Why is OpenJDK 10 packaged as openjdk-11-*?
While looking to compile OpenJDK from source, the newest General Availability version (OpenJDK 10.0.1) insists on OpenJDK 9 or 10. JDK 11, however, is not due to be released until September 2018.
However, to my surprise, when I do apt search openjdk
the result is:
...
openjdk-11-jdk - OpenJDK Development Kit (JDK)
...
openjdk-8-jdk - OpenJDK Development Kit (JDK)
...
No OpenJDK 9 or 10!
And wait, is that OpenJDK 11? Maybe a Beta release? Nooo....
So I looked at apt show openjdk-11-jdk
:
Package: openjdk-11-jdk
Version: 10.0.1+10-3ubuntu1
...
Why has OpenJDK 10 been packaged as openjdk-11-*??
package-management java openjdk versions
add a comment |
While looking to compile OpenJDK from source, the newest General Availability version (OpenJDK 10.0.1) insists on OpenJDK 9 or 10. JDK 11, however, is not due to be released until September 2018.
However, to my surprise, when I do apt search openjdk
the result is:
...
openjdk-11-jdk - OpenJDK Development Kit (JDK)
...
openjdk-8-jdk - OpenJDK Development Kit (JDK)
...
No OpenJDK 9 or 10!
And wait, is that OpenJDK 11? Maybe a Beta release? Nooo....
So I looked at apt show openjdk-11-jdk
:
Package: openjdk-11-jdk
Version: 10.0.1+10-3ubuntu1
...
Why has OpenJDK 10 been packaged as openjdk-11-*??
package-management java openjdk versions
add a comment |
While looking to compile OpenJDK from source, the newest General Availability version (OpenJDK 10.0.1) insists on OpenJDK 9 or 10. JDK 11, however, is not due to be released until September 2018.
However, to my surprise, when I do apt search openjdk
the result is:
...
openjdk-11-jdk - OpenJDK Development Kit (JDK)
...
openjdk-8-jdk - OpenJDK Development Kit (JDK)
...
No OpenJDK 9 or 10!
And wait, is that OpenJDK 11? Maybe a Beta release? Nooo....
So I looked at apt show openjdk-11-jdk
:
Package: openjdk-11-jdk
Version: 10.0.1+10-3ubuntu1
...
Why has OpenJDK 10 been packaged as openjdk-11-*??
package-management java openjdk versions
While looking to compile OpenJDK from source, the newest General Availability version (OpenJDK 10.0.1) insists on OpenJDK 9 or 10. JDK 11, however, is not due to be released until September 2018.
However, to my surprise, when I do apt search openjdk
the result is:
...
openjdk-11-jdk - OpenJDK Development Kit (JDK)
...
openjdk-8-jdk - OpenJDK Development Kit (JDK)
...
No OpenJDK 9 or 10!
And wait, is that OpenJDK 11? Maybe a Beta release? Nooo....
So I looked at apt show openjdk-11-jdk
:
Package: openjdk-11-jdk
Version: 10.0.1+10-3ubuntu1
...
Why has OpenJDK 10 been packaged as openjdk-11-*??
package-management java openjdk versions
package-management java openjdk versions
asked May 18 '18 at 5:54
tudortudor
2,56841845
2,56841845
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
This is because those packages will become OpenJDK 11 when that is released. See this mailing list post:
On behalf of the Ubuntu Foundations Team, I am requesting an SRU
exception for OpenJDK. Our plan is to release OpenJDK 10 as the
default JRE/JDK 1 for Bionic, and then move the default JRE/JDK in
main to OpenJDK 11 in September/October 2018 as an SRU.
= Proposed Plan =
Bionic will be released with OpenJDK 10 as the default JRE/JDK and
OpenJDK 11 will replace it once it reaches GA.
...
If we are going to switch to OpenJDK 11 in bionic once released, we
want to avoid OpenJDK 8 as the default JRE/JDK in Bionic at release
time because any additional interface delta that exists between 8 and
11 not only exposes the archive to breakage, it also exposes external
consumers of the JDK to breakage. In comparison, the interface delta
between OpenJDK 10 and OpenJDK 11 is expected to be fairly small,
especially in comparison with the delta between OpenJDK 8 and OpenJDK
9 that we already know is large. We should therefore release with
OpenJDK 10 as the default JDK in 18.04, transitioning to OpenJDK 11
when it is released.
That's also why the source package of openjdk-11-*
is actually called openjdk-lts
.
A bug report has been filed - please subscribe to it (but don't comment unless you have new information to add, which is unlikely). An Ubuntu dev, Jeremy Bicha, has responded:
The intent is to upgrade openjdk-11 to 11 in Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. That's
why it was named that way. It is a major change and will take some
time to prepare. There is no need to ask for it to be done since it
will be done.
Ubuntu 18.04 LTS was released several months before OpenJDK 11 was
released so it wasn't possible to provide OpenJDK 11 before Ubuntu
18.04 LTS was released.
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-March/004364.html
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Please don't ask for an ETA. That sends out an email to everyone
subscribed to this bug and does not help fix the bug.
This bug is being worked on. openjdk 11.0.1 was updated in 18.10 and
there was a security update that needed to be handled quickly in 18.04
LTS. 11.0.1 will come to 18.04 LTS when it's ready but it is a major
change that needs careful coordination.
So, no ETA at present.
5
Only two days? That's a huge delay? O.o This is a package that Canonical is committing to support for years. I'm sure you can use your Canonical subscription to demand faster releases.
– muru
Sep 27 '18 at 21:15
5
Knowing the release date doesn't shorten the time required for QA, though. If you're in a hurry, the PPA's been updated: launchpad.net/~openjdk-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa I expect the packages to make their way to proposed shortly, and from there to updates.
– muru
Sep 27 '18 at 21:45
7
I believe the comment, but I can't see how them effectively misclassifying a jdk version is a right thing to do. It's confusing and I'll say it, a little dishonest. Just have the versions for us to choose from, and we can do our ownupdate-alternatives
. Thanks @muru for your answer
– Daniel Hinojosa
Sep 28 '18 at 1:39
10
@muru now it's almost a month, still not a big delay?
– 9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo
Oct 23 '18 at 11:51
14
@9ilsdx9rvj0lo someone has filed a bug report, keep an eye on it: bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-lts/+bug/1796027
– muru
Oct 23 '18 at 18:58
|
show 4 more comments
See muru's answer above,
but for a work around you can install openjdk 11 manually and add it to the update-alternatives so you can switch versions, and when the official package gets updated you can switch to that. see below to see how:
$ wget https://download.java.net/java/GA/jdk11/9/GPL/openjdk-11.0.2_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz -O /tmp/openjdk-11.0.2_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz
$ sudo tar xfvz /tmp/openjdk-11.0.2_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz --directory /usr/lib/jvm
that unpacks the jdk under /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2
then add it to the alternatives system
sudo sh -c 'for bin in /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2/bin/*; do update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/$(basename $bin) $(basename $bin) $bin 100; done'
sudo sh -c 'for bin in /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2/bin/*; do update-alternatives --set $(basename $bin) $bin; done'
see it in the alternatives
$ sudo update-alternatives --config java
There are 3 choices for the alternative java (providing /usr/bin/java).
Selection Path Priority Status
------------------------------------------------------------
0 /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/bin/java 1101 auto mode
1 /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/bin/java 1101 manual mode
2 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java 1081 manual mode
* 3 /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2/bin/java 100 manual mode
Press <enter> to keep the current choice[*], or type selection number: 3
check it works
$ java -version
openjdk version "11.0.2" 2019-01-15
OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.2+9)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11.0.2+9, mixed mode)
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1037646%2fwhy-is-openjdk-10-packaged-as-openjdk-11%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is because those packages will become OpenJDK 11 when that is released. See this mailing list post:
On behalf of the Ubuntu Foundations Team, I am requesting an SRU
exception for OpenJDK. Our plan is to release OpenJDK 10 as the
default JRE/JDK 1 for Bionic, and then move the default JRE/JDK in
main to OpenJDK 11 in September/October 2018 as an SRU.
= Proposed Plan =
Bionic will be released with OpenJDK 10 as the default JRE/JDK and
OpenJDK 11 will replace it once it reaches GA.
...
If we are going to switch to OpenJDK 11 in bionic once released, we
want to avoid OpenJDK 8 as the default JRE/JDK in Bionic at release
time because any additional interface delta that exists between 8 and
11 not only exposes the archive to breakage, it also exposes external
consumers of the JDK to breakage. In comparison, the interface delta
between OpenJDK 10 and OpenJDK 11 is expected to be fairly small,
especially in comparison with the delta between OpenJDK 8 and OpenJDK
9 that we already know is large. We should therefore release with
OpenJDK 10 as the default JDK in 18.04, transitioning to OpenJDK 11
when it is released.
That's also why the source package of openjdk-11-*
is actually called openjdk-lts
.
A bug report has been filed - please subscribe to it (but don't comment unless you have new information to add, which is unlikely). An Ubuntu dev, Jeremy Bicha, has responded:
The intent is to upgrade openjdk-11 to 11 in Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. That's
why it was named that way. It is a major change and will take some
time to prepare. There is no need to ask for it to be done since it
will be done.
Ubuntu 18.04 LTS was released several months before OpenJDK 11 was
released so it wasn't possible to provide OpenJDK 11 before Ubuntu
18.04 LTS was released.
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-March/004364.html
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Please don't ask for an ETA. That sends out an email to everyone
subscribed to this bug and does not help fix the bug.
This bug is being worked on. openjdk 11.0.1 was updated in 18.10 and
there was a security update that needed to be handled quickly in 18.04
LTS. 11.0.1 will come to 18.04 LTS when it's ready but it is a major
change that needs careful coordination.
So, no ETA at present.
5
Only two days? That's a huge delay? O.o This is a package that Canonical is committing to support for years. I'm sure you can use your Canonical subscription to demand faster releases.
– muru
Sep 27 '18 at 21:15
5
Knowing the release date doesn't shorten the time required for QA, though. If you're in a hurry, the PPA's been updated: launchpad.net/~openjdk-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa I expect the packages to make their way to proposed shortly, and from there to updates.
– muru
Sep 27 '18 at 21:45
7
I believe the comment, but I can't see how them effectively misclassifying a jdk version is a right thing to do. It's confusing and I'll say it, a little dishonest. Just have the versions for us to choose from, and we can do our ownupdate-alternatives
. Thanks @muru for your answer
– Daniel Hinojosa
Sep 28 '18 at 1:39
10
@muru now it's almost a month, still not a big delay?
– 9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo
Oct 23 '18 at 11:51
14
@9ilsdx9rvj0lo someone has filed a bug report, keep an eye on it: bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-lts/+bug/1796027
– muru
Oct 23 '18 at 18:58
|
show 4 more comments
This is because those packages will become OpenJDK 11 when that is released. See this mailing list post:
On behalf of the Ubuntu Foundations Team, I am requesting an SRU
exception for OpenJDK. Our plan is to release OpenJDK 10 as the
default JRE/JDK 1 for Bionic, and then move the default JRE/JDK in
main to OpenJDK 11 in September/October 2018 as an SRU.
= Proposed Plan =
Bionic will be released with OpenJDK 10 as the default JRE/JDK and
OpenJDK 11 will replace it once it reaches GA.
...
If we are going to switch to OpenJDK 11 in bionic once released, we
want to avoid OpenJDK 8 as the default JRE/JDK in Bionic at release
time because any additional interface delta that exists between 8 and
11 not only exposes the archive to breakage, it also exposes external
consumers of the JDK to breakage. In comparison, the interface delta
between OpenJDK 10 and OpenJDK 11 is expected to be fairly small,
especially in comparison with the delta between OpenJDK 8 and OpenJDK
9 that we already know is large. We should therefore release with
OpenJDK 10 as the default JDK in 18.04, transitioning to OpenJDK 11
when it is released.
That's also why the source package of openjdk-11-*
is actually called openjdk-lts
.
A bug report has been filed - please subscribe to it (but don't comment unless you have new information to add, which is unlikely). An Ubuntu dev, Jeremy Bicha, has responded:
The intent is to upgrade openjdk-11 to 11 in Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. That's
why it was named that way. It is a major change and will take some
time to prepare. There is no need to ask for it to be done since it
will be done.
Ubuntu 18.04 LTS was released several months before OpenJDK 11 was
released so it wasn't possible to provide OpenJDK 11 before Ubuntu
18.04 LTS was released.
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-March/004364.html
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Please don't ask for an ETA. That sends out an email to everyone
subscribed to this bug and does not help fix the bug.
This bug is being worked on. openjdk 11.0.1 was updated in 18.10 and
there was a security update that needed to be handled quickly in 18.04
LTS. 11.0.1 will come to 18.04 LTS when it's ready but it is a major
change that needs careful coordination.
So, no ETA at present.
5
Only two days? That's a huge delay? O.o This is a package that Canonical is committing to support for years. I'm sure you can use your Canonical subscription to demand faster releases.
– muru
Sep 27 '18 at 21:15
5
Knowing the release date doesn't shorten the time required for QA, though. If you're in a hurry, the PPA's been updated: launchpad.net/~openjdk-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa I expect the packages to make their way to proposed shortly, and from there to updates.
– muru
Sep 27 '18 at 21:45
7
I believe the comment, but I can't see how them effectively misclassifying a jdk version is a right thing to do. It's confusing and I'll say it, a little dishonest. Just have the versions for us to choose from, and we can do our ownupdate-alternatives
. Thanks @muru for your answer
– Daniel Hinojosa
Sep 28 '18 at 1:39
10
@muru now it's almost a month, still not a big delay?
– 9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo
Oct 23 '18 at 11:51
14
@9ilsdx9rvj0lo someone has filed a bug report, keep an eye on it: bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-lts/+bug/1796027
– muru
Oct 23 '18 at 18:58
|
show 4 more comments
This is because those packages will become OpenJDK 11 when that is released. See this mailing list post:
On behalf of the Ubuntu Foundations Team, I am requesting an SRU
exception for OpenJDK. Our plan is to release OpenJDK 10 as the
default JRE/JDK 1 for Bionic, and then move the default JRE/JDK in
main to OpenJDK 11 in September/October 2018 as an SRU.
= Proposed Plan =
Bionic will be released with OpenJDK 10 as the default JRE/JDK and
OpenJDK 11 will replace it once it reaches GA.
...
If we are going to switch to OpenJDK 11 in bionic once released, we
want to avoid OpenJDK 8 as the default JRE/JDK in Bionic at release
time because any additional interface delta that exists between 8 and
11 not only exposes the archive to breakage, it also exposes external
consumers of the JDK to breakage. In comparison, the interface delta
between OpenJDK 10 and OpenJDK 11 is expected to be fairly small,
especially in comparison with the delta between OpenJDK 8 and OpenJDK
9 that we already know is large. We should therefore release with
OpenJDK 10 as the default JDK in 18.04, transitioning to OpenJDK 11
when it is released.
That's also why the source package of openjdk-11-*
is actually called openjdk-lts
.
A bug report has been filed - please subscribe to it (but don't comment unless you have new information to add, which is unlikely). An Ubuntu dev, Jeremy Bicha, has responded:
The intent is to upgrade openjdk-11 to 11 in Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. That's
why it was named that way. It is a major change and will take some
time to prepare. There is no need to ask for it to be done since it
will be done.
Ubuntu 18.04 LTS was released several months before OpenJDK 11 was
released so it wasn't possible to provide OpenJDK 11 before Ubuntu
18.04 LTS was released.
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-March/004364.html
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Please don't ask for an ETA. That sends out an email to everyone
subscribed to this bug and does not help fix the bug.
This bug is being worked on. openjdk 11.0.1 was updated in 18.10 and
there was a security update that needed to be handled quickly in 18.04
LTS. 11.0.1 will come to 18.04 LTS when it's ready but it is a major
change that needs careful coordination.
So, no ETA at present.
This is because those packages will become OpenJDK 11 when that is released. See this mailing list post:
On behalf of the Ubuntu Foundations Team, I am requesting an SRU
exception for OpenJDK. Our plan is to release OpenJDK 10 as the
default JRE/JDK 1 for Bionic, and then move the default JRE/JDK in
main to OpenJDK 11 in September/October 2018 as an SRU.
= Proposed Plan =
Bionic will be released with OpenJDK 10 as the default JRE/JDK and
OpenJDK 11 will replace it once it reaches GA.
...
If we are going to switch to OpenJDK 11 in bionic once released, we
want to avoid OpenJDK 8 as the default JRE/JDK in Bionic at release
time because any additional interface delta that exists between 8 and
11 not only exposes the archive to breakage, it also exposes external
consumers of the JDK to breakage. In comparison, the interface delta
between OpenJDK 10 and OpenJDK 11 is expected to be fairly small,
especially in comparison with the delta between OpenJDK 8 and OpenJDK
9 that we already know is large. We should therefore release with
OpenJDK 10 as the default JDK in 18.04, transitioning to OpenJDK 11
when it is released.
That's also why the source package of openjdk-11-*
is actually called openjdk-lts
.
A bug report has been filed - please subscribe to it (but don't comment unless you have new information to add, which is unlikely). An Ubuntu dev, Jeremy Bicha, has responded:
The intent is to upgrade openjdk-11 to 11 in Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. That's
why it was named that way. It is a major change and will take some
time to prepare. There is no need to ask for it to be done since it
will be done.
Ubuntu 18.04 LTS was released several months before OpenJDK 11 was
released so it wasn't possible to provide OpenJDK 11 before Ubuntu
18.04 LTS was released.
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-March/004364.html
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Please don't ask for an ETA. That sends out an email to everyone
subscribed to this bug and does not help fix the bug.
This bug is being worked on. openjdk 11.0.1 was updated in 18.10 and
there was a security update that needed to be handled quickly in 18.04
LTS. 11.0.1 will come to 18.04 LTS when it's ready but it is a major
change that needs careful coordination.
So, no ETA at present.
edited Dec 6 '18 at 10:37
answered May 18 '18 at 6:27
murumuru
1
1
5
Only two days? That's a huge delay? O.o This is a package that Canonical is committing to support for years. I'm sure you can use your Canonical subscription to demand faster releases.
– muru
Sep 27 '18 at 21:15
5
Knowing the release date doesn't shorten the time required for QA, though. If you're in a hurry, the PPA's been updated: launchpad.net/~openjdk-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa I expect the packages to make their way to proposed shortly, and from there to updates.
– muru
Sep 27 '18 at 21:45
7
I believe the comment, but I can't see how them effectively misclassifying a jdk version is a right thing to do. It's confusing and I'll say it, a little dishonest. Just have the versions for us to choose from, and we can do our ownupdate-alternatives
. Thanks @muru for your answer
– Daniel Hinojosa
Sep 28 '18 at 1:39
10
@muru now it's almost a month, still not a big delay?
– 9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo
Oct 23 '18 at 11:51
14
@9ilsdx9rvj0lo someone has filed a bug report, keep an eye on it: bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-lts/+bug/1796027
– muru
Oct 23 '18 at 18:58
|
show 4 more comments
5
Only two days? That's a huge delay? O.o This is a package that Canonical is committing to support for years. I'm sure you can use your Canonical subscription to demand faster releases.
– muru
Sep 27 '18 at 21:15
5
Knowing the release date doesn't shorten the time required for QA, though. If you're in a hurry, the PPA's been updated: launchpad.net/~openjdk-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa I expect the packages to make their way to proposed shortly, and from there to updates.
– muru
Sep 27 '18 at 21:45
7
I believe the comment, but I can't see how them effectively misclassifying a jdk version is a right thing to do. It's confusing and I'll say it, a little dishonest. Just have the versions for us to choose from, and we can do our ownupdate-alternatives
. Thanks @muru for your answer
– Daniel Hinojosa
Sep 28 '18 at 1:39
10
@muru now it's almost a month, still not a big delay?
– 9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo
Oct 23 '18 at 11:51
14
@9ilsdx9rvj0lo someone has filed a bug report, keep an eye on it: bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-lts/+bug/1796027
– muru
Oct 23 '18 at 18:58
5
5
Only two days? That's a huge delay? O.o This is a package that Canonical is committing to support for years. I'm sure you can use your Canonical subscription to demand faster releases.
– muru
Sep 27 '18 at 21:15
Only two days? That's a huge delay? O.o This is a package that Canonical is committing to support for years. I'm sure you can use your Canonical subscription to demand faster releases.
– muru
Sep 27 '18 at 21:15
5
5
Knowing the release date doesn't shorten the time required for QA, though. If you're in a hurry, the PPA's been updated: launchpad.net/~openjdk-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa I expect the packages to make their way to proposed shortly, and from there to updates.
– muru
Sep 27 '18 at 21:45
Knowing the release date doesn't shorten the time required for QA, though. If you're in a hurry, the PPA's been updated: launchpad.net/~openjdk-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa I expect the packages to make their way to proposed shortly, and from there to updates.
– muru
Sep 27 '18 at 21:45
7
7
I believe the comment, but I can't see how them effectively misclassifying a jdk version is a right thing to do. It's confusing and I'll say it, a little dishonest. Just have the versions for us to choose from, and we can do our own
update-alternatives
. Thanks @muru for your answer– Daniel Hinojosa
Sep 28 '18 at 1:39
I believe the comment, but I can't see how them effectively misclassifying a jdk version is a right thing to do. It's confusing and I'll say it, a little dishonest. Just have the versions for us to choose from, and we can do our own
update-alternatives
. Thanks @muru for your answer– Daniel Hinojosa
Sep 28 '18 at 1:39
10
10
@muru now it's almost a month, still not a big delay?
– 9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo
Oct 23 '18 at 11:51
@muru now it's almost a month, still not a big delay?
– 9ilsdx 9rvj 0lo
Oct 23 '18 at 11:51
14
14
@9ilsdx9rvj0lo someone has filed a bug report, keep an eye on it: bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-lts/+bug/1796027
– muru
Oct 23 '18 at 18:58
@9ilsdx9rvj0lo someone has filed a bug report, keep an eye on it: bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-lts/+bug/1796027
– muru
Oct 23 '18 at 18:58
|
show 4 more comments
See muru's answer above,
but for a work around you can install openjdk 11 manually and add it to the update-alternatives so you can switch versions, and when the official package gets updated you can switch to that. see below to see how:
$ wget https://download.java.net/java/GA/jdk11/9/GPL/openjdk-11.0.2_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz -O /tmp/openjdk-11.0.2_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz
$ sudo tar xfvz /tmp/openjdk-11.0.2_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz --directory /usr/lib/jvm
that unpacks the jdk under /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2
then add it to the alternatives system
sudo sh -c 'for bin in /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2/bin/*; do update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/$(basename $bin) $(basename $bin) $bin 100; done'
sudo sh -c 'for bin in /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2/bin/*; do update-alternatives --set $(basename $bin) $bin; done'
see it in the alternatives
$ sudo update-alternatives --config java
There are 3 choices for the alternative java (providing /usr/bin/java).
Selection Path Priority Status
------------------------------------------------------------
0 /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/bin/java 1101 auto mode
1 /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/bin/java 1101 manual mode
2 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java 1081 manual mode
* 3 /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2/bin/java 100 manual mode
Press <enter> to keep the current choice[*], or type selection number: 3
check it works
$ java -version
openjdk version "11.0.2" 2019-01-15
OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.2+9)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11.0.2+9, mixed mode)
New contributor
add a comment |
See muru's answer above,
but for a work around you can install openjdk 11 manually and add it to the update-alternatives so you can switch versions, and when the official package gets updated you can switch to that. see below to see how:
$ wget https://download.java.net/java/GA/jdk11/9/GPL/openjdk-11.0.2_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz -O /tmp/openjdk-11.0.2_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz
$ sudo tar xfvz /tmp/openjdk-11.0.2_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz --directory /usr/lib/jvm
that unpacks the jdk under /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2
then add it to the alternatives system
sudo sh -c 'for bin in /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2/bin/*; do update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/$(basename $bin) $(basename $bin) $bin 100; done'
sudo sh -c 'for bin in /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2/bin/*; do update-alternatives --set $(basename $bin) $bin; done'
see it in the alternatives
$ sudo update-alternatives --config java
There are 3 choices for the alternative java (providing /usr/bin/java).
Selection Path Priority Status
------------------------------------------------------------
0 /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/bin/java 1101 auto mode
1 /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/bin/java 1101 manual mode
2 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java 1081 manual mode
* 3 /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2/bin/java 100 manual mode
Press <enter> to keep the current choice[*], or type selection number: 3
check it works
$ java -version
openjdk version "11.0.2" 2019-01-15
OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.2+9)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11.0.2+9, mixed mode)
New contributor
add a comment |
See muru's answer above,
but for a work around you can install openjdk 11 manually and add it to the update-alternatives so you can switch versions, and when the official package gets updated you can switch to that. see below to see how:
$ wget https://download.java.net/java/GA/jdk11/9/GPL/openjdk-11.0.2_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz -O /tmp/openjdk-11.0.2_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz
$ sudo tar xfvz /tmp/openjdk-11.0.2_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz --directory /usr/lib/jvm
that unpacks the jdk under /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2
then add it to the alternatives system
sudo sh -c 'for bin in /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2/bin/*; do update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/$(basename $bin) $(basename $bin) $bin 100; done'
sudo sh -c 'for bin in /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2/bin/*; do update-alternatives --set $(basename $bin) $bin; done'
see it in the alternatives
$ sudo update-alternatives --config java
There are 3 choices for the alternative java (providing /usr/bin/java).
Selection Path Priority Status
------------------------------------------------------------
0 /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/bin/java 1101 auto mode
1 /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/bin/java 1101 manual mode
2 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java 1081 manual mode
* 3 /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2/bin/java 100 manual mode
Press <enter> to keep the current choice[*], or type selection number: 3
check it works
$ java -version
openjdk version "11.0.2" 2019-01-15
OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.2+9)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11.0.2+9, mixed mode)
New contributor
See muru's answer above,
but for a work around you can install openjdk 11 manually and add it to the update-alternatives so you can switch versions, and when the official package gets updated you can switch to that. see below to see how:
$ wget https://download.java.net/java/GA/jdk11/9/GPL/openjdk-11.0.2_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz -O /tmp/openjdk-11.0.2_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz
$ sudo tar xfvz /tmp/openjdk-11.0.2_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz --directory /usr/lib/jvm
that unpacks the jdk under /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2
then add it to the alternatives system
sudo sh -c 'for bin in /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2/bin/*; do update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/$(basename $bin) $(basename $bin) $bin 100; done'
sudo sh -c 'for bin in /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2/bin/*; do update-alternatives --set $(basename $bin) $bin; done'
see it in the alternatives
$ sudo update-alternatives --config java
There are 3 choices for the alternative java (providing /usr/bin/java).
Selection Path Priority Status
------------------------------------------------------------
0 /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/bin/java 1101 auto mode
1 /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/bin/java 1101 manual mode
2 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java 1081 manual mode
* 3 /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11.0.2/bin/java 100 manual mode
Press <enter> to keep the current choice[*], or type selection number: 3
check it works
$ java -version
openjdk version "11.0.2" 2019-01-15
OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.2+9)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11.0.2+9, mixed mode)
New contributor
New contributor
answered 7 mins ago
KarlKarl
1012
1012
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1037646%2fwhy-is-openjdk-10-packaged-as-openjdk-11%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown