What is the domain of the function $f(x)=sqrt[3]{x^3-x}$?
$begingroup$
Let $f$ be: $f(x) = sqrt[3]{x^3 -x}$, an exercise book asked for the domain of definition. Isn't it over $mathbb R$. The book solution stated $Df = [-1,0] cup [1, +infty[$
I don t get it. Can you explain?
calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f$ be: $f(x) = sqrt[3]{x^3 -x}$, an exercise book asked for the domain of definition. Isn't it over $mathbb R$. The book solution stated $Df = [-1,0] cup [1, +infty[$
I don t get it. Can you explain?
calculus
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^{frac{1}{3}}$ so $D(g)={xinmathbb R|x^3-x>0}.$ All these a definition only.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
$$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrt{x^3-x}$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]{x^3 -x}$ is $Bbb R$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f$ be: $f(x) = sqrt[3]{x^3 -x}$, an exercise book asked for the domain of definition. Isn't it over $mathbb R$. The book solution stated $Df = [-1,0] cup [1, +infty[$
I don t get it. Can you explain?
calculus
$endgroup$
Let $f$ be: $f(x) = sqrt[3]{x^3 -x}$, an exercise book asked for the domain of definition. Isn't it over $mathbb R$. The book solution stated $Df = [-1,0] cup [1, +infty[$
I don t get it. Can you explain?
calculus
calculus
edited 9 hours ago
Asaf Karagila♦
308k33441775
308k33441775
asked 17 hours ago
J.MohJ.Moh
855
855
$begingroup$
It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^{frac{1}{3}}$ so $D(g)={xinmathbb R|x^3-x>0}.$ All these a definition only.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
$$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrt{x^3-x}$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]{x^3 -x}$ is $Bbb R$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^{frac{1}{3}}$ so $D(g)={xinmathbb R|x^3-x>0}.$ All these a definition only.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
$$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrt{x^3-x}$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]{x^3 -x}$ is $Bbb R$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^{frac{1}{3}}$ so $D(g)={xinmathbb R|x^3-x>0}.$ All these a definition only.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^{frac{1}{3}}$ so $D(g)={xinmathbb R|x^3-x>0}.$ All these a definition only.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
$$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
$$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrt{x^3-x}$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]{x^3 -x}$ is $Bbb R$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrt{x^3-x}$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]{x^3 -x}$ is $Bbb R$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
9 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]{phantom{X}}$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.
Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]{phantom X}$ to be defined.
Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.
Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.
(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).
You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
17 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]{x}$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbb{R} x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbb{R}$ to $mathbb{R}$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
$endgroup$
– user21820
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
$endgroup$
– user21820
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@user21820 I did
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
11 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3187198%2fwhat-is-the-domain-of-the-function-fx-sqrt3x3-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]{phantom{X}}$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.
Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]{phantom X}$ to be defined.
Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.
Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.
(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).
You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
17 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]{x}$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbb{R} x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbb{R}$ to $mathbb{R}$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
$endgroup$
– user21820
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
$endgroup$
– user21820
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@user21820 I did
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
11 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]{phantom{X}}$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.
Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]{phantom X}$ to be defined.
Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.
Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.
(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).
You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
17 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]{x}$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbb{R} x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbb{R}$ to $mathbb{R}$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
$endgroup$
– user21820
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
$endgroup$
– user21820
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@user21820 I did
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
11 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]{phantom{X}}$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.
Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]{phantom X}$ to be defined.
Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.
Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.
(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).
You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).
$endgroup$
If your book reaches the domain $[-1,0]cup[1,+infty)$, it must be because the book only considers $sqrt[3]{phantom{X}}$ to be defined when the argument is a non-negative real.
Books (and people) differ in how they consider $sqrt[N]{phantom X}$ to be defined.
Some people find it okay to define odd roots on the entire real line -- after all, $xmapsto x^N$ is a bijection on $mathbb R$ when $N$ is positive odd, and every such bijection has a perfectly fine inverse.
Other people prefer to restrict these functions to non-negative reals, no matter what $N$ is -- partially to avoid creating a (confusing?) distinction between odd and even $N$, partially for more subtle reasons that unfortunately are not apparent when one first learns about roots.
(For even subtler reasons, one might even want to reserve the root notation to arguments that are strictly positive, such that $sqrt 0$ is considered undefined. It is somewhat rare to take that position consistently, though).
You'll just have to live with the fact that such questions cannot be answered without knowing which convention for the root sign is to be used. (Arguably it is bad form to let a find-the-domain-of-this-expression exercise depend on such choices, but that's purely the textbook's fault, of course).
edited 17 hours ago
answered 17 hours ago
Henning MakholmHenning Makholm
243k17312556
243k17312556
$begingroup$
That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
17 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]{x}$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbb{R} x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbb{R}$ to $mathbb{R}$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
$endgroup$
– user21820
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
$endgroup$
– user21820
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@user21820 I did
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
11 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
17 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]{x}$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbb{R} x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbb{R}$ to $mathbb{R}$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
$endgroup$
– user21820
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
$endgroup$
– user21820
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@user21820 I did
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
That s why I love computer scientists, they answer as if they re writing code ;) Thanks Henning! Perfect!
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
17 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]{x}$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbb{R} x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbb{R}$ to $mathbb{R}$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
$endgroup$
– user21820
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@J.Moh: If every mathematics student learns programming, we would hardly see any of the silly mistakes arising from imprecision. I agree with Henning's last sentence and even say that such kind of questions are terrible because they encourage imprecision. Moreover, I personally think that we should define $sqrt[n]{x}$ for all real $x$ and odd natural number $n$, because $(mathbb{R} x ↦ x^n)$ is a bijection from $mathbb{R}$ to $mathbb{R}$, so its inverse exists. Similarly for non-negative real $x$ and even natural number $n$.
$endgroup$
– user21820
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
$endgroup$
– user21820
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@J.Moh: By the way, if you are satisfied with this answer, you can click the tick to accept it.
$endgroup$
– user21820
11 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
I agree! I found refuge in math and programming since I could sense for the first time what honesty was.
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@user21820 I did
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@user21820 I did
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
11 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3187198%2fwhat-is-the-domain-of-the-function-fx-sqrt3x3-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
It is $$x^3-xgeq 0$$
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think it's better $D(f)=mathbb R$, but if $g(x)=(x^3-x)^{frac{1}{3}}$ so $D(g)={xinmathbb R|x^3-x>0}.$ All these a definition only.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Dr.SonnhardGraubner can you explain why?
$endgroup$
– J.Moh
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
$$g(0)=0$$ dear Michael.
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are you quite sure it wasn't $sqrt{x^3-x}$? Because the domain of $sqrt[3]{x^3 -x}$ is $Bbb R$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
9 hours ago