Citing a rejected paper in related work












6















A paper was uploaded to Arxiv that is very similar to my research. I cited it in the related work section of the paper I am currently working on. I was planning on noting the shortcomings of this Arxiv paper when a few days later I found that it was rejected from the conference via openreview. My questions are:




  • Should I leave this citation in?

  • Should I say that it has been rejected?

  • Should the knowledge of the rejection change the way I talk about the paper?


This is the first time something like this has happened to me, so not sure how I should approach this.










share|improve this question





























    6















    A paper was uploaded to Arxiv that is very similar to my research. I cited it in the related work section of the paper I am currently working on. I was planning on noting the shortcomings of this Arxiv paper when a few days later I found that it was rejected from the conference via openreview. My questions are:




    • Should I leave this citation in?

    • Should I say that it has been rejected?

    • Should the knowledge of the rejection change the way I talk about the paper?


    This is the first time something like this has happened to me, so not sure how I should approach this.










    share|improve this question



























      6












      6








      6








      A paper was uploaded to Arxiv that is very similar to my research. I cited it in the related work section of the paper I am currently working on. I was planning on noting the shortcomings of this Arxiv paper when a few days later I found that it was rejected from the conference via openreview. My questions are:




      • Should I leave this citation in?

      • Should I say that it has been rejected?

      • Should the knowledge of the rejection change the way I talk about the paper?


      This is the first time something like this has happened to me, so not sure how I should approach this.










      share|improve this question
















      A paper was uploaded to Arxiv that is very similar to my research. I cited it in the related work section of the paper I am currently working on. I was planning on noting the shortcomings of this Arxiv paper when a few days later I found that it was rejected from the conference via openreview. My questions are:




      • Should I leave this citation in?

      • Should I say that it has been rejected?

      • Should the knowledge of the rejection change the way I talk about the paper?


      This is the first time something like this has happened to me, so not sure how I should approach this.







      citations arxiv rejection






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 6 hours ago







      McAngus

















      asked 6 hours ago









      McAngusMcAngus

      1705




      1705






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          10















          Should I leave this citation in?




          Definitely. A paper on arxiv is still related work regardless of its submission/acceptance status.




          Should I say that it has been rejected?




          No. That seems inappropriate. The paper may soon be accepted elsewhere in which case your comment about rejection will be outdated.



          Just cite it like you would any other paper. If you want, your bibliography could link to the openreview page where people could see the reviews and decision.




          Should the knowledge of the rejection change the way I talk about the paper?




          Not really. Perhaps the reviews include some useful information. Otherwise treat it like any other paper.






          share|improve this answer































            5















            Should I leave this citation in?




            Yes. If the work is related to yours and may be relevant to those reading your paper, you should cite it.




            Should I say that it has been rejected?




            No. The rejection is only a transitory part in the paper's life cycle. If you cite it as an arXiv paper, that in and of itself already communicates the paper has not yet been accepted anywhere.




            Should the knowledge of the rejection change the way I talk about the paper?




            No, probably not. The rejection doesn't necessarily mean the paper is bad, it just means the conference had no room to accept it. It could still be a very good paper, it just didn't make the cut at the conference. If you know it was rejected for a very serious reason, then that might be relevant (for instance if the reviewing process found a crucial flaw in the paper).






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "415"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f123522%2fciting-a-rejected-paper-in-related-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              10















              Should I leave this citation in?




              Definitely. A paper on arxiv is still related work regardless of its submission/acceptance status.




              Should I say that it has been rejected?




              No. That seems inappropriate. The paper may soon be accepted elsewhere in which case your comment about rejection will be outdated.



              Just cite it like you would any other paper. If you want, your bibliography could link to the openreview page where people could see the reviews and decision.




              Should the knowledge of the rejection change the way I talk about the paper?




              Not really. Perhaps the reviews include some useful information. Otherwise treat it like any other paper.






              share|improve this answer




























                10















                Should I leave this citation in?




                Definitely. A paper on arxiv is still related work regardless of its submission/acceptance status.




                Should I say that it has been rejected?




                No. That seems inappropriate. The paper may soon be accepted elsewhere in which case your comment about rejection will be outdated.



                Just cite it like you would any other paper. If you want, your bibliography could link to the openreview page where people could see the reviews and decision.




                Should the knowledge of the rejection change the way I talk about the paper?




                Not really. Perhaps the reviews include some useful information. Otherwise treat it like any other paper.






                share|improve this answer


























                  10












                  10








                  10








                  Should I leave this citation in?




                  Definitely. A paper on arxiv is still related work regardless of its submission/acceptance status.




                  Should I say that it has been rejected?




                  No. That seems inappropriate. The paper may soon be accepted elsewhere in which case your comment about rejection will be outdated.



                  Just cite it like you would any other paper. If you want, your bibliography could link to the openreview page where people could see the reviews and decision.




                  Should the knowledge of the rejection change the way I talk about the paper?




                  Not really. Perhaps the reviews include some useful information. Otherwise treat it like any other paper.






                  share|improve this answer














                  Should I leave this citation in?




                  Definitely. A paper on arxiv is still related work regardless of its submission/acceptance status.




                  Should I say that it has been rejected?




                  No. That seems inappropriate. The paper may soon be accepted elsewhere in which case your comment about rejection will be outdated.



                  Just cite it like you would any other paper. If you want, your bibliography could link to the openreview page where people could see the reviews and decision.




                  Should the knowledge of the rejection change the way I talk about the paper?




                  Not really. Perhaps the reviews include some useful information. Otherwise treat it like any other paper.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 6 hours ago









                  ThomasThomas

                  12k52844




                  12k52844























                      5















                      Should I leave this citation in?




                      Yes. If the work is related to yours and may be relevant to those reading your paper, you should cite it.




                      Should I say that it has been rejected?




                      No. The rejection is only a transitory part in the paper's life cycle. If you cite it as an arXiv paper, that in and of itself already communicates the paper has not yet been accepted anywhere.




                      Should the knowledge of the rejection change the way I talk about the paper?




                      No, probably not. The rejection doesn't necessarily mean the paper is bad, it just means the conference had no room to accept it. It could still be a very good paper, it just didn't make the cut at the conference. If you know it was rejected for a very serious reason, then that might be relevant (for instance if the reviewing process found a crucial flaw in the paper).






                      share|improve this answer




























                        5















                        Should I leave this citation in?




                        Yes. If the work is related to yours and may be relevant to those reading your paper, you should cite it.




                        Should I say that it has been rejected?




                        No. The rejection is only a transitory part in the paper's life cycle. If you cite it as an arXiv paper, that in and of itself already communicates the paper has not yet been accepted anywhere.




                        Should the knowledge of the rejection change the way I talk about the paper?




                        No, probably not. The rejection doesn't necessarily mean the paper is bad, it just means the conference had no room to accept it. It could still be a very good paper, it just didn't make the cut at the conference. If you know it was rejected for a very serious reason, then that might be relevant (for instance if the reviewing process found a crucial flaw in the paper).






                        share|improve this answer


























                          5












                          5








                          5








                          Should I leave this citation in?




                          Yes. If the work is related to yours and may be relevant to those reading your paper, you should cite it.




                          Should I say that it has been rejected?




                          No. The rejection is only a transitory part in the paper's life cycle. If you cite it as an arXiv paper, that in and of itself already communicates the paper has not yet been accepted anywhere.




                          Should the knowledge of the rejection change the way I talk about the paper?




                          No, probably not. The rejection doesn't necessarily mean the paper is bad, it just means the conference had no room to accept it. It could still be a very good paper, it just didn't make the cut at the conference. If you know it was rejected for a very serious reason, then that might be relevant (for instance if the reviewing process found a crucial flaw in the paper).






                          share|improve this answer














                          Should I leave this citation in?




                          Yes. If the work is related to yours and may be relevant to those reading your paper, you should cite it.




                          Should I say that it has been rejected?




                          No. The rejection is only a transitory part in the paper's life cycle. If you cite it as an arXiv paper, that in and of itself already communicates the paper has not yet been accepted anywhere.




                          Should the knowledge of the rejection change the way I talk about the paper?




                          No, probably not. The rejection doesn't necessarily mean the paper is bad, it just means the conference had no room to accept it. It could still be a very good paper, it just didn't make the cut at the conference. If you know it was rejected for a very serious reason, then that might be relevant (for instance if the reviewing process found a crucial flaw in the paper).







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 6 hours ago









                          Tom van der ZandenTom van der Zanden

                          1,333512




                          1,333512






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f123522%2fciting-a-rejected-paper-in-related-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              GameSpot

                              日野市

                              Tu-95轟炸機