gnome-terminal --disable-factory support problem












1















$ gnome-terminal  --tab  --title="700"  --disable-factory  -e

Failed to parse arguments: Option "--disable-factory" is no longer supported in this version of gnome-terminal.


I am using GNOME 3.










share|improve this question

























  • What version of gnome-terminal do you have? Considered using another terminal emulator? Maybe xfce4-terminal?

    – muru
    Feb 3 '16 at 5:42











  • I do not understand why this was downvoted. This is a legitimate question. Ubuntu is for all, not only for Linux-Pros! Please do not discriminate people because they are not fluent in English or do not grok shell syntax. We are here to help them!

    – Tino
    Jun 17 '17 at 8:52
















1















$ gnome-terminal  --tab  --title="700"  --disable-factory  -e

Failed to parse arguments: Option "--disable-factory" is no longer supported in this version of gnome-terminal.


I am using GNOME 3.










share|improve this question

























  • What version of gnome-terminal do you have? Considered using another terminal emulator? Maybe xfce4-terminal?

    – muru
    Feb 3 '16 at 5:42











  • I do not understand why this was downvoted. This is a legitimate question. Ubuntu is for all, not only for Linux-Pros! Please do not discriminate people because they are not fluent in English or do not grok shell syntax. We are here to help them!

    – Tino
    Jun 17 '17 at 8:52














1












1








1








$ gnome-terminal  --tab  --title="700"  --disable-factory  -e

Failed to parse arguments: Option "--disable-factory" is no longer supported in this version of gnome-terminal.


I am using GNOME 3.










share|improve this question
















$ gnome-terminal  --tab  --title="700"  --disable-factory  -e

Failed to parse arguments: Option "--disable-factory" is no longer supported in this version of gnome-terminal.


I am using GNOME 3.







14.04 command-line gnome gnome-terminal






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









ubashu

2,37821837




2,37821837










asked Feb 3 '16 at 3:51









Ahmed Zain El DeinAhmed Zain El Dein

3211918




3211918













  • What version of gnome-terminal do you have? Considered using another terminal emulator? Maybe xfce4-terminal?

    – muru
    Feb 3 '16 at 5:42











  • I do not understand why this was downvoted. This is a legitimate question. Ubuntu is for all, not only for Linux-Pros! Please do not discriminate people because they are not fluent in English or do not grok shell syntax. We are here to help them!

    – Tino
    Jun 17 '17 at 8:52



















  • What version of gnome-terminal do you have? Considered using another terminal emulator? Maybe xfce4-terminal?

    – muru
    Feb 3 '16 at 5:42











  • I do not understand why this was downvoted. This is a legitimate question. Ubuntu is for all, not only for Linux-Pros! Please do not discriminate people because they are not fluent in English or do not grok shell syntax. We are here to help them!

    – Tino
    Jun 17 '17 at 8:52

















What version of gnome-terminal do you have? Considered using another terminal emulator? Maybe xfce4-terminal?

– muru
Feb 3 '16 at 5:42





What version of gnome-terminal do you have? Considered using another terminal emulator? Maybe xfce4-terminal?

– muru
Feb 3 '16 at 5:42













I do not understand why this was downvoted. This is a legitimate question. Ubuntu is for all, not only for Linux-Pros! Please do not discriminate people because they are not fluent in English or do not grok shell syntax. We are here to help them!

– Tino
Jun 17 '17 at 8:52





I do not understand why this was downvoted. This is a legitimate question. Ubuntu is for all, not only for Linux-Pros! Please do not discriminate people because they are not fluent in English or do not grok shell syntax. We are here to help them!

– Tino
Jun 17 '17 at 8:52










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














If you really need multiple instances of gnome-terminal process running (but why should you?), follow the steps at https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Terminal/Debugging except for the gdb part.






share|improve this answer
























  • i can't understand what will i replace the sentence gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" --disable-factory with , will i write instead of it gnome-terminal-server --app-id my.foo.Terminal?

    – Ahmed Zain El Dein
    Feb 3 '16 at 15:07











  • Here's my reason for running separate gnome-terminal processes - I don't limit myself to a single X screen in my X desktop. I have multiple independent X screens. gnome-terminal, apart from the helpful gdb hack you link, is no longer able to have a terminal on more than one screen at a time.

    – Troy Folger
    Jun 25 '18 at 22:43



















1














For the benefit of the reader.



The problem



Option --disable-factory got removed in V3.8 of gnome-terminal and there is no way to archive this behavior the easy way. At least not a way, which can be explained to people, who are not fluent in shell syntax.



Hence the command line



gnome-terminal  --tab  --title="700" --disable-factory -e ...


fails with the error presented in the question.




Please excuse this very personal side note: I really do not understand, why this crucial option got removed. Even Microsoft introduced an option to run cmd, explorer or powershell the blocking way. Microsoft listens to their users. But Gnome does not. Instead of officially documenting the hidden option --disable-factory, Gnome suddenly removed it. If they continue this course, they will make Microsoft win on the long term. That is very very sad and extraordinary stupid. (Sorry for this rant, but it has to be be said.)




BTW: Ubuntu 16.04 restored --disable-factory using a wrapper which emulates this feature. (If you look at the complexity of this wrapper, my rant still applies even more than before.)



Variant 0



I call this 0, because both are not really proper solutions. A proper solution is shown in Variant 1.



Varriant 0a



A first thing, you can try, is to remove option --disable-server:



gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" -e ...


However this has following drawback:



This does no more wait until gnome-terminal finishes. If there is another gnome-terminal running, the command immediately comes back. Usually this is not what you want, because this is, why option --disable-factory was present in the first place.



Variant 0b



So removing this option is only feasible in the case, where you can make sure, that in all and every case, no other gnome-terminal is running, ever.



If this is not the case, but you are in a case, where another running gnome-terminal must not be supported, you can try following desparate fallback variant:



killall -9 gnome-terminal
gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" -e ...


But beware! This unconditionally kills all gnome-terminals which are still open. In a production environment this usually will cause greater harm then it helps. You have been warned!



Variant 1



If you do not need to run it in gnome-terminal and can run it in some other terminal emulator. @muru commented a good replacement.



xfce4-terminal understands nearly the same set of options as gnome-terminal (and adds some very handy other options which are missing in gnome-terminal for years). It also has a documented option, which does, what --disable-factory did for gnome-terminal. The option --tab works differently to gnome-terminal and thus must be removed, too, to get something working. The replacement is:



xfce4-terminal --title="700" --disable-server -e ...


Also you can add a --hold option, if you want to be able to see the full output of the command before the window is closed:



xfce4-terminal --hold --title="700" --disable-server -e ...


Please note that xfce4-terminal has a little race-condition, which unfortunately truncates the output, so --hold is not fully effective. Fixing this properly (such that you can use it copy'n'paste) is beyond the scope of the answer, however usually adding a little echo $? && read -t.1 to the script which is executed with (behind) -e can solve it 99% of the time.



In case you get the message, that xfce4-terminal is missing, then you have to install it first. It can be installed in parallel to gnome, even that it belongs to another desktop variant (Xfce):



sudo apt-get install xfce4-terminal


The only drawback is, that xfce4-terminal has another look than gnome-terminal, and follows some other



Variant 2..∞



There are endless other possible variants to fix that issue. Most of them are really complicated. Too complicated for normal people, those, who are not really into shells.



So I leave them away. My recommendation is:



As noted by @muru, try to use xfce4-terminal instead of gnome-terminal.



Note to those, who grok shells



All simple solutions are not really perfect, as they do not return the command's return value (gnome-terminal does not, too). Sadly. To fix that this is a completely different story.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "89"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f729034%2fgnome-terminal-disable-factory-support-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    If you really need multiple instances of gnome-terminal process running (but why should you?), follow the steps at https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Terminal/Debugging except for the gdb part.






    share|improve this answer
























    • i can't understand what will i replace the sentence gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" --disable-factory with , will i write instead of it gnome-terminal-server --app-id my.foo.Terminal?

      – Ahmed Zain El Dein
      Feb 3 '16 at 15:07











    • Here's my reason for running separate gnome-terminal processes - I don't limit myself to a single X screen in my X desktop. I have multiple independent X screens. gnome-terminal, apart from the helpful gdb hack you link, is no longer able to have a terminal on more than one screen at a time.

      – Troy Folger
      Jun 25 '18 at 22:43
















    1














    If you really need multiple instances of gnome-terminal process running (but why should you?), follow the steps at https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Terminal/Debugging except for the gdb part.






    share|improve this answer
























    • i can't understand what will i replace the sentence gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" --disable-factory with , will i write instead of it gnome-terminal-server --app-id my.foo.Terminal?

      – Ahmed Zain El Dein
      Feb 3 '16 at 15:07











    • Here's my reason for running separate gnome-terminal processes - I don't limit myself to a single X screen in my X desktop. I have multiple independent X screens. gnome-terminal, apart from the helpful gdb hack you link, is no longer able to have a terminal on more than one screen at a time.

      – Troy Folger
      Jun 25 '18 at 22:43














    1












    1








    1







    If you really need multiple instances of gnome-terminal process running (but why should you?), follow the steps at https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Terminal/Debugging except for the gdb part.






    share|improve this answer













    If you really need multiple instances of gnome-terminal process running (but why should you?), follow the steps at https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Terminal/Debugging except for the gdb part.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Feb 3 '16 at 7:58









    egmontegmont

    3,86611024




    3,86611024













    • i can't understand what will i replace the sentence gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" --disable-factory with , will i write instead of it gnome-terminal-server --app-id my.foo.Terminal?

      – Ahmed Zain El Dein
      Feb 3 '16 at 15:07











    • Here's my reason for running separate gnome-terminal processes - I don't limit myself to a single X screen in my X desktop. I have multiple independent X screens. gnome-terminal, apart from the helpful gdb hack you link, is no longer able to have a terminal on more than one screen at a time.

      – Troy Folger
      Jun 25 '18 at 22:43



















    • i can't understand what will i replace the sentence gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" --disable-factory with , will i write instead of it gnome-terminal-server --app-id my.foo.Terminal?

      – Ahmed Zain El Dein
      Feb 3 '16 at 15:07











    • Here's my reason for running separate gnome-terminal processes - I don't limit myself to a single X screen in my X desktop. I have multiple independent X screens. gnome-terminal, apart from the helpful gdb hack you link, is no longer able to have a terminal on more than one screen at a time.

      – Troy Folger
      Jun 25 '18 at 22:43

















    i can't understand what will i replace the sentence gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" --disable-factory with , will i write instead of it gnome-terminal-server --app-id my.foo.Terminal?

    – Ahmed Zain El Dein
    Feb 3 '16 at 15:07





    i can't understand what will i replace the sentence gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" --disable-factory with , will i write instead of it gnome-terminal-server --app-id my.foo.Terminal?

    – Ahmed Zain El Dein
    Feb 3 '16 at 15:07













    Here's my reason for running separate gnome-terminal processes - I don't limit myself to a single X screen in my X desktop. I have multiple independent X screens. gnome-terminal, apart from the helpful gdb hack you link, is no longer able to have a terminal on more than one screen at a time.

    – Troy Folger
    Jun 25 '18 at 22:43





    Here's my reason for running separate gnome-terminal processes - I don't limit myself to a single X screen in my X desktop. I have multiple independent X screens. gnome-terminal, apart from the helpful gdb hack you link, is no longer able to have a terminal on more than one screen at a time.

    – Troy Folger
    Jun 25 '18 at 22:43













    1














    For the benefit of the reader.



    The problem



    Option --disable-factory got removed in V3.8 of gnome-terminal and there is no way to archive this behavior the easy way. At least not a way, which can be explained to people, who are not fluent in shell syntax.



    Hence the command line



    gnome-terminal  --tab  --title="700" --disable-factory -e ...


    fails with the error presented in the question.




    Please excuse this very personal side note: I really do not understand, why this crucial option got removed. Even Microsoft introduced an option to run cmd, explorer or powershell the blocking way. Microsoft listens to their users. But Gnome does not. Instead of officially documenting the hidden option --disable-factory, Gnome suddenly removed it. If they continue this course, they will make Microsoft win on the long term. That is very very sad and extraordinary stupid. (Sorry for this rant, but it has to be be said.)




    BTW: Ubuntu 16.04 restored --disable-factory using a wrapper which emulates this feature. (If you look at the complexity of this wrapper, my rant still applies even more than before.)



    Variant 0



    I call this 0, because both are not really proper solutions. A proper solution is shown in Variant 1.



    Varriant 0a



    A first thing, you can try, is to remove option --disable-server:



    gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" -e ...


    However this has following drawback:



    This does no more wait until gnome-terminal finishes. If there is another gnome-terminal running, the command immediately comes back. Usually this is not what you want, because this is, why option --disable-factory was present in the first place.



    Variant 0b



    So removing this option is only feasible in the case, where you can make sure, that in all and every case, no other gnome-terminal is running, ever.



    If this is not the case, but you are in a case, where another running gnome-terminal must not be supported, you can try following desparate fallback variant:



    killall -9 gnome-terminal
    gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" -e ...


    But beware! This unconditionally kills all gnome-terminals which are still open. In a production environment this usually will cause greater harm then it helps. You have been warned!



    Variant 1



    If you do not need to run it in gnome-terminal and can run it in some other terminal emulator. @muru commented a good replacement.



    xfce4-terminal understands nearly the same set of options as gnome-terminal (and adds some very handy other options which are missing in gnome-terminal for years). It also has a documented option, which does, what --disable-factory did for gnome-terminal. The option --tab works differently to gnome-terminal and thus must be removed, too, to get something working. The replacement is:



    xfce4-terminal --title="700" --disable-server -e ...


    Also you can add a --hold option, if you want to be able to see the full output of the command before the window is closed:



    xfce4-terminal --hold --title="700" --disable-server -e ...


    Please note that xfce4-terminal has a little race-condition, which unfortunately truncates the output, so --hold is not fully effective. Fixing this properly (such that you can use it copy'n'paste) is beyond the scope of the answer, however usually adding a little echo $? && read -t.1 to the script which is executed with (behind) -e can solve it 99% of the time.



    In case you get the message, that xfce4-terminal is missing, then you have to install it first. It can be installed in parallel to gnome, even that it belongs to another desktop variant (Xfce):



    sudo apt-get install xfce4-terminal


    The only drawback is, that xfce4-terminal has another look than gnome-terminal, and follows some other



    Variant 2..∞



    There are endless other possible variants to fix that issue. Most of them are really complicated. Too complicated for normal people, those, who are not really into shells.



    So I leave them away. My recommendation is:



    As noted by @muru, try to use xfce4-terminal instead of gnome-terminal.



    Note to those, who grok shells



    All simple solutions are not really perfect, as they do not return the command's return value (gnome-terminal does not, too). Sadly. To fix that this is a completely different story.






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      For the benefit of the reader.



      The problem



      Option --disable-factory got removed in V3.8 of gnome-terminal and there is no way to archive this behavior the easy way. At least not a way, which can be explained to people, who are not fluent in shell syntax.



      Hence the command line



      gnome-terminal  --tab  --title="700" --disable-factory -e ...


      fails with the error presented in the question.




      Please excuse this very personal side note: I really do not understand, why this crucial option got removed. Even Microsoft introduced an option to run cmd, explorer or powershell the blocking way. Microsoft listens to their users. But Gnome does not. Instead of officially documenting the hidden option --disable-factory, Gnome suddenly removed it. If they continue this course, they will make Microsoft win on the long term. That is very very sad and extraordinary stupid. (Sorry for this rant, but it has to be be said.)




      BTW: Ubuntu 16.04 restored --disable-factory using a wrapper which emulates this feature. (If you look at the complexity of this wrapper, my rant still applies even more than before.)



      Variant 0



      I call this 0, because both are not really proper solutions. A proper solution is shown in Variant 1.



      Varriant 0a



      A first thing, you can try, is to remove option --disable-server:



      gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" -e ...


      However this has following drawback:



      This does no more wait until gnome-terminal finishes. If there is another gnome-terminal running, the command immediately comes back. Usually this is not what you want, because this is, why option --disable-factory was present in the first place.



      Variant 0b



      So removing this option is only feasible in the case, where you can make sure, that in all and every case, no other gnome-terminal is running, ever.



      If this is not the case, but you are in a case, where another running gnome-terminal must not be supported, you can try following desparate fallback variant:



      killall -9 gnome-terminal
      gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" -e ...


      But beware! This unconditionally kills all gnome-terminals which are still open. In a production environment this usually will cause greater harm then it helps. You have been warned!



      Variant 1



      If you do not need to run it in gnome-terminal and can run it in some other terminal emulator. @muru commented a good replacement.



      xfce4-terminal understands nearly the same set of options as gnome-terminal (and adds some very handy other options which are missing in gnome-terminal for years). It also has a documented option, which does, what --disable-factory did for gnome-terminal. The option --tab works differently to gnome-terminal and thus must be removed, too, to get something working. The replacement is:



      xfce4-terminal --title="700" --disable-server -e ...


      Also you can add a --hold option, if you want to be able to see the full output of the command before the window is closed:



      xfce4-terminal --hold --title="700" --disable-server -e ...


      Please note that xfce4-terminal has a little race-condition, which unfortunately truncates the output, so --hold is not fully effective. Fixing this properly (such that you can use it copy'n'paste) is beyond the scope of the answer, however usually adding a little echo $? && read -t.1 to the script which is executed with (behind) -e can solve it 99% of the time.



      In case you get the message, that xfce4-terminal is missing, then you have to install it first. It can be installed in parallel to gnome, even that it belongs to another desktop variant (Xfce):



      sudo apt-get install xfce4-terminal


      The only drawback is, that xfce4-terminal has another look than gnome-terminal, and follows some other



      Variant 2..∞



      There are endless other possible variants to fix that issue. Most of them are really complicated. Too complicated for normal people, those, who are not really into shells.



      So I leave them away. My recommendation is:



      As noted by @muru, try to use xfce4-terminal instead of gnome-terminal.



      Note to those, who grok shells



      All simple solutions are not really perfect, as they do not return the command's return value (gnome-terminal does not, too). Sadly. To fix that this is a completely different story.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        For the benefit of the reader.



        The problem



        Option --disable-factory got removed in V3.8 of gnome-terminal and there is no way to archive this behavior the easy way. At least not a way, which can be explained to people, who are not fluent in shell syntax.



        Hence the command line



        gnome-terminal  --tab  --title="700" --disable-factory -e ...


        fails with the error presented in the question.




        Please excuse this very personal side note: I really do not understand, why this crucial option got removed. Even Microsoft introduced an option to run cmd, explorer or powershell the blocking way. Microsoft listens to their users. But Gnome does not. Instead of officially documenting the hidden option --disable-factory, Gnome suddenly removed it. If they continue this course, they will make Microsoft win on the long term. That is very very sad and extraordinary stupid. (Sorry for this rant, but it has to be be said.)




        BTW: Ubuntu 16.04 restored --disable-factory using a wrapper which emulates this feature. (If you look at the complexity of this wrapper, my rant still applies even more than before.)



        Variant 0



        I call this 0, because both are not really proper solutions. A proper solution is shown in Variant 1.



        Varriant 0a



        A first thing, you can try, is to remove option --disable-server:



        gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" -e ...


        However this has following drawback:



        This does no more wait until gnome-terminal finishes. If there is another gnome-terminal running, the command immediately comes back. Usually this is not what you want, because this is, why option --disable-factory was present in the first place.



        Variant 0b



        So removing this option is only feasible in the case, where you can make sure, that in all and every case, no other gnome-terminal is running, ever.



        If this is not the case, but you are in a case, where another running gnome-terminal must not be supported, you can try following desparate fallback variant:



        killall -9 gnome-terminal
        gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" -e ...


        But beware! This unconditionally kills all gnome-terminals which are still open. In a production environment this usually will cause greater harm then it helps. You have been warned!



        Variant 1



        If you do not need to run it in gnome-terminal and can run it in some other terminal emulator. @muru commented a good replacement.



        xfce4-terminal understands nearly the same set of options as gnome-terminal (and adds some very handy other options which are missing in gnome-terminal for years). It also has a documented option, which does, what --disable-factory did for gnome-terminal. The option --tab works differently to gnome-terminal and thus must be removed, too, to get something working. The replacement is:



        xfce4-terminal --title="700" --disable-server -e ...


        Also you can add a --hold option, if you want to be able to see the full output of the command before the window is closed:



        xfce4-terminal --hold --title="700" --disable-server -e ...


        Please note that xfce4-terminal has a little race-condition, which unfortunately truncates the output, so --hold is not fully effective. Fixing this properly (such that you can use it copy'n'paste) is beyond the scope of the answer, however usually adding a little echo $? && read -t.1 to the script which is executed with (behind) -e can solve it 99% of the time.



        In case you get the message, that xfce4-terminal is missing, then you have to install it first. It can be installed in parallel to gnome, even that it belongs to another desktop variant (Xfce):



        sudo apt-get install xfce4-terminal


        The only drawback is, that xfce4-terminal has another look than gnome-terminal, and follows some other



        Variant 2..∞



        There are endless other possible variants to fix that issue. Most of them are really complicated. Too complicated for normal people, those, who are not really into shells.



        So I leave them away. My recommendation is:



        As noted by @muru, try to use xfce4-terminal instead of gnome-terminal.



        Note to those, who grok shells



        All simple solutions are not really perfect, as they do not return the command's return value (gnome-terminal does not, too). Sadly. To fix that this is a completely different story.






        share|improve this answer













        For the benefit of the reader.



        The problem



        Option --disable-factory got removed in V3.8 of gnome-terminal and there is no way to archive this behavior the easy way. At least not a way, which can be explained to people, who are not fluent in shell syntax.



        Hence the command line



        gnome-terminal  --tab  --title="700" --disable-factory -e ...


        fails with the error presented in the question.




        Please excuse this very personal side note: I really do not understand, why this crucial option got removed. Even Microsoft introduced an option to run cmd, explorer or powershell the blocking way. Microsoft listens to their users. But Gnome does not. Instead of officially documenting the hidden option --disable-factory, Gnome suddenly removed it. If they continue this course, they will make Microsoft win on the long term. That is very very sad and extraordinary stupid. (Sorry for this rant, but it has to be be said.)




        BTW: Ubuntu 16.04 restored --disable-factory using a wrapper which emulates this feature. (If you look at the complexity of this wrapper, my rant still applies even more than before.)



        Variant 0



        I call this 0, because both are not really proper solutions. A proper solution is shown in Variant 1.



        Varriant 0a



        A first thing, you can try, is to remove option --disable-server:



        gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" -e ...


        However this has following drawback:



        This does no more wait until gnome-terminal finishes. If there is another gnome-terminal running, the command immediately comes back. Usually this is not what you want, because this is, why option --disable-factory was present in the first place.



        Variant 0b



        So removing this option is only feasible in the case, where you can make sure, that in all and every case, no other gnome-terminal is running, ever.



        If this is not the case, but you are in a case, where another running gnome-terminal must not be supported, you can try following desparate fallback variant:



        killall -9 gnome-terminal
        gnome-terminal --tab --title="700" -e ...


        But beware! This unconditionally kills all gnome-terminals which are still open. In a production environment this usually will cause greater harm then it helps. You have been warned!



        Variant 1



        If you do not need to run it in gnome-terminal and can run it in some other terminal emulator. @muru commented a good replacement.



        xfce4-terminal understands nearly the same set of options as gnome-terminal (and adds some very handy other options which are missing in gnome-terminal for years). It also has a documented option, which does, what --disable-factory did for gnome-terminal. The option --tab works differently to gnome-terminal and thus must be removed, too, to get something working. The replacement is:



        xfce4-terminal --title="700" --disable-server -e ...


        Also you can add a --hold option, if you want to be able to see the full output of the command before the window is closed:



        xfce4-terminal --hold --title="700" --disable-server -e ...


        Please note that xfce4-terminal has a little race-condition, which unfortunately truncates the output, so --hold is not fully effective. Fixing this properly (such that you can use it copy'n'paste) is beyond the scope of the answer, however usually adding a little echo $? && read -t.1 to the script which is executed with (behind) -e can solve it 99% of the time.



        In case you get the message, that xfce4-terminal is missing, then you have to install it first. It can be installed in parallel to gnome, even that it belongs to another desktop variant (Xfce):



        sudo apt-get install xfce4-terminal


        The only drawback is, that xfce4-terminal has another look than gnome-terminal, and follows some other



        Variant 2..∞



        There are endless other possible variants to fix that issue. Most of them are really complicated. Too complicated for normal people, those, who are not really into shells.



        So I leave them away. My recommendation is:



        As noted by @muru, try to use xfce4-terminal instead of gnome-terminal.



        Note to those, who grok shells



        All simple solutions are not really perfect, as they do not return the command's return value (gnome-terminal does not, too). Sadly. To fix that this is a completely different story.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jun 17 '17 at 10:26









        TinoTino

        44147




        44147






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f729034%2fgnome-terminal-disable-factory-support-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            GameSpot

            connect to host localhost port 22: Connection refused

            Getting a Wifi WPA2 wifi connection