Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







7















enter image description hereenter image description here



I would like to remove the highlighted wall on the second floor of my house in order to create a loft area.



Please help me identify if I'm dealing with a load bearing wall.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Daniel Caviedes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    the wall is load bearing joists run at 90 degrees to the ceiling cladding

    – philip smith
    yesterday











  • Agreed, there are indicators it's load bearing, be wise and have a structural engineer confirm....

    – user99448
    yesterday











  • The wall itself may not be but there are at least two things in the wall that are for sure.

    – DMoore
    21 hours ago











  • What's your end-goal here? If you're planning to remove the wall for some reason, perhaps a framed internal window would be a better solution? Could choose glazed or open-frame or something between.

    – Criggie
    2 hours ago


















7















enter image description hereenter image description here



I would like to remove the highlighted wall on the second floor of my house in order to create a loft area.



Please help me identify if I'm dealing with a load bearing wall.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Daniel Caviedes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    the wall is load bearing joists run at 90 degrees to the ceiling cladding

    – philip smith
    yesterday











  • Agreed, there are indicators it's load bearing, be wise and have a structural engineer confirm....

    – user99448
    yesterday











  • The wall itself may not be but there are at least two things in the wall that are for sure.

    – DMoore
    21 hours ago











  • What's your end-goal here? If you're planning to remove the wall for some reason, perhaps a framed internal window would be a better solution? Could choose glazed or open-frame or something between.

    – Criggie
    2 hours ago














7












7








7








enter image description hereenter image description here



I would like to remove the highlighted wall on the second floor of my house in order to create a loft area.



Please help me identify if I'm dealing with a load bearing wall.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Daniel Caviedes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












enter image description hereenter image description here



I would like to remove the highlighted wall on the second floor of my house in order to create a loft area.



Please help me identify if I'm dealing with a load bearing wall.







walls load






share|improve this question









New contributor




Daniel Caviedes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Daniel Caviedes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday







Daniel Caviedes













New contributor




Daniel Caviedes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Daniel CaviedesDaniel Caviedes

3613




3613




New contributor




Daniel Caviedes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Daniel Caviedes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Daniel Caviedes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1





    the wall is load bearing joists run at 90 degrees to the ceiling cladding

    – philip smith
    yesterday











  • Agreed, there are indicators it's load bearing, be wise and have a structural engineer confirm....

    – user99448
    yesterday











  • The wall itself may not be but there are at least two things in the wall that are for sure.

    – DMoore
    21 hours ago











  • What's your end-goal here? If you're planning to remove the wall for some reason, perhaps a framed internal window would be a better solution? Could choose glazed or open-frame or something between.

    – Criggie
    2 hours ago














  • 1





    the wall is load bearing joists run at 90 degrees to the ceiling cladding

    – philip smith
    yesterday











  • Agreed, there are indicators it's load bearing, be wise and have a structural engineer confirm....

    – user99448
    yesterday











  • The wall itself may not be but there are at least two things in the wall that are for sure.

    – DMoore
    21 hours ago











  • What's your end-goal here? If you're planning to remove the wall for some reason, perhaps a framed internal window would be a better solution? Could choose glazed or open-frame or something between.

    – Criggie
    2 hours ago








1




1





the wall is load bearing joists run at 90 degrees to the ceiling cladding

– philip smith
yesterday





the wall is load bearing joists run at 90 degrees to the ceiling cladding

– philip smith
yesterday













Agreed, there are indicators it's load bearing, be wise and have a structural engineer confirm....

– user99448
yesterday





Agreed, there are indicators it's load bearing, be wise and have a structural engineer confirm....

– user99448
yesterday













The wall itself may not be but there are at least two things in the wall that are for sure.

– DMoore
21 hours ago





The wall itself may not be but there are at least two things in the wall that are for sure.

– DMoore
21 hours ago













What's your end-goal here? If you're planning to remove the wall for some reason, perhaps a framed internal window would be a better solution? Could choose glazed or open-frame or something between.

– Criggie
2 hours ago





What's your end-goal here? If you're planning to remove the wall for some reason, perhaps a framed internal window would be a better solution? Could choose glazed or open-frame or something between.

– Criggie
2 hours ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















20














Disclaimer: I'm not a structural engineer, nor should you believe the word of a internet stranger. Contact a local structural engineer to take a look so you don't bring the house down.



A few details point to the wall visible in the photo being load bearing:



There is a beam in the open bit next to the wall. This implies something is worth supporting up there.



The sloped ceiling implies the roof is right above it. Roofs need supporting.



The blueprints mention a column in the corner instead of just letting them but into each other. This is only needed when that column is supporting a load.



The walls around the closet are unlikely to be load bearing.



Finally the blueprints have that wall shaded like they have the outer walls while the other inner walls are blank. Outer walls are nearly always load bearing, while inner walls rarely are.





share
























  • Thanks so much for your kind response. So you believe that the wall being shaded as the outer walls means it's load bearing? I had also noticed that vertical column in the corner, I was planning on removing the walls but leaving that column untouched.

    – Daniel Caviedes
    yesterday








  • 1





    Another beam in line with the existing one would be in order at the very least. (if only for the visual). However I'm not sure you can get enough bearing surface onto that pole to support the second beam. Which would be a question for the engineer.

    – ratchet freak
    yesterday






  • 1





    @DanielCaviedes Definitely that's a load bearing wall. The 'wraparound' section might not be, but the long wall almost certainly is. Think hard about the open concept kitchen. It's a fad and people are already figuring out it's often a bad idea.

    – J...
    yesterday






  • 1





    @J That it's the long wall is another clue. It is usually the case that joists/rafters run across the short side of a room and the longer wall is the side the rest on.

    – JimmyJames
    yesterday






  • 1





    Another point is that the long section of the highlighted wall is in line with another wall. That's a pattern commonly found in load-bearing walls.

    – Mark
    23 hours ago



















5














I'd bet it is bearing.



The picture shows a wall with a large opening and a door. I'll assume the plan view is the second floor plan.



In the picture you can see your knotty pine running parallel with the wall. This typically means that they are secured to the rafters and are perpendicular. The rafters are then resting one end on that wall. This is also why you see the beam spanning the opening - to support the rafters.



In the plan view you can see that the most likely position of the ceiling joists to span is from the outside wall to the wall dividing the bedrooms and again from the dividing wall to the wall you propose to remove. You could verify if you have attic access.






share|improve this answer
























  • I will see if I can get that far though the attic. Thanks for your guidance. I really appreciate it.

    – Daniel Caviedes
    yesterday



















4














You need a layout of the ceiling joists to determined if it is load bearing. However, I would highly lean towards believing that it is a structural support wall. The exposed beam that runs in the span beside it is a good indicator.



Licensed Home Builder
AL HBLB #25782






share|improve this answer








New contributor




William Payne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




























    4














    Like most have already said, I also believe it's a load bearing wall.. So for all the clues others have mentioned that it's a bearing wall, I also wanna add, and this may or may not actually be applicable here, but that it's common to hatch shear walls diagonally like the drawings show, so not only is that wall a part of your load bearing system, it may also be a part of your lateral system. I wouldn't touch it haha. If you're dead set on opening this wall up, I believe it can still be done with shoring and doing somewhat of an extension of that beam and adding another column. However, the height of those columns are pretty tall, I don't think the walls are the things bracing it from bucking, I think that's why they kinda "stiffen" it with the metal studs as noted on the drawings, but if it is indeed a part of the lateral system, that'd be really tough. Go find a licensed structural engineer though and they can tell you all the possibilities and costs associated! Structural engineers work for the owner and architect and their jobs are literally to make things work. If internet strangers tell you it's a load bearing wall, that's not necessarily a red light. A good structural engineer will probably tell you the same thing but also follow it up with solutions. Construction won't be cheap though.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    spolite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




























      3














      Observations studying the drawing, 100% Load Bearing.



      Section A will confirm further. Structural engineers will always span the shortest distance for timber joists. Taking out that wall, is physically impossible to do that without steel (span the floor over that is what I mean.) plus you would remove partial bearing support of the landing to the top of the stairs.



      You could, to further be certain... Check the wall at the base by scrabbling back the render /fiishess to the masonry... And check for a dpc. If it has one, it means it requires substructure support... Aka... Foundation = load bearing.



      If You decide to remove, prepare to either leave a portion of the wall nearest the external wall... 2-3ft...or put in a windpost to support the external wall.



      Very educated guess (graduate structural engineer... 15 years in the industry). All the best. But definitely get a Structural engineer in who is local to confirm and Check the stability of your external wall should you proceed with the refurb work.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Mark O is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      • Could you please define "DPC"?

        – Patrick M
        6 hours ago











      • @PatrickM guessing "Dampproof course" or "malthoid" a dark grey/tar coloured paper to separate and protect wood from concrete/masonry. The presence of this barrier bitumen/tar-paper means the wood is pressing down hard on the concrete, and moisture could wick up. If it were not load-bearing then there wouldn't be a lot of load to bear so it would be air-gapped from the foundation.

        – Criggie
        2 hours ago










      protected by Community 11 hours ago



      Thank you for your interest in this question.
      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      20














      Disclaimer: I'm not a structural engineer, nor should you believe the word of a internet stranger. Contact a local structural engineer to take a look so you don't bring the house down.



      A few details point to the wall visible in the photo being load bearing:



      There is a beam in the open bit next to the wall. This implies something is worth supporting up there.



      The sloped ceiling implies the roof is right above it. Roofs need supporting.



      The blueprints mention a column in the corner instead of just letting them but into each other. This is only needed when that column is supporting a load.



      The walls around the closet are unlikely to be load bearing.



      Finally the blueprints have that wall shaded like they have the outer walls while the other inner walls are blank. Outer walls are nearly always load bearing, while inner walls rarely are.





      share
























      • Thanks so much for your kind response. So you believe that the wall being shaded as the outer walls means it's load bearing? I had also noticed that vertical column in the corner, I was planning on removing the walls but leaving that column untouched.

        – Daniel Caviedes
        yesterday








      • 1





        Another beam in line with the existing one would be in order at the very least. (if only for the visual). However I'm not sure you can get enough bearing surface onto that pole to support the second beam. Which would be a question for the engineer.

        – ratchet freak
        yesterday






      • 1





        @DanielCaviedes Definitely that's a load bearing wall. The 'wraparound' section might not be, but the long wall almost certainly is. Think hard about the open concept kitchen. It's a fad and people are already figuring out it's often a bad idea.

        – J...
        yesterday






      • 1





        @J That it's the long wall is another clue. It is usually the case that joists/rafters run across the short side of a room and the longer wall is the side the rest on.

        – JimmyJames
        yesterday






      • 1





        Another point is that the long section of the highlighted wall is in line with another wall. That's a pattern commonly found in load-bearing walls.

        – Mark
        23 hours ago
















      20














      Disclaimer: I'm not a structural engineer, nor should you believe the word of a internet stranger. Contact a local structural engineer to take a look so you don't bring the house down.



      A few details point to the wall visible in the photo being load bearing:



      There is a beam in the open bit next to the wall. This implies something is worth supporting up there.



      The sloped ceiling implies the roof is right above it. Roofs need supporting.



      The blueprints mention a column in the corner instead of just letting them but into each other. This is only needed when that column is supporting a load.



      The walls around the closet are unlikely to be load bearing.



      Finally the blueprints have that wall shaded like they have the outer walls while the other inner walls are blank. Outer walls are nearly always load bearing, while inner walls rarely are.





      share
























      • Thanks so much for your kind response. So you believe that the wall being shaded as the outer walls means it's load bearing? I had also noticed that vertical column in the corner, I was planning on removing the walls but leaving that column untouched.

        – Daniel Caviedes
        yesterday








      • 1





        Another beam in line with the existing one would be in order at the very least. (if only for the visual). However I'm not sure you can get enough bearing surface onto that pole to support the second beam. Which would be a question for the engineer.

        – ratchet freak
        yesterday






      • 1





        @DanielCaviedes Definitely that's a load bearing wall. The 'wraparound' section might not be, but the long wall almost certainly is. Think hard about the open concept kitchen. It's a fad and people are already figuring out it's often a bad idea.

        – J...
        yesterday






      • 1





        @J That it's the long wall is another clue. It is usually the case that joists/rafters run across the short side of a room and the longer wall is the side the rest on.

        – JimmyJames
        yesterday






      • 1





        Another point is that the long section of the highlighted wall is in line with another wall. That's a pattern commonly found in load-bearing walls.

        – Mark
        23 hours ago














      20












      20








      20







      Disclaimer: I'm not a structural engineer, nor should you believe the word of a internet stranger. Contact a local structural engineer to take a look so you don't bring the house down.



      A few details point to the wall visible in the photo being load bearing:



      There is a beam in the open bit next to the wall. This implies something is worth supporting up there.



      The sloped ceiling implies the roof is right above it. Roofs need supporting.



      The blueprints mention a column in the corner instead of just letting them but into each other. This is only needed when that column is supporting a load.



      The walls around the closet are unlikely to be load bearing.



      Finally the blueprints have that wall shaded like they have the outer walls while the other inner walls are blank. Outer walls are nearly always load bearing, while inner walls rarely are.





      share













      Disclaimer: I'm not a structural engineer, nor should you believe the word of a internet stranger. Contact a local structural engineer to take a look so you don't bring the house down.



      A few details point to the wall visible in the photo being load bearing:



      There is a beam in the open bit next to the wall. This implies something is worth supporting up there.



      The sloped ceiling implies the roof is right above it. Roofs need supporting.



      The blueprints mention a column in the corner instead of just letting them but into each other. This is only needed when that column is supporting a load.



      The walls around the closet are unlikely to be load bearing.



      Finally the blueprints have that wall shaded like they have the outer walls while the other inner walls are blank. Outer walls are nearly always load bearing, while inner walls rarely are.






      share











      share


      share










      answered yesterday









      ratchet freakratchet freak

      4,92611117




      4,92611117













      • Thanks so much for your kind response. So you believe that the wall being shaded as the outer walls means it's load bearing? I had also noticed that vertical column in the corner, I was planning on removing the walls but leaving that column untouched.

        – Daniel Caviedes
        yesterday








      • 1





        Another beam in line with the existing one would be in order at the very least. (if only for the visual). However I'm not sure you can get enough bearing surface onto that pole to support the second beam. Which would be a question for the engineer.

        – ratchet freak
        yesterday






      • 1





        @DanielCaviedes Definitely that's a load bearing wall. The 'wraparound' section might not be, but the long wall almost certainly is. Think hard about the open concept kitchen. It's a fad and people are already figuring out it's often a bad idea.

        – J...
        yesterday






      • 1





        @J That it's the long wall is another clue. It is usually the case that joists/rafters run across the short side of a room and the longer wall is the side the rest on.

        – JimmyJames
        yesterday






      • 1





        Another point is that the long section of the highlighted wall is in line with another wall. That's a pattern commonly found in load-bearing walls.

        – Mark
        23 hours ago



















      • Thanks so much for your kind response. So you believe that the wall being shaded as the outer walls means it's load bearing? I had also noticed that vertical column in the corner, I was planning on removing the walls but leaving that column untouched.

        – Daniel Caviedes
        yesterday








      • 1





        Another beam in line with the existing one would be in order at the very least. (if only for the visual). However I'm not sure you can get enough bearing surface onto that pole to support the second beam. Which would be a question for the engineer.

        – ratchet freak
        yesterday






      • 1





        @DanielCaviedes Definitely that's a load bearing wall. The 'wraparound' section might not be, but the long wall almost certainly is. Think hard about the open concept kitchen. It's a fad and people are already figuring out it's often a bad idea.

        – J...
        yesterday






      • 1





        @J That it's the long wall is another clue. It is usually the case that joists/rafters run across the short side of a room and the longer wall is the side the rest on.

        – JimmyJames
        yesterday






      • 1





        Another point is that the long section of the highlighted wall is in line with another wall. That's a pattern commonly found in load-bearing walls.

        – Mark
        23 hours ago

















      Thanks so much for your kind response. So you believe that the wall being shaded as the outer walls means it's load bearing? I had also noticed that vertical column in the corner, I was planning on removing the walls but leaving that column untouched.

      – Daniel Caviedes
      yesterday







      Thanks so much for your kind response. So you believe that the wall being shaded as the outer walls means it's load bearing? I had also noticed that vertical column in the corner, I was planning on removing the walls but leaving that column untouched.

      – Daniel Caviedes
      yesterday






      1




      1





      Another beam in line with the existing one would be in order at the very least. (if only for the visual). However I'm not sure you can get enough bearing surface onto that pole to support the second beam. Which would be a question for the engineer.

      – ratchet freak
      yesterday





      Another beam in line with the existing one would be in order at the very least. (if only for the visual). However I'm not sure you can get enough bearing surface onto that pole to support the second beam. Which would be a question for the engineer.

      – ratchet freak
      yesterday




      1




      1





      @DanielCaviedes Definitely that's a load bearing wall. The 'wraparound' section might not be, but the long wall almost certainly is. Think hard about the open concept kitchen. It's a fad and people are already figuring out it's often a bad idea.

      – J...
      yesterday





      @DanielCaviedes Definitely that's a load bearing wall. The 'wraparound' section might not be, but the long wall almost certainly is. Think hard about the open concept kitchen. It's a fad and people are already figuring out it's often a bad idea.

      – J...
      yesterday




      1




      1





      @J That it's the long wall is another clue. It is usually the case that joists/rafters run across the short side of a room and the longer wall is the side the rest on.

      – JimmyJames
      yesterday





      @J That it's the long wall is another clue. It is usually the case that joists/rafters run across the short side of a room and the longer wall is the side the rest on.

      – JimmyJames
      yesterday




      1




      1





      Another point is that the long section of the highlighted wall is in line with another wall. That's a pattern commonly found in load-bearing walls.

      – Mark
      23 hours ago





      Another point is that the long section of the highlighted wall is in line with another wall. That's a pattern commonly found in load-bearing walls.

      – Mark
      23 hours ago













      5














      I'd bet it is bearing.



      The picture shows a wall with a large opening and a door. I'll assume the plan view is the second floor plan.



      In the picture you can see your knotty pine running parallel with the wall. This typically means that they are secured to the rafters and are perpendicular. The rafters are then resting one end on that wall. This is also why you see the beam spanning the opening - to support the rafters.



      In the plan view you can see that the most likely position of the ceiling joists to span is from the outside wall to the wall dividing the bedrooms and again from the dividing wall to the wall you propose to remove. You could verify if you have attic access.






      share|improve this answer
























      • I will see if I can get that far though the attic. Thanks for your guidance. I really appreciate it.

        – Daniel Caviedes
        yesterday
















      5














      I'd bet it is bearing.



      The picture shows a wall with a large opening and a door. I'll assume the plan view is the second floor plan.



      In the picture you can see your knotty pine running parallel with the wall. This typically means that they are secured to the rafters and are perpendicular. The rafters are then resting one end on that wall. This is also why you see the beam spanning the opening - to support the rafters.



      In the plan view you can see that the most likely position of the ceiling joists to span is from the outside wall to the wall dividing the bedrooms and again from the dividing wall to the wall you propose to remove. You could verify if you have attic access.






      share|improve this answer
























      • I will see if I can get that far though the attic. Thanks for your guidance. I really appreciate it.

        – Daniel Caviedes
        yesterday














      5












      5








      5







      I'd bet it is bearing.



      The picture shows a wall with a large opening and a door. I'll assume the plan view is the second floor plan.



      In the picture you can see your knotty pine running parallel with the wall. This typically means that they are secured to the rafters and are perpendicular. The rafters are then resting one end on that wall. This is also why you see the beam spanning the opening - to support the rafters.



      In the plan view you can see that the most likely position of the ceiling joists to span is from the outside wall to the wall dividing the bedrooms and again from the dividing wall to the wall you propose to remove. You could verify if you have attic access.






      share|improve this answer













      I'd bet it is bearing.



      The picture shows a wall with a large opening and a door. I'll assume the plan view is the second floor plan.



      In the picture you can see your knotty pine running parallel with the wall. This typically means that they are secured to the rafters and are perpendicular. The rafters are then resting one end on that wall. This is also why you see the beam spanning the opening - to support the rafters.



      In the plan view you can see that the most likely position of the ceiling joists to span is from the outside wall to the wall dividing the bedrooms and again from the dividing wall to the wall you propose to remove. You could verify if you have attic access.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered yesterday









      Fresh CodemongerFresh Codemonger

      3617




      3617













      • I will see if I can get that far though the attic. Thanks for your guidance. I really appreciate it.

        – Daniel Caviedes
        yesterday



















      • I will see if I can get that far though the attic. Thanks for your guidance. I really appreciate it.

        – Daniel Caviedes
        yesterday

















      I will see if I can get that far though the attic. Thanks for your guidance. I really appreciate it.

      – Daniel Caviedes
      yesterday





      I will see if I can get that far though the attic. Thanks for your guidance. I really appreciate it.

      – Daniel Caviedes
      yesterday











      4














      You need a layout of the ceiling joists to determined if it is load bearing. However, I would highly lean towards believing that it is a structural support wall. The exposed beam that runs in the span beside it is a good indicator.



      Licensed Home Builder
      AL HBLB #25782






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      William Payne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.

























        4














        You need a layout of the ceiling joists to determined if it is load bearing. However, I would highly lean towards believing that it is a structural support wall. The exposed beam that runs in the span beside it is a good indicator.



        Licensed Home Builder
        AL HBLB #25782






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        William Payne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.























          4












          4








          4







          You need a layout of the ceiling joists to determined if it is load bearing. However, I would highly lean towards believing that it is a structural support wall. The exposed beam that runs in the span beside it is a good indicator.



          Licensed Home Builder
          AL HBLB #25782






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          William Payne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.










          You need a layout of the ceiling joists to determined if it is load bearing. However, I would highly lean towards believing that it is a structural support wall. The exposed beam that runs in the span beside it is a good indicator.



          Licensed Home Builder
          AL HBLB #25782







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          William Payne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer






          New contributor




          William Payne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered yesterday









          William PayneWilliam Payne

          411




          411




          New contributor




          William Payne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          William Payne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          William Payne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.























              4














              Like most have already said, I also believe it's a load bearing wall.. So for all the clues others have mentioned that it's a bearing wall, I also wanna add, and this may or may not actually be applicable here, but that it's common to hatch shear walls diagonally like the drawings show, so not only is that wall a part of your load bearing system, it may also be a part of your lateral system. I wouldn't touch it haha. If you're dead set on opening this wall up, I believe it can still be done with shoring and doing somewhat of an extension of that beam and adding another column. However, the height of those columns are pretty tall, I don't think the walls are the things bracing it from bucking, I think that's why they kinda "stiffen" it with the metal studs as noted on the drawings, but if it is indeed a part of the lateral system, that'd be really tough. Go find a licensed structural engineer though and they can tell you all the possibilities and costs associated! Structural engineers work for the owner and architect and their jobs are literally to make things work. If internet strangers tell you it's a load bearing wall, that's not necessarily a red light. A good structural engineer will probably tell you the same thing but also follow it up with solutions. Construction won't be cheap though.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              spolite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                4














                Like most have already said, I also believe it's a load bearing wall.. So for all the clues others have mentioned that it's a bearing wall, I also wanna add, and this may or may not actually be applicable here, but that it's common to hatch shear walls diagonally like the drawings show, so not only is that wall a part of your load bearing system, it may also be a part of your lateral system. I wouldn't touch it haha. If you're dead set on opening this wall up, I believe it can still be done with shoring and doing somewhat of an extension of that beam and adding another column. However, the height of those columns are pretty tall, I don't think the walls are the things bracing it from bucking, I think that's why they kinda "stiffen" it with the metal studs as noted on the drawings, but if it is indeed a part of the lateral system, that'd be really tough. Go find a licensed structural engineer though and they can tell you all the possibilities and costs associated! Structural engineers work for the owner and architect and their jobs are literally to make things work. If internet strangers tell you it's a load bearing wall, that's not necessarily a red light. A good structural engineer will probably tell you the same thing but also follow it up with solutions. Construction won't be cheap though.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                spolite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.























                  4












                  4








                  4







                  Like most have already said, I also believe it's a load bearing wall.. So for all the clues others have mentioned that it's a bearing wall, I also wanna add, and this may or may not actually be applicable here, but that it's common to hatch shear walls diagonally like the drawings show, so not only is that wall a part of your load bearing system, it may also be a part of your lateral system. I wouldn't touch it haha. If you're dead set on opening this wall up, I believe it can still be done with shoring and doing somewhat of an extension of that beam and adding another column. However, the height of those columns are pretty tall, I don't think the walls are the things bracing it from bucking, I think that's why they kinda "stiffen" it with the metal studs as noted on the drawings, but if it is indeed a part of the lateral system, that'd be really tough. Go find a licensed structural engineer though and they can tell you all the possibilities and costs associated! Structural engineers work for the owner and architect and their jobs are literally to make things work. If internet strangers tell you it's a load bearing wall, that's not necessarily a red light. A good structural engineer will probably tell you the same thing but also follow it up with solutions. Construction won't be cheap though.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  spolite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.










                  Like most have already said, I also believe it's a load bearing wall.. So for all the clues others have mentioned that it's a bearing wall, I also wanna add, and this may or may not actually be applicable here, but that it's common to hatch shear walls diagonally like the drawings show, so not only is that wall a part of your load bearing system, it may also be a part of your lateral system. I wouldn't touch it haha. If you're dead set on opening this wall up, I believe it can still be done with shoring and doing somewhat of an extension of that beam and adding another column. However, the height of those columns are pretty tall, I don't think the walls are the things bracing it from bucking, I think that's why they kinda "stiffen" it with the metal studs as noted on the drawings, but if it is indeed a part of the lateral system, that'd be really tough. Go find a licensed structural engineer though and they can tell you all the possibilities and costs associated! Structural engineers work for the owner and architect and their jobs are literally to make things work. If internet strangers tell you it's a load bearing wall, that's not necessarily a red light. A good structural engineer will probably tell you the same thing but also follow it up with solutions. Construction won't be cheap though.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  spolite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  spolite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 19 hours ago









                  spolitespolite

                  412




                  412




                  New contributor




                  spolite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  spolite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  spolite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.























                      3














                      Observations studying the drawing, 100% Load Bearing.



                      Section A will confirm further. Structural engineers will always span the shortest distance for timber joists. Taking out that wall, is physically impossible to do that without steel (span the floor over that is what I mean.) plus you would remove partial bearing support of the landing to the top of the stairs.



                      You could, to further be certain... Check the wall at the base by scrabbling back the render /fiishess to the masonry... And check for a dpc. If it has one, it means it requires substructure support... Aka... Foundation = load bearing.



                      If You decide to remove, prepare to either leave a portion of the wall nearest the external wall... 2-3ft...or put in a windpost to support the external wall.



                      Very educated guess (graduate structural engineer... 15 years in the industry). All the best. But definitely get a Structural engineer in who is local to confirm and Check the stability of your external wall should you proceed with the refurb work.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Mark O is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                      • Could you please define "DPC"?

                        – Patrick M
                        6 hours ago











                      • @PatrickM guessing "Dampproof course" or "malthoid" a dark grey/tar coloured paper to separate and protect wood from concrete/masonry. The presence of this barrier bitumen/tar-paper means the wood is pressing down hard on the concrete, and moisture could wick up. If it were not load-bearing then there wouldn't be a lot of load to bear so it would be air-gapped from the foundation.

                        – Criggie
                        2 hours ago
















                      3














                      Observations studying the drawing, 100% Load Bearing.



                      Section A will confirm further. Structural engineers will always span the shortest distance for timber joists. Taking out that wall, is physically impossible to do that without steel (span the floor over that is what I mean.) plus you would remove partial bearing support of the landing to the top of the stairs.



                      You could, to further be certain... Check the wall at the base by scrabbling back the render /fiishess to the masonry... And check for a dpc. If it has one, it means it requires substructure support... Aka... Foundation = load bearing.



                      If You decide to remove, prepare to either leave a portion of the wall nearest the external wall... 2-3ft...or put in a windpost to support the external wall.



                      Very educated guess (graduate structural engineer... 15 years in the industry). All the best. But definitely get a Structural engineer in who is local to confirm and Check the stability of your external wall should you proceed with the refurb work.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Mark O is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                      • Could you please define "DPC"?

                        – Patrick M
                        6 hours ago











                      • @PatrickM guessing "Dampproof course" or "malthoid" a dark grey/tar coloured paper to separate and protect wood from concrete/masonry. The presence of this barrier bitumen/tar-paper means the wood is pressing down hard on the concrete, and moisture could wick up. If it were not load-bearing then there wouldn't be a lot of load to bear so it would be air-gapped from the foundation.

                        – Criggie
                        2 hours ago














                      3












                      3








                      3







                      Observations studying the drawing, 100% Load Bearing.



                      Section A will confirm further. Structural engineers will always span the shortest distance for timber joists. Taking out that wall, is physically impossible to do that without steel (span the floor over that is what I mean.) plus you would remove partial bearing support of the landing to the top of the stairs.



                      You could, to further be certain... Check the wall at the base by scrabbling back the render /fiishess to the masonry... And check for a dpc. If it has one, it means it requires substructure support... Aka... Foundation = load bearing.



                      If You decide to remove, prepare to either leave a portion of the wall nearest the external wall... 2-3ft...or put in a windpost to support the external wall.



                      Very educated guess (graduate structural engineer... 15 years in the industry). All the best. But definitely get a Structural engineer in who is local to confirm and Check the stability of your external wall should you proceed with the refurb work.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Mark O is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.










                      Observations studying the drawing, 100% Load Bearing.



                      Section A will confirm further. Structural engineers will always span the shortest distance for timber joists. Taking out that wall, is physically impossible to do that without steel (span the floor over that is what I mean.) plus you would remove partial bearing support of the landing to the top of the stairs.



                      You could, to further be certain... Check the wall at the base by scrabbling back the render /fiishess to the masonry... And check for a dpc. If it has one, it means it requires substructure support... Aka... Foundation = load bearing.



                      If You decide to remove, prepare to either leave a portion of the wall nearest the external wall... 2-3ft...or put in a windpost to support the external wall.



                      Very educated guess (graduate structural engineer... 15 years in the industry). All the best. But definitely get a Structural engineer in who is local to confirm and Check the stability of your external wall should you proceed with the refurb work.







                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Mark O is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer






                      New contributor




                      Mark O is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      answered 17 hours ago









                      Mark OMark O

                      311




                      311




                      New contributor




                      Mark O is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      New contributor





                      Mark O is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      Mark O is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.













                      • Could you please define "DPC"?

                        – Patrick M
                        6 hours ago











                      • @PatrickM guessing "Dampproof course" or "malthoid" a dark grey/tar coloured paper to separate and protect wood from concrete/masonry. The presence of this barrier bitumen/tar-paper means the wood is pressing down hard on the concrete, and moisture could wick up. If it were not load-bearing then there wouldn't be a lot of load to bear so it would be air-gapped from the foundation.

                        – Criggie
                        2 hours ago



















                      • Could you please define "DPC"?

                        – Patrick M
                        6 hours ago











                      • @PatrickM guessing "Dampproof course" or "malthoid" a dark grey/tar coloured paper to separate and protect wood from concrete/masonry. The presence of this barrier bitumen/tar-paper means the wood is pressing down hard on the concrete, and moisture could wick up. If it were not load-bearing then there wouldn't be a lot of load to bear so it would be air-gapped from the foundation.

                        – Criggie
                        2 hours ago

















                      Could you please define "DPC"?

                      – Patrick M
                      6 hours ago





                      Could you please define "DPC"?

                      – Patrick M
                      6 hours ago













                      @PatrickM guessing "Dampproof course" or "malthoid" a dark grey/tar coloured paper to separate and protect wood from concrete/masonry. The presence of this barrier bitumen/tar-paper means the wood is pressing down hard on the concrete, and moisture could wick up. If it were not load-bearing then there wouldn't be a lot of load to bear so it would be air-gapped from the foundation.

                      – Criggie
                      2 hours ago





                      @PatrickM guessing "Dampproof course" or "malthoid" a dark grey/tar coloured paper to separate and protect wood from concrete/masonry. The presence of this barrier bitumen/tar-paper means the wood is pressing down hard on the concrete, and moisture could wick up. If it were not load-bearing then there wouldn't be a lot of load to bear so it would be air-gapped from the foundation.

                      – Criggie
                      2 hours ago





                      protected by Community 11 hours ago



                      Thank you for your interest in this question.
                      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      香粉寮

                      GameSpot