Install Canon LiDE 300 / 400 on Ubuntu 18.04
Unable to install Canon LiDE 300 on Ubuntu 18.04. How to solve it?
drivers 18.04 scanner canon sane
add a comment |
Unable to install Canon LiDE 300 on Ubuntu 18.04. How to solve it?
drivers 18.04 scanner canon sane
Hello and welocome to AU. Please review this link and edit your question accordingly to improve your chances of getting a correct and accurate answer.
– Marc Vanhoomissen
Jan 7 at 13:17
1
Have you tried downloading the linux drivers from canon?
– Charles Green
Jan 7 at 15:45
add a comment |
Unable to install Canon LiDE 300 on Ubuntu 18.04. How to solve it?
drivers 18.04 scanner canon sane
Unable to install Canon LiDE 300 on Ubuntu 18.04. How to solve it?
drivers 18.04 scanner canon sane
drivers 18.04 scanner canon sane
edited 17 mins ago
markling
156219
156219
asked Jan 7 at 7:42
indranilindranil
1
1
Hello and welocome to AU. Please review this link and edit your question accordingly to improve your chances of getting a correct and accurate answer.
– Marc Vanhoomissen
Jan 7 at 13:17
1
Have you tried downloading the linux drivers from canon?
– Charles Green
Jan 7 at 15:45
add a comment |
Hello and welocome to AU. Please review this link and edit your question accordingly to improve your chances of getting a correct and accurate answer.
– Marc Vanhoomissen
Jan 7 at 13:17
1
Have you tried downloading the linux drivers from canon?
– Charles Green
Jan 7 at 15:45
Hello and welocome to AU. Please review this link and edit your question accordingly to improve your chances of getting a correct and accurate answer.
– Marc Vanhoomissen
Jan 7 at 13:17
Hello and welocome to AU. Please review this link and edit your question accordingly to improve your chances of getting a correct and accurate answer.
– Marc Vanhoomissen
Jan 7 at 13:17
1
1
Have you tried downloading the linux drivers from canon?
– Charles Green
Jan 7 at 15:45
Have you tried downloading the linux drivers from canon?
– Charles Green
Jan 7 at 15:45
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Download the scanner's linux driver from the Canon website. It's the same driver for related models: scangearmp2-3.70-1-deb
Unpack and install the driver from the download directory:
./install.sh
Canon's own driver is not enough though, to get the Canon scanner working. It only half works. Assuming you have installed Sane. Sane will recognise the scanner.
$ sane-find-scanner
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x1912 [LiDE 400]) at libusb:003:008
But it won't work.
$ scanimage -L
No scanners were identified
$ scanimage --format=png > test.png
scanimage: no SANE devices found
Likewise, SimpleScan won't yet detect the scanner.
It will scan at this stage by running Canon's own scanning software, supplied with the scanner download: scangearmp2. But this software is as rudimentary as toddler's tea set. It won't even let you change the resolution, filetype or scan area.
But thanks to the good work being done by @pekhterev and Rolf Bensch, the scanner will run if you install some more home-grown software.
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:rolfbensch/sane-git
sudo apt-get update
(source here)
sudo apt install libsane-common
sudo apt install sane-utils
sudo apt install xsane
(source)
The scanner worked from Xsane, after doing this. And from Gimp, by calling Xsane (it sees it as a pixma:04A91912 scanner). But the image was dull.
Thankfully, it now also works from SimpleScan.
.
Canon, btw, when I contacted them for help because their scanner didn't work, said. 'we don't support linux'. I said - but you've taken the time to supply a driver - surely you would want to make sure it actually worked when people installed it. They said, 'we don't support linux'.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1107632%2finstall-canon-lide-300-400-on-ubuntu-18-04%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Download the scanner's linux driver from the Canon website. It's the same driver for related models: scangearmp2-3.70-1-deb
Unpack and install the driver from the download directory:
./install.sh
Canon's own driver is not enough though, to get the Canon scanner working. It only half works. Assuming you have installed Sane. Sane will recognise the scanner.
$ sane-find-scanner
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x1912 [LiDE 400]) at libusb:003:008
But it won't work.
$ scanimage -L
No scanners were identified
$ scanimage --format=png > test.png
scanimage: no SANE devices found
Likewise, SimpleScan won't yet detect the scanner.
It will scan at this stage by running Canon's own scanning software, supplied with the scanner download: scangearmp2. But this software is as rudimentary as toddler's tea set. It won't even let you change the resolution, filetype or scan area.
But thanks to the good work being done by @pekhterev and Rolf Bensch, the scanner will run if you install some more home-grown software.
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:rolfbensch/sane-git
sudo apt-get update
(source here)
sudo apt install libsane-common
sudo apt install sane-utils
sudo apt install xsane
(source)
The scanner worked from Xsane, after doing this. And from Gimp, by calling Xsane (it sees it as a pixma:04A91912 scanner). But the image was dull.
Thankfully, it now also works from SimpleScan.
.
Canon, btw, when I contacted them for help because their scanner didn't work, said. 'we don't support linux'. I said - but you've taken the time to supply a driver - surely you would want to make sure it actually worked when people installed it. They said, 'we don't support linux'.
add a comment |
Download the scanner's linux driver from the Canon website. It's the same driver for related models: scangearmp2-3.70-1-deb
Unpack and install the driver from the download directory:
./install.sh
Canon's own driver is not enough though, to get the Canon scanner working. It only half works. Assuming you have installed Sane. Sane will recognise the scanner.
$ sane-find-scanner
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x1912 [LiDE 400]) at libusb:003:008
But it won't work.
$ scanimage -L
No scanners were identified
$ scanimage --format=png > test.png
scanimage: no SANE devices found
Likewise, SimpleScan won't yet detect the scanner.
It will scan at this stage by running Canon's own scanning software, supplied with the scanner download: scangearmp2. But this software is as rudimentary as toddler's tea set. It won't even let you change the resolution, filetype or scan area.
But thanks to the good work being done by @pekhterev and Rolf Bensch, the scanner will run if you install some more home-grown software.
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:rolfbensch/sane-git
sudo apt-get update
(source here)
sudo apt install libsane-common
sudo apt install sane-utils
sudo apt install xsane
(source)
The scanner worked from Xsane, after doing this. And from Gimp, by calling Xsane (it sees it as a pixma:04A91912 scanner). But the image was dull.
Thankfully, it now also works from SimpleScan.
.
Canon, btw, when I contacted them for help because their scanner didn't work, said. 'we don't support linux'. I said - but you've taken the time to supply a driver - surely you would want to make sure it actually worked when people installed it. They said, 'we don't support linux'.
add a comment |
Download the scanner's linux driver from the Canon website. It's the same driver for related models: scangearmp2-3.70-1-deb
Unpack and install the driver from the download directory:
./install.sh
Canon's own driver is not enough though, to get the Canon scanner working. It only half works. Assuming you have installed Sane. Sane will recognise the scanner.
$ sane-find-scanner
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x1912 [LiDE 400]) at libusb:003:008
But it won't work.
$ scanimage -L
No scanners were identified
$ scanimage --format=png > test.png
scanimage: no SANE devices found
Likewise, SimpleScan won't yet detect the scanner.
It will scan at this stage by running Canon's own scanning software, supplied with the scanner download: scangearmp2. But this software is as rudimentary as toddler's tea set. It won't even let you change the resolution, filetype or scan area.
But thanks to the good work being done by @pekhterev and Rolf Bensch, the scanner will run if you install some more home-grown software.
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:rolfbensch/sane-git
sudo apt-get update
(source here)
sudo apt install libsane-common
sudo apt install sane-utils
sudo apt install xsane
(source)
The scanner worked from Xsane, after doing this. And from Gimp, by calling Xsane (it sees it as a pixma:04A91912 scanner). But the image was dull.
Thankfully, it now also works from SimpleScan.
.
Canon, btw, when I contacted them for help because their scanner didn't work, said. 'we don't support linux'. I said - but you've taken the time to supply a driver - surely you would want to make sure it actually worked when people installed it. They said, 'we don't support linux'.
Download the scanner's linux driver from the Canon website. It's the same driver for related models: scangearmp2-3.70-1-deb
Unpack and install the driver from the download directory:
./install.sh
Canon's own driver is not enough though, to get the Canon scanner working. It only half works. Assuming you have installed Sane. Sane will recognise the scanner.
$ sane-find-scanner
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x1912 [LiDE 400]) at libusb:003:008
But it won't work.
$ scanimage -L
No scanners were identified
$ scanimage --format=png > test.png
scanimage: no SANE devices found
Likewise, SimpleScan won't yet detect the scanner.
It will scan at this stage by running Canon's own scanning software, supplied with the scanner download: scangearmp2. But this software is as rudimentary as toddler's tea set. It won't even let you change the resolution, filetype or scan area.
But thanks to the good work being done by @pekhterev and Rolf Bensch, the scanner will run if you install some more home-grown software.
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:rolfbensch/sane-git
sudo apt-get update
(source here)
sudo apt install libsane-common
sudo apt install sane-utils
sudo apt install xsane
(source)
The scanner worked from Xsane, after doing this. And from Gimp, by calling Xsane (it sees it as a pixma:04A91912 scanner). But the image was dull.
Thankfully, it now also works from SimpleScan.
.
Canon, btw, when I contacted them for help because their scanner didn't work, said. 'we don't support linux'. I said - but you've taken the time to supply a driver - surely you would want to make sure it actually worked when people installed it. They said, 'we don't support linux'.
answered 3 hours ago
marklingmarkling
156219
156219
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1107632%2finstall-canon-lide-300-400-on-ubuntu-18-04%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Hello and welocome to AU. Please review this link and edit your question accordingly to improve your chances of getting a correct and accurate answer.
– Marc Vanhoomissen
Jan 7 at 13:17
1
Have you tried downloading the linux drivers from canon?
– Charles Green
Jan 7 at 15:45