Why crontab scripts are not working?












471















Often, crontab scripts are not executed on schedule or as expected. There are numerous reasons for that:




  1. wrong crontab notation

  2. permissions problem

  3. environment variables


This community wiki aims to aggregate the top reasons for crontab scripts not being executed as expected. Write each reason in a separate answer.



Please include one reason per answer - details about why it's not executed - and fix(es) for that one reason.



Please write only cron-specific issues, e.g. commands that execute as expected from the shell but execute erroneously by cron.










share|improve this question




















  • 10





    You must close crontab -e for the cron to take affect. For instance using vim I edit the file and use :w to write it but the job is not added to cron until I quit also. So I will not see the job until after I :q also.

    – DutGRIFF
    Jun 24 '14 at 14:58











  • I think best way to debug cron is to check syslog and find the problems.

    – Suneel Kumar
    Jun 23 '16 at 7:49













  • In my case - the email was going to my SPAM folder, so..... check that before you spend hours on debugging :D

    – almaruf
    Nov 6 '17 at 14:54











  • Electricity outages

    – Josef Klimuk
    Mar 21 '18 at 7:38
















471















Often, crontab scripts are not executed on schedule or as expected. There are numerous reasons for that:




  1. wrong crontab notation

  2. permissions problem

  3. environment variables


This community wiki aims to aggregate the top reasons for crontab scripts not being executed as expected. Write each reason in a separate answer.



Please include one reason per answer - details about why it's not executed - and fix(es) for that one reason.



Please write only cron-specific issues, e.g. commands that execute as expected from the shell but execute erroneously by cron.










share|improve this question




















  • 10





    You must close crontab -e for the cron to take affect. For instance using vim I edit the file and use :w to write it but the job is not added to cron until I quit also. So I will not see the job until after I :q also.

    – DutGRIFF
    Jun 24 '14 at 14:58











  • I think best way to debug cron is to check syslog and find the problems.

    – Suneel Kumar
    Jun 23 '16 at 7:49













  • In my case - the email was going to my SPAM folder, so..... check that before you spend hours on debugging :D

    – almaruf
    Nov 6 '17 at 14:54











  • Electricity outages

    – Josef Klimuk
    Mar 21 '18 at 7:38














471












471








471


255






Often, crontab scripts are not executed on schedule or as expected. There are numerous reasons for that:




  1. wrong crontab notation

  2. permissions problem

  3. environment variables


This community wiki aims to aggregate the top reasons for crontab scripts not being executed as expected. Write each reason in a separate answer.



Please include one reason per answer - details about why it's not executed - and fix(es) for that one reason.



Please write only cron-specific issues, e.g. commands that execute as expected from the shell but execute erroneously by cron.










share|improve this question
















Often, crontab scripts are not executed on schedule or as expected. There are numerous reasons for that:




  1. wrong crontab notation

  2. permissions problem

  3. environment variables


This community wiki aims to aggregate the top reasons for crontab scripts not being executed as expected. Write each reason in a separate answer.



Please include one reason per answer - details about why it's not executed - and fix(es) for that one reason.



Please write only cron-specific issues, e.g. commands that execute as expected from the shell but execute erroneously by cron.







cron






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 8 '17 at 18:15


























community wiki





11 revs, 5 users 57%
Adam Matan









  • 10





    You must close crontab -e for the cron to take affect. For instance using vim I edit the file and use :w to write it but the job is not added to cron until I quit also. So I will not see the job until after I :q also.

    – DutGRIFF
    Jun 24 '14 at 14:58











  • I think best way to debug cron is to check syslog and find the problems.

    – Suneel Kumar
    Jun 23 '16 at 7:49













  • In my case - the email was going to my SPAM folder, so..... check that before you spend hours on debugging :D

    – almaruf
    Nov 6 '17 at 14:54











  • Electricity outages

    – Josef Klimuk
    Mar 21 '18 at 7:38














  • 10





    You must close crontab -e for the cron to take affect. For instance using vim I edit the file and use :w to write it but the job is not added to cron until I quit also. So I will not see the job until after I :q also.

    – DutGRIFF
    Jun 24 '14 at 14:58











  • I think best way to debug cron is to check syslog and find the problems.

    – Suneel Kumar
    Jun 23 '16 at 7:49













  • In my case - the email was going to my SPAM folder, so..... check that before you spend hours on debugging :D

    – almaruf
    Nov 6 '17 at 14:54











  • Electricity outages

    – Josef Klimuk
    Mar 21 '18 at 7:38








10




10





You must close crontab -e for the cron to take affect. For instance using vim I edit the file and use :w to write it but the job is not added to cron until I quit also. So I will not see the job until after I :q also.

– DutGRIFF
Jun 24 '14 at 14:58





You must close crontab -e for the cron to take affect. For instance using vim I edit the file and use :w to write it but the job is not added to cron until I quit also. So I will not see the job until after I :q also.

– DutGRIFF
Jun 24 '14 at 14:58













I think best way to debug cron is to check syslog and find the problems.

– Suneel Kumar
Jun 23 '16 at 7:49







I think best way to debug cron is to check syslog and find the problems.

– Suneel Kumar
Jun 23 '16 at 7:49















In my case - the email was going to my SPAM folder, so..... check that before you spend hours on debugging :D

– almaruf
Nov 6 '17 at 14:54





In my case - the email was going to my SPAM folder, so..... check that before you spend hours on debugging :D

– almaruf
Nov 6 '17 at 14:54













Electricity outages

– Josef Klimuk
Mar 21 '18 at 7:38





Electricity outages

– Josef Klimuk
Mar 21 '18 at 7:38










46 Answers
46






active

oldest

votes













1 2
next












450





+50











Different environment



Cron passes a minimal set of environment variables to your jobs. To see the difference, add a dummy job like this:



* * * * * env > /tmp/env.output


Wait for /tmp/env.output to be created, then remove the job again. Now compare the contents of /tmp/env.output with the output of env run in your regular terminal.



A common "gotcha" here is the PATH environment variable being different. Maybe your cron script uses the command somecommand found in /opt/someApp/bin, which you've added to PATH in /etc/environment? cron ignores PATH from that file, so runnning somecommand from your script will fail when run with cron, but work when run in a terminal. It's worth noting that variables from /etc/environment will be passed on to cron jobs, just not the variables cron specifically sets itself, such as PATH.



To get around that, just set your own PATH variable at the top of the script. E.g.



#!/bin/bash
PATH=/opt/someApp/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin

# rest of script follows


Some prefer to just use absolute paths to all the commands instead. I recommend against that. Consider what happens if you want to run your script on a different system, and on that system, the command is in /opt/someAppv2.2/bin instead. You'd have to go through the whole script replacing /opt/someApp/bin with /opt/someAppv2.2/bin instead of just doing a small edit on the first line of the script.



You can also set the PATH variable in the crontab file, which will apply to all cron jobs. E.g.



PATH=/opt/someApp/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin

15 1 * * * backupscript --incremental /home /root





share|improve this answer





















  • 5





    I think I just fell for this, and newline at end... double whammy.

    – WernerCD
    Jun 2 '11 at 4:22






  • 5





    +1 for env, I had completely forgotten about that command and thought PATH was working. It was actually sliiiightly different in my case.

    – Izkata
    Jan 18 '12 at 15:16






  • 8





    @pbr If such directories are left writable to others, the system is already compromized.

    – geirha
    Apr 9 '12 at 8:23






  • 6





    @pbr A sysadmin could unwittingly delete the root filesystem. You can't guard against sysadmins making silly mistakes. If you install a newer version of an interpreter that is not backwards compatible, I'd expect breakage regardless. The sane way to handle that is to install it as a different command. E.g. you have python version 2.x and install python 3, you install it as python3, not python. And as for /opt/someApp/bin, why on earth wouldn't it have sane permissions/ownership? any sane admin would ensure sane permissions/ownership on system files.

    – geirha
    Apr 10 '12 at 6:36








  • 2





    @pbr It seems we could go on forever, yes. I still fail to see why it's a bad idea to use PATH though. If you feel like discussing this further in a medium better suited for discussion, you'll find me in #ubuntu and #bash, among other channels, on irc.freenode.net

    – geirha
    Apr 11 '12 at 16:28



















302














My top gotcha: If you forget to add a newline at the end of the crontab file. In other words, the crontab file should end with an empty line.



Below is the relevant section in the man pages for this issue (man crontab then skip to the end):



   Although cron requires that each entry in a crontab end  in  a  newline
character, neither the crontab command nor the cron daemon will detect
this error. Instead, the crontab will appear to load normally. However,
the command will never run. The best choice is to ensure that your
crontab has a blank line at the end.

4th Berkeley Distribution 29 December 1993 CRONTAB(1)





share|improve this answer





















  • 77





    this is such a showstopper, how come it hasn't been fixed in so many years of cron?

    – Capi Etheriel
    Jan 27 '11 at 3:20








  • 2





    Seems to be fixed in Vixie cron: man crontab on Ubuntu 10.10 says "cron requires that each entry in a crontab end in a newline character. If the last entry in a crontab is missing the newline, cron will consider the crontab (at least partially) broken and refuse to install it." (And the date at the end is 19 April 2010.)

    – Marius Gedminas
    Feb 1 '11 at 22:58






  • 18





    @barraponto This is actually a bug in new text editors. The "newline" character is supposed to be a line termination character, so the final line in a text file is supposed to end in a newline character that doesn't get shown in the editor. Vi and vim use the character correctly, and cron was built before the new editors started their odd behavior... Hence playing it save and including a blank line.

    – Izkata
    Jan 18 '12 at 15:20






  • 4





    If you edit crontab using crontab -e it will check the syntax of the file before allowing a save, including a check for newline.

    – Tom Harrison Jr
    Sep 26 '14 at 18:26






  • 2





    @Chan-HoSuh, according to man page "cron requires that each entry in a crontab end in a newline character. If the last entry in a crontab is missing the newline, cron will consider the crontab (at least partially) broken and refuse to install it." This behavior will be invoked when editing then saving the crontab using the -e option, and is independent of the editor.

    – Tom Harrison Jr
    Nov 18 '14 at 16:40



















128














Cron daemon is not running. I really screwed up with this some months ago.



Type:



pgrep cron 


If you see no number, then cron is not running. sudo /etc/init.d/cron start can be used to start cron.



EDIT: Rather than invoking init scripts through /etc/init.d, use the service
utility, e.g.



sudo service cron start





share|improve this answer





















  • 40





    Thanks for showing me pgrep. I kept doing ps -ef | grep foo

    – ripper234
    Mar 17 '11 at 17:01






  • 4





    You could also use pidof cron which will omit results for other applications that also have the word 'cron', like crontab.

    – Pithikos
    Mar 11 '14 at 16:19













  • Weird, all of these give me nothing to show cron is running, but if I run sudo service cron start I get start: Job is already running: cron

    – Colleen
    Apr 6 '15 at 17:04






  • 1





    service crond start if its centos/RHEL

    – Srihari Karanth
    Jan 18 '17 at 10:02



















86














The script filenames in cron.d/, cron.daily/, cron.hourly/, etc., should not contain dot (.), otherwise run-parts will skip them.



See run-parts(8):



   If neither the --lsbsysinit option nor the --regex option is given then
the names must consist entirely of upper and lower case letters, dig‐
its, underscores, and hyphens.

If the --lsbsysinit option is given, then the names must not end in
.dpkg-old or .dpkg-dist or .dpkg-new or .dpkg-tmp, and must belong to
one or more of the following namespaces: the LANANA-assigned namespace
(^[a-z0-9]+$); the LSB hierarchical and reserved namespaces
(^_?([a-z0-9_.]+-)+[a-z0-9]+$); and the Debian cron script namespace
(^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$).


So, if you have a cron script backup.sh, analyze-logs.pl in cron.daily/ directory, you'd best to remove the extension names.






share|improve this answer





















  • 10





    It's a feature not a bug - it keeps things like myscript.backup or myscript.original or myscript.rpm-new from running right beside myscript.

    – pbr
    Apr 8 '12 at 22:45











  • @pbr: makes sense. At least it would have been helpful for debugging if run-parts --test (or another imaginary option like --debug would output the files it skips including the reason.

    – Rabarberski
    May 30 '13 at 8:46








  • 7





    If this is a feature, it's not a nice one :( A lot of people use dot in file name (backup.sh is the most common one). If you want to a script to stop executing, the most logical method will be to remove it from "cron.d" directory.

    – MatuDuke
    May 16 '14 at 13:59








  • 5





    This is such a bad feature that it's effectively a bug. It's common practice to require a particular ending (like ".list" or ".cron" or something) if people want to make sure that things only get run when intended. Arbitrarily picking dot as a likely separator for ".bak" or ".temp" or whatever, is completely unpredictable except in the way that it will predictably confuse people. Legitimate endings like ".sh", and ".pl" have been in widespread use for decades. Lots of people use "_bak" or "_temp" or "-bak" instead of a dot, however. This is an awful design choice; it's a design bug at best.

    – Teekin
    May 10 '17 at 20:42





















57














In many environments cron executes commands using sh, while many people assume it will use bash.



Suggestions to test or fix this for a failing command:




  • Try running the command in sh to see if it works

  • Wrap the command in a bash subshell to make sure it gets run in bash:
    bash -c "mybashcommand"

  • Tell cron to run all commands in bash by setting the shell at the top of your crontab:
    SHELL=/bin/bash

  • If the command is a script, make sure the script contains a shebang:
    #!/bin/bash






share|improve this answer


























  • bash suggestion is very helpful, fixed issue with my cron.

    – Maxim Galushka
    Feb 18 '16 at 22:38











  • This just caused me 1hr of fiddling/troubleshooting. Even more perplexing if you're not aware of the issue is the script will run manually just fine if you're typical shell is bash, but not with cron. Thanks!

    – Hendy
    Nov 22 '16 at 19:42











  • A long time ago I ran into something related: The command source is in bash but not sh. In cron/sh, use a period: . envfile rather than source envfile.

    – kungphu
    Dec 22 '17 at 2:24



















34














I had some issues with the time zones. Cron was running with the fresh installation time zone. The solution was to restart cron:



sudo service cron restart





share|improve this answer





















  • 6





    Yes, after changing the timezone on a system, one must either restart every service that cares about what time it is, or reboot. I prefer the reboot, to be sure I've caught everything.

    – pbr
    Apr 8 '12 at 22:48











  • Oh for God's sake, killed hours on this. Tried service restart after * * * * * touch /tmp/cronworks did nothing, yet there is RELOAD at cronlog.

    – НЛО
    Oct 1 '14 at 3:57



















30














Absolute path should be used for scripts:



For example, /bin/grep should be used instead of grep:



# m h  dom mon dow   command
0 0 * * * /bin/grep ERROR /home/adam/run.log &> /tmp/errors


Instead of:



# m h  dom mon dow   command
0 0 * * * grep ERROR /home/adam/run.log &> /tmp/errors


This is especially tricky, because the same command will work when executed from shell. The reason is that cron does not have the same PATH environment variable as the user.






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    see geirha answer, you can (must) define cron's PATH

    – Capi Etheriel
    Jan 27 '11 at 3:22






  • 9





    Bzzt. you do NOT need to define the PATH - using absolute paths is the best practice here. "because an executable may be elsewhere on some other computer" doesn't trump "I want it to run exactly this program and not some other one someone put in the path in front of my original program"

    – pbr
    Apr 8 '12 at 22:55






  • 1





    yep this was it for me, outside the cron I could run the command directly, inside the cron it needed full /usr/bin/whatever path

    – Anentropic
    Aug 14 '16 at 10:56



















30














If your crontab command has a % symbol in it, cron tries to interpret it. So if you were using any command with a % in it (such as a format specification to the date command) you will need to escape it.



That and other good gotchas here:
http://www.pantz.org/software/cron/croninfo.html






share|improve this answer


























  • This is what has been causing my Cron job to fail for the last week. Finally figured out that my Date didn't have an escape character (backslash for any other folks looking for what the escape character is). Yay!

    – Valien
    Oct 14 '13 at 14:27








  • 2





    See also How can I execute date inside of a cron tab job?

    – Jared Beck
    Apr 16 '15 at 20:49











  • This one bit me as well. Thanks!

    – stefansundin
    Jan 1 '17 at 21:54



















24














It is also possible that the user's password has expired. Even root's password can expire. You can tail -f /var/log/cron.log and you will see cron fail with password expired. You can set the password to never expire by doing this: passwd -x -1 <username>



In some systems (Debian, Ubuntu) logging for cron is not enabled by default. In /etc/rsyslog.conf or /etc/rsyslog.d/50-default.conf the line:



# cron.*                          /var/log/cron.log


should be edited (sudo nano /etc/rsyslog.conf) uncommented to:



cron.*                          /var/log/cron.log


After that, you need to restart rsyslog via



/etc/init.d/rsyslog restart


or



service rsyslog restart 


Source: Enable crontab logging in Debian Linux



In some systems (Ubuntu) separate logging file for cron is not enabled by default, but cron related logs are appearing in syslog file. One may use



cat /var/log/syslog | grep cron -i


to view cron-related messages.






share|improve this answer


























  • I have Debian (wheezy) but there is no /etc/init.d/rsyslog, only inetutils-syslogd and sysklogd. Do I have to install something or just restart one of the two?

    – hgoebl
    Oct 21 '16 at 11:41



















22














Cron is calling a script which is not executable.



By running chmod +x /path/to/scrip the script becomes executable and should resolve this issue.






share|improve this answer





















  • 4





    That's not unique to cron, and easily traceable by simply trying to execute /path/to/script from the command line.

    – Adam Matan
    Jan 27 '11 at 6:33






  • 2





    If you're used to executing scripts with . scriptname or sh scriptname or bash scriptname, then this becomes a cron-specific problem.

    – Eliah Kagan
    Nov 24 '11 at 23:09



















17














If your cronjob invokes GUI-apps, you need to tell them what DISPLAY they should use.



Example: Firefox launch with cron.



Your script should contain export DISPLAY=:0 somewhere.






share|improve this answer


























  • aplay needed this one for some reason. thank you

    – IljaBek
    Oct 2 '16 at 10:47











  • * * * * * export DISPLAY=:0 && <command>

    – LoMaPh
    Jul 27 '17 at 22:27





















14














Permissions problems are quite common, I'm afraid.



Note that a common workaround is to execute everything using root's crontab, which sometimes is a Really Bad Idea. Setting proper permissions is definitely a largely overlooked issue.






share|improve this answer


























  • Note that if you have a crontab line that is set to pipe output to a file that does not yet exist, and the directory for the file is one that the cron user doesn't have access to, then the line will not execute.

    – Evan Donovan
    Sep 10 '15 at 16:51



















13














Insecure cron table permission



A cron table is rejected if its permission is insecure



sudo service cron restart
grep -i cron /var/log/syslog|tail -2
2013-02-05T03:47:49.283841+01:00 ubuntu cron[49906]: (user) INSECURE MODE (mode 0600 expected) (crontabs/user)


The problem is solved with



# correct permission
sudo chmod 600 /var/spool/cron/crontabs/user
# signal crond to reload the file
sudo touch /var/spool/cron/crontabs





share|improve this answer


























  • First I figured it out myself and then I found your answer! Still thanks a lot! In my case, I had reverted/restored some crontabs in /var/spool/cron/crontabs via SVN which changed its permissions!

    – alfonx
    Jun 8 '13 at 20:40



















11














Script is location-sensitive. This is related to always using absolute paths in a script, but not quite the same. Your cron job may need to cd to a specific directory before running, e.g. a rake task on a Rails application may need to be in the application root for Rake to find the correct task, not to mention the appropriate database configuration, etc.



So a crontab entry of



23 3 * * * /usr/bin/rake db:session_purge RAILS_ENV=production



would be better as




23 3 * * * cd /var/www/production/current && /usr/bin/rake db:session_purge RAILS_ENV=production


Or, to keep the crontab entry simpler and less brittle:



23 3 * * * /home/<user>/scripts/session-purge.sh



with the following code in /home/<user>/scripts/session-purge.sh:




cd /var/www/production/current
/usr/bin/rake db:session_purge RAILS_ENV=production





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    If the script being invoked from cron is written in an interpreted language like PHP, you may need to set the working directory in the script itself. For example, in PHP: chdir(dirname(__FILE__));

    – Evan Donovan
    Sep 10 '15 at 16:14













  • Just got caught with this one: the script used to be in the root of my home directory, but then I moved it (and updated the crontab) and couldn't figure out why it wasn't working. Turns out the script was using a relative path, assuming that it was relative to the location of the script but it was in fact relative to the root of my home directory because that was the working directory that cron was using, which is why the script worked when it was in the root of my home directory (because the script's expected working directory and it's actual working just happened to coincide).

    – Micheal Johnson
    Feb 4 '16 at 18:36



















10














Crontab specs which worked in the past can break when moved from one crontab file to another. Sometimes the reason is that you've moved the spec from a system crontab file to a user crontab file or vice-versa.



The cron job specification format differs between users' crontab files (/var/spool/cron/username or /var/spool/cron/crontabs/username) and the system crontabs (/etc/crontab and the the files in /etc/cron.d).



The system crontabs have an extra field 'user' right before the command-to-run.



This will cause errors stating things like george; command not found when you move a command out of /etc/crontab or a file in /etc/cron.d into a user's crontab file.



Conversely, cron will deliver errors like /usr/bin/restartxyz is not a valid username or similar when the reverse occurs.






share|improve this answer

































    9














    cron script is invoking a command with --verbose option



    I had a cron script fail on me because I was in autopilot while typing the script and I included the --verbose option:



    #!/bin/bash
    some commands
    tar cvfz /my/archive/file.tar.gz /my/shared/directory
    come more commands


    The script ran fine when executing from shell, but failed when running from crontab because the verbose output goes to stdout when run from shell, but nowhere when run from crontab. Easy fix to remove the 'v':



    #!/bin/bash
    some commands
    tar cfz /my/archive/file.tar.gz /my/shared/directory
    some more commands





    share|improve this answer





















    • 5





      Why is this causing a failure? Buffer issues?

      – Adam Matan
      May 31 '12 at 6:38











    • Any outputs or errors trriggred via cron jobs is gooing to sent to your mailbox.So we should never forget to care about these errors/output.We can redirect them to any file or /dev/null

      – Nischay
      Sep 27 '13 at 11:32



















    7














    Most frequent reason I have seen cron fail in an incorrectly stated schedule. It takes practice to specify a job scheduled for 11:15 pm as 30 23 * * * instead of * * 11 15 * or 11 15 * * *. Day of week for jobs after midnight also gets confused M-F is 2-6 after midnight not 1-5. Specific dates are usually a problem as we rarely use them * * 3 1 * is not March 3rd.



    If your work with different platforms using unsupported options such as 2/3 in time specifications can also cause failures. This is a very useful option but not universally available. I have also run across issues will lists like 1-5 or 1,3,5.



    Using unqualified paths have also caused problems. The default path is usually /bin:/usr/bin so only standard commands will run. These directories usually don't have the desired command. This also affects scripts using non standard commands. Other environment variables can also be missing.



    Clobbering an existing crontab entirely has caused me problems. I now load from a file copy. This can be recovered from the existing crontab using crontab -l if it gets clobbered. I keep the copy of crontab in ~/bin. It is commented throughout and ends with the line # EOF. This is reloaded daily from a crontab entry like:



    #!/usr/bin/crontab
    # Reload this crontab
    #
    54 12 * * * ${HOME}/bin/crontab


    The reload command above relies on an executable crontab with a bang path running crontab. Some systems require the running crontab in the command and specifying the file. If the directory is network shared, then I often use crontab.$(hostname) as the name of the file. This will eventually correct cases where the wrong crontab is loaded on the wrong server.



    Using the file provides a backup of what the crontab should be, and allows temporary edits (the only time I use crontab -e) to be backed out automatically. There are headers available which help with getting the scheduling parameters right. I have added them when inexperience users would be editing a crontab.



    Rarely, I have run into commands that require user input. These fail under crontab, although some will work with input redirection.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 2





      This covers three separate problems. Can they be split into separate answers?

      – Eliah Kagan
      Nov 24 '11 at 23:07






    • 9





      Can you explain how 30 23 * * * translates to 11:15 PM?

      – JYelton
      Jan 10 '14 at 19:23



















    6














    If you are accessing an account via SSH keys it is possible to login to the account but not notice that the password on the account is locked (e.g. due to expiring or invalid password attempts)



    If the system is using PAM and the account is locked, this can stop its cronjob from running. (I've tested this on Solaris, but not on Ubuntu)



    You may find messages like this in /var/adm/messages:




    Oct 24 07:51:00 mybox cron[29024]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host
    Oct 24 07:52:00 mybox cron[29063]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host
    Oct 24 07:53:00 mybox cron[29098]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host
    Oct 24 07:54:00 mybox cron[29527]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host


    All you should need to do is run:




    # passwd -u <USERNAME>


    as root to unlock the account, and the crontab should work again.






    share|improve this answer

































      5














      If you have a command like this:



      * * * * * /path/to/script >> /tmp/output


      and it doesn't work and you can't see any output, it may not necessarily mean cron isn't working. The script could be broken and the output going to stderr which doesn't get passed to /tmp/output. Check this isn't the case, by capturing this output as well:



      * * * * * /path/to/script >> /tmp/output 2>&1


      to see if this helps you catch your issue.






      share|improve this answer

































        3














        === Docker alert ===



        If you're using docker,



        I think it is proper to add that I couldn't manage to make cron to run in the background.



        To run a cron job inside the container, I used supervisor and ran cron -f, together with the other process.



        Edit: Another issue - I also didn't manage to get it work when running the container with HOST networking. See this issue here also: https://github.com/phusion/baseimage-docker/issues/144






        share|improve this answer





















        • 1





          stackoverflow.com/questions/37458287/…

          – Simon D
          Dec 17 '18 at 9:53



















        3














        In my case cron and crontab had different owners.



        NOT working I had this:



        User@Uva ~ $ ps -ef | grep cron | grep -v grep
        User 2940 7284 pty1 19:58:41 /usr/bin/crontab
        SYSTEM 11292 636 ? 22:14:15 /usr/sbin/cro


        Basically I had to run cron-config and answer the questions correctly. There is a point where I was required to enter my Win7 user password for my 'User' account. From reading I did, it looks like this is a potential security issue but I am the only administrator on a single home network so I decided it was OK.



        Here is the command sequence that got me going:



        User@Uva ~ $ cron-config
        The cron daemon can run as a service or as a job. The latter is not recommended.
        Cron is already installed as a service under account LocalSystem.
        Do you want to remove or reinstall it? (yes/no) yes
        OK. The cron service was removed.

        Do you want to install the cron daemon as a service? (yes/no) yes
        Enter the value of CYGWIN for the daemon: [ ] ntsec

        You must decide under what account the cron daemon will run.
        If you are the only user on this machine, the daemon can run as yourself.
        This gives access to all network drives but only allows you as user.
        To run multiple users, cron must change user context without knowing
        the passwords. There are three methods to do that, as explained in
        http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/ntsec.html#ntsec-nopasswd1
        If all the cron users have executed "passwd -R" (see man passwd),
        which provides access to network drives, or if you are using the
        cyglsa package, then cron should run under the local system account.
        Otherwise you need to have or to create a privileged account.
        This script will help you do so.
        Do you want the cron daemon to run as yourself? (yes/no) no

        Were the passwords of all cron users saved with "passwd -R", or
        are you using the cyglsa package ? (yes/no) no

        Finding or creating a privileged user.
        The following accounts were found: 'cyg_server' .
        This script plans to use account cyg_server.
        Do you want to use another privileged account name? (yes/no) yes
        Enter the other name: User

        Reenter: User


        Account User already exists. Checking its privileges.
        INFO: User is a valid privileged account.
        INFO: The cygwin user name for account User is User.

        Please enter the password for user 'User':
        Reenter:
        Running cron_diagnose ...
        ... no problem found.

        Do you want to start the cron daemon as a service now? (yes/no) yes
        OK. The cron daemon is now running.

        In case of problem, examine the log file for cron,
        /var/log/cron.log, and the Windows event log (using /usr/bin/cronevents)
        for information about the problem cron is having.

        Examine also any cron.log file in the HOME directory
        (or the file specified in MAILTO) and cron related files in /tmp.

        If you cannot fix the problem, then report it to cygwin@cygwin.com.
        Please run the script /usr/bin/cronbug and ATTACH its output
        (the file cronbug.txt) to your e-mail.

        WARNING: PATH may be set differently under cron than in interactive shells.
        Names such as "find" and "date" may refer to Windows programs.


        User@Uva ~ $ ps -ef | grep cron | grep -v grep
        User 2944 11780 ? 03:31:10 /usr/sbin/cron
        User 2940 7284 pty1 19:58:41 /usr/bin/crontab

        User@Uva ~ $





        share|improve this answer





















        • 1





          Although well documented, this looks like a Cygwin-specific point; does it really belong in askubuntu?

          – sxc731
          Feb 7 '16 at 11:14



















        3














        I was writing an install shell script that creates another script to purge old transaction data from a database. As a part of the task it had to configure daily cron job to run at an arbitrary time, when the database load was low.



        I created a file mycronjob with cron schedule, username & the command and copied it to the /etc/cron.d directory. My two gotchas:





        1. mycronjob file had to be owned by root to run

        2. I had to set permissions of the file to 644 - 664 would not run.


        A permission problem will appear in /var/log/syslog as something similar to:



        Apr 24 18:30:01 ip-11-22-33-44 cron[40980]: (*system*) INSECURE MODE (group/other writable) (/etc/crontab)
        Apr 24 18:30:01 ip-11-22-33-44 cron[40980]: (*system*) INSECURE MODE (group/other writable) (/etc/cron.d/user)


        The first line refers to /etc/crontab file and the later to a file I placed under /etc/cront.d.






        share|improve this answer

































          2














          Line written in a way crontab doesn't understand. It needs to be correctly written. Here's CrontabHowTo.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            How can this be debugged?

            – Adam Matan
            Jan 27 '11 at 6:34











          • Reviewing cron's error log is the most common way. IIRC 'crontab -e' does a syntax parse after you've edited the file as well - but that might not be universal.

            – pbr
            Apr 8 '12 at 22:47



















          2














          Cron daemon could be running, but not actually working. Try restarting cron:



          sudo /etc/init.d/cron restart





          share|improve this answer





















          • 3





            I've NEVER seen this case in production. Doesn't mean it hasn't happened - just that I've not seen it in the 30 years I've been using UNIX and Linux. Cron is insanely robust.

            – pbr
            Apr 8 '12 at 22:42








          • 1





            I'm not sure but I think this did actually just happen to me. I tried pidof cron and got nothing. Tried using service utility and it said cron was already running. Just ran this command and ran pidof again and I get a result.

            – Colleen
            Apr 6 '15 at 17:13



















          2














          Writing to cron via "crontab -e" with the username argument in a line. I've seen examples of users (or sysadmins) writing their shell scripts and not understanding why they don't automate. The "user" argument exists in /etc/crontab, but not the user-defined files. so, for example, your personal file would be something like:



          # m h dom mon dow command

          * * */2 * * /some/shell/script


          whereas /etc/crontab would be:



          # m h dom mon dow user   command

          * * */2 * * jdoe /some/shell/script


          So, why would you do the latter? Well, depending on how you want to set your permissions, this can become very convoluted. I've written scripts to automate tasks for users who don't understand the intricacies, or don't want to bother with the drudgery. By setting permissions to --x------, I can make the script executable without them being able to read (and perhaps accidentally change) it. However, I might want to run this command with several others from one file (thus making it easier to maintain) but make sure file output is assigned the right owner. Doing so (at least in Ubuntu 10.10) breaks on both the inability to read the file as well as execute, plus the afore-mentioned issue with putting periods in /etc/crontab (which, funnily enough, causes no error when going through crontab -e).



          As an example, I've seen instances of sudo crontab -e used to run a script with root permissions, with a corresponding chown username file_output in the shell script. Sloppy, but it works. IMHO, The more graceful option is to put it in /etc/crontab with username declared and proper permissions, so file_output goes to the right place and owner.






          share|improve this answer


























          • "Doing so (at least in Ubuntu 10.10) breaks on both the inability to read the file as well as execute....." I should clarify: /etc/crontab (by default) requires read AND execute permissions, whereas you COULD run "sudo crontab -e" to create a cronjob which overrides both the need for the "w" permission, and the problem with extensions like ".sh". I haven't had time to pull apart the cron code and check why this works, just a detail I've noticed.

            – Mange
            Jun 12 '12 at 19:54





















          2














          Building off what Aaron Peart mentioned about verbose mode, sometimes scripts not in verbose mode will initialize but not finish if the default behavior of an included command is to output a line or more to the screen once the proc starts. For example, I wrote a backup script for our intranet which used curl, a utility that downloads or uploads files to remote servers, and is quite handy if you can only access said remote files through HTTP. Using 'curl http://something.com/somefile.xls' was causing a script I wrote to hang and never complete because it spits out a newline followed by a progress line. I had to use the silent flag (-s) to tell it not to output any information, and write in my own code to handle if the file failed to download.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            For programs that don't have a silent mode, you can redirect their output to /dev/null. For example: some-command > /dev/null This will redirect only standard output, and not error output (which is usually what you want, since you want to be informed of errors). To redirect error output too, use some-command &> /dev/null.

            – Eliah Kagan
            Jun 12 '12 at 20:22











          • Yeah, that was my first thought when writing the afore-mentioneed script. I forget why I didn't use that, possibly some non-standard behavior that circumvented said solution. I know that verbose/interactive mode is the default on some commands (I'm looking at YOU, scp!), which means you need to hadle said output for smooth operation of shell scripts.

            – Mange
            Jun 13 '12 at 12:09



















          2














          Although you can define environment variables in your crontable, you're not in a shell script. So constructions like the following won't work:



          SOME_DIR=/var/log
          MY_LOG_FILE=${SOME_LOG}/some_file.log

          BIN_DIR=/usr/local/bin
          MY_EXE=${BIN_DIR}/some_executable_file

          0 10 * * * ${MY_EXE} some_param >> ${MY_LOG_FILE}


          This is because variables are not interpreted in the crontable: all values are taken litterally. And this is the same if you omit the brackets.
          So your commands won't run, and your log files won't be written...



          Instead you must define all your environment variables straight:



          SOME_DIR=/var/log
          MY_LOG_FILE=/var/log/some_file.log

          BIN_DIR=/usr/local/bin
          MY_EXE=/usr/local/bin/some_executable_file

          0 10 * * * ${MY_EXE} some_param >> ${MY_LOG_FILE}





          share|improve this answer

































            2














            When a task is run within cron, stdin is closed. Programs that act differently based on whether stdin is available or not will behave differently between the shell session and in cron.



            An example is the program goaccess for analysing web server log files. This does NOT work in cron:



            goaccess -a -f /var/log/nginx/access.log > output.html


            and goaccess shows the help page instead of creating the report. In the shell this can be reproduced with



            goaccess -a -f /var/log/nginx/access.log > output.html < /dev/null


            The fix for goaccess is to make it read the log from stdin instead of reading from the file, so the solution is to change the crontab entry to



            cat /var/log/nginx/access.log | goaccess -a > output.html





            share|improve this answer

































              2














              On my RHEL7 servers, root cron jobs would run, but user jobs would not. I found that without a home directory, the jobs won't run (but you will see good errors in /var/log/cron). When I created the home directory, the problem was solved.






              share|improve this answer

































                2














                If you edited your crontab file using a windows editor (via samba or something) and it's replaced the newlines with nr or just r, cron won't run.



                Also, if you're using /etc/cron.d/* and one of those files has a r in it, cron will move through the files and stop when it hits a bad file. Not sure if that's the problem?



                Use:



                od -c /etc/cron.d/* | grep r





                share|improve this answer





























                  1 2
                  next


                  protected by heemayl May 9 '17 at 3:07



                  Thank you for your interest in this question.
                  Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                  Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














                  46 Answers
                  46






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  46 Answers
                  46






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  active

                  oldest

                  votes






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  1 2
                  next










                  450





                  +50











                  Different environment



                  Cron passes a minimal set of environment variables to your jobs. To see the difference, add a dummy job like this:



                  * * * * * env > /tmp/env.output


                  Wait for /tmp/env.output to be created, then remove the job again. Now compare the contents of /tmp/env.output with the output of env run in your regular terminal.



                  A common "gotcha" here is the PATH environment variable being different. Maybe your cron script uses the command somecommand found in /opt/someApp/bin, which you've added to PATH in /etc/environment? cron ignores PATH from that file, so runnning somecommand from your script will fail when run with cron, but work when run in a terminal. It's worth noting that variables from /etc/environment will be passed on to cron jobs, just not the variables cron specifically sets itself, such as PATH.



                  To get around that, just set your own PATH variable at the top of the script. E.g.



                  #!/bin/bash
                  PATH=/opt/someApp/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin

                  # rest of script follows


                  Some prefer to just use absolute paths to all the commands instead. I recommend against that. Consider what happens if you want to run your script on a different system, and on that system, the command is in /opt/someAppv2.2/bin instead. You'd have to go through the whole script replacing /opt/someApp/bin with /opt/someAppv2.2/bin instead of just doing a small edit on the first line of the script.



                  You can also set the PATH variable in the crontab file, which will apply to all cron jobs. E.g.



                  PATH=/opt/someApp/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin

                  15 1 * * * backupscript --incremental /home /root





                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 5





                    I think I just fell for this, and newline at end... double whammy.

                    – WernerCD
                    Jun 2 '11 at 4:22






                  • 5





                    +1 for env, I had completely forgotten about that command and thought PATH was working. It was actually sliiiightly different in my case.

                    – Izkata
                    Jan 18 '12 at 15:16






                  • 8





                    @pbr If such directories are left writable to others, the system is already compromized.

                    – geirha
                    Apr 9 '12 at 8:23






                  • 6





                    @pbr A sysadmin could unwittingly delete the root filesystem. You can't guard against sysadmins making silly mistakes. If you install a newer version of an interpreter that is not backwards compatible, I'd expect breakage regardless. The sane way to handle that is to install it as a different command. E.g. you have python version 2.x and install python 3, you install it as python3, not python. And as for /opt/someApp/bin, why on earth wouldn't it have sane permissions/ownership? any sane admin would ensure sane permissions/ownership on system files.

                    – geirha
                    Apr 10 '12 at 6:36








                  • 2





                    @pbr It seems we could go on forever, yes. I still fail to see why it's a bad idea to use PATH though. If you feel like discussing this further in a medium better suited for discussion, you'll find me in #ubuntu and #bash, among other channels, on irc.freenode.net

                    – geirha
                    Apr 11 '12 at 16:28
















                  450





                  +50











                  Different environment



                  Cron passes a minimal set of environment variables to your jobs. To see the difference, add a dummy job like this:



                  * * * * * env > /tmp/env.output


                  Wait for /tmp/env.output to be created, then remove the job again. Now compare the contents of /tmp/env.output with the output of env run in your regular terminal.



                  A common "gotcha" here is the PATH environment variable being different. Maybe your cron script uses the command somecommand found in /opt/someApp/bin, which you've added to PATH in /etc/environment? cron ignores PATH from that file, so runnning somecommand from your script will fail when run with cron, but work when run in a terminal. It's worth noting that variables from /etc/environment will be passed on to cron jobs, just not the variables cron specifically sets itself, such as PATH.



                  To get around that, just set your own PATH variable at the top of the script. E.g.



                  #!/bin/bash
                  PATH=/opt/someApp/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin

                  # rest of script follows


                  Some prefer to just use absolute paths to all the commands instead. I recommend against that. Consider what happens if you want to run your script on a different system, and on that system, the command is in /opt/someAppv2.2/bin instead. You'd have to go through the whole script replacing /opt/someApp/bin with /opt/someAppv2.2/bin instead of just doing a small edit on the first line of the script.



                  You can also set the PATH variable in the crontab file, which will apply to all cron jobs. E.g.



                  PATH=/opt/someApp/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin

                  15 1 * * * backupscript --incremental /home /root





                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 5





                    I think I just fell for this, and newline at end... double whammy.

                    – WernerCD
                    Jun 2 '11 at 4:22






                  • 5





                    +1 for env, I had completely forgotten about that command and thought PATH was working. It was actually sliiiightly different in my case.

                    – Izkata
                    Jan 18 '12 at 15:16






                  • 8





                    @pbr If such directories are left writable to others, the system is already compromized.

                    – geirha
                    Apr 9 '12 at 8:23






                  • 6





                    @pbr A sysadmin could unwittingly delete the root filesystem. You can't guard against sysadmins making silly mistakes. If you install a newer version of an interpreter that is not backwards compatible, I'd expect breakage regardless. The sane way to handle that is to install it as a different command. E.g. you have python version 2.x and install python 3, you install it as python3, not python. And as for /opt/someApp/bin, why on earth wouldn't it have sane permissions/ownership? any sane admin would ensure sane permissions/ownership on system files.

                    – geirha
                    Apr 10 '12 at 6:36








                  • 2





                    @pbr It seems we could go on forever, yes. I still fail to see why it's a bad idea to use PATH though. If you feel like discussing this further in a medium better suited for discussion, you'll find me in #ubuntu and #bash, among other channels, on irc.freenode.net

                    – geirha
                    Apr 11 '12 at 16:28














                  450





                  +50







                  450





                  +50



                  450




                  +50







                  Different environment



                  Cron passes a minimal set of environment variables to your jobs. To see the difference, add a dummy job like this:



                  * * * * * env > /tmp/env.output


                  Wait for /tmp/env.output to be created, then remove the job again. Now compare the contents of /tmp/env.output with the output of env run in your regular terminal.



                  A common "gotcha" here is the PATH environment variable being different. Maybe your cron script uses the command somecommand found in /opt/someApp/bin, which you've added to PATH in /etc/environment? cron ignores PATH from that file, so runnning somecommand from your script will fail when run with cron, but work when run in a terminal. It's worth noting that variables from /etc/environment will be passed on to cron jobs, just not the variables cron specifically sets itself, such as PATH.



                  To get around that, just set your own PATH variable at the top of the script. E.g.



                  #!/bin/bash
                  PATH=/opt/someApp/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin

                  # rest of script follows


                  Some prefer to just use absolute paths to all the commands instead. I recommend against that. Consider what happens if you want to run your script on a different system, and on that system, the command is in /opt/someAppv2.2/bin instead. You'd have to go through the whole script replacing /opt/someApp/bin with /opt/someAppv2.2/bin instead of just doing a small edit on the first line of the script.



                  You can also set the PATH variable in the crontab file, which will apply to all cron jobs. E.g.



                  PATH=/opt/someApp/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin

                  15 1 * * * backupscript --incremental /home /root





                  share|improve this answer

















                  Different environment



                  Cron passes a minimal set of environment variables to your jobs. To see the difference, add a dummy job like this:



                  * * * * * env > /tmp/env.output


                  Wait for /tmp/env.output to be created, then remove the job again. Now compare the contents of /tmp/env.output with the output of env run in your regular terminal.



                  A common "gotcha" here is the PATH environment variable being different. Maybe your cron script uses the command somecommand found in /opt/someApp/bin, which you've added to PATH in /etc/environment? cron ignores PATH from that file, so runnning somecommand from your script will fail when run with cron, but work when run in a terminal. It's worth noting that variables from /etc/environment will be passed on to cron jobs, just not the variables cron specifically sets itself, such as PATH.



                  To get around that, just set your own PATH variable at the top of the script. E.g.



                  #!/bin/bash
                  PATH=/opt/someApp/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin

                  # rest of script follows


                  Some prefer to just use absolute paths to all the commands instead. I recommend against that. Consider what happens if you want to run your script on a different system, and on that system, the command is in /opt/someAppv2.2/bin instead. You'd have to go through the whole script replacing /opt/someApp/bin with /opt/someAppv2.2/bin instead of just doing a small edit on the first line of the script.



                  You can also set the PATH variable in the crontab file, which will apply to all cron jobs. E.g.



                  PATH=/opt/someApp/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin

                  15 1 * * * backupscript --incremental /home /root






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Feb 27 '18 at 18:47


























                  community wiki





                  10 revs, 8 users 67%
                  geirha









                  • 5





                    I think I just fell for this, and newline at end... double whammy.

                    – WernerCD
                    Jun 2 '11 at 4:22






                  • 5





                    +1 for env, I had completely forgotten about that command and thought PATH was working. It was actually sliiiightly different in my case.

                    – Izkata
                    Jan 18 '12 at 15:16






                  • 8





                    @pbr If such directories are left writable to others, the system is already compromized.

                    – geirha
                    Apr 9 '12 at 8:23






                  • 6





                    @pbr A sysadmin could unwittingly delete the root filesystem. You can't guard against sysadmins making silly mistakes. If you install a newer version of an interpreter that is not backwards compatible, I'd expect breakage regardless. The sane way to handle that is to install it as a different command. E.g. you have python version 2.x and install python 3, you install it as python3, not python. And as for /opt/someApp/bin, why on earth wouldn't it have sane permissions/ownership? any sane admin would ensure sane permissions/ownership on system files.

                    – geirha
                    Apr 10 '12 at 6:36








                  • 2





                    @pbr It seems we could go on forever, yes. I still fail to see why it's a bad idea to use PATH though. If you feel like discussing this further in a medium better suited for discussion, you'll find me in #ubuntu and #bash, among other channels, on irc.freenode.net

                    – geirha
                    Apr 11 '12 at 16:28














                  • 5





                    I think I just fell for this, and newline at end... double whammy.

                    – WernerCD
                    Jun 2 '11 at 4:22






                  • 5





                    +1 for env, I had completely forgotten about that command and thought PATH was working. It was actually sliiiightly different in my case.

                    – Izkata
                    Jan 18 '12 at 15:16






                  • 8





                    @pbr If such directories are left writable to others, the system is already compromized.

                    – geirha
                    Apr 9 '12 at 8:23






                  • 6





                    @pbr A sysadmin could unwittingly delete the root filesystem. You can't guard against sysadmins making silly mistakes. If you install a newer version of an interpreter that is not backwards compatible, I'd expect breakage regardless. The sane way to handle that is to install it as a different command. E.g. you have python version 2.x and install python 3, you install it as python3, not python. And as for /opt/someApp/bin, why on earth wouldn't it have sane permissions/ownership? any sane admin would ensure sane permissions/ownership on system files.

                    – geirha
                    Apr 10 '12 at 6:36








                  • 2





                    @pbr It seems we could go on forever, yes. I still fail to see why it's a bad idea to use PATH though. If you feel like discussing this further in a medium better suited for discussion, you'll find me in #ubuntu and #bash, among other channels, on irc.freenode.net

                    – geirha
                    Apr 11 '12 at 16:28








                  5




                  5





                  I think I just fell for this, and newline at end... double whammy.

                  – WernerCD
                  Jun 2 '11 at 4:22





                  I think I just fell for this, and newline at end... double whammy.

                  – WernerCD
                  Jun 2 '11 at 4:22




                  5




                  5





                  +1 for env, I had completely forgotten about that command and thought PATH was working. It was actually sliiiightly different in my case.

                  – Izkata
                  Jan 18 '12 at 15:16





                  +1 for env, I had completely forgotten about that command and thought PATH was working. It was actually sliiiightly different in my case.

                  – Izkata
                  Jan 18 '12 at 15:16




                  8




                  8





                  @pbr If such directories are left writable to others, the system is already compromized.

                  – geirha
                  Apr 9 '12 at 8:23





                  @pbr If such directories are left writable to others, the system is already compromized.

                  – geirha
                  Apr 9 '12 at 8:23




                  6




                  6





                  @pbr A sysadmin could unwittingly delete the root filesystem. You can't guard against sysadmins making silly mistakes. If you install a newer version of an interpreter that is not backwards compatible, I'd expect breakage regardless. The sane way to handle that is to install it as a different command. E.g. you have python version 2.x and install python 3, you install it as python3, not python. And as for /opt/someApp/bin, why on earth wouldn't it have sane permissions/ownership? any sane admin would ensure sane permissions/ownership on system files.

                  – geirha
                  Apr 10 '12 at 6:36







                  @pbr A sysadmin could unwittingly delete the root filesystem. You can't guard against sysadmins making silly mistakes. If you install a newer version of an interpreter that is not backwards compatible, I'd expect breakage regardless. The sane way to handle that is to install it as a different command. E.g. you have python version 2.x and install python 3, you install it as python3, not python. And as for /opt/someApp/bin, why on earth wouldn't it have sane permissions/ownership? any sane admin would ensure sane permissions/ownership on system files.

                  – geirha
                  Apr 10 '12 at 6:36






                  2




                  2





                  @pbr It seems we could go on forever, yes. I still fail to see why it's a bad idea to use PATH though. If you feel like discussing this further in a medium better suited for discussion, you'll find me in #ubuntu and #bash, among other channels, on irc.freenode.net

                  – geirha
                  Apr 11 '12 at 16:28





                  @pbr It seems we could go on forever, yes. I still fail to see why it's a bad idea to use PATH though. If you feel like discussing this further in a medium better suited for discussion, you'll find me in #ubuntu and #bash, among other channels, on irc.freenode.net

                  – geirha
                  Apr 11 '12 at 16:28













                  302














                  My top gotcha: If you forget to add a newline at the end of the crontab file. In other words, the crontab file should end with an empty line.



                  Below is the relevant section in the man pages for this issue (man crontab then skip to the end):



                     Although cron requires that each entry in a crontab end  in  a  newline
                  character, neither the crontab command nor the cron daemon will detect
                  this error. Instead, the crontab will appear to load normally. However,
                  the command will never run. The best choice is to ensure that your
                  crontab has a blank line at the end.

                  4th Berkeley Distribution 29 December 1993 CRONTAB(1)





                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 77





                    this is such a showstopper, how come it hasn't been fixed in so many years of cron?

                    – Capi Etheriel
                    Jan 27 '11 at 3:20








                  • 2





                    Seems to be fixed in Vixie cron: man crontab on Ubuntu 10.10 says "cron requires that each entry in a crontab end in a newline character. If the last entry in a crontab is missing the newline, cron will consider the crontab (at least partially) broken and refuse to install it." (And the date at the end is 19 April 2010.)

                    – Marius Gedminas
                    Feb 1 '11 at 22:58






                  • 18





                    @barraponto This is actually a bug in new text editors. The "newline" character is supposed to be a line termination character, so the final line in a text file is supposed to end in a newline character that doesn't get shown in the editor. Vi and vim use the character correctly, and cron was built before the new editors started their odd behavior... Hence playing it save and including a blank line.

                    – Izkata
                    Jan 18 '12 at 15:20






                  • 4





                    If you edit crontab using crontab -e it will check the syntax of the file before allowing a save, including a check for newline.

                    – Tom Harrison Jr
                    Sep 26 '14 at 18:26






                  • 2





                    @Chan-HoSuh, according to man page "cron requires that each entry in a crontab end in a newline character. If the last entry in a crontab is missing the newline, cron will consider the crontab (at least partially) broken and refuse to install it." This behavior will be invoked when editing then saving the crontab using the -e option, and is independent of the editor.

                    – Tom Harrison Jr
                    Nov 18 '14 at 16:40
















                  302














                  My top gotcha: If you forget to add a newline at the end of the crontab file. In other words, the crontab file should end with an empty line.



                  Below is the relevant section in the man pages for this issue (man crontab then skip to the end):



                     Although cron requires that each entry in a crontab end  in  a  newline
                  character, neither the crontab command nor the cron daemon will detect
                  this error. Instead, the crontab will appear to load normally. However,
                  the command will never run. The best choice is to ensure that your
                  crontab has a blank line at the end.

                  4th Berkeley Distribution 29 December 1993 CRONTAB(1)





                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 77





                    this is such a showstopper, how come it hasn't been fixed in so many years of cron?

                    – Capi Etheriel
                    Jan 27 '11 at 3:20








                  • 2





                    Seems to be fixed in Vixie cron: man crontab on Ubuntu 10.10 says "cron requires that each entry in a crontab end in a newline character. If the last entry in a crontab is missing the newline, cron will consider the crontab (at least partially) broken and refuse to install it." (And the date at the end is 19 April 2010.)

                    – Marius Gedminas
                    Feb 1 '11 at 22:58






                  • 18





                    @barraponto This is actually a bug in new text editors. The "newline" character is supposed to be a line termination character, so the final line in a text file is supposed to end in a newline character that doesn't get shown in the editor. Vi and vim use the character correctly, and cron was built before the new editors started their odd behavior... Hence playing it save and including a blank line.

                    – Izkata
                    Jan 18 '12 at 15:20






                  • 4





                    If you edit crontab using crontab -e it will check the syntax of the file before allowing a save, including a check for newline.

                    – Tom Harrison Jr
                    Sep 26 '14 at 18:26






                  • 2





                    @Chan-HoSuh, according to man page "cron requires that each entry in a crontab end in a newline character. If the last entry in a crontab is missing the newline, cron will consider the crontab (at least partially) broken and refuse to install it." This behavior will be invoked when editing then saving the crontab using the -e option, and is independent of the editor.

                    – Tom Harrison Jr
                    Nov 18 '14 at 16:40














                  302












                  302








                  302







                  My top gotcha: If you forget to add a newline at the end of the crontab file. In other words, the crontab file should end with an empty line.



                  Below is the relevant section in the man pages for this issue (man crontab then skip to the end):



                     Although cron requires that each entry in a crontab end  in  a  newline
                  character, neither the crontab command nor the cron daemon will detect
                  this error. Instead, the crontab will appear to load normally. However,
                  the command will never run. The best choice is to ensure that your
                  crontab has a blank line at the end.

                  4th Berkeley Distribution 29 December 1993 CRONTAB(1)





                  share|improve this answer















                  My top gotcha: If you forget to add a newline at the end of the crontab file. In other words, the crontab file should end with an empty line.



                  Below is the relevant section in the man pages for this issue (man crontab then skip to the end):



                     Although cron requires that each entry in a crontab end  in  a  newline
                  character, neither the crontab command nor the cron daemon will detect
                  this error. Instead, the crontab will appear to load normally. However,
                  the command will never run. The best choice is to ensure that your
                  crontab has a blank line at the end.

                  4th Berkeley Distribution 29 December 1993 CRONTAB(1)






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Feb 2 '11 at 20:32


























                  community wiki





                  4 revs, 3 users 88%
                  user4124










                  • 77





                    this is such a showstopper, how come it hasn't been fixed in so many years of cron?

                    – Capi Etheriel
                    Jan 27 '11 at 3:20








                  • 2





                    Seems to be fixed in Vixie cron: man crontab on Ubuntu 10.10 says "cron requires that each entry in a crontab end in a newline character. If the last entry in a crontab is missing the newline, cron will consider the crontab (at least partially) broken and refuse to install it." (And the date at the end is 19 April 2010.)

                    – Marius Gedminas
                    Feb 1 '11 at 22:58






                  • 18





                    @barraponto This is actually a bug in new text editors. The "newline" character is supposed to be a line termination character, so the final line in a text file is supposed to end in a newline character that doesn't get shown in the editor. Vi and vim use the character correctly, and cron was built before the new editors started their odd behavior... Hence playing it save and including a blank line.

                    – Izkata
                    Jan 18 '12 at 15:20






                  • 4





                    If you edit crontab using crontab -e it will check the syntax of the file before allowing a save, including a check for newline.

                    – Tom Harrison Jr
                    Sep 26 '14 at 18:26






                  • 2





                    @Chan-HoSuh, according to man page "cron requires that each entry in a crontab end in a newline character. If the last entry in a crontab is missing the newline, cron will consider the crontab (at least partially) broken and refuse to install it." This behavior will be invoked when editing then saving the crontab using the -e option, and is independent of the editor.

                    – Tom Harrison Jr
                    Nov 18 '14 at 16:40














                  • 77





                    this is such a showstopper, how come it hasn't been fixed in so many years of cron?

                    – Capi Etheriel
                    Jan 27 '11 at 3:20








                  • 2





                    Seems to be fixed in Vixie cron: man crontab on Ubuntu 10.10 says "cron requires that each entry in a crontab end in a newline character. If the last entry in a crontab is missing the newline, cron will consider the crontab (at least partially) broken and refuse to install it." (And the date at the end is 19 April 2010.)

                    – Marius Gedminas
                    Feb 1 '11 at 22:58






                  • 18





                    @barraponto This is actually a bug in new text editors. The "newline" character is supposed to be a line termination character, so the final line in a text file is supposed to end in a newline character that doesn't get shown in the editor. Vi and vim use the character correctly, and cron was built before the new editors started their odd behavior... Hence playing it save and including a blank line.

                    – Izkata
                    Jan 18 '12 at 15:20






                  • 4





                    If you edit crontab using crontab -e it will check the syntax of the file before allowing a save, including a check for newline.

                    – Tom Harrison Jr
                    Sep 26 '14 at 18:26






                  • 2





                    @Chan-HoSuh, according to man page "cron requires that each entry in a crontab end in a newline character. If the last entry in a crontab is missing the newline, cron will consider the crontab (at least partially) broken and refuse to install it." This behavior will be invoked when editing then saving the crontab using the -e option, and is independent of the editor.

                    – Tom Harrison Jr
                    Nov 18 '14 at 16:40








                  77




                  77





                  this is such a showstopper, how come it hasn't been fixed in so many years of cron?

                  – Capi Etheriel
                  Jan 27 '11 at 3:20







                  this is such a showstopper, how come it hasn't been fixed in so many years of cron?

                  – Capi Etheriel
                  Jan 27 '11 at 3:20






                  2




                  2





                  Seems to be fixed in Vixie cron: man crontab on Ubuntu 10.10 says "cron requires that each entry in a crontab end in a newline character. If the last entry in a crontab is missing the newline, cron will consider the crontab (at least partially) broken and refuse to install it." (And the date at the end is 19 April 2010.)

                  – Marius Gedminas
                  Feb 1 '11 at 22:58





                  Seems to be fixed in Vixie cron: man crontab on Ubuntu 10.10 says "cron requires that each entry in a crontab end in a newline character. If the last entry in a crontab is missing the newline, cron will consider the crontab (at least partially) broken and refuse to install it." (And the date at the end is 19 April 2010.)

                  – Marius Gedminas
                  Feb 1 '11 at 22:58




                  18




                  18





                  @barraponto This is actually a bug in new text editors. The "newline" character is supposed to be a line termination character, so the final line in a text file is supposed to end in a newline character that doesn't get shown in the editor. Vi and vim use the character correctly, and cron was built before the new editors started their odd behavior... Hence playing it save and including a blank line.

                  – Izkata
                  Jan 18 '12 at 15:20





                  @barraponto This is actually a bug in new text editors. The "newline" character is supposed to be a line termination character, so the final line in a text file is supposed to end in a newline character that doesn't get shown in the editor. Vi and vim use the character correctly, and cron was built before the new editors started their odd behavior... Hence playing it save and including a blank line.

                  – Izkata
                  Jan 18 '12 at 15:20




                  4




                  4





                  If you edit crontab using crontab -e it will check the syntax of the file before allowing a save, including a check for newline.

                  – Tom Harrison Jr
                  Sep 26 '14 at 18:26





                  If you edit crontab using crontab -e it will check the syntax of the file before allowing a save, including a check for newline.

                  – Tom Harrison Jr
                  Sep 26 '14 at 18:26




                  2




                  2





                  @Chan-HoSuh, according to man page "cron requires that each entry in a crontab end in a newline character. If the last entry in a crontab is missing the newline, cron will consider the crontab (at least partially) broken and refuse to install it." This behavior will be invoked when editing then saving the crontab using the -e option, and is independent of the editor.

                  – Tom Harrison Jr
                  Nov 18 '14 at 16:40





                  @Chan-HoSuh, according to man page "cron requires that each entry in a crontab end in a newline character. If the last entry in a crontab is missing the newline, cron will consider the crontab (at least partially) broken and refuse to install it." This behavior will be invoked when editing then saving the crontab using the -e option, and is independent of the editor.

                  – Tom Harrison Jr
                  Nov 18 '14 at 16:40











                  128














                  Cron daemon is not running. I really screwed up with this some months ago.



                  Type:



                  pgrep cron 


                  If you see no number, then cron is not running. sudo /etc/init.d/cron start can be used to start cron.



                  EDIT: Rather than invoking init scripts through /etc/init.d, use the service
                  utility, e.g.



                  sudo service cron start





                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 40





                    Thanks for showing me pgrep. I kept doing ps -ef | grep foo

                    – ripper234
                    Mar 17 '11 at 17:01






                  • 4





                    You could also use pidof cron which will omit results for other applications that also have the word 'cron', like crontab.

                    – Pithikos
                    Mar 11 '14 at 16:19













                  • Weird, all of these give me nothing to show cron is running, but if I run sudo service cron start I get start: Job is already running: cron

                    – Colleen
                    Apr 6 '15 at 17:04






                  • 1





                    service crond start if its centos/RHEL

                    – Srihari Karanth
                    Jan 18 '17 at 10:02
















                  128














                  Cron daemon is not running. I really screwed up with this some months ago.



                  Type:



                  pgrep cron 


                  If you see no number, then cron is not running. sudo /etc/init.d/cron start can be used to start cron.



                  EDIT: Rather than invoking init scripts through /etc/init.d, use the service
                  utility, e.g.



                  sudo service cron start





                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 40





                    Thanks for showing me pgrep. I kept doing ps -ef | grep foo

                    – ripper234
                    Mar 17 '11 at 17:01






                  • 4





                    You could also use pidof cron which will omit results for other applications that also have the word 'cron', like crontab.

                    – Pithikos
                    Mar 11 '14 at 16:19













                  • Weird, all of these give me nothing to show cron is running, but if I run sudo service cron start I get start: Job is already running: cron

                    – Colleen
                    Apr 6 '15 at 17:04






                  • 1





                    service crond start if its centos/RHEL

                    – Srihari Karanth
                    Jan 18 '17 at 10:02














                  128












                  128








                  128







                  Cron daemon is not running. I really screwed up with this some months ago.



                  Type:



                  pgrep cron 


                  If you see no number, then cron is not running. sudo /etc/init.d/cron start can be used to start cron.



                  EDIT: Rather than invoking init scripts through /etc/init.d, use the service
                  utility, e.g.



                  sudo service cron start





                  share|improve this answer















                  Cron daemon is not running. I really screwed up with this some months ago.



                  Type:



                  pgrep cron 


                  If you see no number, then cron is not running. sudo /etc/init.d/cron start can be used to start cron.



                  EDIT: Rather than invoking init scripts through /etc/init.d, use the service
                  utility, e.g.



                  sudo service cron start






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 26 '12 at 10:57


























                  community wiki





                  4 revs, 4 users 38%
                  user6019










                  • 40





                    Thanks for showing me pgrep. I kept doing ps -ef | grep foo

                    – ripper234
                    Mar 17 '11 at 17:01






                  • 4





                    You could also use pidof cron which will omit results for other applications that also have the word 'cron', like crontab.

                    – Pithikos
                    Mar 11 '14 at 16:19













                  • Weird, all of these give me nothing to show cron is running, but if I run sudo service cron start I get start: Job is already running: cron

                    – Colleen
                    Apr 6 '15 at 17:04






                  • 1





                    service crond start if its centos/RHEL

                    – Srihari Karanth
                    Jan 18 '17 at 10:02














                  • 40





                    Thanks for showing me pgrep. I kept doing ps -ef | grep foo

                    – ripper234
                    Mar 17 '11 at 17:01






                  • 4





                    You could also use pidof cron which will omit results for other applications that also have the word 'cron', like crontab.

                    – Pithikos
                    Mar 11 '14 at 16:19













                  • Weird, all of these give me nothing to show cron is running, but if I run sudo service cron start I get start: Job is already running: cron

                    – Colleen
                    Apr 6 '15 at 17:04






                  • 1





                    service crond start if its centos/RHEL

                    – Srihari Karanth
                    Jan 18 '17 at 10:02








                  40




                  40





                  Thanks for showing me pgrep. I kept doing ps -ef | grep foo

                  – ripper234
                  Mar 17 '11 at 17:01





                  Thanks for showing me pgrep. I kept doing ps -ef | grep foo

                  – ripper234
                  Mar 17 '11 at 17:01




                  4




                  4





                  You could also use pidof cron which will omit results for other applications that also have the word 'cron', like crontab.

                  – Pithikos
                  Mar 11 '14 at 16:19







                  You could also use pidof cron which will omit results for other applications that also have the word 'cron', like crontab.

                  – Pithikos
                  Mar 11 '14 at 16:19















                  Weird, all of these give me nothing to show cron is running, but if I run sudo service cron start I get start: Job is already running: cron

                  – Colleen
                  Apr 6 '15 at 17:04





                  Weird, all of these give me nothing to show cron is running, but if I run sudo service cron start I get start: Job is already running: cron

                  – Colleen
                  Apr 6 '15 at 17:04




                  1




                  1





                  service crond start if its centos/RHEL

                  – Srihari Karanth
                  Jan 18 '17 at 10:02





                  service crond start if its centos/RHEL

                  – Srihari Karanth
                  Jan 18 '17 at 10:02











                  86














                  The script filenames in cron.d/, cron.daily/, cron.hourly/, etc., should not contain dot (.), otherwise run-parts will skip them.



                  See run-parts(8):



                     If neither the --lsbsysinit option nor the --regex option is given then
                  the names must consist entirely of upper and lower case letters, dig‐
                  its, underscores, and hyphens.

                  If the --lsbsysinit option is given, then the names must not end in
                  .dpkg-old or .dpkg-dist or .dpkg-new or .dpkg-tmp, and must belong to
                  one or more of the following namespaces: the LANANA-assigned namespace
                  (^[a-z0-9]+$); the LSB hierarchical and reserved namespaces
                  (^_?([a-z0-9_.]+-)+[a-z0-9]+$); and the Debian cron script namespace
                  (^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$).


                  So, if you have a cron script backup.sh, analyze-logs.pl in cron.daily/ directory, you'd best to remove the extension names.






                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 10





                    It's a feature not a bug - it keeps things like myscript.backup or myscript.original or myscript.rpm-new from running right beside myscript.

                    – pbr
                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:45











                  • @pbr: makes sense. At least it would have been helpful for debugging if run-parts --test (or another imaginary option like --debug would output the files it skips including the reason.

                    – Rabarberski
                    May 30 '13 at 8:46








                  • 7





                    If this is a feature, it's not a nice one :( A lot of people use dot in file name (backup.sh is the most common one). If you want to a script to stop executing, the most logical method will be to remove it from "cron.d" directory.

                    – MatuDuke
                    May 16 '14 at 13:59








                  • 5





                    This is such a bad feature that it's effectively a bug. It's common practice to require a particular ending (like ".list" or ".cron" or something) if people want to make sure that things only get run when intended. Arbitrarily picking dot as a likely separator for ".bak" or ".temp" or whatever, is completely unpredictable except in the way that it will predictably confuse people. Legitimate endings like ".sh", and ".pl" have been in widespread use for decades. Lots of people use "_bak" or "_temp" or "-bak" instead of a dot, however. This is an awful design choice; it's a design bug at best.

                    – Teekin
                    May 10 '17 at 20:42


















                  86














                  The script filenames in cron.d/, cron.daily/, cron.hourly/, etc., should not contain dot (.), otherwise run-parts will skip them.



                  See run-parts(8):



                     If neither the --lsbsysinit option nor the --regex option is given then
                  the names must consist entirely of upper and lower case letters, dig‐
                  its, underscores, and hyphens.

                  If the --lsbsysinit option is given, then the names must not end in
                  .dpkg-old or .dpkg-dist or .dpkg-new or .dpkg-tmp, and must belong to
                  one or more of the following namespaces: the LANANA-assigned namespace
                  (^[a-z0-9]+$); the LSB hierarchical and reserved namespaces
                  (^_?([a-z0-9_.]+-)+[a-z0-9]+$); and the Debian cron script namespace
                  (^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$).


                  So, if you have a cron script backup.sh, analyze-logs.pl in cron.daily/ directory, you'd best to remove the extension names.






                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 10





                    It's a feature not a bug - it keeps things like myscript.backup or myscript.original or myscript.rpm-new from running right beside myscript.

                    – pbr
                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:45











                  • @pbr: makes sense. At least it would have been helpful for debugging if run-parts --test (or another imaginary option like --debug would output the files it skips including the reason.

                    – Rabarberski
                    May 30 '13 at 8:46








                  • 7





                    If this is a feature, it's not a nice one :( A lot of people use dot in file name (backup.sh is the most common one). If you want to a script to stop executing, the most logical method will be to remove it from "cron.d" directory.

                    – MatuDuke
                    May 16 '14 at 13:59








                  • 5





                    This is such a bad feature that it's effectively a bug. It's common practice to require a particular ending (like ".list" or ".cron" or something) if people want to make sure that things only get run when intended. Arbitrarily picking dot as a likely separator for ".bak" or ".temp" or whatever, is completely unpredictable except in the way that it will predictably confuse people. Legitimate endings like ".sh", and ".pl" have been in widespread use for decades. Lots of people use "_bak" or "_temp" or "-bak" instead of a dot, however. This is an awful design choice; it's a design bug at best.

                    – Teekin
                    May 10 '17 at 20:42
















                  86












                  86








                  86







                  The script filenames in cron.d/, cron.daily/, cron.hourly/, etc., should not contain dot (.), otherwise run-parts will skip them.



                  See run-parts(8):



                     If neither the --lsbsysinit option nor the --regex option is given then
                  the names must consist entirely of upper and lower case letters, dig‐
                  its, underscores, and hyphens.

                  If the --lsbsysinit option is given, then the names must not end in
                  .dpkg-old or .dpkg-dist or .dpkg-new or .dpkg-tmp, and must belong to
                  one or more of the following namespaces: the LANANA-assigned namespace
                  (^[a-z0-9]+$); the LSB hierarchical and reserved namespaces
                  (^_?([a-z0-9_.]+-)+[a-z0-9]+$); and the Debian cron script namespace
                  (^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$).


                  So, if you have a cron script backup.sh, analyze-logs.pl in cron.daily/ directory, you'd best to remove the extension names.






                  share|improve this answer















                  The script filenames in cron.d/, cron.daily/, cron.hourly/, etc., should not contain dot (.), otherwise run-parts will skip them.



                  See run-parts(8):



                     If neither the --lsbsysinit option nor the --regex option is given then
                  the names must consist entirely of upper and lower case letters, dig‐
                  its, underscores, and hyphens.

                  If the --lsbsysinit option is given, then the names must not end in
                  .dpkg-old or .dpkg-dist or .dpkg-new or .dpkg-tmp, and must belong to
                  one or more of the following namespaces: the LANANA-assigned namespace
                  (^[a-z0-9]+$); the LSB hierarchical and reserved namespaces
                  (^_?([a-z0-9_.]+-)+[a-z0-9]+$); and the Debian cron script namespace
                  (^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$).


                  So, if you have a cron script backup.sh, analyze-logs.pl in cron.daily/ directory, you'd best to remove the extension names.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 10 '17 at 15:20


























                  community wiki





                  3 revs, 3 users 91%
                  Xiè Jìléi









                  • 10





                    It's a feature not a bug - it keeps things like myscript.backup or myscript.original or myscript.rpm-new from running right beside myscript.

                    – pbr
                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:45











                  • @pbr: makes sense. At least it would have been helpful for debugging if run-parts --test (or another imaginary option like --debug would output the files it skips including the reason.

                    – Rabarberski
                    May 30 '13 at 8:46








                  • 7





                    If this is a feature, it's not a nice one :( A lot of people use dot in file name (backup.sh is the most common one). If you want to a script to stop executing, the most logical method will be to remove it from "cron.d" directory.

                    – MatuDuke
                    May 16 '14 at 13:59








                  • 5





                    This is such a bad feature that it's effectively a bug. It's common practice to require a particular ending (like ".list" or ".cron" or something) if people want to make sure that things only get run when intended. Arbitrarily picking dot as a likely separator for ".bak" or ".temp" or whatever, is completely unpredictable except in the way that it will predictably confuse people. Legitimate endings like ".sh", and ".pl" have been in widespread use for decades. Lots of people use "_bak" or "_temp" or "-bak" instead of a dot, however. This is an awful design choice; it's a design bug at best.

                    – Teekin
                    May 10 '17 at 20:42
















                  • 10





                    It's a feature not a bug - it keeps things like myscript.backup or myscript.original or myscript.rpm-new from running right beside myscript.

                    – pbr
                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:45











                  • @pbr: makes sense. At least it would have been helpful for debugging if run-parts --test (or another imaginary option like --debug would output the files it skips including the reason.

                    – Rabarberski
                    May 30 '13 at 8:46








                  • 7





                    If this is a feature, it's not a nice one :( A lot of people use dot in file name (backup.sh is the most common one). If you want to a script to stop executing, the most logical method will be to remove it from "cron.d" directory.

                    – MatuDuke
                    May 16 '14 at 13:59








                  • 5





                    This is such a bad feature that it's effectively a bug. It's common practice to require a particular ending (like ".list" or ".cron" or something) if people want to make sure that things only get run when intended. Arbitrarily picking dot as a likely separator for ".bak" or ".temp" or whatever, is completely unpredictable except in the way that it will predictably confuse people. Legitimate endings like ".sh", and ".pl" have been in widespread use for decades. Lots of people use "_bak" or "_temp" or "-bak" instead of a dot, however. This is an awful design choice; it's a design bug at best.

                    – Teekin
                    May 10 '17 at 20:42










                  10




                  10





                  It's a feature not a bug - it keeps things like myscript.backup or myscript.original or myscript.rpm-new from running right beside myscript.

                  – pbr
                  Apr 8 '12 at 22:45





                  It's a feature not a bug - it keeps things like myscript.backup or myscript.original or myscript.rpm-new from running right beside myscript.

                  – pbr
                  Apr 8 '12 at 22:45













                  @pbr: makes sense. At least it would have been helpful for debugging if run-parts --test (or another imaginary option like --debug would output the files it skips including the reason.

                  – Rabarberski
                  May 30 '13 at 8:46







                  @pbr: makes sense. At least it would have been helpful for debugging if run-parts --test (or another imaginary option like --debug would output the files it skips including the reason.

                  – Rabarberski
                  May 30 '13 at 8:46






                  7




                  7





                  If this is a feature, it's not a nice one :( A lot of people use dot in file name (backup.sh is the most common one). If you want to a script to stop executing, the most logical method will be to remove it from "cron.d" directory.

                  – MatuDuke
                  May 16 '14 at 13:59







                  If this is a feature, it's not a nice one :( A lot of people use dot in file name (backup.sh is the most common one). If you want to a script to stop executing, the most logical method will be to remove it from "cron.d" directory.

                  – MatuDuke
                  May 16 '14 at 13:59






                  5




                  5





                  This is such a bad feature that it's effectively a bug. It's common practice to require a particular ending (like ".list" or ".cron" or something) if people want to make sure that things only get run when intended. Arbitrarily picking dot as a likely separator for ".bak" or ".temp" or whatever, is completely unpredictable except in the way that it will predictably confuse people. Legitimate endings like ".sh", and ".pl" have been in widespread use for decades. Lots of people use "_bak" or "_temp" or "-bak" instead of a dot, however. This is an awful design choice; it's a design bug at best.

                  – Teekin
                  May 10 '17 at 20:42







                  This is such a bad feature that it's effectively a bug. It's common practice to require a particular ending (like ".list" or ".cron" or something) if people want to make sure that things only get run when intended. Arbitrarily picking dot as a likely separator for ".bak" or ".temp" or whatever, is completely unpredictable except in the way that it will predictably confuse people. Legitimate endings like ".sh", and ".pl" have been in widespread use for decades. Lots of people use "_bak" or "_temp" or "-bak" instead of a dot, however. This is an awful design choice; it's a design bug at best.

                  – Teekin
                  May 10 '17 at 20:42













                  57














                  In many environments cron executes commands using sh, while many people assume it will use bash.



                  Suggestions to test or fix this for a failing command:




                  • Try running the command in sh to see if it works

                  • Wrap the command in a bash subshell to make sure it gets run in bash:
                    bash -c "mybashcommand"

                  • Tell cron to run all commands in bash by setting the shell at the top of your crontab:
                    SHELL=/bin/bash

                  • If the command is a script, make sure the script contains a shebang:
                    #!/bin/bash






                  share|improve this answer


























                  • bash suggestion is very helpful, fixed issue with my cron.

                    – Maxim Galushka
                    Feb 18 '16 at 22:38











                  • This just caused me 1hr of fiddling/troubleshooting. Even more perplexing if you're not aware of the issue is the script will run manually just fine if you're typical shell is bash, but not with cron. Thanks!

                    – Hendy
                    Nov 22 '16 at 19:42











                  • A long time ago I ran into something related: The command source is in bash but not sh. In cron/sh, use a period: . envfile rather than source envfile.

                    – kungphu
                    Dec 22 '17 at 2:24
















                  57














                  In many environments cron executes commands using sh, while many people assume it will use bash.



                  Suggestions to test or fix this for a failing command:




                  • Try running the command in sh to see if it works

                  • Wrap the command in a bash subshell to make sure it gets run in bash:
                    bash -c "mybashcommand"

                  • Tell cron to run all commands in bash by setting the shell at the top of your crontab:
                    SHELL=/bin/bash

                  • If the command is a script, make sure the script contains a shebang:
                    #!/bin/bash






                  share|improve this answer


























                  • bash suggestion is very helpful, fixed issue with my cron.

                    – Maxim Galushka
                    Feb 18 '16 at 22:38











                  • This just caused me 1hr of fiddling/troubleshooting. Even more perplexing if you're not aware of the issue is the script will run manually just fine if you're typical shell is bash, but not with cron. Thanks!

                    – Hendy
                    Nov 22 '16 at 19:42











                  • A long time ago I ran into something related: The command source is in bash but not sh. In cron/sh, use a period: . envfile rather than source envfile.

                    – kungphu
                    Dec 22 '17 at 2:24














                  57












                  57








                  57







                  In many environments cron executes commands using sh, while many people assume it will use bash.



                  Suggestions to test or fix this for a failing command:




                  • Try running the command in sh to see if it works

                  • Wrap the command in a bash subshell to make sure it gets run in bash:
                    bash -c "mybashcommand"

                  • Tell cron to run all commands in bash by setting the shell at the top of your crontab:
                    SHELL=/bin/bash

                  • If the command is a script, make sure the script contains a shebang:
                    #!/bin/bash






                  share|improve this answer















                  In many environments cron executes commands using sh, while many people assume it will use bash.



                  Suggestions to test or fix this for a failing command:




                  • Try running the command in sh to see if it works

                  • Wrap the command in a bash subshell to make sure it gets run in bash:
                    bash -c "mybashcommand"

                  • Tell cron to run all commands in bash by setting the shell at the top of your crontab:
                    SHELL=/bin/bash

                  • If the command is a script, make sure the script contains a shebang:
                    #!/bin/bash







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  answered Jun 25 '11 at 19:30


























                  community wiki





                  Ian Mackinnon














                  • bash suggestion is very helpful, fixed issue with my cron.

                    – Maxim Galushka
                    Feb 18 '16 at 22:38











                  • This just caused me 1hr of fiddling/troubleshooting. Even more perplexing if you're not aware of the issue is the script will run manually just fine if you're typical shell is bash, but not with cron. Thanks!

                    – Hendy
                    Nov 22 '16 at 19:42











                  • A long time ago I ran into something related: The command source is in bash but not sh. In cron/sh, use a period: . envfile rather than source envfile.

                    – kungphu
                    Dec 22 '17 at 2:24



















                  • bash suggestion is very helpful, fixed issue with my cron.

                    – Maxim Galushka
                    Feb 18 '16 at 22:38











                  • This just caused me 1hr of fiddling/troubleshooting. Even more perplexing if you're not aware of the issue is the script will run manually just fine if you're typical shell is bash, but not with cron. Thanks!

                    – Hendy
                    Nov 22 '16 at 19:42











                  • A long time ago I ran into something related: The command source is in bash but not sh. In cron/sh, use a period: . envfile rather than source envfile.

                    – kungphu
                    Dec 22 '17 at 2:24

















                  bash suggestion is very helpful, fixed issue with my cron.

                  – Maxim Galushka
                  Feb 18 '16 at 22:38





                  bash suggestion is very helpful, fixed issue with my cron.

                  – Maxim Galushka
                  Feb 18 '16 at 22:38













                  This just caused me 1hr of fiddling/troubleshooting. Even more perplexing if you're not aware of the issue is the script will run manually just fine if you're typical shell is bash, but not with cron. Thanks!

                  – Hendy
                  Nov 22 '16 at 19:42





                  This just caused me 1hr of fiddling/troubleshooting. Even more perplexing if you're not aware of the issue is the script will run manually just fine if you're typical shell is bash, but not with cron. Thanks!

                  – Hendy
                  Nov 22 '16 at 19:42













                  A long time ago I ran into something related: The command source is in bash but not sh. In cron/sh, use a period: . envfile rather than source envfile.

                  – kungphu
                  Dec 22 '17 at 2:24





                  A long time ago I ran into something related: The command source is in bash but not sh. In cron/sh, use a period: . envfile rather than source envfile.

                  – kungphu
                  Dec 22 '17 at 2:24











                  34














                  I had some issues with the time zones. Cron was running with the fresh installation time zone. The solution was to restart cron:



                  sudo service cron restart





                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 6





                    Yes, after changing the timezone on a system, one must either restart every service that cares about what time it is, or reboot. I prefer the reboot, to be sure I've caught everything.

                    – pbr
                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:48











                  • Oh for God's sake, killed hours on this. Tried service restart after * * * * * touch /tmp/cronworks did nothing, yet there is RELOAD at cronlog.

                    – НЛО
                    Oct 1 '14 at 3:57
















                  34














                  I had some issues with the time zones. Cron was running with the fresh installation time zone. The solution was to restart cron:



                  sudo service cron restart





                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 6





                    Yes, after changing the timezone on a system, one must either restart every service that cares about what time it is, or reboot. I prefer the reboot, to be sure I've caught everything.

                    – pbr
                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:48











                  • Oh for God's sake, killed hours on this. Tried service restart after * * * * * touch /tmp/cronworks did nothing, yet there is RELOAD at cronlog.

                    – НЛО
                    Oct 1 '14 at 3:57














                  34












                  34








                  34







                  I had some issues with the time zones. Cron was running with the fresh installation time zone. The solution was to restart cron:



                  sudo service cron restart





                  share|improve this answer















                  I had some issues with the time zones. Cron was running with the fresh installation time zone. The solution was to restart cron:



                  sudo service cron restart






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  answered Feb 7 '12 at 14:49


























                  community wiki





                  luissquall









                  • 6





                    Yes, after changing the timezone on a system, one must either restart every service that cares about what time it is, or reboot. I prefer the reboot, to be sure I've caught everything.

                    – pbr
                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:48











                  • Oh for God's sake, killed hours on this. Tried service restart after * * * * * touch /tmp/cronworks did nothing, yet there is RELOAD at cronlog.

                    – НЛО
                    Oct 1 '14 at 3:57














                  • 6





                    Yes, after changing the timezone on a system, one must either restart every service that cares about what time it is, or reboot. I prefer the reboot, to be sure I've caught everything.

                    – pbr
                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:48











                  • Oh for God's sake, killed hours on this. Tried service restart after * * * * * touch /tmp/cronworks did nothing, yet there is RELOAD at cronlog.

                    – НЛО
                    Oct 1 '14 at 3:57








                  6




                  6





                  Yes, after changing the timezone on a system, one must either restart every service that cares about what time it is, or reboot. I prefer the reboot, to be sure I've caught everything.

                  – pbr
                  Apr 8 '12 at 22:48





                  Yes, after changing the timezone on a system, one must either restart every service that cares about what time it is, or reboot. I prefer the reboot, to be sure I've caught everything.

                  – pbr
                  Apr 8 '12 at 22:48













                  Oh for God's sake, killed hours on this. Tried service restart after * * * * * touch /tmp/cronworks did nothing, yet there is RELOAD at cronlog.

                  – НЛО
                  Oct 1 '14 at 3:57





                  Oh for God's sake, killed hours on this. Tried service restart after * * * * * touch /tmp/cronworks did nothing, yet there is RELOAD at cronlog.

                  – НЛО
                  Oct 1 '14 at 3:57











                  30














                  Absolute path should be used for scripts:



                  For example, /bin/grep should be used instead of grep:



                  # m h  dom mon dow   command
                  0 0 * * * /bin/grep ERROR /home/adam/run.log &> /tmp/errors


                  Instead of:



                  # m h  dom mon dow   command
                  0 0 * * * grep ERROR /home/adam/run.log &> /tmp/errors


                  This is especially tricky, because the same command will work when executed from shell. The reason is that cron does not have the same PATH environment variable as the user.






                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 3





                    see geirha answer, you can (must) define cron's PATH

                    – Capi Etheriel
                    Jan 27 '11 at 3:22






                  • 9





                    Bzzt. you do NOT need to define the PATH - using absolute paths is the best practice here. "because an executable may be elsewhere on some other computer" doesn't trump "I want it to run exactly this program and not some other one someone put in the path in front of my original program"

                    – pbr
                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:55






                  • 1





                    yep this was it for me, outside the cron I could run the command directly, inside the cron it needed full /usr/bin/whatever path

                    – Anentropic
                    Aug 14 '16 at 10:56
















                  30














                  Absolute path should be used for scripts:



                  For example, /bin/grep should be used instead of grep:



                  # m h  dom mon dow   command
                  0 0 * * * /bin/grep ERROR /home/adam/run.log &> /tmp/errors


                  Instead of:



                  # m h  dom mon dow   command
                  0 0 * * * grep ERROR /home/adam/run.log &> /tmp/errors


                  This is especially tricky, because the same command will work when executed from shell. The reason is that cron does not have the same PATH environment variable as the user.






                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 3





                    see geirha answer, you can (must) define cron's PATH

                    – Capi Etheriel
                    Jan 27 '11 at 3:22






                  • 9





                    Bzzt. you do NOT need to define the PATH - using absolute paths is the best practice here. "because an executable may be elsewhere on some other computer" doesn't trump "I want it to run exactly this program and not some other one someone put in the path in front of my original program"

                    – pbr
                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:55






                  • 1





                    yep this was it for me, outside the cron I could run the command directly, inside the cron it needed full /usr/bin/whatever path

                    – Anentropic
                    Aug 14 '16 at 10:56














                  30












                  30








                  30







                  Absolute path should be used for scripts:



                  For example, /bin/grep should be used instead of grep:



                  # m h  dom mon dow   command
                  0 0 * * * /bin/grep ERROR /home/adam/run.log &> /tmp/errors


                  Instead of:



                  # m h  dom mon dow   command
                  0 0 * * * grep ERROR /home/adam/run.log &> /tmp/errors


                  This is especially tricky, because the same command will work when executed from shell. The reason is that cron does not have the same PATH environment variable as the user.






                  share|improve this answer















                  Absolute path should be used for scripts:



                  For example, /bin/grep should be used instead of grep:



                  # m h  dom mon dow   command
                  0 0 * * * /bin/grep ERROR /home/adam/run.log &> /tmp/errors


                  Instead of:



                  # m h  dom mon dow   command
                  0 0 * * * grep ERROR /home/adam/run.log &> /tmp/errors


                  This is especially tricky, because the same command will work when executed from shell. The reason is that cron does not have the same PATH environment variable as the user.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  answered Jan 24 '11 at 10:02


























                  community wiki





                  Adam Matan









                  • 3





                    see geirha answer, you can (must) define cron's PATH

                    – Capi Etheriel
                    Jan 27 '11 at 3:22






                  • 9





                    Bzzt. you do NOT need to define the PATH - using absolute paths is the best practice here. "because an executable may be elsewhere on some other computer" doesn't trump "I want it to run exactly this program and not some other one someone put in the path in front of my original program"

                    – pbr
                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:55






                  • 1





                    yep this was it for me, outside the cron I could run the command directly, inside the cron it needed full /usr/bin/whatever path

                    – Anentropic
                    Aug 14 '16 at 10:56














                  • 3





                    see geirha answer, you can (must) define cron's PATH

                    – Capi Etheriel
                    Jan 27 '11 at 3:22






                  • 9





                    Bzzt. you do NOT need to define the PATH - using absolute paths is the best practice here. "because an executable may be elsewhere on some other computer" doesn't trump "I want it to run exactly this program and not some other one someone put in the path in front of my original program"

                    – pbr
                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:55






                  • 1





                    yep this was it for me, outside the cron I could run the command directly, inside the cron it needed full /usr/bin/whatever path

                    – Anentropic
                    Aug 14 '16 at 10:56








                  3




                  3





                  see geirha answer, you can (must) define cron's PATH

                  – Capi Etheriel
                  Jan 27 '11 at 3:22





                  see geirha answer, you can (must) define cron's PATH

                  – Capi Etheriel
                  Jan 27 '11 at 3:22




                  9




                  9





                  Bzzt. you do NOT need to define the PATH - using absolute paths is the best practice here. "because an executable may be elsewhere on some other computer" doesn't trump "I want it to run exactly this program and not some other one someone put in the path in front of my original program"

                  – pbr
                  Apr 8 '12 at 22:55





                  Bzzt. you do NOT need to define the PATH - using absolute paths is the best practice here. "because an executable may be elsewhere on some other computer" doesn't trump "I want it to run exactly this program and not some other one someone put in the path in front of my original program"

                  – pbr
                  Apr 8 '12 at 22:55




                  1




                  1





                  yep this was it for me, outside the cron I could run the command directly, inside the cron it needed full /usr/bin/whatever path

                  – Anentropic
                  Aug 14 '16 at 10:56





                  yep this was it for me, outside the cron I could run the command directly, inside the cron it needed full /usr/bin/whatever path

                  – Anentropic
                  Aug 14 '16 at 10:56











                  30














                  If your crontab command has a % symbol in it, cron tries to interpret it. So if you were using any command with a % in it (such as a format specification to the date command) you will need to escape it.



                  That and other good gotchas here:
                  http://www.pantz.org/software/cron/croninfo.html






                  share|improve this answer


























                  • This is what has been causing my Cron job to fail for the last week. Finally figured out that my Date didn't have an escape character (backslash for any other folks looking for what the escape character is). Yay!

                    – Valien
                    Oct 14 '13 at 14:27








                  • 2





                    See also How can I execute date inside of a cron tab job?

                    – Jared Beck
                    Apr 16 '15 at 20:49











                  • This one bit me as well. Thanks!

                    – stefansundin
                    Jan 1 '17 at 21:54
















                  30














                  If your crontab command has a % symbol in it, cron tries to interpret it. So if you were using any command with a % in it (such as a format specification to the date command) you will need to escape it.



                  That and other good gotchas here:
                  http://www.pantz.org/software/cron/croninfo.html






                  share|improve this answer


























                  • This is what has been causing my Cron job to fail for the last week. Finally figured out that my Date didn't have an escape character (backslash for any other folks looking for what the escape character is). Yay!

                    – Valien
                    Oct 14 '13 at 14:27








                  • 2





                    See also How can I execute date inside of a cron tab job?

                    – Jared Beck
                    Apr 16 '15 at 20:49











                  • This one bit me as well. Thanks!

                    – stefansundin
                    Jan 1 '17 at 21:54














                  30












                  30








                  30







                  If your crontab command has a % symbol in it, cron tries to interpret it. So if you were using any command with a % in it (such as a format specification to the date command) you will need to escape it.



                  That and other good gotchas here:
                  http://www.pantz.org/software/cron/croninfo.html






                  share|improve this answer















                  If your crontab command has a % symbol in it, cron tries to interpret it. So if you were using any command with a % in it (such as a format specification to the date command) you will need to escape it.



                  That and other good gotchas here:
                  http://www.pantz.org/software/cron/croninfo.html







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Aug 26 '12 at 6:59


























                  community wiki





                  2 revs, 2 users 75%
                  JMS















                  • This is what has been causing my Cron job to fail for the last week. Finally figured out that my Date didn't have an escape character (backslash for any other folks looking for what the escape character is). Yay!

                    – Valien
                    Oct 14 '13 at 14:27








                  • 2





                    See also How can I execute date inside of a cron tab job?

                    – Jared Beck
                    Apr 16 '15 at 20:49











                  • This one bit me as well. Thanks!

                    – stefansundin
                    Jan 1 '17 at 21:54



















                  • This is what has been causing my Cron job to fail for the last week. Finally figured out that my Date didn't have an escape character (backslash for any other folks looking for what the escape character is). Yay!

                    – Valien
                    Oct 14 '13 at 14:27








                  • 2





                    See also How can I execute date inside of a cron tab job?

                    – Jared Beck
                    Apr 16 '15 at 20:49











                  • This one bit me as well. Thanks!

                    – stefansundin
                    Jan 1 '17 at 21:54

















                  This is what has been causing my Cron job to fail for the last week. Finally figured out that my Date didn't have an escape character (backslash for any other folks looking for what the escape character is). Yay!

                  – Valien
                  Oct 14 '13 at 14:27







                  This is what has been causing my Cron job to fail for the last week. Finally figured out that my Date didn't have an escape character (backslash for any other folks looking for what the escape character is). Yay!

                  – Valien
                  Oct 14 '13 at 14:27






                  2




                  2





                  See also How can I execute date inside of a cron tab job?

                  – Jared Beck
                  Apr 16 '15 at 20:49





                  See also How can I execute date inside of a cron tab job?

                  – Jared Beck
                  Apr 16 '15 at 20:49













                  This one bit me as well. Thanks!

                  – stefansundin
                  Jan 1 '17 at 21:54





                  This one bit me as well. Thanks!

                  – stefansundin
                  Jan 1 '17 at 21:54











                  24














                  It is also possible that the user's password has expired. Even root's password can expire. You can tail -f /var/log/cron.log and you will see cron fail with password expired. You can set the password to never expire by doing this: passwd -x -1 <username>



                  In some systems (Debian, Ubuntu) logging for cron is not enabled by default. In /etc/rsyslog.conf or /etc/rsyslog.d/50-default.conf the line:



                  # cron.*                          /var/log/cron.log


                  should be edited (sudo nano /etc/rsyslog.conf) uncommented to:



                  cron.*                          /var/log/cron.log


                  After that, you need to restart rsyslog via



                  /etc/init.d/rsyslog restart


                  or



                  service rsyslog restart 


                  Source: Enable crontab logging in Debian Linux



                  In some systems (Ubuntu) separate logging file for cron is not enabled by default, but cron related logs are appearing in syslog file. One may use



                  cat /var/log/syslog | grep cron -i


                  to view cron-related messages.






                  share|improve this answer


























                  • I have Debian (wheezy) but there is no /etc/init.d/rsyslog, only inetutils-syslogd and sysklogd. Do I have to install something or just restart one of the two?

                    – hgoebl
                    Oct 21 '16 at 11:41
















                  24














                  It is also possible that the user's password has expired. Even root's password can expire. You can tail -f /var/log/cron.log and you will see cron fail with password expired. You can set the password to never expire by doing this: passwd -x -1 <username>



                  In some systems (Debian, Ubuntu) logging for cron is not enabled by default. In /etc/rsyslog.conf or /etc/rsyslog.d/50-default.conf the line:



                  # cron.*                          /var/log/cron.log


                  should be edited (sudo nano /etc/rsyslog.conf) uncommented to:



                  cron.*                          /var/log/cron.log


                  After that, you need to restart rsyslog via



                  /etc/init.d/rsyslog restart


                  or



                  service rsyslog restart 


                  Source: Enable crontab logging in Debian Linux



                  In some systems (Ubuntu) separate logging file for cron is not enabled by default, but cron related logs are appearing in syslog file. One may use



                  cat /var/log/syslog | grep cron -i


                  to view cron-related messages.






                  share|improve this answer


























                  • I have Debian (wheezy) but there is no /etc/init.d/rsyslog, only inetutils-syslogd and sysklogd. Do I have to install something or just restart one of the two?

                    – hgoebl
                    Oct 21 '16 at 11:41














                  24












                  24








                  24







                  It is also possible that the user's password has expired. Even root's password can expire. You can tail -f /var/log/cron.log and you will see cron fail with password expired. You can set the password to never expire by doing this: passwd -x -1 <username>



                  In some systems (Debian, Ubuntu) logging for cron is not enabled by default. In /etc/rsyslog.conf or /etc/rsyslog.d/50-default.conf the line:



                  # cron.*                          /var/log/cron.log


                  should be edited (sudo nano /etc/rsyslog.conf) uncommented to:



                  cron.*                          /var/log/cron.log


                  After that, you need to restart rsyslog via



                  /etc/init.d/rsyslog restart


                  or



                  service rsyslog restart 


                  Source: Enable crontab logging in Debian Linux



                  In some systems (Ubuntu) separate logging file for cron is not enabled by default, but cron related logs are appearing in syslog file. One may use



                  cat /var/log/syslog | grep cron -i


                  to view cron-related messages.






                  share|improve this answer















                  It is also possible that the user's password has expired. Even root's password can expire. You can tail -f /var/log/cron.log and you will see cron fail with password expired. You can set the password to never expire by doing this: passwd -x -1 <username>



                  In some systems (Debian, Ubuntu) logging for cron is not enabled by default. In /etc/rsyslog.conf or /etc/rsyslog.d/50-default.conf the line:



                  # cron.*                          /var/log/cron.log


                  should be edited (sudo nano /etc/rsyslog.conf) uncommented to:



                  cron.*                          /var/log/cron.log


                  After that, you need to restart rsyslog via



                  /etc/init.d/rsyslog restart


                  or



                  service rsyslog restart 


                  Source: Enable crontab logging in Debian Linux



                  In some systems (Ubuntu) separate logging file for cron is not enabled by default, but cron related logs are appearing in syslog file. One may use



                  cat /var/log/syslog | grep cron -i


                  to view cron-related messages.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 4 hours ago


























                  community wiki





                  7 revs, 6 users 33%
                  unknown














                  • I have Debian (wheezy) but there is no /etc/init.d/rsyslog, only inetutils-syslogd and sysklogd. Do I have to install something or just restart one of the two?

                    – hgoebl
                    Oct 21 '16 at 11:41



















                  • I have Debian (wheezy) but there is no /etc/init.d/rsyslog, only inetutils-syslogd and sysklogd. Do I have to install something or just restart one of the two?

                    – hgoebl
                    Oct 21 '16 at 11:41

















                  I have Debian (wheezy) but there is no /etc/init.d/rsyslog, only inetutils-syslogd and sysklogd. Do I have to install something or just restart one of the two?

                  – hgoebl
                  Oct 21 '16 at 11:41





                  I have Debian (wheezy) but there is no /etc/init.d/rsyslog, only inetutils-syslogd and sysklogd. Do I have to install something or just restart one of the two?

                  – hgoebl
                  Oct 21 '16 at 11:41











                  22














                  Cron is calling a script which is not executable.



                  By running chmod +x /path/to/scrip the script becomes executable and should resolve this issue.






                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 4





                    That's not unique to cron, and easily traceable by simply trying to execute /path/to/script from the command line.

                    – Adam Matan
                    Jan 27 '11 at 6:33






                  • 2





                    If you're used to executing scripts with . scriptname or sh scriptname or bash scriptname, then this becomes a cron-specific problem.

                    – Eliah Kagan
                    Nov 24 '11 at 23:09
















                  22














                  Cron is calling a script which is not executable.



                  By running chmod +x /path/to/scrip the script becomes executable and should resolve this issue.






                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 4





                    That's not unique to cron, and easily traceable by simply trying to execute /path/to/script from the command line.

                    – Adam Matan
                    Jan 27 '11 at 6:33






                  • 2





                    If you're used to executing scripts with . scriptname or sh scriptname or bash scriptname, then this becomes a cron-specific problem.

                    – Eliah Kagan
                    Nov 24 '11 at 23:09














                  22












                  22








                  22







                  Cron is calling a script which is not executable.



                  By running chmod +x /path/to/scrip the script becomes executable and should resolve this issue.






                  share|improve this answer















                  Cron is calling a script which is not executable.



                  By running chmod +x /path/to/scrip the script becomes executable and should resolve this issue.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 26 '11 at 18:24


























                  community wiki





                  2 revs, 2 users 75%
                  jet










                  • 4





                    That's not unique to cron, and easily traceable by simply trying to execute /path/to/script from the command line.

                    – Adam Matan
                    Jan 27 '11 at 6:33






                  • 2





                    If you're used to executing scripts with . scriptname or sh scriptname or bash scriptname, then this becomes a cron-specific problem.

                    – Eliah Kagan
                    Nov 24 '11 at 23:09














                  • 4





                    That's not unique to cron, and easily traceable by simply trying to execute /path/to/script from the command line.

                    – Adam Matan
                    Jan 27 '11 at 6:33






                  • 2





                    If you're used to executing scripts with . scriptname or sh scriptname or bash scriptname, then this becomes a cron-specific problem.

                    – Eliah Kagan
                    Nov 24 '11 at 23:09








                  4




                  4





                  That's not unique to cron, and easily traceable by simply trying to execute /path/to/script from the command line.

                  – Adam Matan
                  Jan 27 '11 at 6:33





                  That's not unique to cron, and easily traceable by simply trying to execute /path/to/script from the command line.

                  – Adam Matan
                  Jan 27 '11 at 6:33




                  2




                  2





                  If you're used to executing scripts with . scriptname or sh scriptname or bash scriptname, then this becomes a cron-specific problem.

                  – Eliah Kagan
                  Nov 24 '11 at 23:09





                  If you're used to executing scripts with . scriptname or sh scriptname or bash scriptname, then this becomes a cron-specific problem.

                  – Eliah Kagan
                  Nov 24 '11 at 23:09











                  17














                  If your cronjob invokes GUI-apps, you need to tell them what DISPLAY they should use.



                  Example: Firefox launch with cron.



                  Your script should contain export DISPLAY=:0 somewhere.






                  share|improve this answer


























                  • aplay needed this one for some reason. thank you

                    – IljaBek
                    Oct 2 '16 at 10:47











                  • * * * * * export DISPLAY=:0 && <command>

                    – LoMaPh
                    Jul 27 '17 at 22:27


















                  17














                  If your cronjob invokes GUI-apps, you need to tell them what DISPLAY they should use.



                  Example: Firefox launch with cron.



                  Your script should contain export DISPLAY=:0 somewhere.






                  share|improve this answer


























                  • aplay needed this one for some reason. thank you

                    – IljaBek
                    Oct 2 '16 at 10:47











                  • * * * * * export DISPLAY=:0 && <command>

                    – LoMaPh
                    Jul 27 '17 at 22:27
















                  17












                  17








                  17







                  If your cronjob invokes GUI-apps, you need to tell them what DISPLAY they should use.



                  Example: Firefox launch with cron.



                  Your script should contain export DISPLAY=:0 somewhere.






                  share|improve this answer















                  If your cronjob invokes GUI-apps, you need to tell them what DISPLAY they should use.



                  Example: Firefox launch with cron.



                  Your script should contain export DISPLAY=:0 somewhere.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Jul 26 '12 at 15:46


























                  community wiki





                  2 revs, 2 users 77%
                  andrew















                  • aplay needed this one for some reason. thank you

                    – IljaBek
                    Oct 2 '16 at 10:47











                  • * * * * * export DISPLAY=:0 && <command>

                    – LoMaPh
                    Jul 27 '17 at 22:27





















                  • aplay needed this one for some reason. thank you

                    – IljaBek
                    Oct 2 '16 at 10:47











                  • * * * * * export DISPLAY=:0 && <command>

                    – LoMaPh
                    Jul 27 '17 at 22:27



















                  aplay needed this one for some reason. thank you

                  – IljaBek
                  Oct 2 '16 at 10:47





                  aplay needed this one for some reason. thank you

                  – IljaBek
                  Oct 2 '16 at 10:47













                  * * * * * export DISPLAY=:0 && <command>

                  – LoMaPh
                  Jul 27 '17 at 22:27







                  * * * * * export DISPLAY=:0 && <command>

                  – LoMaPh
                  Jul 27 '17 at 22:27













                  14














                  Permissions problems are quite common, I'm afraid.



                  Note that a common workaround is to execute everything using root's crontab, which sometimes is a Really Bad Idea. Setting proper permissions is definitely a largely overlooked issue.






                  share|improve this answer


























                  • Note that if you have a crontab line that is set to pipe output to a file that does not yet exist, and the directory for the file is one that the cron user doesn't have access to, then the line will not execute.

                    – Evan Donovan
                    Sep 10 '15 at 16:51
















                  14














                  Permissions problems are quite common, I'm afraid.



                  Note that a common workaround is to execute everything using root's crontab, which sometimes is a Really Bad Idea. Setting proper permissions is definitely a largely overlooked issue.






                  share|improve this answer


























                  • Note that if you have a crontab line that is set to pipe output to a file that does not yet exist, and the directory for the file is one that the cron user doesn't have access to, then the line will not execute.

                    – Evan Donovan
                    Sep 10 '15 at 16:51














                  14












                  14








                  14







                  Permissions problems are quite common, I'm afraid.



                  Note that a common workaround is to execute everything using root's crontab, which sometimes is a Really Bad Idea. Setting proper permissions is definitely a largely overlooked issue.






                  share|improve this answer















                  Permissions problems are quite common, I'm afraid.



                  Note that a common workaround is to execute everything using root's crontab, which sometimes is a Really Bad Idea. Setting proper permissions is definitely a largely overlooked issue.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  answered Jan 26 '11 at 15:53


























                  community wiki





                  user9521














                  • Note that if you have a crontab line that is set to pipe output to a file that does not yet exist, and the directory for the file is one that the cron user doesn't have access to, then the line will not execute.

                    – Evan Donovan
                    Sep 10 '15 at 16:51



















                  • Note that if you have a crontab line that is set to pipe output to a file that does not yet exist, and the directory for the file is one that the cron user doesn't have access to, then the line will not execute.

                    – Evan Donovan
                    Sep 10 '15 at 16:51

















                  Note that if you have a crontab line that is set to pipe output to a file that does not yet exist, and the directory for the file is one that the cron user doesn't have access to, then the line will not execute.

                  – Evan Donovan
                  Sep 10 '15 at 16:51





                  Note that if you have a crontab line that is set to pipe output to a file that does not yet exist, and the directory for the file is one that the cron user doesn't have access to, then the line will not execute.

                  – Evan Donovan
                  Sep 10 '15 at 16:51











                  13














                  Insecure cron table permission



                  A cron table is rejected if its permission is insecure



                  sudo service cron restart
                  grep -i cron /var/log/syslog|tail -2
                  2013-02-05T03:47:49.283841+01:00 ubuntu cron[49906]: (user) INSECURE MODE (mode 0600 expected) (crontabs/user)


                  The problem is solved with



                  # correct permission
                  sudo chmod 600 /var/spool/cron/crontabs/user
                  # signal crond to reload the file
                  sudo touch /var/spool/cron/crontabs





                  share|improve this answer


























                  • First I figured it out myself and then I found your answer! Still thanks a lot! In my case, I had reverted/restored some crontabs in /var/spool/cron/crontabs via SVN which changed its permissions!

                    – alfonx
                    Jun 8 '13 at 20:40
















                  13














                  Insecure cron table permission



                  A cron table is rejected if its permission is insecure



                  sudo service cron restart
                  grep -i cron /var/log/syslog|tail -2
                  2013-02-05T03:47:49.283841+01:00 ubuntu cron[49906]: (user) INSECURE MODE (mode 0600 expected) (crontabs/user)


                  The problem is solved with



                  # correct permission
                  sudo chmod 600 /var/spool/cron/crontabs/user
                  # signal crond to reload the file
                  sudo touch /var/spool/cron/crontabs





                  share|improve this answer


























                  • First I figured it out myself and then I found your answer! Still thanks a lot! In my case, I had reverted/restored some crontabs in /var/spool/cron/crontabs via SVN which changed its permissions!

                    – alfonx
                    Jun 8 '13 at 20:40














                  13












                  13








                  13







                  Insecure cron table permission



                  A cron table is rejected if its permission is insecure



                  sudo service cron restart
                  grep -i cron /var/log/syslog|tail -2
                  2013-02-05T03:47:49.283841+01:00 ubuntu cron[49906]: (user) INSECURE MODE (mode 0600 expected) (crontabs/user)


                  The problem is solved with



                  # correct permission
                  sudo chmod 600 /var/spool/cron/crontabs/user
                  # signal crond to reload the file
                  sudo touch /var/spool/cron/crontabs





                  share|improve this answer















                  Insecure cron table permission



                  A cron table is rejected if its permission is insecure



                  sudo service cron restart
                  grep -i cron /var/log/syslog|tail -2
                  2013-02-05T03:47:49.283841+01:00 ubuntu cron[49906]: (user) INSECURE MODE (mode 0600 expected) (crontabs/user)


                  The problem is solved with



                  # correct permission
                  sudo chmod 600 /var/spool/cron/crontabs/user
                  # signal crond to reload the file
                  sudo touch /var/spool/cron/crontabs






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Jun 15 '13 at 3:12


























                  community wiki





                  4 revs
                  John Peterson














                  • First I figured it out myself and then I found your answer! Still thanks a lot! In my case, I had reverted/restored some crontabs in /var/spool/cron/crontabs via SVN which changed its permissions!

                    – alfonx
                    Jun 8 '13 at 20:40



















                  • First I figured it out myself and then I found your answer! Still thanks a lot! In my case, I had reverted/restored some crontabs in /var/spool/cron/crontabs via SVN which changed its permissions!

                    – alfonx
                    Jun 8 '13 at 20:40

















                  First I figured it out myself and then I found your answer! Still thanks a lot! In my case, I had reverted/restored some crontabs in /var/spool/cron/crontabs via SVN which changed its permissions!

                  – alfonx
                  Jun 8 '13 at 20:40





                  First I figured it out myself and then I found your answer! Still thanks a lot! In my case, I had reverted/restored some crontabs in /var/spool/cron/crontabs via SVN which changed its permissions!

                  – alfonx
                  Jun 8 '13 at 20:40











                  11














                  Script is location-sensitive. This is related to always using absolute paths in a script, but not quite the same. Your cron job may need to cd to a specific directory before running, e.g. a rake task on a Rails application may need to be in the application root for Rake to find the correct task, not to mention the appropriate database configuration, etc.



                  So a crontab entry of



                  23 3 * * * /usr/bin/rake db:session_purge RAILS_ENV=production



                  would be better as




                  23 3 * * * cd /var/www/production/current && /usr/bin/rake db:session_purge RAILS_ENV=production


                  Or, to keep the crontab entry simpler and less brittle:



                  23 3 * * * /home/<user>/scripts/session-purge.sh



                  with the following code in /home/<user>/scripts/session-purge.sh:




                  cd /var/www/production/current
                  /usr/bin/rake db:session_purge RAILS_ENV=production





                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 1





                    If the script being invoked from cron is written in an interpreted language like PHP, you may need to set the working directory in the script itself. For example, in PHP: chdir(dirname(__FILE__));

                    – Evan Donovan
                    Sep 10 '15 at 16:14













                  • Just got caught with this one: the script used to be in the root of my home directory, but then I moved it (and updated the crontab) and couldn't figure out why it wasn't working. Turns out the script was using a relative path, assuming that it was relative to the location of the script but it was in fact relative to the root of my home directory because that was the working directory that cron was using, which is why the script worked when it was in the root of my home directory (because the script's expected working directory and it's actual working just happened to coincide).

                    – Micheal Johnson
                    Feb 4 '16 at 18:36
















                  11














                  Script is location-sensitive. This is related to always using absolute paths in a script, but not quite the same. Your cron job may need to cd to a specific directory before running, e.g. a rake task on a Rails application may need to be in the application root for Rake to find the correct task, not to mention the appropriate database configuration, etc.



                  So a crontab entry of



                  23 3 * * * /usr/bin/rake db:session_purge RAILS_ENV=production



                  would be better as




                  23 3 * * * cd /var/www/production/current && /usr/bin/rake db:session_purge RAILS_ENV=production


                  Or, to keep the crontab entry simpler and less brittle:



                  23 3 * * * /home/<user>/scripts/session-purge.sh



                  with the following code in /home/<user>/scripts/session-purge.sh:




                  cd /var/www/production/current
                  /usr/bin/rake db:session_purge RAILS_ENV=production





                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 1





                    If the script being invoked from cron is written in an interpreted language like PHP, you may need to set the working directory in the script itself. For example, in PHP: chdir(dirname(__FILE__));

                    – Evan Donovan
                    Sep 10 '15 at 16:14













                  • Just got caught with this one: the script used to be in the root of my home directory, but then I moved it (and updated the crontab) and couldn't figure out why it wasn't working. Turns out the script was using a relative path, assuming that it was relative to the location of the script but it was in fact relative to the root of my home directory because that was the working directory that cron was using, which is why the script worked when it was in the root of my home directory (because the script's expected working directory and it's actual working just happened to coincide).

                    – Micheal Johnson
                    Feb 4 '16 at 18:36














                  11












                  11








                  11







                  Script is location-sensitive. This is related to always using absolute paths in a script, but not quite the same. Your cron job may need to cd to a specific directory before running, e.g. a rake task on a Rails application may need to be in the application root for Rake to find the correct task, not to mention the appropriate database configuration, etc.



                  So a crontab entry of



                  23 3 * * * /usr/bin/rake db:session_purge RAILS_ENV=production



                  would be better as




                  23 3 * * * cd /var/www/production/current && /usr/bin/rake db:session_purge RAILS_ENV=production


                  Or, to keep the crontab entry simpler and less brittle:



                  23 3 * * * /home/<user>/scripts/session-purge.sh



                  with the following code in /home/<user>/scripts/session-purge.sh:




                  cd /var/www/production/current
                  /usr/bin/rake db:session_purge RAILS_ENV=production





                  share|improve this answer















                  Script is location-sensitive. This is related to always using absolute paths in a script, but not quite the same. Your cron job may need to cd to a specific directory before running, e.g. a rake task on a Rails application may need to be in the application root for Rake to find the correct task, not to mention the appropriate database configuration, etc.



                  So a crontab entry of



                  23 3 * * * /usr/bin/rake db:session_purge RAILS_ENV=production



                  would be better as




                  23 3 * * * cd /var/www/production/current && /usr/bin/rake db:session_purge RAILS_ENV=production


                  Or, to keep the crontab entry simpler and less brittle:



                  23 3 * * * /home/<user>/scripts/session-purge.sh



                  with the following code in /home/<user>/scripts/session-purge.sh:




                  cd /var/www/production/current
                  /usr/bin/rake db:session_purge RAILS_ENV=production






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Nov 29 '11 at 15:20


























                  community wiki





                  2 revs
                  pjmorse









                  • 1





                    If the script being invoked from cron is written in an interpreted language like PHP, you may need to set the working directory in the script itself. For example, in PHP: chdir(dirname(__FILE__));

                    – Evan Donovan
                    Sep 10 '15 at 16:14













                  • Just got caught with this one: the script used to be in the root of my home directory, but then I moved it (and updated the crontab) and couldn't figure out why it wasn't working. Turns out the script was using a relative path, assuming that it was relative to the location of the script but it was in fact relative to the root of my home directory because that was the working directory that cron was using, which is why the script worked when it was in the root of my home directory (because the script's expected working directory and it's actual working just happened to coincide).

                    – Micheal Johnson
                    Feb 4 '16 at 18:36














                  • 1





                    If the script being invoked from cron is written in an interpreted language like PHP, you may need to set the working directory in the script itself. For example, in PHP: chdir(dirname(__FILE__));

                    – Evan Donovan
                    Sep 10 '15 at 16:14













                  • Just got caught with this one: the script used to be in the root of my home directory, but then I moved it (and updated the crontab) and couldn't figure out why it wasn't working. Turns out the script was using a relative path, assuming that it was relative to the location of the script but it was in fact relative to the root of my home directory because that was the working directory that cron was using, which is why the script worked when it was in the root of my home directory (because the script's expected working directory and it's actual working just happened to coincide).

                    – Micheal Johnson
                    Feb 4 '16 at 18:36








                  1




                  1





                  If the script being invoked from cron is written in an interpreted language like PHP, you may need to set the working directory in the script itself. For example, in PHP: chdir(dirname(__FILE__));

                  – Evan Donovan
                  Sep 10 '15 at 16:14







                  If the script being invoked from cron is written in an interpreted language like PHP, you may need to set the working directory in the script itself. For example, in PHP: chdir(dirname(__FILE__));

                  – Evan Donovan
                  Sep 10 '15 at 16:14















                  Just got caught with this one: the script used to be in the root of my home directory, but then I moved it (and updated the crontab) and couldn't figure out why it wasn't working. Turns out the script was using a relative path, assuming that it was relative to the location of the script but it was in fact relative to the root of my home directory because that was the working directory that cron was using, which is why the script worked when it was in the root of my home directory (because the script's expected working directory and it's actual working just happened to coincide).

                  – Micheal Johnson
                  Feb 4 '16 at 18:36





                  Just got caught with this one: the script used to be in the root of my home directory, but then I moved it (and updated the crontab) and couldn't figure out why it wasn't working. Turns out the script was using a relative path, assuming that it was relative to the location of the script but it was in fact relative to the root of my home directory because that was the working directory that cron was using, which is why the script worked when it was in the root of my home directory (because the script's expected working directory and it's actual working just happened to coincide).

                  – Micheal Johnson
                  Feb 4 '16 at 18:36











                  10














                  Crontab specs which worked in the past can break when moved from one crontab file to another. Sometimes the reason is that you've moved the spec from a system crontab file to a user crontab file or vice-versa.



                  The cron job specification format differs between users' crontab files (/var/spool/cron/username or /var/spool/cron/crontabs/username) and the system crontabs (/etc/crontab and the the files in /etc/cron.d).



                  The system crontabs have an extra field 'user' right before the command-to-run.



                  This will cause errors stating things like george; command not found when you move a command out of /etc/crontab or a file in /etc/cron.d into a user's crontab file.



                  Conversely, cron will deliver errors like /usr/bin/restartxyz is not a valid username or similar when the reverse occurs.






                  share|improve this answer






























                    10














                    Crontab specs which worked in the past can break when moved from one crontab file to another. Sometimes the reason is that you've moved the spec from a system crontab file to a user crontab file or vice-versa.



                    The cron job specification format differs between users' crontab files (/var/spool/cron/username or /var/spool/cron/crontabs/username) and the system crontabs (/etc/crontab and the the files in /etc/cron.d).



                    The system crontabs have an extra field 'user' right before the command-to-run.



                    This will cause errors stating things like george; command not found when you move a command out of /etc/crontab or a file in /etc/cron.d into a user's crontab file.



                    Conversely, cron will deliver errors like /usr/bin/restartxyz is not a valid username or similar when the reverse occurs.






                    share|improve this answer




























                      10












                      10








                      10







                      Crontab specs which worked in the past can break when moved from one crontab file to another. Sometimes the reason is that you've moved the spec from a system crontab file to a user crontab file or vice-versa.



                      The cron job specification format differs between users' crontab files (/var/spool/cron/username or /var/spool/cron/crontabs/username) and the system crontabs (/etc/crontab and the the files in /etc/cron.d).



                      The system crontabs have an extra field 'user' right before the command-to-run.



                      This will cause errors stating things like george; command not found when you move a command out of /etc/crontab or a file in /etc/cron.d into a user's crontab file.



                      Conversely, cron will deliver errors like /usr/bin/restartxyz is not a valid username or similar when the reverse occurs.






                      share|improve this answer















                      Crontab specs which worked in the past can break when moved from one crontab file to another. Sometimes the reason is that you've moved the spec from a system crontab file to a user crontab file or vice-versa.



                      The cron job specification format differs between users' crontab files (/var/spool/cron/username or /var/spool/cron/crontabs/username) and the system crontabs (/etc/crontab and the the files in /etc/cron.d).



                      The system crontabs have an extra field 'user' right before the command-to-run.



                      This will cause errors stating things like george; command not found when you move a command out of /etc/crontab or a file in /etc/cron.d into a user's crontab file.



                      Conversely, cron will deliver errors like /usr/bin/restartxyz is not a valid username or similar when the reverse occurs.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Oct 25 '13 at 15:04


























                      community wiki





                      4 revs, 3 users 80%
                      pbr

























                          9














                          cron script is invoking a command with --verbose option



                          I had a cron script fail on me because I was in autopilot while typing the script and I included the --verbose option:



                          #!/bin/bash
                          some commands
                          tar cvfz /my/archive/file.tar.gz /my/shared/directory
                          come more commands


                          The script ran fine when executing from shell, but failed when running from crontab because the verbose output goes to stdout when run from shell, but nowhere when run from crontab. Easy fix to remove the 'v':



                          #!/bin/bash
                          some commands
                          tar cfz /my/archive/file.tar.gz /my/shared/directory
                          some more commands





                          share|improve this answer





















                          • 5





                            Why is this causing a failure? Buffer issues?

                            – Adam Matan
                            May 31 '12 at 6:38











                          • Any outputs or errors trriggred via cron jobs is gooing to sent to your mailbox.So we should never forget to care about these errors/output.We can redirect them to any file or /dev/null

                            – Nischay
                            Sep 27 '13 at 11:32
















                          9














                          cron script is invoking a command with --verbose option



                          I had a cron script fail on me because I was in autopilot while typing the script and I included the --verbose option:



                          #!/bin/bash
                          some commands
                          tar cvfz /my/archive/file.tar.gz /my/shared/directory
                          come more commands


                          The script ran fine when executing from shell, but failed when running from crontab because the verbose output goes to stdout when run from shell, but nowhere when run from crontab. Easy fix to remove the 'v':



                          #!/bin/bash
                          some commands
                          tar cfz /my/archive/file.tar.gz /my/shared/directory
                          some more commands





                          share|improve this answer





















                          • 5





                            Why is this causing a failure? Buffer issues?

                            – Adam Matan
                            May 31 '12 at 6:38











                          • Any outputs or errors trriggred via cron jobs is gooing to sent to your mailbox.So we should never forget to care about these errors/output.We can redirect them to any file or /dev/null

                            – Nischay
                            Sep 27 '13 at 11:32














                          9












                          9








                          9







                          cron script is invoking a command with --verbose option



                          I had a cron script fail on me because I was in autopilot while typing the script and I included the --verbose option:



                          #!/bin/bash
                          some commands
                          tar cvfz /my/archive/file.tar.gz /my/shared/directory
                          come more commands


                          The script ran fine when executing from shell, but failed when running from crontab because the verbose output goes to stdout when run from shell, but nowhere when run from crontab. Easy fix to remove the 'v':



                          #!/bin/bash
                          some commands
                          tar cfz /my/archive/file.tar.gz /my/shared/directory
                          some more commands





                          share|improve this answer















                          cron script is invoking a command with --verbose option



                          I had a cron script fail on me because I was in autopilot while typing the script and I included the --verbose option:



                          #!/bin/bash
                          some commands
                          tar cvfz /my/archive/file.tar.gz /my/shared/directory
                          come more commands


                          The script ran fine when executing from shell, but failed when running from crontab because the verbose output goes to stdout when run from shell, but nowhere when run from crontab. Easy fix to remove the 'v':



                          #!/bin/bash
                          some commands
                          tar cfz /my/archive/file.tar.gz /my/shared/directory
                          some more commands






                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited Jun 3 '12 at 6:59


























                          community wiki





                          2 revs, 2 users 97%
                          Aaron Peart










                          • 5





                            Why is this causing a failure? Buffer issues?

                            – Adam Matan
                            May 31 '12 at 6:38











                          • Any outputs or errors trriggred via cron jobs is gooing to sent to your mailbox.So we should never forget to care about these errors/output.We can redirect them to any file or /dev/null

                            – Nischay
                            Sep 27 '13 at 11:32














                          • 5





                            Why is this causing a failure? Buffer issues?

                            – Adam Matan
                            May 31 '12 at 6:38











                          • Any outputs or errors trriggred via cron jobs is gooing to sent to your mailbox.So we should never forget to care about these errors/output.We can redirect them to any file or /dev/null

                            – Nischay
                            Sep 27 '13 at 11:32








                          5




                          5





                          Why is this causing a failure? Buffer issues?

                          – Adam Matan
                          May 31 '12 at 6:38





                          Why is this causing a failure? Buffer issues?

                          – Adam Matan
                          May 31 '12 at 6:38













                          Any outputs or errors trriggred via cron jobs is gooing to sent to your mailbox.So we should never forget to care about these errors/output.We can redirect them to any file or /dev/null

                          – Nischay
                          Sep 27 '13 at 11:32





                          Any outputs or errors trriggred via cron jobs is gooing to sent to your mailbox.So we should never forget to care about these errors/output.We can redirect them to any file or /dev/null

                          – Nischay
                          Sep 27 '13 at 11:32











                          7














                          Most frequent reason I have seen cron fail in an incorrectly stated schedule. It takes practice to specify a job scheduled for 11:15 pm as 30 23 * * * instead of * * 11 15 * or 11 15 * * *. Day of week for jobs after midnight also gets confused M-F is 2-6 after midnight not 1-5. Specific dates are usually a problem as we rarely use them * * 3 1 * is not March 3rd.



                          If your work with different platforms using unsupported options such as 2/3 in time specifications can also cause failures. This is a very useful option but not universally available. I have also run across issues will lists like 1-5 or 1,3,5.



                          Using unqualified paths have also caused problems. The default path is usually /bin:/usr/bin so only standard commands will run. These directories usually don't have the desired command. This also affects scripts using non standard commands. Other environment variables can also be missing.



                          Clobbering an existing crontab entirely has caused me problems. I now load from a file copy. This can be recovered from the existing crontab using crontab -l if it gets clobbered. I keep the copy of crontab in ~/bin. It is commented throughout and ends with the line # EOF. This is reloaded daily from a crontab entry like:



                          #!/usr/bin/crontab
                          # Reload this crontab
                          #
                          54 12 * * * ${HOME}/bin/crontab


                          The reload command above relies on an executable crontab with a bang path running crontab. Some systems require the running crontab in the command and specifying the file. If the directory is network shared, then I often use crontab.$(hostname) as the name of the file. This will eventually correct cases where the wrong crontab is loaded on the wrong server.



                          Using the file provides a backup of what the crontab should be, and allows temporary edits (the only time I use crontab -e) to be backed out automatically. There are headers available which help with getting the scheduling parameters right. I have added them when inexperience users would be editing a crontab.



                          Rarely, I have run into commands that require user input. These fail under crontab, although some will work with input redirection.






                          share|improve this answer





















                          • 2





                            This covers three separate problems. Can they be split into separate answers?

                            – Eliah Kagan
                            Nov 24 '11 at 23:07






                          • 9





                            Can you explain how 30 23 * * * translates to 11:15 PM?

                            – JYelton
                            Jan 10 '14 at 19:23
















                          7














                          Most frequent reason I have seen cron fail in an incorrectly stated schedule. It takes practice to specify a job scheduled for 11:15 pm as 30 23 * * * instead of * * 11 15 * or 11 15 * * *. Day of week for jobs after midnight also gets confused M-F is 2-6 after midnight not 1-5. Specific dates are usually a problem as we rarely use them * * 3 1 * is not March 3rd.



                          If your work with different platforms using unsupported options such as 2/3 in time specifications can also cause failures. This is a very useful option but not universally available. I have also run across issues will lists like 1-5 or 1,3,5.



                          Using unqualified paths have also caused problems. The default path is usually /bin:/usr/bin so only standard commands will run. These directories usually don't have the desired command. This also affects scripts using non standard commands. Other environment variables can also be missing.



                          Clobbering an existing crontab entirely has caused me problems. I now load from a file copy. This can be recovered from the existing crontab using crontab -l if it gets clobbered. I keep the copy of crontab in ~/bin. It is commented throughout and ends with the line # EOF. This is reloaded daily from a crontab entry like:



                          #!/usr/bin/crontab
                          # Reload this crontab
                          #
                          54 12 * * * ${HOME}/bin/crontab


                          The reload command above relies on an executable crontab with a bang path running crontab. Some systems require the running crontab in the command and specifying the file. If the directory is network shared, then I often use crontab.$(hostname) as the name of the file. This will eventually correct cases where the wrong crontab is loaded on the wrong server.



                          Using the file provides a backup of what the crontab should be, and allows temporary edits (the only time I use crontab -e) to be backed out automatically. There are headers available which help with getting the scheduling parameters right. I have added them when inexperience users would be editing a crontab.



                          Rarely, I have run into commands that require user input. These fail under crontab, although some will work with input redirection.






                          share|improve this answer





















                          • 2





                            This covers three separate problems. Can they be split into separate answers?

                            – Eliah Kagan
                            Nov 24 '11 at 23:07






                          • 9





                            Can you explain how 30 23 * * * translates to 11:15 PM?

                            – JYelton
                            Jan 10 '14 at 19:23














                          7












                          7








                          7







                          Most frequent reason I have seen cron fail in an incorrectly stated schedule. It takes practice to specify a job scheduled for 11:15 pm as 30 23 * * * instead of * * 11 15 * or 11 15 * * *. Day of week for jobs after midnight also gets confused M-F is 2-6 after midnight not 1-5. Specific dates are usually a problem as we rarely use them * * 3 1 * is not March 3rd.



                          If your work with different platforms using unsupported options such as 2/3 in time specifications can also cause failures. This is a very useful option but not universally available. I have also run across issues will lists like 1-5 or 1,3,5.



                          Using unqualified paths have also caused problems. The default path is usually /bin:/usr/bin so only standard commands will run. These directories usually don't have the desired command. This also affects scripts using non standard commands. Other environment variables can also be missing.



                          Clobbering an existing crontab entirely has caused me problems. I now load from a file copy. This can be recovered from the existing crontab using crontab -l if it gets clobbered. I keep the copy of crontab in ~/bin. It is commented throughout and ends with the line # EOF. This is reloaded daily from a crontab entry like:



                          #!/usr/bin/crontab
                          # Reload this crontab
                          #
                          54 12 * * * ${HOME}/bin/crontab


                          The reload command above relies on an executable crontab with a bang path running crontab. Some systems require the running crontab in the command and specifying the file. If the directory is network shared, then I often use crontab.$(hostname) as the name of the file. This will eventually correct cases where the wrong crontab is loaded on the wrong server.



                          Using the file provides a backup of what the crontab should be, and allows temporary edits (the only time I use crontab -e) to be backed out automatically. There are headers available which help with getting the scheduling parameters right. I have added them when inexperience users would be editing a crontab.



                          Rarely, I have run into commands that require user input. These fail under crontab, although some will work with input redirection.






                          share|improve this answer















                          Most frequent reason I have seen cron fail in an incorrectly stated schedule. It takes practice to specify a job scheduled for 11:15 pm as 30 23 * * * instead of * * 11 15 * or 11 15 * * *. Day of week for jobs after midnight also gets confused M-F is 2-6 after midnight not 1-5. Specific dates are usually a problem as we rarely use them * * 3 1 * is not March 3rd.



                          If your work with different platforms using unsupported options such as 2/3 in time specifications can also cause failures. This is a very useful option but not universally available. I have also run across issues will lists like 1-5 or 1,3,5.



                          Using unqualified paths have also caused problems. The default path is usually /bin:/usr/bin so only standard commands will run. These directories usually don't have the desired command. This also affects scripts using non standard commands. Other environment variables can also be missing.



                          Clobbering an existing crontab entirely has caused me problems. I now load from a file copy. This can be recovered from the existing crontab using crontab -l if it gets clobbered. I keep the copy of crontab in ~/bin. It is commented throughout and ends with the line # EOF. This is reloaded daily from a crontab entry like:



                          #!/usr/bin/crontab
                          # Reload this crontab
                          #
                          54 12 * * * ${HOME}/bin/crontab


                          The reload command above relies on an executable crontab with a bang path running crontab. Some systems require the running crontab in the command and specifying the file. If the directory is network shared, then I often use crontab.$(hostname) as the name of the file. This will eventually correct cases where the wrong crontab is loaded on the wrong server.



                          Using the file provides a backup of what the crontab should be, and allows temporary edits (the only time I use crontab -e) to be backed out automatically. There are headers available which help with getting the scheduling parameters right. I have added them when inexperience users would be editing a crontab.



                          Rarely, I have run into commands that require user input. These fail under crontab, although some will work with input redirection.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited Feb 1 '11 at 18:37


























                          community wiki





                          2 revs
                          BillThor









                          • 2





                            This covers three separate problems. Can they be split into separate answers?

                            – Eliah Kagan
                            Nov 24 '11 at 23:07






                          • 9





                            Can you explain how 30 23 * * * translates to 11:15 PM?

                            – JYelton
                            Jan 10 '14 at 19:23














                          • 2





                            This covers three separate problems. Can they be split into separate answers?

                            – Eliah Kagan
                            Nov 24 '11 at 23:07






                          • 9





                            Can you explain how 30 23 * * * translates to 11:15 PM?

                            – JYelton
                            Jan 10 '14 at 19:23








                          2




                          2





                          This covers three separate problems. Can they be split into separate answers?

                          – Eliah Kagan
                          Nov 24 '11 at 23:07





                          This covers three separate problems. Can they be split into separate answers?

                          – Eliah Kagan
                          Nov 24 '11 at 23:07




                          9




                          9





                          Can you explain how 30 23 * * * translates to 11:15 PM?

                          – JYelton
                          Jan 10 '14 at 19:23





                          Can you explain how 30 23 * * * translates to 11:15 PM?

                          – JYelton
                          Jan 10 '14 at 19:23











                          6














                          If you are accessing an account via SSH keys it is possible to login to the account but not notice that the password on the account is locked (e.g. due to expiring or invalid password attempts)



                          If the system is using PAM and the account is locked, this can stop its cronjob from running. (I've tested this on Solaris, but not on Ubuntu)



                          You may find messages like this in /var/adm/messages:




                          Oct 24 07:51:00 mybox cron[29024]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host
                          Oct 24 07:52:00 mybox cron[29063]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host
                          Oct 24 07:53:00 mybox cron[29098]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host
                          Oct 24 07:54:00 mybox cron[29527]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host


                          All you should need to do is run:




                          # passwd -u <USERNAME>


                          as root to unlock the account, and the crontab should work again.






                          share|improve this answer






























                            6














                            If you are accessing an account via SSH keys it is possible to login to the account but not notice that the password on the account is locked (e.g. due to expiring or invalid password attempts)



                            If the system is using PAM and the account is locked, this can stop its cronjob from running. (I've tested this on Solaris, but not on Ubuntu)



                            You may find messages like this in /var/adm/messages:




                            Oct 24 07:51:00 mybox cron[29024]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host
                            Oct 24 07:52:00 mybox cron[29063]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host
                            Oct 24 07:53:00 mybox cron[29098]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host
                            Oct 24 07:54:00 mybox cron[29527]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host


                            All you should need to do is run:




                            # passwd -u <USERNAME>


                            as root to unlock the account, and the crontab should work again.






                            share|improve this answer




























                              6












                              6








                              6







                              If you are accessing an account via SSH keys it is possible to login to the account but not notice that the password on the account is locked (e.g. due to expiring or invalid password attempts)



                              If the system is using PAM and the account is locked, this can stop its cronjob from running. (I've tested this on Solaris, but not on Ubuntu)



                              You may find messages like this in /var/adm/messages:




                              Oct 24 07:51:00 mybox cron[29024]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host
                              Oct 24 07:52:00 mybox cron[29063]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host
                              Oct 24 07:53:00 mybox cron[29098]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host
                              Oct 24 07:54:00 mybox cron[29527]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host


                              All you should need to do is run:




                              # passwd -u <USERNAME>


                              as root to unlock the account, and the crontab should work again.






                              share|improve this answer















                              If you are accessing an account via SSH keys it is possible to login to the account but not notice that the password on the account is locked (e.g. due to expiring or invalid password attempts)



                              If the system is using PAM and the account is locked, this can stop its cronjob from running. (I've tested this on Solaris, but not on Ubuntu)



                              You may find messages like this in /var/adm/messages:




                              Oct 24 07:51:00 mybox cron[29024]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host
                              Oct 24 07:52:00 mybox cron[29063]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host
                              Oct 24 07:53:00 mybox cron[29098]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host
                              Oct 24 07:54:00 mybox cron[29527]: [ID 731128 auth.notice] pam_unix_account: cron attempting to validate locked account myuser from local host


                              All you should need to do is run:




                              # passwd -u <USERNAME>


                              as root to unlock the account, and the crontab should work again.







                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              answered Oct 24 '12 at 7:22


























                              community wiki





                              JohnGH
























                                  5














                                  If you have a command like this:



                                  * * * * * /path/to/script >> /tmp/output


                                  and it doesn't work and you can't see any output, it may not necessarily mean cron isn't working. The script could be broken and the output going to stderr which doesn't get passed to /tmp/output. Check this isn't the case, by capturing this output as well:



                                  * * * * * /path/to/script >> /tmp/output 2>&1


                                  to see if this helps you catch your issue.






                                  share|improve this answer






























                                    5














                                    If you have a command like this:



                                    * * * * * /path/to/script >> /tmp/output


                                    and it doesn't work and you can't see any output, it may not necessarily mean cron isn't working. The script could be broken and the output going to stderr which doesn't get passed to /tmp/output. Check this isn't the case, by capturing this output as well:



                                    * * * * * /path/to/script >> /tmp/output 2>&1


                                    to see if this helps you catch your issue.






                                    share|improve this answer




























                                      5












                                      5








                                      5







                                      If you have a command like this:



                                      * * * * * /path/to/script >> /tmp/output


                                      and it doesn't work and you can't see any output, it may not necessarily mean cron isn't working. The script could be broken and the output going to stderr which doesn't get passed to /tmp/output. Check this isn't the case, by capturing this output as well:



                                      * * * * * /path/to/script >> /tmp/output 2>&1


                                      to see if this helps you catch your issue.






                                      share|improve this answer















                                      If you have a command like this:



                                      * * * * * /path/to/script >> /tmp/output


                                      and it doesn't work and you can't see any output, it may not necessarily mean cron isn't working. The script could be broken and the output going to stderr which doesn't get passed to /tmp/output. Check this isn't the case, by capturing this output as well:



                                      * * * * * /path/to/script >> /tmp/output 2>&1


                                      to see if this helps you catch your issue.







                                      share|improve this answer














                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer








                                      edited Apr 18 '18 at 18:26


























                                      community wiki





                                      3 revs, 3 users 76%
                                      Philluminati
























                                          3














                                          === Docker alert ===



                                          If you're using docker,



                                          I think it is proper to add that I couldn't manage to make cron to run in the background.



                                          To run a cron job inside the container, I used supervisor and ran cron -f, together with the other process.



                                          Edit: Another issue - I also didn't manage to get it work when running the container with HOST networking. See this issue here also: https://github.com/phusion/baseimage-docker/issues/144






                                          share|improve this answer





















                                          • 1





                                            stackoverflow.com/questions/37458287/…

                                            – Simon D
                                            Dec 17 '18 at 9:53
















                                          3














                                          === Docker alert ===



                                          If you're using docker,



                                          I think it is proper to add that I couldn't manage to make cron to run in the background.



                                          To run a cron job inside the container, I used supervisor and ran cron -f, together with the other process.



                                          Edit: Another issue - I also didn't manage to get it work when running the container with HOST networking. See this issue here also: https://github.com/phusion/baseimage-docker/issues/144






                                          share|improve this answer





















                                          • 1





                                            stackoverflow.com/questions/37458287/…

                                            – Simon D
                                            Dec 17 '18 at 9:53














                                          3












                                          3








                                          3







                                          === Docker alert ===



                                          If you're using docker,



                                          I think it is proper to add that I couldn't manage to make cron to run in the background.



                                          To run a cron job inside the container, I used supervisor and ran cron -f, together with the other process.



                                          Edit: Another issue - I also didn't manage to get it work when running the container with HOST networking. See this issue here also: https://github.com/phusion/baseimage-docker/issues/144






                                          share|improve this answer















                                          === Docker alert ===



                                          If you're using docker,



                                          I think it is proper to add that I couldn't manage to make cron to run in the background.



                                          To run a cron job inside the container, I used supervisor and ran cron -f, together with the other process.



                                          Edit: Another issue - I also didn't manage to get it work when running the container with HOST networking. See this issue here also: https://github.com/phusion/baseimage-docker/issues/144







                                          share|improve this answer














                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer








                                          edited May 20 '15 at 15:48


























                                          community wiki





                                          2 revs
                                          AlonL









                                          • 1





                                            stackoverflow.com/questions/37458287/…

                                            – Simon D
                                            Dec 17 '18 at 9:53














                                          • 1





                                            stackoverflow.com/questions/37458287/…

                                            – Simon D
                                            Dec 17 '18 at 9:53








                                          1




                                          1





                                          stackoverflow.com/questions/37458287/…

                                          – Simon D
                                          Dec 17 '18 at 9:53





                                          stackoverflow.com/questions/37458287/…

                                          – Simon D
                                          Dec 17 '18 at 9:53











                                          3














                                          In my case cron and crontab had different owners.



                                          NOT working I had this:



                                          User@Uva ~ $ ps -ef | grep cron | grep -v grep
                                          User 2940 7284 pty1 19:58:41 /usr/bin/crontab
                                          SYSTEM 11292 636 ? 22:14:15 /usr/sbin/cro


                                          Basically I had to run cron-config and answer the questions correctly. There is a point where I was required to enter my Win7 user password for my 'User' account. From reading I did, it looks like this is a potential security issue but I am the only administrator on a single home network so I decided it was OK.



                                          Here is the command sequence that got me going:



                                          User@Uva ~ $ cron-config
                                          The cron daemon can run as a service or as a job. The latter is not recommended.
                                          Cron is already installed as a service under account LocalSystem.
                                          Do you want to remove or reinstall it? (yes/no) yes
                                          OK. The cron service was removed.

                                          Do you want to install the cron daemon as a service? (yes/no) yes
                                          Enter the value of CYGWIN for the daemon: [ ] ntsec

                                          You must decide under what account the cron daemon will run.
                                          If you are the only user on this machine, the daemon can run as yourself.
                                          This gives access to all network drives but only allows you as user.
                                          To run multiple users, cron must change user context without knowing
                                          the passwords. There are three methods to do that, as explained in
                                          http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/ntsec.html#ntsec-nopasswd1
                                          If all the cron users have executed "passwd -R" (see man passwd),
                                          which provides access to network drives, or if you are using the
                                          cyglsa package, then cron should run under the local system account.
                                          Otherwise you need to have or to create a privileged account.
                                          This script will help you do so.
                                          Do you want the cron daemon to run as yourself? (yes/no) no

                                          Were the passwords of all cron users saved with "passwd -R", or
                                          are you using the cyglsa package ? (yes/no) no

                                          Finding or creating a privileged user.
                                          The following accounts were found: 'cyg_server' .
                                          This script plans to use account cyg_server.
                                          Do you want to use another privileged account name? (yes/no) yes
                                          Enter the other name: User

                                          Reenter: User


                                          Account User already exists. Checking its privileges.
                                          INFO: User is a valid privileged account.
                                          INFO: The cygwin user name for account User is User.

                                          Please enter the password for user 'User':
                                          Reenter:
                                          Running cron_diagnose ...
                                          ... no problem found.

                                          Do you want to start the cron daemon as a service now? (yes/no) yes
                                          OK. The cron daemon is now running.

                                          In case of problem, examine the log file for cron,
                                          /var/log/cron.log, and the Windows event log (using /usr/bin/cronevents)
                                          for information about the problem cron is having.

                                          Examine also any cron.log file in the HOME directory
                                          (or the file specified in MAILTO) and cron related files in /tmp.

                                          If you cannot fix the problem, then report it to cygwin@cygwin.com.
                                          Please run the script /usr/bin/cronbug and ATTACH its output
                                          (the file cronbug.txt) to your e-mail.

                                          WARNING: PATH may be set differently under cron than in interactive shells.
                                          Names such as "find" and "date" may refer to Windows programs.


                                          User@Uva ~ $ ps -ef | grep cron | grep -v grep
                                          User 2944 11780 ? 03:31:10 /usr/sbin/cron
                                          User 2940 7284 pty1 19:58:41 /usr/bin/crontab

                                          User@Uva ~ $





                                          share|improve this answer





















                                          • 1





                                            Although well documented, this looks like a Cygwin-specific point; does it really belong in askubuntu?

                                            – sxc731
                                            Feb 7 '16 at 11:14
















                                          3














                                          In my case cron and crontab had different owners.



                                          NOT working I had this:



                                          User@Uva ~ $ ps -ef | grep cron | grep -v grep
                                          User 2940 7284 pty1 19:58:41 /usr/bin/crontab
                                          SYSTEM 11292 636 ? 22:14:15 /usr/sbin/cro


                                          Basically I had to run cron-config and answer the questions correctly. There is a point where I was required to enter my Win7 user password for my 'User' account. From reading I did, it looks like this is a potential security issue but I am the only administrator on a single home network so I decided it was OK.



                                          Here is the command sequence that got me going:



                                          User@Uva ~ $ cron-config
                                          The cron daemon can run as a service or as a job. The latter is not recommended.
                                          Cron is already installed as a service under account LocalSystem.
                                          Do you want to remove or reinstall it? (yes/no) yes
                                          OK. The cron service was removed.

                                          Do you want to install the cron daemon as a service? (yes/no) yes
                                          Enter the value of CYGWIN for the daemon: [ ] ntsec

                                          You must decide under what account the cron daemon will run.
                                          If you are the only user on this machine, the daemon can run as yourself.
                                          This gives access to all network drives but only allows you as user.
                                          To run multiple users, cron must change user context without knowing
                                          the passwords. There are three methods to do that, as explained in
                                          http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/ntsec.html#ntsec-nopasswd1
                                          If all the cron users have executed "passwd -R" (see man passwd),
                                          which provides access to network drives, or if you are using the
                                          cyglsa package, then cron should run under the local system account.
                                          Otherwise you need to have or to create a privileged account.
                                          This script will help you do so.
                                          Do you want the cron daemon to run as yourself? (yes/no) no

                                          Were the passwords of all cron users saved with "passwd -R", or
                                          are you using the cyglsa package ? (yes/no) no

                                          Finding or creating a privileged user.
                                          The following accounts were found: 'cyg_server' .
                                          This script plans to use account cyg_server.
                                          Do you want to use another privileged account name? (yes/no) yes
                                          Enter the other name: User

                                          Reenter: User


                                          Account User already exists. Checking its privileges.
                                          INFO: User is a valid privileged account.
                                          INFO: The cygwin user name for account User is User.

                                          Please enter the password for user 'User':
                                          Reenter:
                                          Running cron_diagnose ...
                                          ... no problem found.

                                          Do you want to start the cron daemon as a service now? (yes/no) yes
                                          OK. The cron daemon is now running.

                                          In case of problem, examine the log file for cron,
                                          /var/log/cron.log, and the Windows event log (using /usr/bin/cronevents)
                                          for information about the problem cron is having.

                                          Examine also any cron.log file in the HOME directory
                                          (or the file specified in MAILTO) and cron related files in /tmp.

                                          If you cannot fix the problem, then report it to cygwin@cygwin.com.
                                          Please run the script /usr/bin/cronbug and ATTACH its output
                                          (the file cronbug.txt) to your e-mail.

                                          WARNING: PATH may be set differently under cron than in interactive shells.
                                          Names such as "find" and "date" may refer to Windows programs.


                                          User@Uva ~ $ ps -ef | grep cron | grep -v grep
                                          User 2944 11780 ? 03:31:10 /usr/sbin/cron
                                          User 2940 7284 pty1 19:58:41 /usr/bin/crontab

                                          User@Uva ~ $





                                          share|improve this answer





















                                          • 1





                                            Although well documented, this looks like a Cygwin-specific point; does it really belong in askubuntu?

                                            – sxc731
                                            Feb 7 '16 at 11:14














                                          3












                                          3








                                          3







                                          In my case cron and crontab had different owners.



                                          NOT working I had this:



                                          User@Uva ~ $ ps -ef | grep cron | grep -v grep
                                          User 2940 7284 pty1 19:58:41 /usr/bin/crontab
                                          SYSTEM 11292 636 ? 22:14:15 /usr/sbin/cro


                                          Basically I had to run cron-config and answer the questions correctly. There is a point where I was required to enter my Win7 user password for my 'User' account. From reading I did, it looks like this is a potential security issue but I am the only administrator on a single home network so I decided it was OK.



                                          Here is the command sequence that got me going:



                                          User@Uva ~ $ cron-config
                                          The cron daemon can run as a service or as a job. The latter is not recommended.
                                          Cron is already installed as a service under account LocalSystem.
                                          Do you want to remove or reinstall it? (yes/no) yes
                                          OK. The cron service was removed.

                                          Do you want to install the cron daemon as a service? (yes/no) yes
                                          Enter the value of CYGWIN for the daemon: [ ] ntsec

                                          You must decide under what account the cron daemon will run.
                                          If you are the only user on this machine, the daemon can run as yourself.
                                          This gives access to all network drives but only allows you as user.
                                          To run multiple users, cron must change user context without knowing
                                          the passwords. There are three methods to do that, as explained in
                                          http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/ntsec.html#ntsec-nopasswd1
                                          If all the cron users have executed "passwd -R" (see man passwd),
                                          which provides access to network drives, or if you are using the
                                          cyglsa package, then cron should run under the local system account.
                                          Otherwise you need to have or to create a privileged account.
                                          This script will help you do so.
                                          Do you want the cron daemon to run as yourself? (yes/no) no

                                          Were the passwords of all cron users saved with "passwd -R", or
                                          are you using the cyglsa package ? (yes/no) no

                                          Finding or creating a privileged user.
                                          The following accounts were found: 'cyg_server' .
                                          This script plans to use account cyg_server.
                                          Do you want to use another privileged account name? (yes/no) yes
                                          Enter the other name: User

                                          Reenter: User


                                          Account User already exists. Checking its privileges.
                                          INFO: User is a valid privileged account.
                                          INFO: The cygwin user name for account User is User.

                                          Please enter the password for user 'User':
                                          Reenter:
                                          Running cron_diagnose ...
                                          ... no problem found.

                                          Do you want to start the cron daemon as a service now? (yes/no) yes
                                          OK. The cron daemon is now running.

                                          In case of problem, examine the log file for cron,
                                          /var/log/cron.log, and the Windows event log (using /usr/bin/cronevents)
                                          for information about the problem cron is having.

                                          Examine also any cron.log file in the HOME directory
                                          (or the file specified in MAILTO) and cron related files in /tmp.

                                          If you cannot fix the problem, then report it to cygwin@cygwin.com.
                                          Please run the script /usr/bin/cronbug and ATTACH its output
                                          (the file cronbug.txt) to your e-mail.

                                          WARNING: PATH may be set differently under cron than in interactive shells.
                                          Names such as "find" and "date" may refer to Windows programs.


                                          User@Uva ~ $ ps -ef | grep cron | grep -v grep
                                          User 2944 11780 ? 03:31:10 /usr/sbin/cron
                                          User 2940 7284 pty1 19:58:41 /usr/bin/crontab

                                          User@Uva ~ $





                                          share|improve this answer















                                          In my case cron and crontab had different owners.



                                          NOT working I had this:



                                          User@Uva ~ $ ps -ef | grep cron | grep -v grep
                                          User 2940 7284 pty1 19:58:41 /usr/bin/crontab
                                          SYSTEM 11292 636 ? 22:14:15 /usr/sbin/cro


                                          Basically I had to run cron-config and answer the questions correctly. There is a point where I was required to enter my Win7 user password for my 'User' account. From reading I did, it looks like this is a potential security issue but I am the only administrator on a single home network so I decided it was OK.



                                          Here is the command sequence that got me going:



                                          User@Uva ~ $ cron-config
                                          The cron daemon can run as a service or as a job. The latter is not recommended.
                                          Cron is already installed as a service under account LocalSystem.
                                          Do you want to remove or reinstall it? (yes/no) yes
                                          OK. The cron service was removed.

                                          Do you want to install the cron daemon as a service? (yes/no) yes
                                          Enter the value of CYGWIN for the daemon: [ ] ntsec

                                          You must decide under what account the cron daemon will run.
                                          If you are the only user on this machine, the daemon can run as yourself.
                                          This gives access to all network drives but only allows you as user.
                                          To run multiple users, cron must change user context without knowing
                                          the passwords. There are three methods to do that, as explained in
                                          http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/ntsec.html#ntsec-nopasswd1
                                          If all the cron users have executed "passwd -R" (see man passwd),
                                          which provides access to network drives, or if you are using the
                                          cyglsa package, then cron should run under the local system account.
                                          Otherwise you need to have or to create a privileged account.
                                          This script will help you do so.
                                          Do you want the cron daemon to run as yourself? (yes/no) no

                                          Were the passwords of all cron users saved with "passwd -R", or
                                          are you using the cyglsa package ? (yes/no) no

                                          Finding or creating a privileged user.
                                          The following accounts were found: 'cyg_server' .
                                          This script plans to use account cyg_server.
                                          Do you want to use another privileged account name? (yes/no) yes
                                          Enter the other name: User

                                          Reenter: User


                                          Account User already exists. Checking its privileges.
                                          INFO: User is a valid privileged account.
                                          INFO: The cygwin user name for account User is User.

                                          Please enter the password for user 'User':
                                          Reenter:
                                          Running cron_diagnose ...
                                          ... no problem found.

                                          Do you want to start the cron daemon as a service now? (yes/no) yes
                                          OK. The cron daemon is now running.

                                          In case of problem, examine the log file for cron,
                                          /var/log/cron.log, and the Windows event log (using /usr/bin/cronevents)
                                          for information about the problem cron is having.

                                          Examine also any cron.log file in the HOME directory
                                          (or the file specified in MAILTO) and cron related files in /tmp.

                                          If you cannot fix the problem, then report it to cygwin@cygwin.com.
                                          Please run the script /usr/bin/cronbug and ATTACH its output
                                          (the file cronbug.txt) to your e-mail.

                                          WARNING: PATH may be set differently under cron than in interactive shells.
                                          Names such as "find" and "date" may refer to Windows programs.


                                          User@Uva ~ $ ps -ef | grep cron | grep -v grep
                                          User 2944 11780 ? 03:31:10 /usr/sbin/cron
                                          User 2940 7284 pty1 19:58:41 /usr/bin/crontab

                                          User@Uva ~ $






                                          share|improve this answer














                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer








                                          answered Dec 10 '15 at 9:20


























                                          community wiki





                                          KiloOne









                                          • 1





                                            Although well documented, this looks like a Cygwin-specific point; does it really belong in askubuntu?

                                            – sxc731
                                            Feb 7 '16 at 11:14














                                          • 1





                                            Although well documented, this looks like a Cygwin-specific point; does it really belong in askubuntu?

                                            – sxc731
                                            Feb 7 '16 at 11:14








                                          1




                                          1





                                          Although well documented, this looks like a Cygwin-specific point; does it really belong in askubuntu?

                                          – sxc731
                                          Feb 7 '16 at 11:14





                                          Although well documented, this looks like a Cygwin-specific point; does it really belong in askubuntu?

                                          – sxc731
                                          Feb 7 '16 at 11:14











                                          3














                                          I was writing an install shell script that creates another script to purge old transaction data from a database. As a part of the task it had to configure daily cron job to run at an arbitrary time, when the database load was low.



                                          I created a file mycronjob with cron schedule, username & the command and copied it to the /etc/cron.d directory. My two gotchas:





                                          1. mycronjob file had to be owned by root to run

                                          2. I had to set permissions of the file to 644 - 664 would not run.


                                          A permission problem will appear in /var/log/syslog as something similar to:



                                          Apr 24 18:30:01 ip-11-22-33-44 cron[40980]: (*system*) INSECURE MODE (group/other writable) (/etc/crontab)
                                          Apr 24 18:30:01 ip-11-22-33-44 cron[40980]: (*system*) INSECURE MODE (group/other writable) (/etc/cron.d/user)


                                          The first line refers to /etc/crontab file and the later to a file I placed under /etc/cront.d.






                                          share|improve this answer






























                                            3














                                            I was writing an install shell script that creates another script to purge old transaction data from a database. As a part of the task it had to configure daily cron job to run at an arbitrary time, when the database load was low.



                                            I created a file mycronjob with cron schedule, username & the command and copied it to the /etc/cron.d directory. My two gotchas:





                                            1. mycronjob file had to be owned by root to run

                                            2. I had to set permissions of the file to 644 - 664 would not run.


                                            A permission problem will appear in /var/log/syslog as something similar to:



                                            Apr 24 18:30:01 ip-11-22-33-44 cron[40980]: (*system*) INSECURE MODE (group/other writable) (/etc/crontab)
                                            Apr 24 18:30:01 ip-11-22-33-44 cron[40980]: (*system*) INSECURE MODE (group/other writable) (/etc/cron.d/user)


                                            The first line refers to /etc/crontab file and the later to a file I placed under /etc/cront.d.






                                            share|improve this answer




























                                              3












                                              3








                                              3







                                              I was writing an install shell script that creates another script to purge old transaction data from a database. As a part of the task it had to configure daily cron job to run at an arbitrary time, when the database load was low.



                                              I created a file mycronjob with cron schedule, username & the command and copied it to the /etc/cron.d directory. My two gotchas:





                                              1. mycronjob file had to be owned by root to run

                                              2. I had to set permissions of the file to 644 - 664 would not run.


                                              A permission problem will appear in /var/log/syslog as something similar to:



                                              Apr 24 18:30:01 ip-11-22-33-44 cron[40980]: (*system*) INSECURE MODE (group/other writable) (/etc/crontab)
                                              Apr 24 18:30:01 ip-11-22-33-44 cron[40980]: (*system*) INSECURE MODE (group/other writable) (/etc/cron.d/user)


                                              The first line refers to /etc/crontab file and the later to a file I placed under /etc/cront.d.






                                              share|improve this answer















                                              I was writing an install shell script that creates another script to purge old transaction data from a database. As a part of the task it had to configure daily cron job to run at an arbitrary time, when the database load was low.



                                              I created a file mycronjob with cron schedule, username & the command and copied it to the /etc/cron.d directory. My two gotchas:





                                              1. mycronjob file had to be owned by root to run

                                              2. I had to set permissions of the file to 644 - 664 would not run.


                                              A permission problem will appear in /var/log/syslog as something similar to:



                                              Apr 24 18:30:01 ip-11-22-33-44 cron[40980]: (*system*) INSECURE MODE (group/other writable) (/etc/crontab)
                                              Apr 24 18:30:01 ip-11-22-33-44 cron[40980]: (*system*) INSECURE MODE (group/other writable) (/etc/cron.d/user)


                                              The first line refers to /etc/crontab file and the later to a file I placed under /etc/cront.d.







                                              share|improve this answer














                                              share|improve this answer



                                              share|improve this answer








                                              edited Apr 24 '17 at 19:53


























                                              community wiki





                                              4 revs, 4 users 41%
                                              Izik Golan
























                                                  2














                                                  Line written in a way crontab doesn't understand. It needs to be correctly written. Here's CrontabHowTo.






                                                  share|improve this answer





















                                                  • 1





                                                    How can this be debugged?

                                                    – Adam Matan
                                                    Jan 27 '11 at 6:34











                                                  • Reviewing cron's error log is the most common way. IIRC 'crontab -e' does a syntax parse after you've edited the file as well - but that might not be universal.

                                                    – pbr
                                                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:47
















                                                  2














                                                  Line written in a way crontab doesn't understand. It needs to be correctly written. Here's CrontabHowTo.






                                                  share|improve this answer





















                                                  • 1





                                                    How can this be debugged?

                                                    – Adam Matan
                                                    Jan 27 '11 at 6:34











                                                  • Reviewing cron's error log is the most common way. IIRC 'crontab -e' does a syntax parse after you've edited the file as well - but that might not be universal.

                                                    – pbr
                                                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:47














                                                  2












                                                  2








                                                  2







                                                  Line written in a way crontab doesn't understand. It needs to be correctly written. Here's CrontabHowTo.






                                                  share|improve this answer















                                                  Line written in a way crontab doesn't understand. It needs to be correctly written. Here's CrontabHowTo.







                                                  share|improve this answer














                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                  share|improve this answer








                                                  edited Feb 2 '11 at 19:52


























                                                  community wiki





                                                  4 revs, 3 users 67%
                                                  Kangarooo










                                                  • 1





                                                    How can this be debugged?

                                                    – Adam Matan
                                                    Jan 27 '11 at 6:34











                                                  • Reviewing cron's error log is the most common way. IIRC 'crontab -e' does a syntax parse after you've edited the file as well - but that might not be universal.

                                                    – pbr
                                                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:47














                                                  • 1





                                                    How can this be debugged?

                                                    – Adam Matan
                                                    Jan 27 '11 at 6:34











                                                  • Reviewing cron's error log is the most common way. IIRC 'crontab -e' does a syntax parse after you've edited the file as well - but that might not be universal.

                                                    – pbr
                                                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:47








                                                  1




                                                  1





                                                  How can this be debugged?

                                                  – Adam Matan
                                                  Jan 27 '11 at 6:34





                                                  How can this be debugged?

                                                  – Adam Matan
                                                  Jan 27 '11 at 6:34













                                                  Reviewing cron's error log is the most common way. IIRC 'crontab -e' does a syntax parse after you've edited the file as well - but that might not be universal.

                                                  – pbr
                                                  Apr 8 '12 at 22:47





                                                  Reviewing cron's error log is the most common way. IIRC 'crontab -e' does a syntax parse after you've edited the file as well - but that might not be universal.

                                                  – pbr
                                                  Apr 8 '12 at 22:47











                                                  2














                                                  Cron daemon could be running, but not actually working. Try restarting cron:



                                                  sudo /etc/init.d/cron restart





                                                  share|improve this answer





















                                                  • 3





                                                    I've NEVER seen this case in production. Doesn't mean it hasn't happened - just that I've not seen it in the 30 years I've been using UNIX and Linux. Cron is insanely robust.

                                                    – pbr
                                                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:42








                                                  • 1





                                                    I'm not sure but I think this did actually just happen to me. I tried pidof cron and got nothing. Tried using service utility and it said cron was already running. Just ran this command and ran pidof again and I get a result.

                                                    – Colleen
                                                    Apr 6 '15 at 17:13
















                                                  2














                                                  Cron daemon could be running, but not actually working. Try restarting cron:



                                                  sudo /etc/init.d/cron restart





                                                  share|improve this answer





















                                                  • 3





                                                    I've NEVER seen this case in production. Doesn't mean it hasn't happened - just that I've not seen it in the 30 years I've been using UNIX and Linux. Cron is insanely robust.

                                                    – pbr
                                                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:42








                                                  • 1





                                                    I'm not sure but I think this did actually just happen to me. I tried pidof cron and got nothing. Tried using service utility and it said cron was already running. Just ran this command and ran pidof again and I get a result.

                                                    – Colleen
                                                    Apr 6 '15 at 17:13














                                                  2












                                                  2








                                                  2







                                                  Cron daemon could be running, but not actually working. Try restarting cron:



                                                  sudo /etc/init.d/cron restart





                                                  share|improve this answer















                                                  Cron daemon could be running, but not actually working. Try restarting cron:



                                                  sudo /etc/init.d/cron restart






                                                  share|improve this answer














                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                  share|improve this answer








                                                  edited Nov 24 '11 at 23:20


























                                                  community wiki





                                                  2 revs, 2 users 67%
                                                  Phil Dodd










                                                  • 3





                                                    I've NEVER seen this case in production. Doesn't mean it hasn't happened - just that I've not seen it in the 30 years I've been using UNIX and Linux. Cron is insanely robust.

                                                    – pbr
                                                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:42








                                                  • 1





                                                    I'm not sure but I think this did actually just happen to me. I tried pidof cron and got nothing. Tried using service utility and it said cron was already running. Just ran this command and ran pidof again and I get a result.

                                                    – Colleen
                                                    Apr 6 '15 at 17:13














                                                  • 3





                                                    I've NEVER seen this case in production. Doesn't mean it hasn't happened - just that I've not seen it in the 30 years I've been using UNIX and Linux. Cron is insanely robust.

                                                    – pbr
                                                    Apr 8 '12 at 22:42








                                                  • 1





                                                    I'm not sure but I think this did actually just happen to me. I tried pidof cron and got nothing. Tried using service utility and it said cron was already running. Just ran this command and ran pidof again and I get a result.

                                                    – Colleen
                                                    Apr 6 '15 at 17:13








                                                  3




                                                  3





                                                  I've NEVER seen this case in production. Doesn't mean it hasn't happened - just that I've not seen it in the 30 years I've been using UNIX and Linux. Cron is insanely robust.

                                                  – pbr
                                                  Apr 8 '12 at 22:42







                                                  I've NEVER seen this case in production. Doesn't mean it hasn't happened - just that I've not seen it in the 30 years I've been using UNIX and Linux. Cron is insanely robust.

                                                  – pbr
                                                  Apr 8 '12 at 22:42






                                                  1




                                                  1





                                                  I'm not sure but I think this did actually just happen to me. I tried pidof cron and got nothing. Tried using service utility and it said cron was already running. Just ran this command and ran pidof again and I get a result.

                                                  – Colleen
                                                  Apr 6 '15 at 17:13





                                                  I'm not sure but I think this did actually just happen to me. I tried pidof cron and got nothing. Tried using service utility and it said cron was already running. Just ran this command and ran pidof again and I get a result.

                                                  – Colleen
                                                  Apr 6 '15 at 17:13











                                                  2














                                                  Writing to cron via "crontab -e" with the username argument in a line. I've seen examples of users (or sysadmins) writing their shell scripts and not understanding why they don't automate. The "user" argument exists in /etc/crontab, but not the user-defined files. so, for example, your personal file would be something like:



                                                  # m h dom mon dow command

                                                  * * */2 * * /some/shell/script


                                                  whereas /etc/crontab would be:



                                                  # m h dom mon dow user   command

                                                  * * */2 * * jdoe /some/shell/script


                                                  So, why would you do the latter? Well, depending on how you want to set your permissions, this can become very convoluted. I've written scripts to automate tasks for users who don't understand the intricacies, or don't want to bother with the drudgery. By setting permissions to --x------, I can make the script executable without them being able to read (and perhaps accidentally change) it. However, I might want to run this command with several others from one file (thus making it easier to maintain) but make sure file output is assigned the right owner. Doing so (at least in Ubuntu 10.10) breaks on both the inability to read the file as well as execute, plus the afore-mentioned issue with putting periods in /etc/crontab (which, funnily enough, causes no error when going through crontab -e).



                                                  As an example, I've seen instances of sudo crontab -e used to run a script with root permissions, with a corresponding chown username file_output in the shell script. Sloppy, but it works. IMHO, The more graceful option is to put it in /etc/crontab with username declared and proper permissions, so file_output goes to the right place and owner.






                                                  share|improve this answer


























                                                  • "Doing so (at least in Ubuntu 10.10) breaks on both the inability to read the file as well as execute....." I should clarify: /etc/crontab (by default) requires read AND execute permissions, whereas you COULD run "sudo crontab -e" to create a cronjob which overrides both the need for the "w" permission, and the problem with extensions like ".sh". I haven't had time to pull apart the cron code and check why this works, just a detail I've noticed.

                                                    – Mange
                                                    Jun 12 '12 at 19:54


















                                                  2














                                                  Writing to cron via "crontab -e" with the username argument in a line. I've seen examples of users (or sysadmins) writing their shell scripts and not understanding why they don't automate. The "user" argument exists in /etc/crontab, but not the user-defined files. so, for example, your personal file would be something like:



                                                  # m h dom mon dow command

                                                  * * */2 * * /some/shell/script


                                                  whereas /etc/crontab would be:



                                                  # m h dom mon dow user   command

                                                  * * */2 * * jdoe /some/shell/script


                                                  So, why would you do the latter? Well, depending on how you want to set your permissions, this can become very convoluted. I've written scripts to automate tasks for users who don't understand the intricacies, or don't want to bother with the drudgery. By setting permissions to --x------, I can make the script executable without them being able to read (and perhaps accidentally change) it. However, I might want to run this command with several others from one file (thus making it easier to maintain) but make sure file output is assigned the right owner. Doing so (at least in Ubuntu 10.10) breaks on both the inability to read the file as well as execute, plus the afore-mentioned issue with putting periods in /etc/crontab (which, funnily enough, causes no error when going through crontab -e).



                                                  As an example, I've seen instances of sudo crontab -e used to run a script with root permissions, with a corresponding chown username file_output in the shell script. Sloppy, but it works. IMHO, The more graceful option is to put it in /etc/crontab with username declared and proper permissions, so file_output goes to the right place and owner.






                                                  share|improve this answer


























                                                  • "Doing so (at least in Ubuntu 10.10) breaks on both the inability to read the file as well as execute....." I should clarify: /etc/crontab (by default) requires read AND execute permissions, whereas you COULD run "sudo crontab -e" to create a cronjob which overrides both the need for the "w" permission, and the problem with extensions like ".sh". I haven't had time to pull apart the cron code and check why this works, just a detail I've noticed.

                                                    – Mange
                                                    Jun 12 '12 at 19:54
















                                                  2












                                                  2








                                                  2







                                                  Writing to cron via "crontab -e" with the username argument in a line. I've seen examples of users (or sysadmins) writing their shell scripts and not understanding why they don't automate. The "user" argument exists in /etc/crontab, but not the user-defined files. so, for example, your personal file would be something like:



                                                  # m h dom mon dow command

                                                  * * */2 * * /some/shell/script


                                                  whereas /etc/crontab would be:



                                                  # m h dom mon dow user   command

                                                  * * */2 * * jdoe /some/shell/script


                                                  So, why would you do the latter? Well, depending on how you want to set your permissions, this can become very convoluted. I've written scripts to automate tasks for users who don't understand the intricacies, or don't want to bother with the drudgery. By setting permissions to --x------, I can make the script executable without them being able to read (and perhaps accidentally change) it. However, I might want to run this command with several others from one file (thus making it easier to maintain) but make sure file output is assigned the right owner. Doing so (at least in Ubuntu 10.10) breaks on both the inability to read the file as well as execute, plus the afore-mentioned issue with putting periods in /etc/crontab (which, funnily enough, causes no error when going through crontab -e).



                                                  As an example, I've seen instances of sudo crontab -e used to run a script with root permissions, with a corresponding chown username file_output in the shell script. Sloppy, but it works. IMHO, The more graceful option is to put it in /etc/crontab with username declared and proper permissions, so file_output goes to the right place and owner.






                                                  share|improve this answer















                                                  Writing to cron via "crontab -e" with the username argument in a line. I've seen examples of users (or sysadmins) writing their shell scripts and not understanding why they don't automate. The "user" argument exists in /etc/crontab, but not the user-defined files. so, for example, your personal file would be something like:



                                                  # m h dom mon dow command

                                                  * * */2 * * /some/shell/script


                                                  whereas /etc/crontab would be:



                                                  # m h dom mon dow user   command

                                                  * * */2 * * jdoe /some/shell/script


                                                  So, why would you do the latter? Well, depending on how you want to set your permissions, this can become very convoluted. I've written scripts to automate tasks for users who don't understand the intricacies, or don't want to bother with the drudgery. By setting permissions to --x------, I can make the script executable without them being able to read (and perhaps accidentally change) it. However, I might want to run this command with several others from one file (thus making it easier to maintain) but make sure file output is assigned the right owner. Doing so (at least in Ubuntu 10.10) breaks on both the inability to read the file as well as execute, plus the afore-mentioned issue with putting periods in /etc/crontab (which, funnily enough, causes no error when going through crontab -e).



                                                  As an example, I've seen instances of sudo crontab -e used to run a script with root permissions, with a corresponding chown username file_output in the shell script. Sloppy, but it works. IMHO, The more graceful option is to put it in /etc/crontab with username declared and proper permissions, so file_output goes to the right place and owner.







                                                  share|improve this answer














                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                  share|improve this answer








                                                  edited Jun 12 '12 at 17:42


























                                                  community wiki





                                                  3 revs, 2 users 77%
                                                  Mange















                                                  • "Doing so (at least in Ubuntu 10.10) breaks on both the inability to read the file as well as execute....." I should clarify: /etc/crontab (by default) requires read AND execute permissions, whereas you COULD run "sudo crontab -e" to create a cronjob which overrides both the need for the "w" permission, and the problem with extensions like ".sh". I haven't had time to pull apart the cron code and check why this works, just a detail I've noticed.

                                                    – Mange
                                                    Jun 12 '12 at 19:54





















                                                  • "Doing so (at least in Ubuntu 10.10) breaks on both the inability to read the file as well as execute....." I should clarify: /etc/crontab (by default) requires read AND execute permissions, whereas you COULD run "sudo crontab -e" to create a cronjob which overrides both the need for the "w" permission, and the problem with extensions like ".sh". I haven't had time to pull apart the cron code and check why this works, just a detail I've noticed.

                                                    – Mange
                                                    Jun 12 '12 at 19:54



















                                                  "Doing so (at least in Ubuntu 10.10) breaks on both the inability to read the file as well as execute....." I should clarify: /etc/crontab (by default) requires read AND execute permissions, whereas you COULD run "sudo crontab -e" to create a cronjob which overrides both the need for the "w" permission, and the problem with extensions like ".sh". I haven't had time to pull apart the cron code and check why this works, just a detail I've noticed.

                                                  – Mange
                                                  Jun 12 '12 at 19:54







                                                  "Doing so (at least in Ubuntu 10.10) breaks on both the inability to read the file as well as execute....." I should clarify: /etc/crontab (by default) requires read AND execute permissions, whereas you COULD run "sudo crontab -e" to create a cronjob which overrides both the need for the "w" permission, and the problem with extensions like ".sh". I haven't had time to pull apart the cron code and check why this works, just a detail I've noticed.

                                                  – Mange
                                                  Jun 12 '12 at 19:54













                                                  2














                                                  Building off what Aaron Peart mentioned about verbose mode, sometimes scripts not in verbose mode will initialize but not finish if the default behavior of an included command is to output a line or more to the screen once the proc starts. For example, I wrote a backup script for our intranet which used curl, a utility that downloads or uploads files to remote servers, and is quite handy if you can only access said remote files through HTTP. Using 'curl http://something.com/somefile.xls' was causing a script I wrote to hang and never complete because it spits out a newline followed by a progress line. I had to use the silent flag (-s) to tell it not to output any information, and write in my own code to handle if the file failed to download.






                                                  share|improve this answer





















                                                  • 1





                                                    For programs that don't have a silent mode, you can redirect their output to /dev/null. For example: some-command > /dev/null This will redirect only standard output, and not error output (which is usually what you want, since you want to be informed of errors). To redirect error output too, use some-command &> /dev/null.

                                                    – Eliah Kagan
                                                    Jun 12 '12 at 20:22











                                                  • Yeah, that was my first thought when writing the afore-mentioneed script. I forget why I didn't use that, possibly some non-standard behavior that circumvented said solution. I know that verbose/interactive mode is the default on some commands (I'm looking at YOU, scp!), which means you need to hadle said output for smooth operation of shell scripts.

                                                    – Mange
                                                    Jun 13 '12 at 12:09
















                                                  2














                                                  Building off what Aaron Peart mentioned about verbose mode, sometimes scripts not in verbose mode will initialize but not finish if the default behavior of an included command is to output a line or more to the screen once the proc starts. For example, I wrote a backup script for our intranet which used curl, a utility that downloads or uploads files to remote servers, and is quite handy if you can only access said remote files through HTTP. Using 'curl http://something.com/somefile.xls' was causing a script I wrote to hang and never complete because it spits out a newline followed by a progress line. I had to use the silent flag (-s) to tell it not to output any information, and write in my own code to handle if the file failed to download.






                                                  share|improve this answer





















                                                  • 1





                                                    For programs that don't have a silent mode, you can redirect their output to /dev/null. For example: some-command > /dev/null This will redirect only standard output, and not error output (which is usually what you want, since you want to be informed of errors). To redirect error output too, use some-command &> /dev/null.

                                                    – Eliah Kagan
                                                    Jun 12 '12 at 20:22











                                                  • Yeah, that was my first thought when writing the afore-mentioneed script. I forget why I didn't use that, possibly some non-standard behavior that circumvented said solution. I know that verbose/interactive mode is the default on some commands (I'm looking at YOU, scp!), which means you need to hadle said output for smooth operation of shell scripts.

                                                    – Mange
                                                    Jun 13 '12 at 12:09














                                                  2












                                                  2








                                                  2







                                                  Building off what Aaron Peart mentioned about verbose mode, sometimes scripts not in verbose mode will initialize but not finish if the default behavior of an included command is to output a line or more to the screen once the proc starts. For example, I wrote a backup script for our intranet which used curl, a utility that downloads or uploads files to remote servers, and is quite handy if you can only access said remote files through HTTP. Using 'curl http://something.com/somefile.xls' was causing a script I wrote to hang and never complete because it spits out a newline followed by a progress line. I had to use the silent flag (-s) to tell it not to output any information, and write in my own code to handle if the file failed to download.






                                                  share|improve this answer















                                                  Building off what Aaron Peart mentioned about verbose mode, sometimes scripts not in verbose mode will initialize but not finish if the default behavior of an included command is to output a line or more to the screen once the proc starts. For example, I wrote a backup script for our intranet which used curl, a utility that downloads or uploads files to remote servers, and is quite handy if you can only access said remote files through HTTP. Using 'curl http://something.com/somefile.xls' was causing a script I wrote to hang and never complete because it spits out a newline followed by a progress line. I had to use the silent flag (-s) to tell it not to output any information, and write in my own code to handle if the file failed to download.







                                                  share|improve this answer














                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                  share|improve this answer








                                                  answered Jun 12 '12 at 20:06


























                                                  community wiki





                                                  Mange









                                                  • 1





                                                    For programs that don't have a silent mode, you can redirect their output to /dev/null. For example: some-command > /dev/null This will redirect only standard output, and not error output (which is usually what you want, since you want to be informed of errors). To redirect error output too, use some-command &> /dev/null.

                                                    – Eliah Kagan
                                                    Jun 12 '12 at 20:22











                                                  • Yeah, that was my first thought when writing the afore-mentioneed script. I forget why I didn't use that, possibly some non-standard behavior that circumvented said solution. I know that verbose/interactive mode is the default on some commands (I'm looking at YOU, scp!), which means you need to hadle said output for smooth operation of shell scripts.

                                                    – Mange
                                                    Jun 13 '12 at 12:09














                                                  • 1





                                                    For programs that don't have a silent mode, you can redirect their output to /dev/null. For example: some-command > /dev/null This will redirect only standard output, and not error output (which is usually what you want, since you want to be informed of errors). To redirect error output too, use some-command &> /dev/null.

                                                    – Eliah Kagan
                                                    Jun 12 '12 at 20:22











                                                  • Yeah, that was my first thought when writing the afore-mentioneed script. I forget why I didn't use that, possibly some non-standard behavior that circumvented said solution. I know that verbose/interactive mode is the default on some commands (I'm looking at YOU, scp!), which means you need to hadle said output for smooth operation of shell scripts.

                                                    – Mange
                                                    Jun 13 '12 at 12:09








                                                  1




                                                  1





                                                  For programs that don't have a silent mode, you can redirect their output to /dev/null. For example: some-command > /dev/null This will redirect only standard output, and not error output (which is usually what you want, since you want to be informed of errors). To redirect error output too, use some-command &> /dev/null.

                                                  – Eliah Kagan
                                                  Jun 12 '12 at 20:22





                                                  For programs that don't have a silent mode, you can redirect their output to /dev/null. For example: some-command > /dev/null This will redirect only standard output, and not error output (which is usually what you want, since you want to be informed of errors). To redirect error output too, use some-command &> /dev/null.

                                                  – Eliah Kagan
                                                  Jun 12 '12 at 20:22













                                                  Yeah, that was my first thought when writing the afore-mentioneed script. I forget why I didn't use that, possibly some non-standard behavior that circumvented said solution. I know that verbose/interactive mode is the default on some commands (I'm looking at YOU, scp!), which means you need to hadle said output for smooth operation of shell scripts.

                                                  – Mange
                                                  Jun 13 '12 at 12:09





                                                  Yeah, that was my first thought when writing the afore-mentioneed script. I forget why I didn't use that, possibly some non-standard behavior that circumvented said solution. I know that verbose/interactive mode is the default on some commands (I'm looking at YOU, scp!), which means you need to hadle said output for smooth operation of shell scripts.

                                                  – Mange
                                                  Jun 13 '12 at 12:09











                                                  2














                                                  Although you can define environment variables in your crontable, you're not in a shell script. So constructions like the following won't work:



                                                  SOME_DIR=/var/log
                                                  MY_LOG_FILE=${SOME_LOG}/some_file.log

                                                  BIN_DIR=/usr/local/bin
                                                  MY_EXE=${BIN_DIR}/some_executable_file

                                                  0 10 * * * ${MY_EXE} some_param >> ${MY_LOG_FILE}


                                                  This is because variables are not interpreted in the crontable: all values are taken litterally. And this is the same if you omit the brackets.
                                                  So your commands won't run, and your log files won't be written...



                                                  Instead you must define all your environment variables straight:



                                                  SOME_DIR=/var/log
                                                  MY_LOG_FILE=/var/log/some_file.log

                                                  BIN_DIR=/usr/local/bin
                                                  MY_EXE=/usr/local/bin/some_executable_file

                                                  0 10 * * * ${MY_EXE} some_param >> ${MY_LOG_FILE}





                                                  share|improve this answer






























                                                    2














                                                    Although you can define environment variables in your crontable, you're not in a shell script. So constructions like the following won't work:



                                                    SOME_DIR=/var/log
                                                    MY_LOG_FILE=${SOME_LOG}/some_file.log

                                                    BIN_DIR=/usr/local/bin
                                                    MY_EXE=${BIN_DIR}/some_executable_file

                                                    0 10 * * * ${MY_EXE} some_param >> ${MY_LOG_FILE}


                                                    This is because variables are not interpreted in the crontable: all values are taken litterally. And this is the same if you omit the brackets.
                                                    So your commands won't run, and your log files won't be written...



                                                    Instead you must define all your environment variables straight:



                                                    SOME_DIR=/var/log
                                                    MY_LOG_FILE=/var/log/some_file.log

                                                    BIN_DIR=/usr/local/bin
                                                    MY_EXE=/usr/local/bin/some_executable_file

                                                    0 10 * * * ${MY_EXE} some_param >> ${MY_LOG_FILE}





                                                    share|improve this answer




























                                                      2












                                                      2








                                                      2







                                                      Although you can define environment variables in your crontable, you're not in a shell script. So constructions like the following won't work:



                                                      SOME_DIR=/var/log
                                                      MY_LOG_FILE=${SOME_LOG}/some_file.log

                                                      BIN_DIR=/usr/local/bin
                                                      MY_EXE=${BIN_DIR}/some_executable_file

                                                      0 10 * * * ${MY_EXE} some_param >> ${MY_LOG_FILE}


                                                      This is because variables are not interpreted in the crontable: all values are taken litterally. And this is the same if you omit the brackets.
                                                      So your commands won't run, and your log files won't be written...



                                                      Instead you must define all your environment variables straight:



                                                      SOME_DIR=/var/log
                                                      MY_LOG_FILE=/var/log/some_file.log

                                                      BIN_DIR=/usr/local/bin
                                                      MY_EXE=/usr/local/bin/some_executable_file

                                                      0 10 * * * ${MY_EXE} some_param >> ${MY_LOG_FILE}





                                                      share|improve this answer















                                                      Although you can define environment variables in your crontable, you're not in a shell script. So constructions like the following won't work:



                                                      SOME_DIR=/var/log
                                                      MY_LOG_FILE=${SOME_LOG}/some_file.log

                                                      BIN_DIR=/usr/local/bin
                                                      MY_EXE=${BIN_DIR}/some_executable_file

                                                      0 10 * * * ${MY_EXE} some_param >> ${MY_LOG_FILE}


                                                      This is because variables are not interpreted in the crontable: all values are taken litterally. And this is the same if you omit the brackets.
                                                      So your commands won't run, and your log files won't be written...



                                                      Instead you must define all your environment variables straight:



                                                      SOME_DIR=/var/log
                                                      MY_LOG_FILE=/var/log/some_file.log

                                                      BIN_DIR=/usr/local/bin
                                                      MY_EXE=/usr/local/bin/some_executable_file

                                                      0 10 * * * ${MY_EXE} some_param >> ${MY_LOG_FILE}






                                                      share|improve this answer














                                                      share|improve this answer



                                                      share|improve this answer








                                                      edited Jun 7 '13 at 9:13


























                                                      community wiki





                                                      2 revs
                                                      Alexandre
























                                                          2














                                                          When a task is run within cron, stdin is closed. Programs that act differently based on whether stdin is available or not will behave differently between the shell session and in cron.



                                                          An example is the program goaccess for analysing web server log files. This does NOT work in cron:



                                                          goaccess -a -f /var/log/nginx/access.log > output.html


                                                          and goaccess shows the help page instead of creating the report. In the shell this can be reproduced with



                                                          goaccess -a -f /var/log/nginx/access.log > output.html < /dev/null


                                                          The fix for goaccess is to make it read the log from stdin instead of reading from the file, so the solution is to change the crontab entry to



                                                          cat /var/log/nginx/access.log | goaccess -a > output.html





                                                          share|improve this answer






























                                                            2














                                                            When a task is run within cron, stdin is closed. Programs that act differently based on whether stdin is available or not will behave differently between the shell session and in cron.



                                                            An example is the program goaccess for analysing web server log files. This does NOT work in cron:



                                                            goaccess -a -f /var/log/nginx/access.log > output.html


                                                            and goaccess shows the help page instead of creating the report. In the shell this can be reproduced with



                                                            goaccess -a -f /var/log/nginx/access.log > output.html < /dev/null


                                                            The fix for goaccess is to make it read the log from stdin instead of reading from the file, so the solution is to change the crontab entry to



                                                            cat /var/log/nginx/access.log | goaccess -a > output.html





                                                            share|improve this answer




























                                                              2












                                                              2








                                                              2







                                                              When a task is run within cron, stdin is closed. Programs that act differently based on whether stdin is available or not will behave differently between the shell session and in cron.



                                                              An example is the program goaccess for analysing web server log files. This does NOT work in cron:



                                                              goaccess -a -f /var/log/nginx/access.log > output.html


                                                              and goaccess shows the help page instead of creating the report. In the shell this can be reproduced with



                                                              goaccess -a -f /var/log/nginx/access.log > output.html < /dev/null


                                                              The fix for goaccess is to make it read the log from stdin instead of reading from the file, so the solution is to change the crontab entry to



                                                              cat /var/log/nginx/access.log | goaccess -a > output.html





                                                              share|improve this answer















                                                              When a task is run within cron, stdin is closed. Programs that act differently based on whether stdin is available or not will behave differently between the shell session and in cron.



                                                              An example is the program goaccess for analysing web server log files. This does NOT work in cron:



                                                              goaccess -a -f /var/log/nginx/access.log > output.html


                                                              and goaccess shows the help page instead of creating the report. In the shell this can be reproduced with



                                                              goaccess -a -f /var/log/nginx/access.log > output.html < /dev/null


                                                              The fix for goaccess is to make it read the log from stdin instead of reading from the file, so the solution is to change the crontab entry to



                                                              cat /var/log/nginx/access.log | goaccess -a > output.html






                                                              share|improve this answer














                                                              share|improve this answer



                                                              share|improve this answer








                                                              answered Aug 9 '13 at 20:27


























                                                              community wiki





                                                              Martijn de Milliano
























                                                                  2














                                                                  On my RHEL7 servers, root cron jobs would run, but user jobs would not. I found that without a home directory, the jobs won't run (but you will see good errors in /var/log/cron). When I created the home directory, the problem was solved.






                                                                  share|improve this answer






























                                                                    2














                                                                    On my RHEL7 servers, root cron jobs would run, but user jobs would not. I found that without a home directory, the jobs won't run (but you will see good errors in /var/log/cron). When I created the home directory, the problem was solved.






                                                                    share|improve this answer




























                                                                      2












                                                                      2








                                                                      2







                                                                      On my RHEL7 servers, root cron jobs would run, but user jobs would not. I found that without a home directory, the jobs won't run (but you will see good errors in /var/log/cron). When I created the home directory, the problem was solved.






                                                                      share|improve this answer















                                                                      On my RHEL7 servers, root cron jobs would run, but user jobs would not. I found that without a home directory, the jobs won't run (but you will see good errors in /var/log/cron). When I created the home directory, the problem was solved.







                                                                      share|improve this answer














                                                                      share|improve this answer



                                                                      share|improve this answer








                                                                      answered Feb 2 '17 at 21:29


























                                                                      community wiki





                                                                      Dennis Parslow
























                                                                          2














                                                                          If you edited your crontab file using a windows editor (via samba or something) and it's replaced the newlines with nr or just r, cron won't run.



                                                                          Also, if you're using /etc/cron.d/* and one of those files has a r in it, cron will move through the files and stop when it hits a bad file. Not sure if that's the problem?



                                                                          Use:



                                                                          od -c /etc/cron.d/* | grep r





                                                                          share|improve this answer






























                                                                            2














                                                                            If you edited your crontab file using a windows editor (via samba or something) and it's replaced the newlines with nr or just r, cron won't run.



                                                                            Also, if you're using /etc/cron.d/* and one of those files has a r in it, cron will move through the files and stop when it hits a bad file. Not sure if that's the problem?



                                                                            Use:



                                                                            od -c /etc/cron.d/* | grep r





                                                                            share|improve this answer




























                                                                              2












                                                                              2








                                                                              2







                                                                              If you edited your crontab file using a windows editor (via samba or something) and it's replaced the newlines with nr or just r, cron won't run.



                                                                              Also, if you're using /etc/cron.d/* and one of those files has a r in it, cron will move through the files and stop when it hits a bad file. Not sure if that's the problem?



                                                                              Use:



                                                                              od -c /etc/cron.d/* | grep r





                                                                              share|improve this answer















                                                                              If you edited your crontab file using a windows editor (via samba or something) and it's replaced the newlines with nr or just r, cron won't run.



                                                                              Also, if you're using /etc/cron.d/* and one of those files has a r in it, cron will move through the files and stop when it hits a bad file. Not sure if that's the problem?



                                                                              Use:



                                                                              od -c /etc/cron.d/* | grep r






                                                                              share|improve this answer














                                                                              share|improve this answer



                                                                              share|improve this answer








                                                                              edited Apr 20 '17 at 1:38


























                                                                              community wiki





                                                                              4 revs, 2 users 91%
                                                                              Doug























                                                                                  1 2
                                                                                  next




                                                                                  protected by heemayl May 9 '17 at 3:07



                                                                                  Thank you for your interest in this question.
                                                                                  Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                                                                                  Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                                                                                  Popular posts from this blog

                                                                                  GameSpot

                                                                                  connect to host localhost port 22: Connection refused

                                                                                  Getting a Wifi WPA2 wifi connection