andrew Mao
                Oct 23 '12 at 18:48














              0












              0








              0







              I have an ATI Radeon HD 4770 and the open source drivers are working quite nicely. I don't know which card you have, but you may end up having better luck than with fglrx and downgrading your xorg. I used fglrx for years and this summer switched over to the open source drivers and haven't looked back.



              Granted, some effects in Compiz are slower using the open source drivers. Also, 3D gaming is noticeably slower without fglrx. However, for most of your desktop use, the open source drivers are much easier to use than fglrx, with the added bonus of being actually supported.



              (Incidentally, the Gnome Shell packaged in 12.10 works very nicely with the open source drivers, and is much faster than Compiz/Unity!)






              share|improve this answer













              I have an ATI Radeon HD 4770 and the open source drivers are working quite nicely. I don't know which card you have, but you may end up having better luck than with fglrx and downgrading your xorg. I used fglrx for years and this summer switched over to the open source drivers and haven't looked back.



              Granted, some effects in Compiz are slower using the open source drivers. Also, 3D gaming is noticeably slower without fglrx. However, for most of your desktop use, the open source drivers are much easier to use than fglrx, with the added bonus of being actually supported.



              (Incidentally, the Gnome Shell packaged in 12.10 works very nicely with the open source drivers, and is much faster than Compiz/Unity!)







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Oct 23 '12 at 18:43









              osarusanosarusan

              12218




              12218













              • I have a chipset integrated Radeon HD 4290 which is in dire need of fglrx. I think with more powerful cards like your 4770, there is some breathing room for the open source drivers to be somewhat blah and the compositing to still work well...but not the case for my low end integrated card.

                – Andrew Mao
                Oct 23 '12 at 18:48



















              • I have a chipset integrated Radeon HD 4290 which is in dire need of fglrx. I think with more powerful cards like your 4770, there is some breathing room for the open source drivers to be somewhat blah and the compositing to still work well...but not the case for my low end integrated card.

                – Andrew Mao
                Oct 23 '12 at 18:48

















              I have a chipset integrated Radeon HD 4290 which is in dire need of fglrx. I think with more powerful cards like your 4770, there is some breathing room for the open source drivers to be somewhat blah and the compositing to still work well...but not the case for my low end integrated card.

              – Andrew Mao
              Oct 23 '12 at 18:48





              I have a chipset integrated Radeon HD 4290 which is in dire need of fglrx. I think with more powerful cards like your 4770, there is some breathing room for the open source drivers to be somewhat blah and the compositing to still work well...but not the case for my low end integrated card.

              – Andrew Mao
              Oct 23 '12 at 18:48











              0














              Repo for putting last good proprietary driver : http://www.ubuntuvibes.com/2012/10/how-to-install-amd-catalyst-legacy.html






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1





                Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

                – fossfreedom
                Nov 4 '12 at 22:59


















              0














              Repo for putting last good proprietary driver : http://www.ubuntuvibes.com/2012/10/how-to-install-amd-catalyst-legacy.html






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1





                Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

                – fossfreedom
                Nov 4 '12 at 22:59
















              0












              0








              0







              Repo for putting last good proprietary driver : http://www.ubuntuvibes.com/2012/10/how-to-install-amd-catalyst-legacy.html






              share|improve this answer













              Repo for putting last good proprietary driver : http://www.ubuntuvibes.com/2012/10/how-to-install-amd-catalyst-legacy.html







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Oct 30 '12 at 14:48









              lalejandlalejand

              191




              191








              • 1





                Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

                – fossfreedom
                Nov 4 '12 at 22:59
















              • 1





                Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

                – fossfreedom
                Nov 4 '12 at 22:59










              1




              1





              Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

              – fossfreedom
              Nov 4 '12 at 22:59







              Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

              – fossfreedom
              Nov 4 '12 at 22:59













              0














              A workaround for this problem is posted at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2073279






              share|improve this answer



















              • 2





                Welcome to Ask Ubuntu! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

                – fossfreedom
                Nov 4 '12 at 22:58













              • This thread helped me fix fglrx-legacy install after using the recommended approach above. By doing these: sudo apt-get purge fglrx-amdcccle-legacy fglrx-legacy-dev fglrx-legacy sudo rm -R /usr/lib/fglrx sudo rm -R /usr/share/ati

                – gare
                Feb 15 '13 at 14:28


















              0














              A workaround for this problem is posted at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2073279






              share|improve this answer



















              • 2





                Welcome to Ask Ubuntu! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

                – fossfreedom
                Nov 4 '12 at 22:58













              • This thread helped me fix fglrx-legacy install after using the recommended approach above. By doing these: sudo apt-get purge fglrx-amdcccle-legacy fglrx-legacy-dev fglrx-legacy sudo rm -R /usr/lib/fglrx sudo rm -R /usr/share/ati

                – gare
                Feb 15 '13 at 14:28
















              0












              0








              0







              A workaround for this problem is posted at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2073279






              share|improve this answer













              A workaround for this problem is posted at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2073279







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Nov 4 '12 at 22:38









              Glen StewartGlen Stewart

              91




              91








              • 2





                Welcome to Ask Ubuntu! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

                – fossfreedom
                Nov 4 '12 at 22:58













              • This thread helped me fix fglrx-legacy install after using the recommended approach above. By doing these: sudo apt-get purge fglrx-amdcccle-legacy fglrx-legacy-dev fglrx-legacy sudo rm -R /usr/lib/fglrx sudo rm -R /usr/share/ati

                – gare
                Feb 15 '13 at 14:28
















              • 2





                Welcome to Ask Ubuntu! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

                – fossfreedom
                Nov 4 '12 at 22:58













              • This thread helped me fix fglrx-legacy install after using the recommended approach above. By doing these: sudo apt-get purge fglrx-amdcccle-legacy fglrx-legacy-dev fglrx-legacy sudo rm -R /usr/lib/fglrx sudo rm -R /usr/share/ati

                – gare
                Feb 15 '13 at 14:28










              2




              2





              Welcome to Ask Ubuntu! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

              – fossfreedom
              Nov 4 '12 at 22:58







              Welcome to Ask Ubuntu! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference.

              – fossfreedom
              Nov 4 '12 at 22:58















              This thread helped me fix fglrx-legacy install after using the recommended approach above. By doing these: sudo apt-get purge fglrx-amdcccle-legacy fglrx-legacy-dev fglrx-legacy sudo rm -R /usr/lib/fglrx sudo rm -R /usr/share/ati

              – gare
              Feb 15 '13 at 14:28







              This thread helped me fix fglrx-legacy install after using the recommended approach above. By doing these: sudo apt-get purge fglrx-amdcccle-legacy fglrx-legacy-dev fglrx-legacy sudo rm -R /usr/lib/fglrx sudo rm -R /usr/share/ati

              – gare
              Feb 15 '13 at 14:28













              0














              I have an old Radeon Mobility HD 2600 on 13.04. It did not suffice for me to install the above repository (makson), because when checking Xorg -version it had not downgraded Xorg.



              What I finally ended up doing was rebooting into recovery, removing all xorg packages (which triggered removal of the package ubuntu-desktop (gulp)) and then reinstalling the packages again. This triggering the retrieving of the packages from the repository.



              Something like:



              sudo apt-get remove xserver-*
              sudo apt-get autoremove
              sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop


              Have to play around with it! After that I got into a high-resolution desktop. Just reset Unity, enable the OpenGL plugin in ccsm and we're good to go!






              share|improve this answer






























                0














                I have an old Radeon Mobility HD 2600 on 13.04. It did not suffice for me to install the above repository (makson), because when checking Xorg -version it had not downgraded Xorg.



                What I finally ended up doing was rebooting into recovery, removing all xorg packages (which triggered removal of the package ubuntu-desktop (gulp)) and then reinstalling the packages again. This triggering the retrieving of the packages from the repository.



                Something like:



                sudo apt-get remove xserver-*
                sudo apt-get autoremove
                sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop


                Have to play around with it! After that I got into a high-resolution desktop. Just reset Unity, enable the OpenGL plugin in ccsm and we're good to go!






                share|improve this answer




























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  I have an old Radeon Mobility HD 2600 on 13.04. It did not suffice for me to install the above repository (makson), because when checking Xorg -version it had not downgraded Xorg.



                  What I finally ended up doing was rebooting into recovery, removing all xorg packages (which triggered removal of the package ubuntu-desktop (gulp)) and then reinstalling the packages again. This triggering the retrieving of the packages from the repository.



                  Something like:



                  sudo apt-get remove xserver-*
                  sudo apt-get autoremove
                  sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop


                  Have to play around with it! After that I got into a high-resolution desktop. Just reset Unity, enable the OpenGL plugin in ccsm and we're good to go!






                  share|improve this answer















                  I have an old Radeon Mobility HD 2600 on 13.04. It did not suffice for me to install the above repository (makson), because when checking Xorg -version it had not downgraded Xorg.



                  What I finally ended up doing was rebooting into recovery, removing all xorg packages (which triggered removal of the package ubuntu-desktop (gulp)) and then reinstalling the packages again. This triggering the retrieving of the packages from the repository.



                  Something like:



                  sudo apt-get remove xserver-*
                  sudo apt-get autoremove
                  sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop


                  Have to play around with it! After that I got into a high-resolution desktop. Just reset Unity, enable the OpenGL plugin in ccsm and we're good to go!







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Aug 30 '13 at 7:27









                  Kevin Bowen

                  14.5k155970




                  14.5k155970










                  answered Aug 30 '13 at 6:36









                  PoyanPoyan

                  1011




                  1011























                      -2














                      Guys If You Have any Graphics Resolution problem.



                      Just go to update manager-->Additional drivers-->select the default driver and reboot.






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • You might want to tell folks how to do this without a GUI since having no GUI is what got them here in the first place.

                        – Dale E. Moore
                        Dec 25 '13 at 3:50
















                      -2














                      Guys If You Have any Graphics Resolution problem.



                      Just go to update manager-->Additional drivers-->select the default driver and reboot.






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • You might want to tell folks how to do this without a GUI since having no GUI is what got them here in the first place.

                        – Dale E. Moore
                        Dec 25 '13 at 3:50














                      -2












                      -2








                      -2







                      Guys If You Have any Graphics Resolution problem.



                      Just go to update manager-->Additional drivers-->select the default driver and reboot.






                      share|improve this answer















                      Guys If You Have any Graphics Resolution problem.



                      Just go to update manager-->Additional drivers-->select the default driver and reboot.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited May 7 '13 at 16:28









                      hs.chandra

                      299111




                      299111










                      answered May 7 '13 at 15:05









                      Mohamed Naser TntjMohamed Naser Tntj

                      1




                      1













                      • You might want to tell folks how to do this without a GUI since having no GUI is what got them here in the first place.

                        – Dale E. Moore
                        Dec 25 '13 at 3:50



















                      • You might want to tell folks how to do this without a GUI since having no GUI is what got them here in the first place.

                        – Dale E. Moore
                        Dec 25 '13 at 3:50

















                      You might want to tell folks how to do this without a GUI since having no GUI is what got them here in the first place.

                      – Dale E. Moore
                      Dec 25 '13 at 3:50





                      You might want to tell folks how to do this without a GUI since having no GUI is what got them here in the first place.

                      – Dale E. Moore
                      Dec 25 '13 at 3:50


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f203232%2fradeon-hd-2000-3000-4000-on-ubuntu-12-04-2-and-higher-fglrx-legacy-unsuppor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      GameSpot

                      connect to host localhost port 22: Connection refused

                      Getting a Wifi WPA2 wifi connection