Complicated square root problem.
$begingroup$
I was wondering the general method to solve
What is the value of $sqrt{a-bsqrt{c}}?$
The basic method I learned is to set this equal to $sqrt{x-ysqrt{c}}$, but I found out that this doesn't work with $sqrt{5+2sqrt{6}}$ which equals $sqrt{3}+sqrt{2}$. What is the general method to simplify these problems?(i.e. $sqrt{a-bsqrt{c}}=?$)
number-theory radicals nested-radicals
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I was wondering the general method to solve
What is the value of $sqrt{a-bsqrt{c}}?$
The basic method I learned is to set this equal to $sqrt{x-ysqrt{c}}$, but I found out that this doesn't work with $sqrt{5+2sqrt{6}}$ which equals $sqrt{3}+sqrt{2}$. What is the general method to simplify these problems?(i.e. $sqrt{a-bsqrt{c}}=?$)
number-theory radicals nested-radicals
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
"The basic method I learned is to set this equal to $sqrt{x-ysqrt{c}}$" and do what with it? "but I found out that this doesn't work with $sqrt{5+2sqrt{6}}$" why not? What was supposed to happen?
$endgroup$
– fleablood
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
By the way, don't say "complex square root". "complex" has a specific mathematical meaning you didn't mean.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Quite. The word "complicated" would be better to use here since "complicated" doesn't really have much mathematical use, just linguistic use.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@fleablood I know, complex numbers. How should I write it then?
$endgroup$
– Max0815
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
As @JMoravitz said, rewrite is as "complicated"
$endgroup$
– MilkyWay90
54 mins ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I was wondering the general method to solve
What is the value of $sqrt{a-bsqrt{c}}?$
The basic method I learned is to set this equal to $sqrt{x-ysqrt{c}}$, but I found out that this doesn't work with $sqrt{5+2sqrt{6}}$ which equals $sqrt{3}+sqrt{2}$. What is the general method to simplify these problems?(i.e. $sqrt{a-bsqrt{c}}=?$)
number-theory radicals nested-radicals
$endgroup$
I was wondering the general method to solve
What is the value of $sqrt{a-bsqrt{c}}?$
The basic method I learned is to set this equal to $sqrt{x-ysqrt{c}}$, but I found out that this doesn't work with $sqrt{5+2sqrt{6}}$ which equals $sqrt{3}+sqrt{2}$. What is the general method to simplify these problems?(i.e. $sqrt{a-bsqrt{c}}=?$)
number-theory radicals nested-radicals
number-theory radicals nested-radicals
edited 2 hours ago
Michael Rozenberg
104k1891196
104k1891196
asked 4 hours ago
Max0815Max0815
67118
67118
1
$begingroup$
"The basic method I learned is to set this equal to $sqrt{x-ysqrt{c}}$" and do what with it? "but I found out that this doesn't work with $sqrt{5+2sqrt{6}}$" why not? What was supposed to happen?
$endgroup$
– fleablood
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
By the way, don't say "complex square root". "complex" has a specific mathematical meaning you didn't mean.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Quite. The word "complicated" would be better to use here since "complicated" doesn't really have much mathematical use, just linguistic use.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@fleablood I know, complex numbers. How should I write it then?
$endgroup$
– Max0815
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
As @JMoravitz said, rewrite is as "complicated"
$endgroup$
– MilkyWay90
54 mins ago
|
show 2 more comments
1
$begingroup$
"The basic method I learned is to set this equal to $sqrt{x-ysqrt{c}}$" and do what with it? "but I found out that this doesn't work with $sqrt{5+2sqrt{6}}$" why not? What was supposed to happen?
$endgroup$
– fleablood
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
By the way, don't say "complex square root". "complex" has a specific mathematical meaning you didn't mean.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Quite. The word "complicated" would be better to use here since "complicated" doesn't really have much mathematical use, just linguistic use.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@fleablood I know, complex numbers. How should I write it then?
$endgroup$
– Max0815
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
As @JMoravitz said, rewrite is as "complicated"
$endgroup$
– MilkyWay90
54 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
"The basic method I learned is to set this equal to $sqrt{x-ysqrt{c}}$" and do what with it? "but I found out that this doesn't work with $sqrt{5+2sqrt{6}}$" why not? What was supposed to happen?
$endgroup$
– fleablood
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
"The basic method I learned is to set this equal to $sqrt{x-ysqrt{c}}$" and do what with it? "but I found out that this doesn't work with $sqrt{5+2sqrt{6}}$" why not? What was supposed to happen?
$endgroup$
– fleablood
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
By the way, don't say "complex square root". "complex" has a specific mathematical meaning you didn't mean.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
By the way, don't say "complex square root". "complex" has a specific mathematical meaning you didn't mean.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
3 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Quite. The word "complicated" would be better to use here since "complicated" doesn't really have much mathematical use, just linguistic use.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Quite. The word "complicated" would be better to use here since "complicated" doesn't really have much mathematical use, just linguistic use.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@fleablood I know, complex numbers. How should I write it then?
$endgroup$
– Max0815
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@fleablood I know, complex numbers. How should I write it then?
$endgroup$
– Max0815
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
As @JMoravitz said, rewrite is as "complicated"
$endgroup$
– MilkyWay90
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
As @JMoravitz said, rewrite is as "complicated"
$endgroup$
– MilkyWay90
54 mins ago
|
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
One way of approaching this problem is by viewing it as a zero of an equation. Let me explain. Let's say you want to compute $sqrt{x_0}$ where $x_0$ is a zero of some quadratic polynomial of the form $x^2-bx+1$. Now, one way to go is to note that if you have a zero of $x^2+ax+1$, then it will still be a zero if you multiply it with $x^2-ax+1$ which equals
$$x^4 + (2-a^2) x^2 + 1$$
Now the idea is to work backwards. So, in particular, if you can find you can find an $a$ such that $b=a^2-2$, then you can conclude that the square root of you polynomial is equal to one of the zeros of the polynomials $x^2-ax+1$ or $x^2+ax+1$. It is usually not too hard to find out which. If you found out which, you can rewrite your square root accordingly to the desired form :)
To conclude, one of the tricks is to find the right form of your polynomials such that you end up with something useful. This method will however require some puzzling.
Edit applying this method to your example, you will find that the polynomial you need (thus the one for which you want to calculate the square root of a zero) is $x^2-10x+1$. Then according to the above method (which you derive on the go), your $a=sqrt{12}$ and then you just need to solve $x^2-ax+1=0$ which is the only possibility since for the other one, filling in a positive number will yield a positive number. Solving this equation by completing the square is not too difficult. It turns out that the zeros lie at around 0.5 and 3. Hence, it is not difficult to note you need the larger zero which turns out to be exactly gicen by $sqrt{2}+sqrt{3}$. Does that make sense?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes. thanx!!!!!
$endgroup$
– Max0815
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
If your polynomial ends with $+b$ instead of $1$, I think you need to work with $+sqrt{b}$ in the polynomials with the $a$s. (Did not check this but I am sure this will work).
$endgroup$
– Stan Tendijck
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes I believe so too.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are the following identities.
$$sqrt{a+sqrt{b}}=sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}+sqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}$$ and
$$sqrt{a-sqrt{b}}=sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}-sqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}},$$
where all numbers under radicals they are non-negatives.
For example:
$$sqrt{5+2sqrt6}=sqrt{5+sqrt{24}}=sqrt{frac{5+sqrt{5^2-24}}{2}}+sqrt{frac{5-sqrt{5^2-24}}{2}}=sqrt3+sqrt2.$$
This is interesting, when $a$ and $b$ are rationals and $a^2-b$ is a square of a rational number.
The first identity is true because
$$left(sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}+sqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}right)^2=$$
$$=frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}+frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}+2sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}cdotsqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}=a+sqrt{b}.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is interesting. I had never seen the identities you begin with.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Lubin same with me too.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
We can prove it. It's not hard.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
How would you prove the first one @MichaelRozenberg? I can get the second on I think because it is conjugate of first, which should be easy.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Max0815 I added something. See now.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3119568%2fcomplicated-square-root-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
One way of approaching this problem is by viewing it as a zero of an equation. Let me explain. Let's say you want to compute $sqrt{x_0}$ where $x_0$ is a zero of some quadratic polynomial of the form $x^2-bx+1$. Now, one way to go is to note that if you have a zero of $x^2+ax+1$, then it will still be a zero if you multiply it with $x^2-ax+1$ which equals
$$x^4 + (2-a^2) x^2 + 1$$
Now the idea is to work backwards. So, in particular, if you can find you can find an $a$ such that $b=a^2-2$, then you can conclude that the square root of you polynomial is equal to one of the zeros of the polynomials $x^2-ax+1$ or $x^2+ax+1$. It is usually not too hard to find out which. If you found out which, you can rewrite your square root accordingly to the desired form :)
To conclude, one of the tricks is to find the right form of your polynomials such that you end up with something useful. This method will however require some puzzling.
Edit applying this method to your example, you will find that the polynomial you need (thus the one for which you want to calculate the square root of a zero) is $x^2-10x+1$. Then according to the above method (which you derive on the go), your $a=sqrt{12}$ and then you just need to solve $x^2-ax+1=0$ which is the only possibility since for the other one, filling in a positive number will yield a positive number. Solving this equation by completing the square is not too difficult. It turns out that the zeros lie at around 0.5 and 3. Hence, it is not difficult to note you need the larger zero which turns out to be exactly gicen by $sqrt{2}+sqrt{3}$. Does that make sense?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes. thanx!!!!!
$endgroup$
– Max0815
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
If your polynomial ends with $+b$ instead of $1$, I think you need to work with $+sqrt{b}$ in the polynomials with the $a$s. (Did not check this but I am sure this will work).
$endgroup$
– Stan Tendijck
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes I believe so too.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One way of approaching this problem is by viewing it as a zero of an equation. Let me explain. Let's say you want to compute $sqrt{x_0}$ where $x_0$ is a zero of some quadratic polynomial of the form $x^2-bx+1$. Now, one way to go is to note that if you have a zero of $x^2+ax+1$, then it will still be a zero if you multiply it with $x^2-ax+1$ which equals
$$x^4 + (2-a^2) x^2 + 1$$
Now the idea is to work backwards. So, in particular, if you can find you can find an $a$ such that $b=a^2-2$, then you can conclude that the square root of you polynomial is equal to one of the zeros of the polynomials $x^2-ax+1$ or $x^2+ax+1$. It is usually not too hard to find out which. If you found out which, you can rewrite your square root accordingly to the desired form :)
To conclude, one of the tricks is to find the right form of your polynomials such that you end up with something useful. This method will however require some puzzling.
Edit applying this method to your example, you will find that the polynomial you need (thus the one for which you want to calculate the square root of a zero) is $x^2-10x+1$. Then according to the above method (which you derive on the go), your $a=sqrt{12}$ and then you just need to solve $x^2-ax+1=0$ which is the only possibility since for the other one, filling in a positive number will yield a positive number. Solving this equation by completing the square is not too difficult. It turns out that the zeros lie at around 0.5 and 3. Hence, it is not difficult to note you need the larger zero which turns out to be exactly gicen by $sqrt{2}+sqrt{3}$. Does that make sense?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes. thanx!!!!!
$endgroup$
– Max0815
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
If your polynomial ends with $+b$ instead of $1$, I think you need to work with $+sqrt{b}$ in the polynomials with the $a$s. (Did not check this but I am sure this will work).
$endgroup$
– Stan Tendijck
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes I believe so too.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One way of approaching this problem is by viewing it as a zero of an equation. Let me explain. Let's say you want to compute $sqrt{x_0}$ where $x_0$ is a zero of some quadratic polynomial of the form $x^2-bx+1$. Now, one way to go is to note that if you have a zero of $x^2+ax+1$, then it will still be a zero if you multiply it with $x^2-ax+1$ which equals
$$x^4 + (2-a^2) x^2 + 1$$
Now the idea is to work backwards. So, in particular, if you can find you can find an $a$ such that $b=a^2-2$, then you can conclude that the square root of you polynomial is equal to one of the zeros of the polynomials $x^2-ax+1$ or $x^2+ax+1$. It is usually not too hard to find out which. If you found out which, you can rewrite your square root accordingly to the desired form :)
To conclude, one of the tricks is to find the right form of your polynomials such that you end up with something useful. This method will however require some puzzling.
Edit applying this method to your example, you will find that the polynomial you need (thus the one for which you want to calculate the square root of a zero) is $x^2-10x+1$. Then according to the above method (which you derive on the go), your $a=sqrt{12}$ and then you just need to solve $x^2-ax+1=0$ which is the only possibility since for the other one, filling in a positive number will yield a positive number. Solving this equation by completing the square is not too difficult. It turns out that the zeros lie at around 0.5 and 3. Hence, it is not difficult to note you need the larger zero which turns out to be exactly gicen by $sqrt{2}+sqrt{3}$. Does that make sense?
$endgroup$
One way of approaching this problem is by viewing it as a zero of an equation. Let me explain. Let's say you want to compute $sqrt{x_0}$ where $x_0$ is a zero of some quadratic polynomial of the form $x^2-bx+1$. Now, one way to go is to note that if you have a zero of $x^2+ax+1$, then it will still be a zero if you multiply it with $x^2-ax+1$ which equals
$$x^4 + (2-a^2) x^2 + 1$$
Now the idea is to work backwards. So, in particular, if you can find you can find an $a$ such that $b=a^2-2$, then you can conclude that the square root of you polynomial is equal to one of the zeros of the polynomials $x^2-ax+1$ or $x^2+ax+1$. It is usually not too hard to find out which. If you found out which, you can rewrite your square root accordingly to the desired form :)
To conclude, one of the tricks is to find the right form of your polynomials such that you end up with something useful. This method will however require some puzzling.
Edit applying this method to your example, you will find that the polynomial you need (thus the one for which you want to calculate the square root of a zero) is $x^2-10x+1$. Then according to the above method (which you derive on the go), your $a=sqrt{12}$ and then you just need to solve $x^2-ax+1=0$ which is the only possibility since for the other one, filling in a positive number will yield a positive number. Solving this equation by completing the square is not too difficult. It turns out that the zeros lie at around 0.5 and 3. Hence, it is not difficult to note you need the larger zero which turns out to be exactly gicen by $sqrt{2}+sqrt{3}$. Does that make sense?
edited 3 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
Stan TendijckStan Tendijck
1,826311
1,826311
$begingroup$
Yes. thanx!!!!!
$endgroup$
– Max0815
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
If your polynomial ends with $+b$ instead of $1$, I think you need to work with $+sqrt{b}$ in the polynomials with the $a$s. (Did not check this but I am sure this will work).
$endgroup$
– Stan Tendijck
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes I believe so too.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes. thanx!!!!!
$endgroup$
– Max0815
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
If your polynomial ends with $+b$ instead of $1$, I think you need to work with $+sqrt{b}$ in the polynomials with the $a$s. (Did not check this but I am sure this will work).
$endgroup$
– Stan Tendijck
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes I believe so too.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes. thanx!!!!!
$endgroup$
– Max0815
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes. thanx!!!!!
$endgroup$
– Max0815
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
If your polynomial ends with $+b$ instead of $1$, I think you need to work with $+sqrt{b}$ in the polynomials with the $a$s. (Did not check this but I am sure this will work).
$endgroup$
– Stan Tendijck
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
If your polynomial ends with $+b$ instead of $1$, I think you need to work with $+sqrt{b}$ in the polynomials with the $a$s. (Did not check this but I am sure this will work).
$endgroup$
– Stan Tendijck
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes I believe so too.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
yes I believe so too.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are the following identities.
$$sqrt{a+sqrt{b}}=sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}+sqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}$$ and
$$sqrt{a-sqrt{b}}=sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}-sqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}},$$
where all numbers under radicals they are non-negatives.
For example:
$$sqrt{5+2sqrt6}=sqrt{5+sqrt{24}}=sqrt{frac{5+sqrt{5^2-24}}{2}}+sqrt{frac{5-sqrt{5^2-24}}{2}}=sqrt3+sqrt2.$$
This is interesting, when $a$ and $b$ are rationals and $a^2-b$ is a square of a rational number.
The first identity is true because
$$left(sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}+sqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}right)^2=$$
$$=frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}+frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}+2sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}cdotsqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}=a+sqrt{b}.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is interesting. I had never seen the identities you begin with.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Lubin same with me too.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
We can prove it. It's not hard.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
How would you prove the first one @MichaelRozenberg? I can get the second on I think because it is conjugate of first, which should be easy.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Max0815 I added something. See now.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
There are the following identities.
$$sqrt{a+sqrt{b}}=sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}+sqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}$$ and
$$sqrt{a-sqrt{b}}=sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}-sqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}},$$
where all numbers under radicals they are non-negatives.
For example:
$$sqrt{5+2sqrt6}=sqrt{5+sqrt{24}}=sqrt{frac{5+sqrt{5^2-24}}{2}}+sqrt{frac{5-sqrt{5^2-24}}{2}}=sqrt3+sqrt2.$$
This is interesting, when $a$ and $b$ are rationals and $a^2-b$ is a square of a rational number.
The first identity is true because
$$left(sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}+sqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}right)^2=$$
$$=frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}+frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}+2sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}cdotsqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}=a+sqrt{b}.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is interesting. I had never seen the identities you begin with.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Lubin same with me too.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
We can prove it. It's not hard.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
How would you prove the first one @MichaelRozenberg? I can get the second on I think because it is conjugate of first, which should be easy.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Max0815 I added something. See now.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
There are the following identities.
$$sqrt{a+sqrt{b}}=sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}+sqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}$$ and
$$sqrt{a-sqrt{b}}=sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}-sqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}},$$
where all numbers under radicals they are non-negatives.
For example:
$$sqrt{5+2sqrt6}=sqrt{5+sqrt{24}}=sqrt{frac{5+sqrt{5^2-24}}{2}}+sqrt{frac{5-sqrt{5^2-24}}{2}}=sqrt3+sqrt2.$$
This is interesting, when $a$ and $b$ are rationals and $a^2-b$ is a square of a rational number.
The first identity is true because
$$left(sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}+sqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}right)^2=$$
$$=frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}+frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}+2sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}cdotsqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}=a+sqrt{b}.$$
$endgroup$
There are the following identities.
$$sqrt{a+sqrt{b}}=sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}+sqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}$$ and
$$sqrt{a-sqrt{b}}=sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}-sqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}},$$
where all numbers under radicals they are non-negatives.
For example:
$$sqrt{5+2sqrt6}=sqrt{5+sqrt{24}}=sqrt{frac{5+sqrt{5^2-24}}{2}}+sqrt{frac{5-sqrt{5^2-24}}{2}}=sqrt3+sqrt2.$$
This is interesting, when $a$ and $b$ are rationals and $a^2-b$ is a square of a rational number.
The first identity is true because
$$left(sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}+sqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}right)^2=$$
$$=frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}+frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}+2sqrt{frac{a+sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}cdotsqrt{frac{a-sqrt{a^2-b}}{2}}=a+sqrt{b}.$$
edited 1 hour ago
answered 3 hours ago
Michael RozenbergMichael Rozenberg
104k1891196
104k1891196
$begingroup$
This is interesting. I had never seen the identities you begin with.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Lubin same with me too.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
We can prove it. It's not hard.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
How would you prove the first one @MichaelRozenberg? I can get the second on I think because it is conjugate of first, which should be easy.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Max0815 I added something. See now.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
This is interesting. I had never seen the identities you begin with.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Lubin same with me too.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
We can prove it. It's not hard.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
How would you prove the first one @MichaelRozenberg? I can get the second on I think because it is conjugate of first, which should be easy.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Max0815 I added something. See now.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This is interesting. I had never seen the identities you begin with.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is interesting. I had never seen the identities you begin with.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Lubin same with me too.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Lubin same with me too.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
We can prove it. It's not hard.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
We can prove it. It's not hard.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
How would you prove the first one @MichaelRozenberg? I can get the second on I think because it is conjugate of first, which should be easy.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
How would you prove the first one @MichaelRozenberg? I can get the second on I think because it is conjugate of first, which should be easy.
$endgroup$
– Max0815
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Max0815 I added something. See now.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Max0815 I added something. See now.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3119568%2fcomplicated-square-root-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
"The basic method I learned is to set this equal to $sqrt{x-ysqrt{c}}$" and do what with it? "but I found out that this doesn't work with $sqrt{5+2sqrt{6}}$" why not? What was supposed to happen?
$endgroup$
– fleablood
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
By the way, don't say "complex square root". "complex" has a specific mathematical meaning you didn't mean.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Quite. The word "complicated" would be better to use here since "complicated" doesn't really have much mathematical use, just linguistic use.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@fleablood I know, complex numbers. How should I write it then?
$endgroup$
– Max0815
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
As @JMoravitz said, rewrite is as "complicated"
$endgroup$
– MilkyWay90
54 mins ago