How do I find the package that provides a file?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
Simple enough question: is there some shell command (or GUI method) I can use that, given the path to a file on my system, tells me what package put it there? Assuming the file did in fact come from a package, that is.
Bonus question: what if it's a file that isn't installed on my system? Is there, say, a website that will let me look up a file and see what packages, if any, provide it?
package-management
add a comment |
Simple enough question: is there some shell command (or GUI method) I can use that, given the path to a file on my system, tells me what package put it there? Assuming the file did in fact come from a package, that is.
Bonus question: what if it's a file that isn't installed on my system? Is there, say, a website that will let me look up a file and see what packages, if any, provide it?
package-management
6
I've always wondered this myself - I know with YUM you can do yum whatprovides <filepath>/<filename> but I never really have found an alternative to that in Aptitude other than the Packages website
– Marco Ceppi♦
Jul 30 '10 at 13:44
Same on SU: superuser.com/questions/10997/…
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心996ICU六四事件
May 21 '15 at 11:07
None of the answers here actually cover theProvides:
mechanism. In some more detail, a command likemailx
orsendmail
is not included as a binary in any package; instead, various packages install their own binaries and then make some of them available under a "canonical" name via/etc/alternatives
. See also askubuntu.com/questions/366135/…
– tripleee
Jan 26 '18 at 4:13
add a comment |
Simple enough question: is there some shell command (or GUI method) I can use that, given the path to a file on my system, tells me what package put it there? Assuming the file did in fact come from a package, that is.
Bonus question: what if it's a file that isn't installed on my system? Is there, say, a website that will let me look up a file and see what packages, if any, provide it?
package-management
Simple enough question: is there some shell command (or GUI method) I can use that, given the path to a file on my system, tells me what package put it there? Assuming the file did in fact come from a package, that is.
Bonus question: what if it's a file that isn't installed on my system? Is there, say, a website that will let me look up a file and see what packages, if any, provide it?
package-management
package-management
edited Jan 22 '14 at 2:20
Braiam
52.7k20138223
52.7k20138223
asked Jul 30 '10 at 8:10
David ZDavid Z
3,95252021
3,95252021
6
I've always wondered this myself - I know with YUM you can do yum whatprovides <filepath>/<filename> but I never really have found an alternative to that in Aptitude other than the Packages website
– Marco Ceppi♦
Jul 30 '10 at 13:44
Same on SU: superuser.com/questions/10997/…
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心996ICU六四事件
May 21 '15 at 11:07
None of the answers here actually cover theProvides:
mechanism. In some more detail, a command likemailx
orsendmail
is not included as a binary in any package; instead, various packages install their own binaries and then make some of them available under a "canonical" name via/etc/alternatives
. See also askubuntu.com/questions/366135/…
– tripleee
Jan 26 '18 at 4:13
add a comment |
6
I've always wondered this myself - I know with YUM you can do yum whatprovides <filepath>/<filename> but I never really have found an alternative to that in Aptitude other than the Packages website
– Marco Ceppi♦
Jul 30 '10 at 13:44
Same on SU: superuser.com/questions/10997/…
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心996ICU六四事件
May 21 '15 at 11:07
None of the answers here actually cover theProvides:
mechanism. In some more detail, a command likemailx
orsendmail
is not included as a binary in any package; instead, various packages install their own binaries and then make some of them available under a "canonical" name via/etc/alternatives
. See also askubuntu.com/questions/366135/…
– tripleee
Jan 26 '18 at 4:13
6
6
I've always wondered this myself - I know with YUM you can do yum whatprovides <filepath>/<filename> but I never really have found an alternative to that in Aptitude other than the Packages website
– Marco Ceppi♦
Jul 30 '10 at 13:44
I've always wondered this myself - I know with YUM you can do yum whatprovides <filepath>/<filename> but I never really have found an alternative to that in Aptitude other than the Packages website
– Marco Ceppi♦
Jul 30 '10 at 13:44
Same on SU: superuser.com/questions/10997/…
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心996ICU六四事件
May 21 '15 at 11:07
Same on SU: superuser.com/questions/10997/…
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心996ICU六四事件
May 21 '15 at 11:07
None of the answers here actually cover the
Provides:
mechanism. In some more detail, a command like mailx
or sendmail
is not included as a binary in any package; instead, various packages install their own binaries and then make some of them available under a "canonical" name via /etc/alternatives
. See also askubuntu.com/questions/366135/…– tripleee
Jan 26 '18 at 4:13
None of the answers here actually cover the
Provides:
mechanism. In some more detail, a command like mailx
or sendmail
is not included as a binary in any package; instead, various packages install their own binaries and then make some of them available under a "canonical" name via /etc/alternatives
. See also askubuntu.com/questions/366135/…– tripleee
Jan 26 '18 at 4:13
add a comment |
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
You can use dpkg
command to find out which installed package owns a file:
From man dpkg
:
-S, --search filename-search-pattern...
Search for a filename from installed packages.
Example:
$ dpkg -S /bin/ls
coreutils: /bin/ls
You can either search with a full path or with just the filename.
If you wish to search for files not yet installed on your computer, you can use the Ubuntu Packages Search
5
I highly recommend using dlocate, which is updated daily for faster lookups.
– Daniel T Chen
Nov 23 '10 at 21:29
15
Hint: if you do not know the full path, but just the command name, usewhich
to find he program:dpkg -S `which firefox`
– Lekensteyn
Jun 7 '11 at 15:38
This works for libraries as well, which is particularly handy if you have a binary that won't run because you can inspect it with ldd and use the full library paths to find the packages you are missing.
– Alain O'Dea
Oct 23 '14 at 14:41
1
@DanielTChen, butdlocate
may not do the job, if dlocate's database is out of date. You have to callsudo update-dlocatedb
to update it.
– jarno
Jun 14 '15 at 14:40
2
Ifdpkg
the exact path doesn't return anything (e.g.dpkg /usr/bin/java
), try just the executable's name (e.g.dpkg java
).
– Dan Dascalescu
Jan 21 '16 at 1:05
|
show 4 more comments
The apt-file
command can do this for you from the command line. I use it frequently when building packages from source. For files provided by packages that are already installed on your system, apt-cache
is another choice.
To install apt-file
, do:
sudo apt-get install apt-file
Then, you need to update it's database:
apt-file update
And, finally, search the file:
$ apt-file find kwallet.h
kdelibs5-dev: /usr/include/kwallet.h
libkf5wallet-dev: /usr/include/KF5/KWallet/kwallet.h
However a much friendlier way is to use the Ubuntu Packages Search website. They have an option to "search the contents of packages" for a specific filename.
16
In my opinion this should be the accepted answer. But in response to Ubuntu Packages Search, I might argue that a shell program this simple is extremely friendly and easy to remember (once you know it). If you use dpkg, apt-get, or aptitude as your standard tools, there is nothing friendly about firing up Chrome to surf the internet!
– user2097818
Apr 1 '16 at 6:00
3
@user2097818 The reason this isn't the accepted answer is that my primary question is restricted to files on the system and packages which are installed.apt-file
often finds false positives, i.e. packages that aren't installed. Of course this answer is great for the "bonus question".
– David Z
Apr 3 '18 at 23:36
2
For those from the Redhat side of the world -apt-file search <>
is the closest analog todnf/yum whatprovides <>
.
– ffledgling
Apr 29 '18 at 20:14
add a comment |
There's also apt-file for looking up files in packages that aren't installed. For example:
apt-file list packagename
add a comment |
You can search the contents of packages included in the various Ubuntu releases on the Ubuntu Packages website. Look under the heading "Search the contents of packages".
For example, here are the search results for libnss3.so in lucid (10.04):
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=libnss3.so&mode=exactfilename&suite=lucid&arch=any
add a comment |
You mean, which package and not which application. The application is your package manager, e.g. Software Center
.
Using dpkg
:
dpkg -S /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
dpkg -S tracker-extract
dpkg -S tracker-miner-fs
Example
% dpkg -S /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
tracker: /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
Using apt-file
:
apt-file search /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
or also possible:
apt-file search --regex /tracker-extract$
apt-file search --regex /tracker-miner-fs$
Example
% apt-file search /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
tracker: /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
Or online here, in the section Search the contents of packages
.
Example
You mean, which package and not which application. The application is your package manager, e.g. Software Center. Okay. Thank you! :)
– ReyKev
Nov 29 '15 at 17:14
Thank you for all the help! None of these suggestions helped me find which package installed this/these applications though. All searches just lead back to "Tracker". I suspected it was Enthoughts' Canopy though. That mile long EULA reminded me of my old Microsoft Windows daze, with which, I am so glad I am no longer involved. I saw that Tracker was installed yesterday so, as root, I got rid of it, along with Enthoughts' Canopy and, all problems are solved. I really thank you for all your help. It is such a great thing to have such support. Thanks again! Kevin
– ReyKev
Nov 29 '15 at 17:22
add a comment |
I was trying to track down what installed which
on my system. After a little work I created apt-whatprovides
#!/bin/sh
#apt-whatprovides ver. 201801010101 Copyright alexx, MIT Licence
#rdfa:deps="[realpath,apt-file,grep,which,sh,echo]"
BINARY=$(realpath $(which $@))
PACKAGE=$(apt-file search $BINARY|grep -E ":s*${BINARY}$")
echo ${PACKAGE%:*}
Though for most THINGs you can just use
apt-file search $(realpath $(which THING))|grep 'THING$'
1
Alexx, I love this answer. I hope you don't mind my edit. I made it also work for files that are not installed on the system. I made a backup at gist.github.com/RichardBronosky/… and will create my own answer if you revert/reject it.
– Bruno Bronosky
Jul 15 '18 at 5:00
Update: It feels slimy to copy pasta this answer and make subtle changes to it, but my edit got rejected. I hope you feel like I maintained the integrity of your answer in mine.
– Bruno Bronosky
Jul 18 '18 at 5:47
Feel free to edit or hack; anything that makes it better for you, (that's why I added MIT Licence! I don't even need credit.)
– Alexx Roche
Jul 30 '18 at 11:41
add a comment |
This is an extension to Alexx Roche's excellent answer. I tried to make an edit to that answer, but it got rejected (though not by Alexx)
I was trying to track down what installed which
on my system. After a little work I created /usr/local/bin/apt-whatprovides
#!/bin/sh
#apt-whatprovides ver. 201801010101 Copyright alexx, MIT Licence
#rdfa:deps="[realpath,apt-file,grep,which,sh,echo]"
BINARY="$(realpath $(which $@) 2>/dev/null)"
[ -z "$BINARY" ] && BINARY="$@"
echo Searching for $BINARY
PACKAGE="$(apt-file search $BINARY|grep -E ":.*[^-.a-zA-Z0-9]${BINARY}$")"
echo "${PACKAGE}"
Though for most THINGs that are installed you can just use:
apt-file search $(realpath $(which THING)) | grep 'THING$'
For THINGs that are not installed, you can use:
apt-file search THING | grep '/THING$'
The apt-whatprovides
script works for files that are and are not on your system. For example, my system lacked dig
but had ping
so this it what resulted:
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ apt-whatprovides ping
Searching for /bin/ping
inetutils-ping: /bin/ping
iputils-ping: /bin/ping
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ apt-whatprovides dig
Searching for dig
dnsutils: /usr/bin/dig
epic4: /usr/share/epic4/script/dig
epic4-help: /usr/share/epic4/help/8_Scripts/dig
knot-dnsutils: /usr/bin/dig
Notice that Searching for
is a complete path for ping
(installed) and just the binary name for dig
not installed. This helped me discover that I needed to install dnsutils
without needing to go search https://packages.ubuntu.com/#search_contents
This is such a good answer that I should delete mine!
– Alexx Roche
Jul 30 '18 at 11:49
add a comment |
One reason you might have to do this is if you are compiling software which there already is an ubuntu package, you can run apt-get build-dep $PACKAGENAME
. That will install all packages you need to compile $PACKAGENAME
.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f481%2fhow-do-i-find-the-package-that-provides-a-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can use dpkg
command to find out which installed package owns a file:
From man dpkg
:
-S, --search filename-search-pattern...
Search for a filename from installed packages.
Example:
$ dpkg -S /bin/ls
coreutils: /bin/ls
You can either search with a full path or with just the filename.
If you wish to search for files not yet installed on your computer, you can use the Ubuntu Packages Search
5
I highly recommend using dlocate, which is updated daily for faster lookups.
– Daniel T Chen
Nov 23 '10 at 21:29
15
Hint: if you do not know the full path, but just the command name, usewhich
to find he program:dpkg -S `which firefox`
– Lekensteyn
Jun 7 '11 at 15:38
This works for libraries as well, which is particularly handy if you have a binary that won't run because you can inspect it with ldd and use the full library paths to find the packages you are missing.
– Alain O'Dea
Oct 23 '14 at 14:41
1
@DanielTChen, butdlocate
may not do the job, if dlocate's database is out of date. You have to callsudo update-dlocatedb
to update it.
– jarno
Jun 14 '15 at 14:40
2
Ifdpkg
the exact path doesn't return anything (e.g.dpkg /usr/bin/java
), try just the executable's name (e.g.dpkg java
).
– Dan Dascalescu
Jan 21 '16 at 1:05
|
show 4 more comments
You can use dpkg
command to find out which installed package owns a file:
From man dpkg
:
-S, --search filename-search-pattern...
Search for a filename from installed packages.
Example:
$ dpkg -S /bin/ls
coreutils: /bin/ls
You can either search with a full path or with just the filename.
If you wish to search for files not yet installed on your computer, you can use the Ubuntu Packages Search
5
I highly recommend using dlocate, which is updated daily for faster lookups.
– Daniel T Chen
Nov 23 '10 at 21:29
15
Hint: if you do not know the full path, but just the command name, usewhich
to find he program:dpkg -S `which firefox`
– Lekensteyn
Jun 7 '11 at 15:38
This works for libraries as well, which is particularly handy if you have a binary that won't run because you can inspect it with ldd and use the full library paths to find the packages you are missing.
– Alain O'Dea
Oct 23 '14 at 14:41
1
@DanielTChen, butdlocate
may not do the job, if dlocate's database is out of date. You have to callsudo update-dlocatedb
to update it.
– jarno
Jun 14 '15 at 14:40
2
Ifdpkg
the exact path doesn't return anything (e.g.dpkg /usr/bin/java
), try just the executable's name (e.g.dpkg java
).
– Dan Dascalescu
Jan 21 '16 at 1:05
|
show 4 more comments
You can use dpkg
command to find out which installed package owns a file:
From man dpkg
:
-S, --search filename-search-pattern...
Search for a filename from installed packages.
Example:
$ dpkg -S /bin/ls
coreutils: /bin/ls
You can either search with a full path or with just the filename.
If you wish to search for files not yet installed on your computer, you can use the Ubuntu Packages Search
You can use dpkg
command to find out which installed package owns a file:
From man dpkg
:
-S, --search filename-search-pattern...
Search for a filename from installed packages.
Example:
$ dpkg -S /bin/ls
coreutils: /bin/ls
You can either search with a full path or with just the filename.
If you wish to search for files not yet installed on your computer, you can use the Ubuntu Packages Search
edited Mar 15 '18 at 19:34
N0rbert
25.3k853120
25.3k853120
answered Jul 30 '10 at 8:42
RessuRessu
8,76013027
8,76013027
5
I highly recommend using dlocate, which is updated daily for faster lookups.
– Daniel T Chen
Nov 23 '10 at 21:29
15
Hint: if you do not know the full path, but just the command name, usewhich
to find he program:dpkg -S `which firefox`
– Lekensteyn
Jun 7 '11 at 15:38
This works for libraries as well, which is particularly handy if you have a binary that won't run because you can inspect it with ldd and use the full library paths to find the packages you are missing.
– Alain O'Dea
Oct 23 '14 at 14:41
1
@DanielTChen, butdlocate
may not do the job, if dlocate's database is out of date. You have to callsudo update-dlocatedb
to update it.
– jarno
Jun 14 '15 at 14:40
2
Ifdpkg
the exact path doesn't return anything (e.g.dpkg /usr/bin/java
), try just the executable's name (e.g.dpkg java
).
– Dan Dascalescu
Jan 21 '16 at 1:05
|
show 4 more comments
5
I highly recommend using dlocate, which is updated daily for faster lookups.
– Daniel T Chen
Nov 23 '10 at 21:29
15
Hint: if you do not know the full path, but just the command name, usewhich
to find he program:dpkg -S `which firefox`
– Lekensteyn
Jun 7 '11 at 15:38
This works for libraries as well, which is particularly handy if you have a binary that won't run because you can inspect it with ldd and use the full library paths to find the packages you are missing.
– Alain O'Dea
Oct 23 '14 at 14:41
1
@DanielTChen, butdlocate
may not do the job, if dlocate's database is out of date. You have to callsudo update-dlocatedb
to update it.
– jarno
Jun 14 '15 at 14:40
2
Ifdpkg
the exact path doesn't return anything (e.g.dpkg /usr/bin/java
), try just the executable's name (e.g.dpkg java
).
– Dan Dascalescu
Jan 21 '16 at 1:05
5
5
I highly recommend using dlocate, which is updated daily for faster lookups.
– Daniel T Chen
Nov 23 '10 at 21:29
I highly recommend using dlocate, which is updated daily for faster lookups.
– Daniel T Chen
Nov 23 '10 at 21:29
15
15
Hint: if you do not know the full path, but just the command name, use
which
to find he program: dpkg -S `which firefox`
– Lekensteyn
Jun 7 '11 at 15:38
Hint: if you do not know the full path, but just the command name, use
which
to find he program: dpkg -S `which firefox`
– Lekensteyn
Jun 7 '11 at 15:38
This works for libraries as well, which is particularly handy if you have a binary that won't run because you can inspect it with ldd and use the full library paths to find the packages you are missing.
– Alain O'Dea
Oct 23 '14 at 14:41
This works for libraries as well, which is particularly handy if you have a binary that won't run because you can inspect it with ldd and use the full library paths to find the packages you are missing.
– Alain O'Dea
Oct 23 '14 at 14:41
1
1
@DanielTChen, but
dlocate
may not do the job, if dlocate's database is out of date. You have to call sudo update-dlocatedb
to update it.– jarno
Jun 14 '15 at 14:40
@DanielTChen, but
dlocate
may not do the job, if dlocate's database is out of date. You have to call sudo update-dlocatedb
to update it.– jarno
Jun 14 '15 at 14:40
2
2
If
dpkg
the exact path doesn't return anything (e.g. dpkg /usr/bin/java
), try just the executable's name (e.g. dpkg java
).– Dan Dascalescu
Jan 21 '16 at 1:05
If
dpkg
the exact path doesn't return anything (e.g. dpkg /usr/bin/java
), try just the executable's name (e.g. dpkg java
).– Dan Dascalescu
Jan 21 '16 at 1:05
|
show 4 more comments
The apt-file
command can do this for you from the command line. I use it frequently when building packages from source. For files provided by packages that are already installed on your system, apt-cache
is another choice.
To install apt-file
, do:
sudo apt-get install apt-file
Then, you need to update it's database:
apt-file update
And, finally, search the file:
$ apt-file find kwallet.h
kdelibs5-dev: /usr/include/kwallet.h
libkf5wallet-dev: /usr/include/KF5/KWallet/kwallet.h
However a much friendlier way is to use the Ubuntu Packages Search website. They have an option to "search the contents of packages" for a specific filename.
16
In my opinion this should be the accepted answer. But in response to Ubuntu Packages Search, I might argue that a shell program this simple is extremely friendly and easy to remember (once you know it). If you use dpkg, apt-get, or aptitude as your standard tools, there is nothing friendly about firing up Chrome to surf the internet!
– user2097818
Apr 1 '16 at 6:00
3
@user2097818 The reason this isn't the accepted answer is that my primary question is restricted to files on the system and packages which are installed.apt-file
often finds false positives, i.e. packages that aren't installed. Of course this answer is great for the "bonus question".
– David Z
Apr 3 '18 at 23:36
2
For those from the Redhat side of the world -apt-file search <>
is the closest analog todnf/yum whatprovides <>
.
– ffledgling
Apr 29 '18 at 20:14
add a comment |
The apt-file
command can do this for you from the command line. I use it frequently when building packages from source. For files provided by packages that are already installed on your system, apt-cache
is another choice.
To install apt-file
, do:
sudo apt-get install apt-file
Then, you need to update it's database:
apt-file update
And, finally, search the file:
$ apt-file find kwallet.h
kdelibs5-dev: /usr/include/kwallet.h
libkf5wallet-dev: /usr/include/KF5/KWallet/kwallet.h
However a much friendlier way is to use the Ubuntu Packages Search website. They have an option to "search the contents of packages" for a specific filename.
16
In my opinion this should be the accepted answer. But in response to Ubuntu Packages Search, I might argue that a shell program this simple is extremely friendly and easy to remember (once you know it). If you use dpkg, apt-get, or aptitude as your standard tools, there is nothing friendly about firing up Chrome to surf the internet!
– user2097818
Apr 1 '16 at 6:00
3
@user2097818 The reason this isn't the accepted answer is that my primary question is restricted to files on the system and packages which are installed.apt-file
often finds false positives, i.e. packages that aren't installed. Of course this answer is great for the "bonus question".
– David Z
Apr 3 '18 at 23:36
2
For those from the Redhat side of the world -apt-file search <>
is the closest analog todnf/yum whatprovides <>
.
– ffledgling
Apr 29 '18 at 20:14
add a comment |
The apt-file
command can do this for you from the command line. I use it frequently when building packages from source. For files provided by packages that are already installed on your system, apt-cache
is another choice.
To install apt-file
, do:
sudo apt-get install apt-file
Then, you need to update it's database:
apt-file update
And, finally, search the file:
$ apt-file find kwallet.h
kdelibs5-dev: /usr/include/kwallet.h
libkf5wallet-dev: /usr/include/KF5/KWallet/kwallet.h
However a much friendlier way is to use the Ubuntu Packages Search website. They have an option to "search the contents of packages" for a specific filename.
The apt-file
command can do this for you from the command line. I use it frequently when building packages from source. For files provided by packages that are already installed on your system, apt-cache
is another choice.
To install apt-file
, do:
sudo apt-get install apt-file
Then, you need to update it's database:
apt-file update
And, finally, search the file:
$ apt-file find kwallet.h
kdelibs5-dev: /usr/include/kwallet.h
libkf5wallet-dev: /usr/include/KF5/KWallet/kwallet.h
However a much friendlier way is to use the Ubuntu Packages Search website. They have an option to "search the contents of packages" for a specific filename.
edited Dec 3 '14 at 11:34
Danatela
9,41493264
9,41493264
answered Aug 11 '10 at 2:43
jbowtiejbowtie
8,10632029
8,10632029
16
In my opinion this should be the accepted answer. But in response to Ubuntu Packages Search, I might argue that a shell program this simple is extremely friendly and easy to remember (once you know it). If you use dpkg, apt-get, or aptitude as your standard tools, there is nothing friendly about firing up Chrome to surf the internet!
– user2097818
Apr 1 '16 at 6:00
3
@user2097818 The reason this isn't the accepted answer is that my primary question is restricted to files on the system and packages which are installed.apt-file
often finds false positives, i.e. packages that aren't installed. Of course this answer is great for the "bonus question".
– David Z
Apr 3 '18 at 23:36
2
For those from the Redhat side of the world -apt-file search <>
is the closest analog todnf/yum whatprovides <>
.
– ffledgling
Apr 29 '18 at 20:14
add a comment |
16
In my opinion this should be the accepted answer. But in response to Ubuntu Packages Search, I might argue that a shell program this simple is extremely friendly and easy to remember (once you know it). If you use dpkg, apt-get, or aptitude as your standard tools, there is nothing friendly about firing up Chrome to surf the internet!
– user2097818
Apr 1 '16 at 6:00
3
@user2097818 The reason this isn't the accepted answer is that my primary question is restricted to files on the system and packages which are installed.apt-file
often finds false positives, i.e. packages that aren't installed. Of course this answer is great for the "bonus question".
– David Z
Apr 3 '18 at 23:36
2
For those from the Redhat side of the world -apt-file search <>
is the closest analog todnf/yum whatprovides <>
.
– ffledgling
Apr 29 '18 at 20:14
16
16
In my opinion this should be the accepted answer. But in response to Ubuntu Packages Search, I might argue that a shell program this simple is extremely friendly and easy to remember (once you know it). If you use dpkg, apt-get, or aptitude as your standard tools, there is nothing friendly about firing up Chrome to surf the internet!
– user2097818
Apr 1 '16 at 6:00
In my opinion this should be the accepted answer. But in response to Ubuntu Packages Search, I might argue that a shell program this simple is extremely friendly and easy to remember (once you know it). If you use dpkg, apt-get, or aptitude as your standard tools, there is nothing friendly about firing up Chrome to surf the internet!
– user2097818
Apr 1 '16 at 6:00
3
3
@user2097818 The reason this isn't the accepted answer is that my primary question is restricted to files on the system and packages which are installed.
apt-file
often finds false positives, i.e. packages that aren't installed. Of course this answer is great for the "bonus question".– David Z
Apr 3 '18 at 23:36
@user2097818 The reason this isn't the accepted answer is that my primary question is restricted to files on the system and packages which are installed.
apt-file
often finds false positives, i.e. packages that aren't installed. Of course this answer is great for the "bonus question".– David Z
Apr 3 '18 at 23:36
2
2
For those from the Redhat side of the world -
apt-file search <>
is the closest analog to dnf/yum whatprovides <>
.– ffledgling
Apr 29 '18 at 20:14
For those from the Redhat side of the world -
apt-file search <>
is the closest analog to dnf/yum whatprovides <>
.– ffledgling
Apr 29 '18 at 20:14
add a comment |
There's also apt-file for looking up files in packages that aren't installed. For example:
apt-file list packagename
add a comment |
There's also apt-file for looking up files in packages that aren't installed. For example:
apt-file list packagename
add a comment |
There's also apt-file for looking up files in packages that aren't installed. For example:
apt-file list packagename
There's also apt-file for looking up files in packages that aren't installed. For example:
apt-file list packagename
edited Jan 14 '17 at 17:55
muru
1
1
answered Jul 30 '10 at 8:49
ptmanptman
54135
54135
add a comment |
add a comment |
You can search the contents of packages included in the various Ubuntu releases on the Ubuntu Packages website. Look under the heading "Search the contents of packages".
For example, here are the search results for libnss3.so in lucid (10.04):
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=libnss3.so&mode=exactfilename&suite=lucid&arch=any
add a comment |
You can search the contents of packages included in the various Ubuntu releases on the Ubuntu Packages website. Look under the heading "Search the contents of packages".
For example, here are the search results for libnss3.so in lucid (10.04):
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=libnss3.so&mode=exactfilename&suite=lucid&arch=any
add a comment |
You can search the contents of packages included in the various Ubuntu releases on the Ubuntu Packages website. Look under the heading "Search the contents of packages".
For example, here are the search results for libnss3.so in lucid (10.04):
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=libnss3.so&mode=exactfilename&suite=lucid&arch=any
You can search the contents of packages included in the various Ubuntu releases on the Ubuntu Packages website. Look under the heading "Search the contents of packages".
For example, here are the search results for libnss3.so in lucid (10.04):
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=libnss3.so&mode=exactfilename&suite=lucid&arch=any
answered Aug 11 '10 at 2:42
moberleymoberley
837915
837915
add a comment |
add a comment |
You mean, which package and not which application. The application is your package manager, e.g. Software Center
.
Using dpkg
:
dpkg -S /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
dpkg -S tracker-extract
dpkg -S tracker-miner-fs
Example
% dpkg -S /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
tracker: /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
Using apt-file
:
apt-file search /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
or also possible:
apt-file search --regex /tracker-extract$
apt-file search --regex /tracker-miner-fs$
Example
% apt-file search /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
tracker: /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
Or online here, in the section Search the contents of packages
.
Example
You mean, which package and not which application. The application is your package manager, e.g. Software Center. Okay. Thank you! :)
– ReyKev
Nov 29 '15 at 17:14
Thank you for all the help! None of these suggestions helped me find which package installed this/these applications though. All searches just lead back to "Tracker". I suspected it was Enthoughts' Canopy though. That mile long EULA reminded me of my old Microsoft Windows daze, with which, I am so glad I am no longer involved. I saw that Tracker was installed yesterday so, as root, I got rid of it, along with Enthoughts' Canopy and, all problems are solved. I really thank you for all your help. It is such a great thing to have such support. Thanks again! Kevin
– ReyKev
Nov 29 '15 at 17:22
add a comment |
You mean, which package and not which application. The application is your package manager, e.g. Software Center
.
Using dpkg
:
dpkg -S /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
dpkg -S tracker-extract
dpkg -S tracker-miner-fs
Example
% dpkg -S /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
tracker: /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
Using apt-file
:
apt-file search /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
or also possible:
apt-file search --regex /tracker-extract$
apt-file search --regex /tracker-miner-fs$
Example
% apt-file search /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
tracker: /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
Or online here, in the section Search the contents of packages
.
Example
You mean, which package and not which application. The application is your package manager, e.g. Software Center. Okay. Thank you! :)
– ReyKev
Nov 29 '15 at 17:14
Thank you for all the help! None of these suggestions helped me find which package installed this/these applications though. All searches just lead back to "Tracker". I suspected it was Enthoughts' Canopy though. That mile long EULA reminded me of my old Microsoft Windows daze, with which, I am so glad I am no longer involved. I saw that Tracker was installed yesterday so, as root, I got rid of it, along with Enthoughts' Canopy and, all problems are solved. I really thank you for all your help. It is such a great thing to have such support. Thanks again! Kevin
– ReyKev
Nov 29 '15 at 17:22
add a comment |
You mean, which package and not which application. The application is your package manager, e.g. Software Center
.
Using dpkg
:
dpkg -S /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
dpkg -S tracker-extract
dpkg -S tracker-miner-fs
Example
% dpkg -S /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
tracker: /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
Using apt-file
:
apt-file search /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
or also possible:
apt-file search --regex /tracker-extract$
apt-file search --regex /tracker-miner-fs$
Example
% apt-file search /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
tracker: /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
Or online here, in the section Search the contents of packages
.
Example
You mean, which package and not which application. The application is your package manager, e.g. Software Center
.
Using dpkg
:
dpkg -S /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
dpkg -S tracker-extract
dpkg -S tracker-miner-fs
Example
% dpkg -S /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
tracker: /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
Using apt-file
:
apt-file search /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
or also possible:
apt-file search --regex /tracker-extract$
apt-file search --regex /tracker-miner-fs$
Example
% apt-file search /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
tracker: /usr/lib/tracker/tracker-store
Or online here, in the section Search the contents of packages
.
Example
edited Feb 9 '18 at 11:05
Chai T. Rex
4,20711536
4,20711536
answered Nov 29 '15 at 15:57
A.B.A.B.
69.9k12172267
69.9k12172267
You mean, which package and not which application. The application is your package manager, e.g. Software Center. Okay. Thank you! :)
– ReyKev
Nov 29 '15 at 17:14
Thank you for all the help! None of these suggestions helped me find which package installed this/these applications though. All searches just lead back to "Tracker". I suspected it was Enthoughts' Canopy though. That mile long EULA reminded me of my old Microsoft Windows daze, with which, I am so glad I am no longer involved. I saw that Tracker was installed yesterday so, as root, I got rid of it, along with Enthoughts' Canopy and, all problems are solved. I really thank you for all your help. It is such a great thing to have such support. Thanks again! Kevin
– ReyKev
Nov 29 '15 at 17:22
add a comment |
You mean, which package and not which application. The application is your package manager, e.g. Software Center. Okay. Thank you! :)
– ReyKev
Nov 29 '15 at 17:14
Thank you for all the help! None of these suggestions helped me find which package installed this/these applications though. All searches just lead back to "Tracker". I suspected it was Enthoughts' Canopy though. That mile long EULA reminded me of my old Microsoft Windows daze, with which, I am so glad I am no longer involved. I saw that Tracker was installed yesterday so, as root, I got rid of it, along with Enthoughts' Canopy and, all problems are solved. I really thank you for all your help. It is such a great thing to have such support. Thanks again! Kevin
– ReyKev
Nov 29 '15 at 17:22
You mean, which package and not which application. The application is your package manager, e.g. Software Center. Okay. Thank you! :)
– ReyKev
Nov 29 '15 at 17:14
You mean, which package and not which application. The application is your package manager, e.g. Software Center. Okay. Thank you! :)
– ReyKev
Nov 29 '15 at 17:14
Thank you for all the help! None of these suggestions helped me find which package installed this/these applications though. All searches just lead back to "Tracker". I suspected it was Enthoughts' Canopy though. That mile long EULA reminded me of my old Microsoft Windows daze, with which, I am so glad I am no longer involved. I saw that Tracker was installed yesterday so, as root, I got rid of it, along with Enthoughts' Canopy and, all problems are solved. I really thank you for all your help. It is such a great thing to have such support. Thanks again! Kevin
– ReyKev
Nov 29 '15 at 17:22
Thank you for all the help! None of these suggestions helped me find which package installed this/these applications though. All searches just lead back to "Tracker". I suspected it was Enthoughts' Canopy though. That mile long EULA reminded me of my old Microsoft Windows daze, with which, I am so glad I am no longer involved. I saw that Tracker was installed yesterday so, as root, I got rid of it, along with Enthoughts' Canopy and, all problems are solved. I really thank you for all your help. It is such a great thing to have such support. Thanks again! Kevin
– ReyKev
Nov 29 '15 at 17:22
add a comment |
I was trying to track down what installed which
on my system. After a little work I created apt-whatprovides
#!/bin/sh
#apt-whatprovides ver. 201801010101 Copyright alexx, MIT Licence
#rdfa:deps="[realpath,apt-file,grep,which,sh,echo]"
BINARY=$(realpath $(which $@))
PACKAGE=$(apt-file search $BINARY|grep -E ":s*${BINARY}$")
echo ${PACKAGE%:*}
Though for most THINGs you can just use
apt-file search $(realpath $(which THING))|grep 'THING$'
1
Alexx, I love this answer. I hope you don't mind my edit. I made it also work for files that are not installed on the system. I made a backup at gist.github.com/RichardBronosky/… and will create my own answer if you revert/reject it.
– Bruno Bronosky
Jul 15 '18 at 5:00
Update: It feels slimy to copy pasta this answer and make subtle changes to it, but my edit got rejected. I hope you feel like I maintained the integrity of your answer in mine.
– Bruno Bronosky
Jul 18 '18 at 5:47
Feel free to edit or hack; anything that makes it better for you, (that's why I added MIT Licence! I don't even need credit.)
– Alexx Roche
Jul 30 '18 at 11:41
add a comment |
I was trying to track down what installed which
on my system. After a little work I created apt-whatprovides
#!/bin/sh
#apt-whatprovides ver. 201801010101 Copyright alexx, MIT Licence
#rdfa:deps="[realpath,apt-file,grep,which,sh,echo]"
BINARY=$(realpath $(which $@))
PACKAGE=$(apt-file search $BINARY|grep -E ":s*${BINARY}$")
echo ${PACKAGE%:*}
Though for most THINGs you can just use
apt-file search $(realpath $(which THING))|grep 'THING$'
1
Alexx, I love this answer. I hope you don't mind my edit. I made it also work for files that are not installed on the system. I made a backup at gist.github.com/RichardBronosky/… and will create my own answer if you revert/reject it.
– Bruno Bronosky
Jul 15 '18 at 5:00
Update: It feels slimy to copy pasta this answer and make subtle changes to it, but my edit got rejected. I hope you feel like I maintained the integrity of your answer in mine.
– Bruno Bronosky
Jul 18 '18 at 5:47
Feel free to edit or hack; anything that makes it better for you, (that's why I added MIT Licence! I don't even need credit.)
– Alexx Roche
Jul 30 '18 at 11:41
add a comment |
I was trying to track down what installed which
on my system. After a little work I created apt-whatprovides
#!/bin/sh
#apt-whatprovides ver. 201801010101 Copyright alexx, MIT Licence
#rdfa:deps="[realpath,apt-file,grep,which,sh,echo]"
BINARY=$(realpath $(which $@))
PACKAGE=$(apt-file search $BINARY|grep -E ":s*${BINARY}$")
echo ${PACKAGE%:*}
Though for most THINGs you can just use
apt-file search $(realpath $(which THING))|grep 'THING$'
I was trying to track down what installed which
on my system. After a little work I created apt-whatprovides
#!/bin/sh
#apt-whatprovides ver. 201801010101 Copyright alexx, MIT Licence
#rdfa:deps="[realpath,apt-file,grep,which,sh,echo]"
BINARY=$(realpath $(which $@))
PACKAGE=$(apt-file search $BINARY|grep -E ":s*${BINARY}$")
echo ${PACKAGE%:*}
Though for most THINGs you can just use
apt-file search $(realpath $(which THING))|grep 'THING$'
answered Mar 17 '18 at 15:25
Alexx RocheAlexx Roche
1936
1936
1
Alexx, I love this answer. I hope you don't mind my edit. I made it also work for files that are not installed on the system. I made a backup at gist.github.com/RichardBronosky/… and will create my own answer if you revert/reject it.
– Bruno Bronosky
Jul 15 '18 at 5:00
Update: It feels slimy to copy pasta this answer and make subtle changes to it, but my edit got rejected. I hope you feel like I maintained the integrity of your answer in mine.
– Bruno Bronosky
Jul 18 '18 at 5:47
Feel free to edit or hack; anything that makes it better for you, (that's why I added MIT Licence! I don't even need credit.)
– Alexx Roche
Jul 30 '18 at 11:41
add a comment |
1
Alexx, I love this answer. I hope you don't mind my edit. I made it also work for files that are not installed on the system. I made a backup at gist.github.com/RichardBronosky/… and will create my own answer if you revert/reject it.
– Bruno Bronosky
Jul 15 '18 at 5:00
Update: It feels slimy to copy pasta this answer and make subtle changes to it, but my edit got rejected. I hope you feel like I maintained the integrity of your answer in mine.
– Bruno Bronosky
Jul 18 '18 at 5:47
Feel free to edit or hack; anything that makes it better for you, (that's why I added MIT Licence! I don't even need credit.)
– Alexx Roche
Jul 30 '18 at 11:41
1
1
Alexx, I love this answer. I hope you don't mind my edit. I made it also work for files that are not installed on the system. I made a backup at gist.github.com/RichardBronosky/… and will create my own answer if you revert/reject it.
– Bruno Bronosky
Jul 15 '18 at 5:00
Alexx, I love this answer. I hope you don't mind my edit. I made it also work for files that are not installed on the system. I made a backup at gist.github.com/RichardBronosky/… and will create my own answer if you revert/reject it.
– Bruno Bronosky
Jul 15 '18 at 5:00
Update: It feels slimy to copy pasta this answer and make subtle changes to it, but my edit got rejected. I hope you feel like I maintained the integrity of your answer in mine.
– Bruno Bronosky
Jul 18 '18 at 5:47
Update: It feels slimy to copy pasta this answer and make subtle changes to it, but my edit got rejected. I hope you feel like I maintained the integrity of your answer in mine.
– Bruno Bronosky
Jul 18 '18 at 5:47
Feel free to edit or hack; anything that makes it better for you, (that's why I added MIT Licence! I don't even need credit.)
– Alexx Roche
Jul 30 '18 at 11:41
Feel free to edit or hack; anything that makes it better for you, (that's why I added MIT Licence! I don't even need credit.)
– Alexx Roche
Jul 30 '18 at 11:41
add a comment |
This is an extension to Alexx Roche's excellent answer. I tried to make an edit to that answer, but it got rejected (though not by Alexx)
I was trying to track down what installed which
on my system. After a little work I created /usr/local/bin/apt-whatprovides
#!/bin/sh
#apt-whatprovides ver. 201801010101 Copyright alexx, MIT Licence
#rdfa:deps="[realpath,apt-file,grep,which,sh,echo]"
BINARY="$(realpath $(which $@) 2>/dev/null)"
[ -z "$BINARY" ] && BINARY="$@"
echo Searching for $BINARY
PACKAGE="$(apt-file search $BINARY|grep -E ":.*[^-.a-zA-Z0-9]${BINARY}$")"
echo "${PACKAGE}"
Though for most THINGs that are installed you can just use:
apt-file search $(realpath $(which THING)) | grep 'THING$'
For THINGs that are not installed, you can use:
apt-file search THING | grep '/THING$'
The apt-whatprovides
script works for files that are and are not on your system. For example, my system lacked dig
but had ping
so this it what resulted:
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ apt-whatprovides ping
Searching for /bin/ping
inetutils-ping: /bin/ping
iputils-ping: /bin/ping
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ apt-whatprovides dig
Searching for dig
dnsutils: /usr/bin/dig
epic4: /usr/share/epic4/script/dig
epic4-help: /usr/share/epic4/help/8_Scripts/dig
knot-dnsutils: /usr/bin/dig
Notice that Searching for
is a complete path for ping
(installed) and just the binary name for dig
not installed. This helped me discover that I needed to install dnsutils
without needing to go search https://packages.ubuntu.com/#search_contents
This is such a good answer that I should delete mine!
– Alexx Roche
Jul 30 '18 at 11:49
add a comment |
This is an extension to Alexx Roche's excellent answer. I tried to make an edit to that answer, but it got rejected (though not by Alexx)
I was trying to track down what installed which
on my system. After a little work I created /usr/local/bin/apt-whatprovides
#!/bin/sh
#apt-whatprovides ver. 201801010101 Copyright alexx, MIT Licence
#rdfa:deps="[realpath,apt-file,grep,which,sh,echo]"
BINARY="$(realpath $(which $@) 2>/dev/null)"
[ -z "$BINARY" ] && BINARY="$@"
echo Searching for $BINARY
PACKAGE="$(apt-file search $BINARY|grep -E ":.*[^-.a-zA-Z0-9]${BINARY}$")"
echo "${PACKAGE}"
Though for most THINGs that are installed you can just use:
apt-file search $(realpath $(which THING)) | grep 'THING$'
For THINGs that are not installed, you can use:
apt-file search THING | grep '/THING$'
The apt-whatprovides
script works for files that are and are not on your system. For example, my system lacked dig
but had ping
so this it what resulted:
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ apt-whatprovides ping
Searching for /bin/ping
inetutils-ping: /bin/ping
iputils-ping: /bin/ping
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ apt-whatprovides dig
Searching for dig
dnsutils: /usr/bin/dig
epic4: /usr/share/epic4/script/dig
epic4-help: /usr/share/epic4/help/8_Scripts/dig
knot-dnsutils: /usr/bin/dig
Notice that Searching for
is a complete path for ping
(installed) and just the binary name for dig
not installed. This helped me discover that I needed to install dnsutils
without needing to go search https://packages.ubuntu.com/#search_contents
This is such a good answer that I should delete mine!
– Alexx Roche
Jul 30 '18 at 11:49
add a comment |
This is an extension to Alexx Roche's excellent answer. I tried to make an edit to that answer, but it got rejected (though not by Alexx)
I was trying to track down what installed which
on my system. After a little work I created /usr/local/bin/apt-whatprovides
#!/bin/sh
#apt-whatprovides ver. 201801010101 Copyright alexx, MIT Licence
#rdfa:deps="[realpath,apt-file,grep,which,sh,echo]"
BINARY="$(realpath $(which $@) 2>/dev/null)"
[ -z "$BINARY" ] && BINARY="$@"
echo Searching for $BINARY
PACKAGE="$(apt-file search $BINARY|grep -E ":.*[^-.a-zA-Z0-9]${BINARY}$")"
echo "${PACKAGE}"
Though for most THINGs that are installed you can just use:
apt-file search $(realpath $(which THING)) | grep 'THING$'
For THINGs that are not installed, you can use:
apt-file search THING | grep '/THING$'
The apt-whatprovides
script works for files that are and are not on your system. For example, my system lacked dig
but had ping
so this it what resulted:
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ apt-whatprovides ping
Searching for /bin/ping
inetutils-ping: /bin/ping
iputils-ping: /bin/ping
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ apt-whatprovides dig
Searching for dig
dnsutils: /usr/bin/dig
epic4: /usr/share/epic4/script/dig
epic4-help: /usr/share/epic4/help/8_Scripts/dig
knot-dnsutils: /usr/bin/dig
Notice that Searching for
is a complete path for ping
(installed) and just the binary name for dig
not installed. This helped me discover that I needed to install dnsutils
without needing to go search https://packages.ubuntu.com/#search_contents
This is an extension to Alexx Roche's excellent answer. I tried to make an edit to that answer, but it got rejected (though not by Alexx)
I was trying to track down what installed which
on my system. After a little work I created /usr/local/bin/apt-whatprovides
#!/bin/sh
#apt-whatprovides ver. 201801010101 Copyright alexx, MIT Licence
#rdfa:deps="[realpath,apt-file,grep,which,sh,echo]"
BINARY="$(realpath $(which $@) 2>/dev/null)"
[ -z "$BINARY" ] && BINARY="$@"
echo Searching for $BINARY
PACKAGE="$(apt-file search $BINARY|grep -E ":.*[^-.a-zA-Z0-9]${BINARY}$")"
echo "${PACKAGE}"
Though for most THINGs that are installed you can just use:
apt-file search $(realpath $(which THING)) | grep 'THING$'
For THINGs that are not installed, you can use:
apt-file search THING | grep '/THING$'
The apt-whatprovides
script works for files that are and are not on your system. For example, my system lacked dig
but had ping
so this it what resulted:
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ apt-whatprovides ping
Searching for /bin/ping
inetutils-ping: /bin/ping
iputils-ping: /bin/ping
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ apt-whatprovides dig
Searching for dig
dnsutils: /usr/bin/dig
epic4: /usr/share/epic4/script/dig
epic4-help: /usr/share/epic4/help/8_Scripts/dig
knot-dnsutils: /usr/bin/dig
Notice that Searching for
is a complete path for ping
(installed) and just the binary name for dig
not installed. This helped me discover that I needed to install dnsutils
without needing to go search https://packages.ubuntu.com/#search_contents
edited Jul 18 '18 at 8:16
answered Jul 18 '18 at 5:45
Bruno BronoskyBruno Bronosky
50349
50349
This is such a good answer that I should delete mine!
– Alexx Roche
Jul 30 '18 at 11:49
add a comment |
This is such a good answer that I should delete mine!
– Alexx Roche
Jul 30 '18 at 11:49
This is such a good answer that I should delete mine!
– Alexx Roche
Jul 30 '18 at 11:49
This is such a good answer that I should delete mine!
– Alexx Roche
Jul 30 '18 at 11:49
add a comment |
One reason you might have to do this is if you are compiling software which there already is an ubuntu package, you can run apt-get build-dep $PACKAGENAME
. That will install all packages you need to compile $PACKAGENAME
.
add a comment |
One reason you might have to do this is if you are compiling software which there already is an ubuntu package, you can run apt-get build-dep $PACKAGENAME
. That will install all packages you need to compile $PACKAGENAME
.
add a comment |
One reason you might have to do this is if you are compiling software which there already is an ubuntu package, you can run apt-get build-dep $PACKAGENAME
. That will install all packages you need to compile $PACKAGENAME
.
One reason you might have to do this is if you are compiling software which there already is an ubuntu package, you can run apt-get build-dep $PACKAGENAME
. That will install all packages you need to compile $PACKAGENAME
.
answered Aug 11 '10 at 19:31
RoryRory
1,24721323
1,24721323
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f481%2fhow-do-i-find-the-package-that-provides-a-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
6
I've always wondered this myself - I know with YUM you can do yum whatprovides <filepath>/<filename> but I never really have found an alternative to that in Aptitude other than the Packages website
– Marco Ceppi♦
Jul 30 '10 at 13:44
Same on SU: superuser.com/questions/10997/…
– Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心996ICU六四事件
May 21 '15 at 11:07
None of the answers here actually cover the
Provides:
mechanism. In some more detail, a command likemailx
orsendmail
is not included as a binary in any package; instead, various packages install their own binaries and then make some of them available under a "canonical" name via/etc/alternatives
. See also askubuntu.com/questions/366135/…– tripleee
Jan 26 '18 at 4:13