ufw Allow-All backdoor?
I am on Ubuntu 18.04 with ufw and gufw installed. Latest updates have been applied. No other special configuration.
ufw
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I am on Ubuntu 18.04 with ufw and gufw installed. Latest updates have been applied. No other special configuration.
ufw
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Did you remember to flush the existing rules before building your new chains?
– user535733
2 hours ago
Seems you misunderstood. Let's try again: Is the very first step in building your new rulechain a flush of the existing rules? "ACCEPT all" is a default rule, and needs to be flushed.
– user535733
2 hours ago
To view your iptables rules use this command instead:sudo iptables -v -x -n -Land you should then observe that is in only the local interface (lo) that is set to ACCEPT all (which is how it should be).
– Doug Smythies
1 hour ago
Why did you delete most of the content for your question and your comments? Now no one has the context for these comments nor can they see what the problem is. Unless they look at the edits, I suppose.
– Doug Smythies
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I am on Ubuntu 18.04 with ufw and gufw installed. Latest updates have been applied. No other special configuration.
ufw
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I am on Ubuntu 18.04 with ufw and gufw installed. Latest updates have been applied. No other special configuration.
ufw
ufw
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
James
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
JamesJames
62
62
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Did you remember to flush the existing rules before building your new chains?
– user535733
2 hours ago
Seems you misunderstood. Let's try again: Is the very first step in building your new rulechain a flush of the existing rules? "ACCEPT all" is a default rule, and needs to be flushed.
– user535733
2 hours ago
To view your iptables rules use this command instead:sudo iptables -v -x -n -Land you should then observe that is in only the local interface (lo) that is set to ACCEPT all (which is how it should be).
– Doug Smythies
1 hour ago
Why did you delete most of the content for your question and your comments? Now no one has the context for these comments nor can they see what the problem is. Unless they look at the edits, I suppose.
– Doug Smythies
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Did you remember to flush the existing rules before building your new chains?
– user535733
2 hours ago
Seems you misunderstood. Let's try again: Is the very first step in building your new rulechain a flush of the existing rules? "ACCEPT all" is a default rule, and needs to be flushed.
– user535733
2 hours ago
To view your iptables rules use this command instead:sudo iptables -v -x -n -Land you should then observe that is in only the local interface (lo) that is set to ACCEPT all (which is how it should be).
– Doug Smythies
1 hour ago
Why did you delete most of the content for your question and your comments? Now no one has the context for these comments nor can they see what the problem is. Unless they look at the edits, I suppose.
– Doug Smythies
1 hour ago
Did you remember to flush the existing rules before building your new chains?
– user535733
2 hours ago
Did you remember to flush the existing rules before building your new chains?
– user535733
2 hours ago
Seems you misunderstood. Let's try again: Is the very first step in building your new rulechain a flush of the existing rules? "ACCEPT all" is a default rule, and needs to be flushed.
– user535733
2 hours ago
Seems you misunderstood. Let's try again: Is the very first step in building your new rulechain a flush of the existing rules? "ACCEPT all" is a default rule, and needs to be flushed.
– user535733
2 hours ago
To view your iptables rules use this command instead:
sudo iptables -v -x -n -L and you should then observe that is in only the local interface (lo) that is set to ACCEPT all (which is how it should be).– Doug Smythies
1 hour ago
To view your iptables rules use this command instead:
sudo iptables -v -x -n -L and you should then observe that is in only the local interface (lo) that is set to ACCEPT all (which is how it should be).– Doug Smythies
1 hour ago
Why did you delete most of the content for your question and your comments? Now no one has the context for these comments nor can they see what the problem is. Unless they look at the edits, I suppose.
– Doug Smythies
1 hour ago
Why did you delete most of the content for your question and your comments? Now no one has the context for these comments nor can they see what the problem is. Unless they look at the edits, I suppose.
– Doug Smythies
1 hour ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1124861%2fufw-allow-all-backdoor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1124861%2fufw-allow-all-backdoor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Did you remember to flush the existing rules before building your new chains?
– user535733
2 hours ago
Seems you misunderstood. Let's try again: Is the very first step in building your new rulechain a flush of the existing rules? "ACCEPT all" is a default rule, and needs to be flushed.
– user535733
2 hours ago
To view your iptables rules use this command instead:
sudo iptables -v -x -n -Land you should then observe that is in only the local interface (lo) that is set to ACCEPT all (which is how it should be).– Doug Smythies
1 hour ago
Why did you delete most of the content for your question and your comments? Now no one has the context for these comments nor can they see what the problem is. Unless they look at the edits, I suppose.
– Doug Smythies
1 hour ago