align optimization problem with multiple conditions
2
I am using the following environment to align optimization problem statements from Typesetting an optimisation problem
documentclass{report}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}
begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{alignat}{2}
&!min_{x} &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2label{eq:optProb}\
&text{subject to} & & alpha + (beta*gamma)geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\
& & & beta geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}
end{alignat}
end{subequations}
end{document}
How can I additionally align the "condition" at the geq sign such that it looks like this:
math-mode align amsmath
asked 11 hours ago
Manuel SchmidtManuel Schmidt
1,5181918
add a comment |
2
I am using the following environment to align optimization problem statements from Typesetting an optimisation problem
documentclass{report}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}
begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{alignat}{2}
&!min_{x} &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2label{eq:optProb}\
&text{subject to} & & alpha + (beta*gamma)geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\
& & & beta geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}
end{alignat}
end{subequations}
end{document}
How can I additionally align the "condition" at the geq sign such that it looks like this:
math-mode align amsmath
asked 11 hours ago
Manuel SchmidtManuel Schmidt
1,5181918
add a comment |
2
2
2
I am using the following environment to align optimization problem statements from Typesetting an optimisation problem
documentclass{report}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}
begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{alignat}{2}
&!min_{x} &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2label{eq:optProb}\
&text{subject to} & & alpha + (beta*gamma)geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\
& & & beta geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}
end{alignat}
end{subequations}
end{document}
How can I additionally align the "condition" at the geq sign such that it looks like this:
math-mode align amsmath
asked 11 hours ago
Manuel SchmidtManuel Schmidt
1,5181918
I am using the following environment to align optimization problem statements from Typesetting an optimisation problem
documentclass{report}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}
begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{alignat}{2}
&!min_{x} &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2label{eq:optProb}\
&text{subject to} & & alpha + (beta*gamma)geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\
& & & beta geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}
end{alignat}
end{subequations}
end{document}
How can I additionally align the "condition" at the geq sign such that it looks like this:
math-mode align amsmath
math-mode align amsmath
asked 11 hours ago
Manuel SchmidtManuel Schmidt
1,5181918
asked 11 hours ago
Manuel SchmidtManuel Schmidt
1,5181918
asked 11 hours ago
Manuel SchmidtManuel Schmidt
1,5181918
asked 11 hours ago
Manuel SchmidtManuel Schmidt
1,5181918
asked 11 hours ago
Manuel SchmidtManuel Schmidt
1,5181918
1,5181918
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
4
I suggest using the optidef package instead, which is done for the layout of optimisation problems, and has several variants:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{amsmath, optidef}
newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}
begin{document}
begin{mini!}
{x}{ norm{f(x)}^2 label{eq:optProb}}{}{}
addConstraint{alpha + (beta*gamma)}{ geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}}
addConstraint{beta}{geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}}
end{mini!}
end{document}
answered 10 hours ago
BernardBernard
167k769194
add a comment |
2
I changed the alignat parameter and added some &
documentclass{report}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}
begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{alignat}{3}
&!min_{x} &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2 & label{eq:optProb}\
&text{subject to} & & alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\
& & & beta &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}
end{alignat}
end{subequations}
% edit
begin{subequations}
begin{alignat}{3}
&!min_{x} &qquad&& norm{f(x)}^2 & label{eq:optProb}\
&text{subject to} & && alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\
& & && beta &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}
end{alignat}
end{subequations}
end{document}
See, for instance, this post for details.
answered 10 hours ago
NBurNBur
1,390214
Thanks, this looks better. However the beta parameter is not at the geq sign.
– Manuel Schmidt
10 hours ago
Sorry. See the edit: I added&
– NBur
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470262%2falign-optimization-problem-with-multiple-conditions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
4
I suggest using the optidef package instead, which is done for the layout of optimisation problems, and has several variants:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{amsmath, optidef}
newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}
begin{document}
begin{mini!}
{x}{ norm{f(x)}^2 label{eq:optProb}}{}{}
addConstraint{alpha + (beta*gamma)}{ geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}}
addConstraint{beta}{geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}}
end{mini!}
end{document}
answered 10 hours ago
BernardBernard
167k769194
add a comment |
4
I suggest using the optidef package instead, which is done for the layout of optimisation problems, and has several variants:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{amsmath, optidef}
newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}
begin{document}
begin{mini!}
{x}{ norm{f(x)}^2 label{eq:optProb}}{}{}
addConstraint{alpha + (beta*gamma)}{ geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}}
addConstraint{beta}{geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}}
end{mini!}
end{document}
answered 10 hours ago
BernardBernard
167k769194
add a comment |
4
4
4
I suggest using the optidef package instead, which is done for the layout of optimisation problems, and has several variants:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{amsmath, optidef}
newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}
begin{document}
begin{mini!}
{x}{ norm{f(x)}^2 label{eq:optProb}}{}{}
addConstraint{alpha + (beta*gamma)}{ geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}}
addConstraint{beta}{geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}}
end{mini!}
end{document}
answered 10 hours ago
BernardBernard
167k769194
I suggest using the optidef package instead, which is done for the layout of optimisation problems, and has several variants:
documentclass{report}
usepackage{amsmath, optidef}
newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}
begin{document}
begin{mini!}
{x}{ norm{f(x)}^2 label{eq:optProb}}{}{}
addConstraint{alpha + (beta*gamma)}{ geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}}
addConstraint{beta}{geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}}
end{mini!}
end{document}
answered 10 hours ago
BernardBernard
167k769194
edited 9 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
BernardBernard
167k769194
answered 10 hours ago
BernardBernard
167k769194
answered 10 hours ago
BernardBernard
167k769194
167k769194
add a comment |
add a comment |
2
I changed the alignat parameter and added some &
documentclass{report}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}
begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{alignat}{3}
&!min_{x} &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2 & label{eq:optProb}\
&text{subject to} & & alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\
& & & beta &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}
end{alignat}
end{subequations}
% edit
begin{subequations}
begin{alignat}{3}
&!min_{x} &qquad&& norm{f(x)}^2 & label{eq:optProb}\
&text{subject to} & && alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\
& & && beta &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}
end{alignat}
end{subequations}
end{document}
See, for instance, this post for details.
answered 10 hours ago
NBurNBur
1,390214
Thanks, this looks better. However the beta parameter is not at the geq sign.
– Manuel Schmidt
10 hours ago
Sorry. See the edit: I added&
– NBur
10 hours ago
add a comment |
2
I changed the alignat parameter and added some &
documentclass{report}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}
begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{alignat}{3}
&!min_{x} &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2 & label{eq:optProb}\
&text{subject to} & & alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\
& & & beta &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}
end{alignat}
end{subequations}
% edit
begin{subequations}
begin{alignat}{3}
&!min_{x} &qquad&& norm{f(x)}^2 & label{eq:optProb}\
&text{subject to} & && alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\
& & && beta &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}
end{alignat}
end{subequations}
end{document}
See, for instance, this post for details.
answered 10 hours ago
NBurNBur
1,390214
Thanks, this looks better. However the beta parameter is not at the geq sign.
– Manuel Schmidt
10 hours ago
Sorry. See the edit: I added&
– NBur
10 hours ago
add a comment |
2
2
2
I changed the alignat parameter and added some &
documentclass{report}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}
begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{alignat}{3}
&!min_{x} &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2 & label{eq:optProb}\
&text{subject to} & & alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\
& & & beta &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}
end{alignat}
end{subequations}
% edit
begin{subequations}
begin{alignat}{3}
&!min_{x} &qquad&& norm{f(x)}^2 & label{eq:optProb}\
&text{subject to} & && alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\
& & && beta &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}
end{alignat}
end{subequations}
end{document}
See, for instance, this post for details.
answered 10 hours ago
NBurNBur
1,390214
I changed the alignat parameter and added some &
documentclass{report}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{norm}[1]{lVert#1rVert_2}
begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{alignat}{3}
&!min_{x} &qquad& norm{f(x)}^2 & label{eq:optProb}\
&text{subject to} & & alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\
& & & beta &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}
end{alignat}
end{subequations}
% edit
begin{subequations}
begin{alignat}{3}
&!min_{x} &qquad&& norm{f(x)}^2 & label{eq:optProb}\
&text{subject to} & && alpha + (beta*gamma) & geq 0,label{eq:constraint1}\
& & && beta &geq 0.label{eq:constraint2}
end{alignat}
end{subequations}
end{document}
See, for instance, this post for details.
answered 10 hours ago
NBurNBur
1,390214
edited 10 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
NBurNBur
1,390214
answered 10 hours ago
NBurNBur
1,390214
answered 10 hours ago
NBurNBur
1,390214
1,390214
Thanks, this looks better. However the beta parameter is not at the geq sign.
– Manuel Schmidt
10 hours ago
Sorry. See the edit: I added&
– NBur
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks, this looks better. However the beta parameter is not at the geq sign.
– Manuel Schmidt
10 hours ago
Sorry. See the edit: I added&
– NBur
10 hours ago
Thanks, this looks better. However the beta parameter is not at the geq sign.
– Manuel Schmidt
10 hours ago
Thanks, this looks better. However the beta parameter is not at the geq sign.
– Manuel Schmidt
10 hours ago
Sorry. See the edit: I added
&– NBur
10 hours ago
Sorry. See the edit: I added
&– NBur
10 hours ago
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470262%2falign-optimization-problem-with-multiple-conditions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
